Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Qdoc - Tips - Cima E3 Revision Notes
Qdoc - Tips - Cima E3 Revision Notes
Enterprise Strategy
SMART Notes
Email: darrensparkesnotes@sky
darrensparkesnotes@sky.com
.com
The notes act as a learning and memory aid for the core models, theories and academic tools included in the syllabus.
However, in order to pass your examination the academic knowledge must be combined with extensive question practice
leading up to the examination.
Your examiner is not interested in the regurgitation of your knowledge but how you APPLY that knowledge to the
scenarios provided in order to answer the requirement set. The examiner feedback from every exam sitting confirms this.
I suggest that you should practice as many exam standard questions as possible before the examination. Your practice
answers can be a mixture of answer plans and full written answers to get through as many questions as possible. In
particular, you must practice the new pilot paper for the new E3 examination.
However, I would also suggest that it is essential for you to practice at least one full examination to time before entering
the exam room. It is only by replicating the time pressure in the exam that you can appreciate the importance of time
planning on the day.
Keep a look out for relevant articles appearing in your professional magazine or on the Institute’s website prior to the
examination, particularly if they are written by the examiner.
And remember….
‘Whether you believe you can or you can’t, you’re right.’ (Henry Ford)
Regards,
Darren Sparkes
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 3
Dealing with the pre-seen material
The most significant change in the new E3 paper is the addition of ‘pre-seen’ case study material for Section A (scenario
common to all three strategic papers). This will be available for students to download from www.CIMAglobal.com around 6
weeks prior to the examination. The pilot paper pre-seen material has five pages. Once in the examination there will be
additional ‘un-seen’ case study material and the requirements. The pilot paper contains two pages of ‘un-seen’ material.
Once the real examination pre-seen material has been released by CIMA you should do the following in preparation for
the exam:
Complete a thorough analysis of the pre-seen material. As a start point you could conduct a corporate appraisal
(SWOT) of the organisation in question, that is, a full internal and external analysis (see pages 14 and 15 of these
notes). This should help you to recognise the major issues affecting the organisation. Pay particular attention to any
numbers and what they may tell you about the organisations performance and position.
You should avoid too much emphasis on the research of industry information. Leave that for your T4 TOPCIMA
examination!
From your analysis, identify the related syllabus areas and learn/review them in light of the position and problems of
the organisation.
You can now conduct some scenario planning. Think of the different scenarios that could appear in the un-seen
material and the requirements that could be asked by the examiner. Remember that there is likely to be at least four
separate requirements.
Practice your approaches to answering the scenarios that you have identified.
Be warned, identifying likely requirements is a dangerous occupation. It is done here for you to start thinking more
widely about the pre-seen material. Once in the exam room you must FOCUS ON THE ACTUAL REQUIREMENT IN
THE QUESTION and avoid replicating an answer to a different requirement that you had prepared for.
Purchase a revision kit from one of the big tuition providers that contain a number of mock exams (probably around 6
different un-seen scenario’s) based upon the actual pre-seen material and practise as many as you can to time.
It is essential that you familiarise yourself well with the pre-seen material before entering the exam room.However, this
must not be to the detriment of your wider studies. Remember, the Section A of the exam only accounts for 50%
of the marks. You will still have to complete two Section B questions that will be completely un-seen.
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 4
Approach Required
‘Overall this paper is a balanced test of the key syllabus areas and covers a
number of well used strategic tools and models. Candidates should not find
any surprises in this paper and a well prepared candidate should have no
difficulty in both demonstration of syllabus knowledge and in the application
of this to the various examination scenarios.’
‘It’s easy to get carried away with all the models covered in the (P6) syllabus
and forget why it’s there in the first place. The syllabus is at the top of the
business management pillar, but its title is very clear. It isn’t a business
strategy exam; it’s an exam in business strategy in the context of
management accounting.’
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 5
Extracts from the Examiners comments November 2009
Section A - Question 1
Knowledge Management question very poorly answered as candidates had no clear understanding of
Knowledge Management
‘… with no reference to the scenario information.’
Only generic benefits of knowledge management given with no reference to the scenario
Insufficient depth of discussion – use of short form answers such as bullet points
Provision of calculations good but limited critical analysis or discussion plus poor use of the scenario
information
Basic description of the Five Forces model with limited application to the scenario
Section B
Limited application
General discussion of the process of competitor analysis
Unjustified recommendations in terms of why they were appropriate to the short or long term
Not answering the question set
Insufficient application
Description rather than evaluation of the proposed strategies
Limited/no application
Recommendations with no/limited justification
Including a range of stakeholders not included in the scenario i nformation
Some repetition of points made between each suggestion
Imbalanced discussions of suggestions
Limited/no justification of recommended course of action
Part c a repeat of answer to part b
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 6
Cost of Capital
(debt / equity / WACC)
Enterprise Strategy
Ratio Analysis
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 7
Examination Technique to give the Examiners what they want
PADI – Plan, Analyse, Design, Implement
PLAN
1. USE 20 MINUTES READING TIME WISELY
Examine section B questions and choose the two on which you can MAXIMISE MARKS (not necessarily
•
get a feel for the relevant issues and identify where the information is for each part of the requirements.
Break down the time required for each part of the requirements using the marks as a guide. 1.8 minutes per
•
evaluate, recommend, analyse, calculate. Be sure to identify all the verbs in the requirement just in case
there is more than one thing to do, e.g. analyse and discuss, evaluate and recommend.
Identify key words. These tell you what to do it on or about, e.g. evaluate what?, recommend what?
•
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 8
6. DEVELOP HEADINGS AND NUMBERS LAYOUT
Put key elements of model in plan as headings, e.g. Porters 5 Forces analysis = 5 headings. Headings will
•
ANALYSE
8. ANALYSE THE SCENARIO
Make brief notes in your plan under relevant headings from models/tools/theories and requirement
•
DESIGN
9. THINK BEFORE YOU WRITE
Decide which points you are going to put in your answer (trying to put in everything usually leads to going
•
IMPLEMENT
10. WRITE UP YOUR ANSWER TO MAXIMISE MARKS
Layout calculations in a logical and easy to mark format - Add value to calculations by asking ‘SO WHAT?’
•
Short sentences in short paragraphs - Paragraphs of 3/4 sentences maximum - Looking for 2 marks for each
•
paragraph
PEE for 2 marks – Point, Evidence, Explain (So what?)
•
Leave a blank line between paragraphs to make your answer ‘easy on the eye’
•
Be strict with timings. When time is up on a question, or part of a question, move on.
•
Stick to answering the requirement – use your plan to keep you on track
•
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 9
• Evaluate the Key external factors affecting an organisation’s strategy
Apply knowledge
and skills
Aims of the paper
Background
Section A 50%
• Compulsory
• Major case study, pre-seen and • Interacting with the Competitive Environment 20%
un-seen
• Usually four parts
• Case will include numbers • Change Management 20%
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 10
3 E’s – Efficiency, Economy, Effectiveness
Syllabus Overview
CSF’s SMART
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 11
Integrates activities Competitive advantage
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 12
Advantages
Purpose • Resolve stakeholder conflict
• Set direction Criticisms
Strategy • Help formulate strategy • Meaningless terms used
• Communicates values to • Written retrospectively? S Specific
employees • Not communicated to M Measurable
• Marketing to customers employees A Attainable
Policies and • Ignored by managers
R Relevant
standards
T Timebound
Mission Statement
‘… the most generalised type
Values of objective which can be
thought of as its raison d’etre.’
Objectives
Results:
Financial performance F
Mendelow’s Power – Interest Matrix Critical Success Competitiveness C
Bri nall et al
Low Interest High Factors
"The limited number of areas
in which results, if they are
Not for Profit Or anisations
A B satisfactory, will ensure
Low Minimal Effort Keep Informed successful competitive
Features of objective setting
performance for the
Give Direction Education / organization.
• Multiple and contradictory objectives
Communication • Participation in objective setting
Power • Providers of funding different to beneficiaries of service
They are the few key areas
• Priorities may change frequently
where things must go right for
• Value for money a requirement not an objective
the business to flourish.
C D • Increased role of personal objectives
Keep Satisfied Key Players – If results in these areas are
High Keep Close not adequate, the
Intervention organization's efforts for the Economy Effectiveness
Participation period will be less than (Inputs) (Outputs)
desired."
Efficiency
(Process)
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 13
• Strategy • Valuable Strategic Porter’s Value Chain
• Manpower S
• Structure • Rare Assets
• Management • Systems • Can’t be copied …identify activities within the firm which
• Money A
• Staff • Not substitutable Architecture contribute to competitive advantage and
• Make-up Style Give access to wide those which do not.
• • R
• Machinery • Shared values range of markets
• Methods Skills I Reputation
• Materials
•
Primary Activities
• Markets • Inbound Logistics
Core Competences
• Management • Operations
‘…the activities or processes that Innovation
information • Outbound logistics
McKinsey 7 S critically underpin competitive
• Marketing and sales
Model advantage.’
• Service
• Technology development
• Firm infrastructure
Resource Audit/ Uses
Position Audit • Streamline linkages
• Eliminate non-value added activities
Product Life-cycle • Business Process Re-engineering
Stages: • Benchmark key processes
• Introduction: high risk, little
competition, low volume, high
Internal Analysis Value Networks
•
advertising = losses + negative cash
Growth: increased competition, (Strengths & Weaknesses)
growing volumes, EOS, high
advertising = losses to profits +
negative to positive cash Problems: Benchmarking
• Maturity: steady repeat sales, high • Definition of axes
volumes, EOS, low level advertising
Portfolio Analysis • Definition of market
= profits + positive cash • No account of complimentary goods
• Decline: falling volumes, falling • Assumes high market share = 1. Determine processes to be
prices = profits to losses + positive advantage benchmark
to negative cash, divest 2. Choose type of benchmarking
3. Choose partner
Balance the portfolio 4. Determine measures
Balance the portfolio BCG Matrix 5. Collect data
6. Learn and improve
Problems: Relative market
7. Implement changes
• No common shape High share Low
• Unpredictable
• Self-fulfilling prophecy STAR PROBLEM CHILD
High Build then Hold Build or Divest
• Product orientated – ignores market Competitive Internal
Losses to profits, negative Losses, negative cash
to ositive cash
Process/Activity
CASH COW DOG
Hold then Harvest Harvest then Divest
Low Profits and positive cash Profits to losses, positive BEST IN PRACTICE
to negative cash
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 14
Economic Social & Demographic Technological
• Globalisation • Income distribution • Internet P Prediction of Reaction
• Economic cycle • Education levels • Government spending on RnD R Resources
• Interest rates • Population size • Communications
• Inflation • Age profile • Speed/rate of change O Objectives
• Employment levels • Lifestyle changes • Processes and methods of S Strategy
Exchange rates Market
Fashions and tastes production
• •
growth A Assumptions
• Consumerism • Transportation
C Competences
Political and Legal
• Taxation PEST analysis
• Government policy External, Environmental anal sis
• Foreign trade
regulations
Competitor
• Monopoly legislation Anal sis
• Environmental
legislation External Analysis
• Employment legislation
•
•
Consumer protection
Protectionism
(Opportunities and Threats)
Porter’s 5 Forces
Threat from New Market Entrants Threat from Substitute
Barriers to Entry: (Competitive,
Technologies
• Economies of Scale Industry analysis) • Can same features be produced
• Other cost advantages cheaper?
• Capital requirements • Can new features be provided for same
• Access to distribution channels cost?
• Patents, Government policy
• Reaction of existing firms
Competitive Rivalry • Level of danger may be influenced by
Greatest where: barriers to entry and/or power of buyers
• Competitors of similar size
• Slow market growth rate
• High fixed cost industry
Power of Buyers • Lack of differentiation Power of Suppliers
Power greatest where: Power greatest where:
• Few buyers • Few suppliers
• High number of suppliers available • Few substitutes
• Cost is high proportion of buyers total cost Internal + External Analysis • High switching costs
• Low switching costs = Corporate Appraisal = Position • Threat from forward integration
• Buyers have low profits • Customer not significant to supplier
• Buyers have full information
Appraisal= SWOT Analysis • Supplier has differentiated product
• Little product differentiation Strengths Weaknesses
INTERNAL
EXTERNAL
Opportunities Threats
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 15
Filling The Gap
Gap Analysis
Target
Objective
e.g. ROI Diversification
GAP New products
or new markets
Future Penetration
Plans
Efficiency
Current
operations
Scenario Planning
Time
•
Ignores factors such as competitors
Suggests strategies in isolation
Strategic Options Uses
• Analyse rivals
• Suggest own strategy
What Direction? • SBU level strategy
•
Skills transfer
Dilution of risk
Method of Withdrawal √
Demerger
Gives shareholders
•
•
Reduced power of
buyers/suppliers
Tax advantages
Growth? √
an exit route
Management can
focus on core areas
√ Two companies can
develop separate
identities
Joint Venture
Separate business entity
with equity form two or
more businesses
Joint Development
Methods Management Buyout
(MBO)
Strategic Alliance √ Quick growth Consider
Long-term agreement to √ Access to competences • On-going involvement of
Licensing √ Less financial risk/outlay holding company
share knowledge, Giving the right to
competences, technology √ Overcome product, market, • Why is holding company
exploit brand, recipe, operational risk selling?
for mutual benefit process etc for a × May lose competences • Loss of Holding company
share of the rofits × Train future competitors help, e.g. technical support,
Franchising × Brand infection finance services
Giving the right to exploit a business × Operational and contractual • Quality of management team
method/model in return for a capital sum disputes • Price
plus a share of the profits. Franchisor × Ownership of assets • Personal risk, e.g. home at
usually provides support e.g. marketing, × Sharing of profits risk?
training, technical
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 18
Acceptability
Suitability Will the proposed strategy meet
Is the proposed strategy suitable for the Feasibility
the objectives of the organisation Has the organisation got, or can it get,
present situation and circumstances of the and, therefore, be acceptable to
organisation? the necessary resources to carry out the
the ma or stakeholders? strategy?
i.e. Is it suitable given the SWOT
analysis?
Strategic
Risk
Evaluation & Cost/Benefit
Choice
Game Theory Real Options
• Concerned with the interrelationships between t he competitive •‘…the net present value rule is not sufficient. To make intelligent
moves of a set of competitors investment choices, managers need to consider the value of keeping
• Can be a useful tool to analyse and understand different their options open.’ (Dixit and Pindyck, 1995)
scenarios
• Relies on two key principles: •…all business decisions are real options…they confer the right but not
- Strategists take a rational, informed view of potential the obligation to take some initiative in the future. (Lewent, 1994)
competitor actions
- If a competitors strategy allows them to dominate us then the Real options capture the value of managerial flexibility to adapt
priority is to eliminate that strategy decisions in response to unexpected market developments.
4. Value the portfolio of options using the Black & Scholes portfolio approach
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 19
Unfreeze Change Refreeze
Role Task
Job Factors
Cultural Web
Strengthen Weaken Personal Factors • Stories
• Rituals Power Person
• Symbols
Social Factors • Power structure
Driving Forces Restraining Forces • Organisation
resistance structure Handy’s cultural types
Organisational Factors • Control systems
Lewin’s Force
Field Analysis
• Participation
• Education & communication
Facilitation & support
Culture
Kanter’s prescription for creativity: The change •
Issues A
S
S
A bias for action
Stick to the knitting
Simple structure
C Close to the customer
A Autonomy and entrepreneurship
Context of Change S Simultaneous loose-tight properties
H Hands on, value driven
Quality
Triggers ‘Fitness for use’
Organisational Development • Internal Customers
To increase: • External TQM
• Level of trust Quality control ‘Get it right
Likelihood of solving problems first time’ Competence
•
Types of change = reactive
• Openness of communication • Planned Quality
• Level of individual and group Emergent
•
Assurance =
responsibility for problem Incremental
•
proactive Commitment
Continuous
solving • Step 6 C’s improvement
• Transformational
Four costs of Quality:
Methods Appraisal
• Costs
• Survey research and feedback • Preventative
• Therapy groups (T-Groups) Communication
• Internal failure
• Team Building
• External failure
• Change Agents
Continued on next page
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 20
• Recruitment
• Appraisals • Commitment
• Training Motivation:
• Reward • Quality • Maslow – Hierarchy of needs
• Job design • Herzberg – Hygiene factors and motivators
• Involvement • Flexibility
• Status and security
Knowledge = closest we
can get to ultimate
Organisational Issues (cont’d) Extranet
Improve quality
Support Speed up of data
Incompatible systems integrated value response times Predictive Descriptive
& processes chain to queries models models
Peppard – Applications
Radical & fundamental Business Process Portfolio
change for quantum Re-engineering
lea s in erformance Developing an
1. Work backwards from
outcomes not tasks
Process IT Strategy McFarlan & McKenney’s
2. Empower the end user Innovation Strate ic Grid
3. Increase access to Completely new and
databases
radical processes. Strategic impact of future systems
4. Link parallel activities
5. Capture information only
Low High
Earls 3 Levels of
IS Strategy - IT Strategy
Organisation of
Support – Turnaround –
systems No strategic value Expect info system
L to become
IM Strategy – o strategically
Supporting w important in the
IT Strategy – management Strategic future
Technology processes (COPT) impact of
infrastructure current
systems
Factory – Strategic –
Technology H See strategic value Depend on info
i of info system now system for
Control g but expect value to competitive
Planning h decrease in the advantage
Organisation future
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 22
Functional Im lementation Issues cont’d
√ Economies of scale Divisional
Entrepreneurial √ Specialists with some autonomy √ Multiple products &
√ Fast decisions √ Career structures markets
√ Responsive to market √ Frees up entrepreneur √ Autonomy for SBU
√ Congruence × Slow decisions (bureaucratic) managers
× No career structure × Functional silo’s √ Training of SBU managers
× No autonomy × Few products & markets Career √ Frees up senior managers
× Single product & market path √ Focus on specific
products/markets
× Loss of congruence?
Employee
Quality Flexibility Autonomy × Duplication of effort
motivation
Centralised vs Decentralised Speed
× Isolation of SBU
managers
×
Innovation and creativity
Dual command
Dilution of functional
S Size
Structure ×
authority
Time consuming meetings
Decentralisation S an of control
Mintzberg’s Structural
Advantages: Confi urations
Tall/Narrow • Simple structure =
• Frees senior √ Promotional opportunities
management Strategic Apex entrepreneurial
√ Smooth progression
• Better local decisions between levels • Machine bureaucracy
• Better motivation Techno- Support = functional
√ More personal contact
• Flexibility structure Middle Line Staff • Professional
• Training/career path bureaucracy =
decentralised
Operating core • Divisional form
Flat/Wide Greiner’s • Adhocracy = matrix
√ Encourages delegation Growth Model
Disadvantages: √ Quicker, more informed
• Loss of control decisions
• Loss of congruence √ Encourages participation Growth through Revolutionary Crisis
• Duplication of effort of lower levels Creativity Leadership
• Extra costs of control √ Lower management costs Direction Autonomy
√ Promotions real and Delegation Control
meaningful Coordination Red Tape
√ Closer contact between Collaboration Ps cholo ical saturation
senior management and
lower levels
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 23
Market Leader Supplier Markets Recruitment Influence
- largest market share Markets Markets
Analyse environment
Referral Markets Internal and competitors – PEST
Market Challenger Markets Marketing
- runner-up, fighting to / Porter’s five forces /
increase share Strategy PROSAC / 4P’s
Six Markets Model
Customer
(Payne)
Market Follower Markets
- runner-up, aiming to Market Segmentation and
hold share Marketing Target Market
…identify, anticipate and satisfy …division of the market into
Competitive homogenous groups of potential
Market nicher customer requirements customers who may be treated
Strategies
- serve small segment, not similarly for marketing purposes
pursued by larger firms
Product Sales
Production • Geographic
• Demographic
o Age
Firm’s orientation o Gender
o Income
A Awareness o Family life-cycle
• Social class
I Interest
D Desire Communications Mix:
Advertising
Marketing •
•
Psychological
Education
A Action Sales promotion
• Hobbies
Public relations
Personal selling Use of intermediaries:
• Economic criteria Marketing Research Undifferentiated
• Control criteria …systematic gathering,
Promotion Place recording and analysing of data Differentiated
about problems relating to the
marketing of goods and services
Marketing Mix – 4P’s Concentrated
…set of controllable
marketing variables used to Field Research (Primary Desk research
Price produce desired response in Product qualities data) secondar data
the target market Features, options,
range, warranty, Interviews, focus groups, External
packaging, branding questionnaires, Internal CSO reports,
• Cost based experiments, Test Accounts, Sales Business
• Target pricing reports, Customer monitors, Trade
• Discriminatory pricing Product marketing
journals,
Product Life Cycle com laints
• Psychological pricing news a ers
• Promotional pricing
• Product line pricing Product Brand Strategies Existing Product New Product
• Captive product pricing to meet Product
• Market skimming needs mix Existing Brand Line Extension Brand Extension
• Market penetration
New Brand Multi-branding New Brand
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 24
Sales (price x number of Improving DPP:
Evaluation of DPP:
units – returns) Calculating DPP • Increase sales price
Increase sales volume • Too product focussed
•
Profitable Consider:
• Present value of existing & future
purchases
Products or • Probability of customer retention
• Probability of customer
Single period view of
value of customer
CAP – Customer
Account
Customers? •
purchasing new products
Costs of initial attraction
Profitabilit
Life-Cycle
1. Analyse customer base and divide into
Customer View
customer value
segments
2. Calculate annual revenues earned Developing Customer Relationships:
from customer segments Evaluation of CAP: Customer Develop customer retention schemes
•
3. Calculate annual costs of serving the Includes non-production costs Relationship for staff
segment including the ‘hassle’ factor Identifies customer groups of
Marketing / • Reduce staff turnover
4. Identify and retain ‘quality’ customers value to the firm Elevate customer retention in corporate
•
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 25
C Confidentiality Equal opportunities
O Objectivity
P Professional due care Consumer health and safety
Professional Ethics Fair Trade
P Professional Competence ‘Self control, not self interest’
I Integrity Safety in the workplace
T Threats
Honesty in Advertising
Competitive disadvantage No universal acceptance of Conflict of CSR with shareholder wealth
Potential problems morals & ethics • Reduced revenues
• Increased costs
Deciding what is ethical • Diverts funds from shareholders
Disclosure of business information • Distracts management
Exporting
√
√
Low capital outlay
Low risk
The International Strategy,
Porter’s
Diamond Related &
√
×
Can learn about market
May not meet customer needs Market Place structure,
& rivalry
‘National
Competitive
supporting
industries
× Perceived lack of commitment Advantage’
× High distribution costs
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 27
Transfer Prices:
• Marginal Cost – no incentive for
seller & inflated profit for buyer Problem:
• Full Cost (Cost Plus) – may be no no account taken of invested Return On Residual
incentive for the buyer & no capital used to generate
incentive for seller to control costs
Investment Income (RI)
profits
• Market price – no buyer incentive ROI
• Opportunity Cost – usually best
• Centrally set – uncontrollable Examples
• Negotiated – powerful divisions • Gross margin PBIT
• Net margin PBIT X 100 = % (CE x imputed interest rate)
• Cost % sales CE RI
Aims of performance measures: • Profit
• Motivation
• Congruence Relative Measure % Absolute Measure £’s
• Accurate reflection of performance Profit Related Measures
• Accountability/Controllability
• Reconcile long and short-term Problems: Problems:
• Sub-optimal • Absolute measure
investment poor for
CIMA E3 – Enterprise Strategy These notes are not intended to cover the whole of the E3 syllabus © Darren Sparkes, 2010 28