Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Aerogen
1
Aerogen Vibrating Mesh Nebuliser (VMN) is a high performance, highly
efficient aerosol drug delivery device, increasing drug delivery to the lungs up
to 6-fold compared to the jet nebuliser1.
Aerogen VMN may pose a lower risk of infection by averting the challenges of
jet nebulisers that require breaking the circuit during mechanical ventilation to
treat the patient. Aerogen VMN also reduces re-nebulisation of condensate as it
sits above the circuit2.
2
3 Aerogen VMN can be used inline during other types of respiratory support in
the acute care settings including HFOV, NIV, CPAP and HFNC2.
“Aerogen’s VMN in line circuit design, removing the need to break the ventilation
circuit when nebulising, provides a significant safety advantage in patients suffering
droplet spread infections. When the circuit is broken to insert a gas driven nebuliser,
particularly at the patient end of the circuit, the resulting droplet spray may
contaminate the room and creates a risk to carers. This risk can be eliminated using
an Aerogen VMN closed system. The Aerogen VMN can also be used inline during
other types of respiratory support including HFOV, NIV, CPAP and HFNC.2 In addition,
Aerogen’s efficient drug delivery to the lungs has demonstrated clinically meaningful
outcomes,8,9,10,11. Aerogen’s technology is therefore ideally placed to help deliver safe
and industry leading care to patients that may be suffering from Coronavirus”.
PM650
For confirmed 2019-nCoV infections, reported illnesses have ranged from people
being mildly sick to people being severely ill and dying. Symptoms include fever,
cough and shortness of breath. In more severe cases, infection can cause pneumonia,
severe acute respiratory syndrome, kidney failure and even death3.
References
1. Dugernier J et al. SPECT-CT Comparison of Lung Deposition using a System combining a Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer with a Valved Holding Chamber and a Conventional
Jet Nebulizer: a Randomized Cross-over Study. Pharmaceutical Research. 2017;34:290-300. 2. Aerogen Solo System Instruction Manual. Accessed 31 January 2020.
https://u5i6p3z8.stackpathcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/30-354-Rev-T-Aerogen-Solo-System-UK_WEB.pdf 3. Ari Arzu, Aerosol therapy in pulmonary critical
care. Respiratory Care, June 2015 Vol 60, No. 6 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed 31 January 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/about/
symptoms.html 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection Control Precautions for Aerosol-Generating Procedures on Patients Who have Suspected
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Accessed 31 January 2020 and Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/25034 6. Tran, K.; Cimon, K.; Severn, M.;
Pessoa-Silva, C.L.; Conly, J. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: A systematic review. PLoS
ONE 2012, 7, e35797 7. McGrath et al. Investigation of the quality of exhaled aerosols released into the environment during nebulisation. Pharmaceutics 2019. 11,75 8.
Moody, G. et al. Comparison of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Jet Nebulizer in the Pediatric Asthma Patient: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Respiratory Care October
2019, 64 (Suppl 10) 3217971 9. Dunne RB and Shortt S. Comparison of bronchodilator administration with vibrating mesh nebulizer and standard jet nebulizer in the
emergency department. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2018;36(4):641-646 10. Cantu t and Jenkins L. Comparison of Clinical Endpoints in Patients
with Asthma and Reactive Airway Disease Treated Utilizing the Aerogen Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Technology with Ultra versus the Standard Jet Nebulizer in the
Emergency Department Setting. AARC poster presentation. 2019 11. Chweich H et al. Effect on Airflow of Bronchodilator Therapy Delivered via Vibrating-Mesh versus
Jet Nebulizers in Acute Asthmatics in an Emergency Department. Poster at ATS. 2019.
PM650