Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/222833347
CITATIONS READS
110 5,031
5 authors, including:
15 PUBLICATIONS 452 CITATIONS
São Paulo State University
159 PUBLICATIONS 3,033 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Propriedades mecânicas e fadiga cíclica de cerâmicas biocompatíveis à base de compósitos ZrO2-Al2O3-biovidro View project
The effect of 3IP treatment on the fatigue and corrosion resistance of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Marcelino Pereira do Nascimento on 03 November 2017.
Received 26 August 1999; received in revised form 5 October 2000; accepted 7 November 2000
Abstract
In cases of decorative and functional applications, chromium results in protection against wear and corrosion combined with
chemical resistance and good lubricity. However, pressure to identify alternatives or to improve conventional chromium
electroplating mechanical characteristics has increased in recent years, related to the reduction in the fatigue strength of the base
material and to environmental requirements. The high efficiency and fluoride-free hard chromium electroplating is an
improvement to the conventional process, considering chemical and physical final properties. One of the most interesting,
environmentally safer and cleaner alternatives for the replacement of hard chrome plating is tungsten carbide thermal spray
coating, applied by the high velocity oxy-fuel ŽHVOF. process. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of the tungsten
carbide thermal spray coating applied by the HPrHVOF process and of the high efficiency and fluoride-free hard chromium
electroplating Žin the present paper called ‘accelerated’., in comparison to the conventional hard chromium electroplating on the
AISI 4340 high strength steel behaviour in fatigue, corrosion, and abrasive wear tests. The results showed that the coatings were
damaging to the AISI 4340 steel behaviour when submitted to fatigue testing, with the tungsten carbide thermal spray coatings
showing the better performance. Experimental data from abrasive wear tests were conclusive, indicating better results from the
WC coating. Regarding corrosion by salt spray test, both coatings were completely corroded after 72 h exposure. Scanning
electron microscopy technique ŽSEM. and optical microscopy were used to observe crack origin sites, thickness and adhesion in
all the coatings and microcrack density in hard chromium electroplatings, to aid in the results analysis. 䊚 2001 Elsevier Science
B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Tungsten carbide thermal spray coating; Hard chromium electroplating; Abrasive wear; Corrosion; Fatigue; HPrHVOF
U
Corresponding author. Tel.: q55-12-525-2800; fax: q55-12-515-2466.
E-mail address: pereira@feg.unesp.br ŽM.P. Nascimento..
0257-8972r01r$ - see front matter 䊚 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 2 5 7 - 8 9 7 2 Ž 0 0 . 0 1 1 4 8 - 8
114 M.P. Nascimento et al. r Surface and Coatings Technology 138 (2001) 113᎐124
2.1. For rotating bending fatigue tests rotating bending fatigue specimens were tested without
blasting.
2.5. Tungsten carbide coating with 100 m thickness, which resulted in a surface
roughness of R a f 0.74 m for the former and R a f 1.6
m for the later, in the as-electroplated condition. The
The tungsten carbide thermal spray coating applied
surface microcracks were enhanced through anodic
by HPrHVOF system, used WC powder with 12% Co,
etching for 30 s with a current density equal to 25
resulting in thickness equal to 100 m. The average
Ardm2 in the same chromium bath and later analysed
superficial roughness in the reduced section of the
using an optical microscope model NikonrApophot.
samples was R a f 4 m and a S.D. of 0.39 m, in the
All surface roughness data measured in this research
as-deposited condition.
was obtained by Mitutoyo 301 equipment using a cut-off
of 0.8 mm.
2.6. Hard chromium electroplating The analysis of fracture surface was carried out on
rotating bending fatigue specimens by scanning elec-
tron microscope, model LEO 435 vpi and Zeiss DSM
The conventional hard chromium electroplating was 950. The metallographic analysis was carried out on
carried out from a chromic acid solution with 250 grl optical microscope model Neophot 21.
of CrO 3 and 2.5 grl of H 2 SO4 , at 50᎐55⬚C, with a
current density from 31 to 46 Ardm2 , and a speed of
deposition equal to 25 mrh. A bath with a single
catalyst based on sulfate was used. 3. Results and discussion
The accelerated hard chromium electroplating was
carried out from a chromic acid solution with 250 grl
3.1. Fatigue test
of CrO 3 and 2.7 grl of H 2 SO4 , at 55᎐60⬚C, with a
current density from 55 to 65 Ardm2 , and a speed of
deposition equal to 80 mrh. A bath with a double The S᎐N curves for the rotating bending and axial
catalyst, one based on sulfate and the other without fatigue tests for the base metal and coated specimens
fluoride, was used. After the coating deposition, the are presented in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively.
samples were subjected to a hydrogen embrittlement Fig. 3 shows that the effect of coating in the rotating
relief treatment at 190⬚C for 8 h. The average surface bending fatigue test is to decrease the fatigue strength
roughness of the hard chromium electroplating was of AISI 4340 steel. The tendency is observed for low
R a f 3.13 m in the reduced section and a S.D. of 0.79 number of cycles Ž10 4 ., high number of cycles Ž10 5 . and
m in the as-electroplated condition. for the fatigue limit, 10 7 cycles, and is represented in
For the microcrack determination in both hard Table 1. One sees that the specimens coated with
chromium electroplating, samples were prepared from tungsten carbide applied by the HVOF process show a
normalised AISI 4340 steel Ž R a f 0.2 m., 1 mm thick- lower decrease in fatigue strength. This may be at-
ness, 25 mm width and length, and with accelerated tributed to the process itself. It is well known that
and conventional hard chromium electroplating both HVOF thermal spray process produces compressive
residual internal stresses within the substrate, which sile shrinkage stresses of the coating caused by fast
are formed from mechanical deformation on the sur- cooling and solidification as particles strike the surface.
face during particle impact. This is confirmed by the These tensile stresses in the coating also generate
through-thickness residual stress behaviour shown in compressive stresses within the surface of the subs-
Fig. 5. These surface deformations counteract the ten- trate. However, there was a reduction in the fatigue
Table 1
Rotating bending fatigue strength.
Base material s 950 MPa Ž85%ys . ( 700 MPa Ž63%ys . ( 615 MPa Ž59%ys .
Treat. T. carb Ž100 m. s 900 MPa Ž80%ys . ( 610 MPa Ž54%ys . ( 531 MPa Ž47.5%ys .
Tungsten carb. Ž100 m. ( 900 MPa Ž80%ys . ( 570 MPa Ž51%ys . ( 531 MPa Ž47.5%ys .
Conv. chrome Ž160 m. ( 840 MPa Ž75%ys . ( 500 MPa Ž45%ys . ( 321 MPa Ž29%ys .
Accel. chrome Ž100 m. ( 730 MPa Ž65%ys . ( 340 MPa Ž30%ys . ( 280 MPa Ž25%ys .
Fig. 5. Through-thickness residual stress distribution for WC HPrHVOF thermal spray coating.
118 M.P. Nascimento et al. r Surface and Coatings Technology 138 (2001) 113᎐124
Table 2
Axial fatigue strength
Base material ( 1330 MPa Ž119%ys . ( 1125 MPa Ž101%ys . ( 850 MPa Ž76%ys .
Tungsten carb. Ž100 m. ( 1350 MPa Ž121%ys . ( 850 MPa Ž76%ys . ( 750 MPa Ž67%ys .
Conv. chrome Ž160 m. ( 1200 MPa Ž107%ys . ( 650 MPa Ž58%ys . ( 400 MPa Ž36%ys .
Accel. chrome Ž100 m. ( 1150 MPa Ž103%ys . ( 650 MPa Ž58%ys . ( 400 MPa Ž36%ys .
a
ª Projection of the curves until the respective number of cycles Ž10 4 ..
For hard chromium electroplating residual stresses, rotating bending fatigue tests. A comparison of Tables
Pina et al. w7x showed that, despite the fact that micro- 1 and 2, as shown in Table 3, indicates the higher
cracks result in residual stress relief in the coating, the fatigue strength shown in axial fatigue test in relation
stresses still remain high at the surface Žapprox. 800 to the rotating bending fatigue tests. In addition to the
MPa., decreasing in direction to the core Žapprox. 200 lower specimen dimensions, this is in accordance with
to 300 MPa., and increasing again at the interface to the fact that the rotating bending fatigue tests are
values which depend on the substrate material. more severe as a result of the effect of the bending
Fig. 4 shows the axial fatigue testing results, indicat- moment which increases the tensile stresses on surface
ing the decrease in fatigue strength for all specimens from where, in general, the fatigue cracks grow. How-
coated with tungsten carbide thermal spray and hard ever, Table 3 shows a higher decrease in the fatigue
chromium electroplating, in comparison to the base strength as a function of the number of cycles in
material. Comparing the curves, one sees the negative comparison to the rotating bending fatigue test results,
influence of coatings on the fatigue strength of the for each level of stress. This may also be due to radial
steel, with the same tendency observed previously in throughout thickness crack propagation to the base
the rotating bending fatigue tests. This behaviour can metal, in a direction normal to the maximum tensile
also be explained by high tensile residual internal stress and resulting in lower fatigue life of the speci-
stresses, oxide inclusions, pores and microcracks inher- men w15x.
ent from each process. Table 2 indicates the axial Fig. 7 shows a typical fracture surface from the base
fatigue strength tendency of all specimens groups, based metal, indicating that the fatigue crack nucleation
on Fig. 4. The better performance of tungsten carbide started at the surface. In Fig. 8, several crack fronts
coated specimens in comparison to the hard chromium that may be associated to the microcracks density origi-
plating may also be attributed to the lower tensile nated from the plating process are represented.
residual internal stresses in the coating of the former, From Fig. 9, which represents fracture surface from
compressive residual stresses on the substrate surface a rotating bending fatigue specimen electroplated with
and in the subsurface due to the particles impact effect, accelerated hard chromium and tested at 871 MPa, one
as well as by interactions between surfacersubstrate sees the coating homogeneity, strong adhesion subs-
residual stresses. Note in the axial fatigue test that the tratercoating, and microcracks distributed along thick-
different microcrack density between both hard ness in a radial shape.
chromium electroplatings did not play an important Fig. 10 shows a micrograph of a tungsten carbide
role in the specimens performance, as occurred in thermal spray coated specimen blasted with aluminium
Table 3
Fatigue strength in number of cycles in the rotating bending and axial fatigue tests
Fatigue testing
Stress Rotating. bending fatigue data Ž%.a Axial fatigue data Ž%.a
Base mat. W.C. C.H.C. A.H.C. Base mat. W.C. C.H.C. A.H.C.
ŽMPa. Cycles Cycles Cycles Cycles Cycles Cycles Cycles Cycles
850 22 000 12 000 Ž55. 9500 Ž43. 6000 Ž27. 107 105 Ž1. 30 000Ž0.30. 30 000Ž0.30.
750 60 000 24 000 Ž40. 18 000 Ž36. 9000 Ž18. 107 106 Ž10. 42 000Ž0.42. 42 000Ž0.42.
650 299 000 56 000 Ž19. 36 500 Ž12. 14 200 Ž5. 107 107 Ž100. 60 000Ž0.60. 60 000Ž0.60.
a
ª Values contained in parenthesis are the rate between the number of cycles of the coated material and the number of cycles of base
metal, in percentage.
120 M.P. Nascimento et al. r Surface and Coatings Technology 138 (2001) 113᎐124
Fig. 9. Fracture surface of samples accelerated hard chromium electroplated and tested at 871 MPa Ž500 = ..
M.P. Nascimento et al. r Surface and Coatings Technology 138 (2001) 113᎐124 121
Table 4
Abrasive wears weight loss
1000 2.20 2.20 1.57 8.30 8.30 11.67 2.83 2.83 3.97
2000 3.90 1.70 2.78 13.40 5.10 18.81 5.57 2.74 7.82
3000 4.70 0.80 3.56 16.50 3.10 23.16 8.33 2.76 11.70
4000 7.97 3.27 5.69 19.10 2.60 26.81 11.33 3.00 15.90
5000 10.80 2.83 7.72 21.00 1.90 29.47 14.83 3.50 20.81
6000 13.03 2.23 9.31 22.60 1.60 31.72 17.63 2.80 24.74
7000 14.20 1.17 10.15 24.10 1.50 33.82 20.60 2.97 28.91
8000 15.80 1.60 11.29 25.30 1.20 35.51 22.93 2.33 32.20
9000 17.40 1.60 12.43 26.30 1.00 36.91 25.83 2.90 36.25
10 000 18.87 1.47 13.48 27.10 0.80 38.80 29.13 3.30 40.80
Median 1.89 mgr1000 cycles 2.71 mgr1,000 cycles 2.91 mgr1000 cycles
Standard 0.75 mgr1000 cycles 2.34 mgr1000 cycles 0.88 mgr1000 cycles
deviation
and so in the higher amount of edges, resulting in by image analyser software of the specimen surface
lower fracture toughness and higher brittleness. In after exposure to salt spray test. Both coatings com-
addition, the higher the crack density, the higher the pleted the tests fully corroded. Table 6, Figs. 14 and 15
amount of previously detached solid particles, which show the results of the salt spray test after 24, 48 and
are suppressed in the microcracks and decrease the 72 h, for all the cases.
wear strength. This may result in micro-cutting, which For the HPrHVOF tungsten carbide coating, a bet-
is considered to be the predominant wear weight loss ter corrosion resistance was observed after sealing the
mechanism w16x. Hard chromium electroplates with application before testing. However, HPrHVOF tung-
hardness of approximately 750᎐800 Vickers were found sten carbide coating did not quite protect the substrate
to have the best frictional wear resistance, if the hard- against the aggressive action of salt spray environment
ness was obtained as-deposited or by moderate heat after 72 h in the test chamber. The HPrHVOF ther-
treatment of harder deposit w4x. mal spray tungsten carbide process has a high content
of pores and oxides, which can be detrimental towards
3.3. Salt spray tests corrosion strength w14x. In addition, it is well known
that the HPrHVOF tungsten carbide coating does not
The results of the corrosion testing, performed in a yield consistent thickness, which also made easy the
qualitative way, were obtained by visual inspection and salt spray action on sites of low thickness. On the other
Table 6
Results of the salt spray test in 24, 48 and 72 h
Acknowledgements
䢇 The wear weight loss tests showed better results for w1x B.E. Bodger, R.T.R. McGrann, D.A. Somerville, Plating and
the HPrHVOF tungsten carbide coating in com- Surface Finishing ŽSeptember 1997. 28.
parison to the chromium electroplating. An initially w2x J.M. Tyler, Metal Finishing ŽOctober 1995. 11.
higher wear weight loss for the accelerated hard w3x A.R. Jones, Plating and Surface Finishing ŽApril 1989. 62.
w4x G. Dubpernell, F.A. Lowenheim, Modern Electroplating Ž1968.
chromium electroplating occurred, decreasing cont-
80.
inuously with the increase in test cycles. w5x H.S. Kuo, J.K. Wu, J. Mater. Sci. 31 Ž1996. 6095.
䢇 Both coatings completed the test of 72 h with full w6x K.L. Lin, C.-J. Hsu, J.-T. Chang, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 1
corrosion. For the HPrHVOF tungsten carbide Ž1992. 359.
coating, a better corrosion resistance was observed w7x J. Pina, A. Dias, M. François, J.L. Lebrun, Surf. Coat. Technol.
96 Ž1997. 148.
after sealing application before testing. With re- w8x S. Hotta, Y. Itou, K. Saruki, T. Arai, Surf. Coat. Technol. 73
Ž1995. 5.
w9x S. Wang, Y. Li, M. Yao, R. Wang, J. Mats. Process. Technol. 73
Ž1998. 64.
w10x Y. Matsumoto, D. Magda, D.W. Hoeppner, T.Y. Kim, J. Eng.
Ind. 113 Ž1991. 154.
w11x J.R. Hwang, C.-P. Fung, Surf. Coat. Technol. 80 Ž1996. 271.
w12x D.C. Bolles, Welding J., October Ž1995. 31
w13x W. Coulson, E.R. Leheup, M.G. Marsh, Trans. IMF 73 Ž1.
Ž1995. 7.
w14x Available from World Wide Web: http:rrmember.aol.
comrenglandgrtsc.htm
w15x H.E. Boyer, Am. Soc. Metals. Metals Park, Ohio 44073 Ž1986.
1.
w16x H. Wang, W. Xia, Y. Jin, Wear 195 Ž1996. 47.
w17x E. Budke, J. Krempel-Hesse, H. Maidhof, H. Schussler,¨ Surf.
Coat. Technol. 112 Ž1999. 108.
w18x D.J. Greving, E.F. Rybicki, J.R. Shadley, J. Thermal Spray
Technol. 3 Ž4. ŽDecember 1994. 379.
Fig. 15. Salt spray test results for tungsten carbide coated samples w19x L. Pejryd, J. Wigren, D.J. Greving, J.R. Shadley, E.F. Rybicki, J.
after 72 h. Thermal Spray Technol. 4 Ž3. Ž1995. 268.