‌  ‌
‌AFFIDAVIT‌‌OF‌‌STATUS‌  ‌
 ‌
NEW‌‌YORK‌‌STATE‌ )‌  ‌ ‌
‌)‌‌ss.:‌  ‌
COUNTY‌‌OF‌ ‌) ‌ ‌
 ‌
 ‌
“‌ Indeed‌‌no‌‌more‌‌than‌‌(affidavit)‌‌is‌  ‌
‌necessary‌‌to‌‌make‌‌the‌‌prima‌‌facie‌  ‌
‌case.”‌U
‌ nited‌‌States‌‌v.‌‌Kis‌,‌‌658‌  ‌
‌F.2d‌‌526,‌‌536‌‌(7the‌‌Cir.‌‌1981);‌‌Cert.‌  ‌
‌Denied‌‌50‌‌U.S.‌‌L.W.‌‌2169;‌‌S.Ct.‌‌March‌  ‌
‌22,‌‌1982.‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
‌ HAT‌‌I,‌‌Lamont‌‌A:‌‌Walker,‌‌A‌‌living‌‌breathing‌‌man,‌‌Sui‌‌Juris,‌‌being‌‌first‌‌duly‌‌sworn‌‌and‌‌
T    ‌
says‌‌and‌‌declared‌‌by‌‌my‌‌signature‌‌that‌‌the‌‌following‌‌fact‌‌are‌‌true,‌‌correct,‌‌and‌‌complete‌‌and‌  ‌
not‌‌meant‌‌to‌‌mislead.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌a‌‌flesh‌‌and‌‌blood‌‌man,‌‌and‌‌sovereign‌‌in‌‌a‌‌collective‌‌capacity‌  ‌
with‌‌other‌‌sovereigns.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌federal‌‌“U.S.‌‌citizens”‌‌have‌‌no‌‌unalienable‌‌rights,‌‌just‌‌statutory‌‌civil‌‌rights‌‌and‌  ‌
government‌‌granted‌‌which‌‌includes,‌‌“subjects”,‌‌“residents”,‌‌“voters",‌‌“taxpayers”,‌‌“servants",‌  ‌
“peons",‌‌“artificial‌‌person”,‌‌“chattel”,‌‌“property”,‌‌“vessels",‌‌“insidiously‌‌created‌‌by‌‌some‌‌form‌‌of‌  ‌
government.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌the‌‌government‌‌having‌‌incorporated,‌‌having‌‌laid‌‌down‌‌their‌‌sovereignty‌‌to‌‌become‌  ‌
persons,‌‌under‌‌Clearfield‌‌Doctrine.‌  ‌
 ‌
   ‌ ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌government‌‌jurisdiction‌‌by‌‌way‌‌of‌‌government‌‌enactments,‌‌    ‌
presumes‌‌that‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌those‌‌jurisdictions‌‌created‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Constitutions,‌‌which‌‌in‌  ‌
‌turn‌‌created‌‌such‌‌governments‌‌in‌‌a‌‌perpetuating‌‌fashion.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌government‌‌sovereignty‌‌over‌‌the‌‌people‌‌is‌‌presumption‌‌of‌‌a‌‌fiction,‌‌and‌‌when‌‌once‌  ‌
repudiated,‌‌must‌‌thereafter‌‌be‌‌proven‌‌to‌‌exist.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌if‌‌Affiant‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌proven‌‌to‌‌be‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌any‌‌Constitution‌‌or‌‌other‌  ‌
Social‌‌Contract‌‌or‌‌Compact,‌‌Affiant‌‌also‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌proven‌‌to‌‌be‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌any‌  ‌
branch‌‌of‌‌government‌‌created‌‌thereunder.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌if‌‌Affiant‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌proven‌‌to‌‌directly‌‌be‌‌a‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌any‌‌Legis-‌  ‌
lature,‌‌it‌‌also‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌proven‌‌that‌‌this‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌directly‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌such‌‌jurisdictions‌‌by‌‌way‌  ‌
of‌‌any‌‌Legislative‌‌Enactments.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌in‌‌the‌‌absence‌‌of‌‌proof‌‌that‌‌this‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌any‌‌Con-‌  ‌
stitution‌‌or‌‌other‌‌Social‌‌Contract‌‌or‌‌Compact,‌‌jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌the‌‌Affiant‌D ‌ OES‌‌NOT‌‌EXIST‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌general‌‌requirement‌‌that‌‌“The‌‌burden‌‌of‌‌PROOF”‌‌is‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Affiant‌‌to‌‌show‌‌the‌‌non-‌  ‌
existence‌‌of‌‌jurisdictional‌‌facts,‌‌is‌‌resolved‌‌by‌‌Article‌‌VI,‌‌which‌‌defines‌‌exactly‌‌who‌‌is‌‌sub-‌  ‌
ject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution,‌‌and‌‌exactly‌‌who‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌contractually‌‌bound‌‌by‌‌Oath‌  ‌
Or‌‌Affirmation‌‌to‌‌support‌‌such‌‌Constitution‌‌in‌‌consideration‌‌for‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌Public‌‌Trust‌‌and‌‌those‌  ‌
Benefits‌‌of‌‌Public‌‌Service‌‌and‌‌Public‌‌Employment.‌‌“‌‌…‌‌The‌‌Senators‌‌and‌‌Representative‌‌  
before‌‌mentioned‌‌and‌‌the‌‌members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌several‌‌States‌‌Legislature,‌‌and‌‌all‌‌Executives‌‌and‌‌  
Judicial‌‌Officers,‌‌both‌‌of‌‌the‌‌United‌‌States‌‌and‌‌of‌‌the‌‌several‌‌States,‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌bound‌‌by‌  ‌
Oath‌‌of‌‌Affirmation,‌‌to‌‌support‌‌this‌‌Constitution;‌‌…”‌‌Article‌‌VI‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌since‌‌the‌‌intent‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌VI‌‌is‌‌to‌‌define‌‌exactly‌‌to‌‌whom‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌jurisdiction‌  ‌
Applies;‌‌since‌‌the‌‌fact‌‌exists‌‌that‌‌the‌‌People‌‌are‌‌excluded‌‌from‌‌the‌‌requirements‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌VI,‌‌    ‌
PRIMA‌‌FACIE:‌‌See‌‌“Inclusio‌‌Unis‌‌Est‌‌Exclusio‌‌Alterius”‌‌in‌‌Black’s‌‌Law‌‌Dictionary.‌  ‌
 ‌
   ‌ ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
THAT,‌‌since‌‌no‌‌presumption‌‌that‌‌the‌‌People‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌all‌‌jurisdictions‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
Is,‌‌or‌‌can‌‌be‌‌made;‌‌since‌‌all‌‌Constitutions‌‌are‌‌considered‌‌in‌‌pari‌‌materia‌‌with‌‌all‌‌other‌‌Con-‌  ‌
stitutions;‌‌since‌‌all‌‌Constitutions‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌provisions‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌VI:‌‌since‌‌no‌‌  
Constitutions‌‌operates‌‌on‌‌the‌‌People‌‌at‌‌large‌‌by‌‌virtue‌‌of‌‌the‌‌fact‌‌that‌‌the‌‌People‌‌are‌‌excluded‌‌  
from‌‌the‌‌requirements‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌VI,‌‌et‌‌seq;‌‌then‌‌in‌‌pursuing‌‌Affiant’s‌‌occupations‌‌of‌‌Common-‌  ‌
Right,‌‌the‌‌Affiant‌‌has‌‌made‌‌no‌‌Oath‌‌or‌‌Affirmation‌‌to‌‌supporting‌‌any‌‌Constitution,‌‌and‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌  
not‌‌subjected‌‌to‌‌any‌‌Constitutional‌‌jurisdictions.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌if‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌Constitutional‌‌jurisdiction,‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌  
Enactments‌‌made‌‌by‌‌any‌‌Constitutionally‌‌created‌‌Legislature;‌‌if‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌  
Constitution‌‌jurisdictions,‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌jurisdiction‌‌presumed‌‌by‌‌any‌‌  
Constitutionally‌‌created‌‌by‌‌Executive‌‌branch‌‌of‌‌the‌‌government;‌‌and‌‌if‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌  
any‌‌Constitutional‌‌jurisdictions,‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌also‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌Constitutional‌‌jurisdictions.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌if‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌Constitutional‌‌jurisdictions,‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌also‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌  
any‌‌Enactments‌‌made‌‌by‌‌any‌‌Constitutionally‌‌created‌‌Legislature;‌‌if‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌  
Constitution‌‌jurisdictions,‌‌this‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌surely‌‌not‌‌subjected‌‌to‌‌any‌‌and‌‌all‌‌jurisdiction‌‌presumed‌‌  
by‌‌any‌‌Constitutionally‌‌created‌‌Executive‌‌branch‌‌of‌‌the‌‌government;‌‌and‌‌if‌‌this‌‌Affiant‌‌is‌‌also‌‌  
not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌any‌‌jurisdiction‌‌presumed‌‌by‌‌any‌‌Constitutionally‌‌created‌‌Judiciary.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌in‌‌our‌‌system‌‌while‌‌sovereign‌‌power‌‌are‌‌delegated‌‌to‌‌the‌‌agencies‌‌of‌‌government,‌‌  
sovereignty‌‌itself‌‌remains‌‌with‌‌the‌‌People,‌‌by‌‌whom‌‌and‌‌for‌‌all‌‌government‌‌exist‌‌and‌‌acts.‌  ‌
Yick‌‌Wo‌‌v.‌‌Hopkins‌,‌‌118‌‌U.S.‌‌356‌‌(1886).‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌we‌‌see‌‌the‌‌People‌‌acting‌‌as‌‌sovereigns‌‌of‌‌the‌‌whole‌‌country‌‌  
by‌‌which‌‌it‌‌was‌‌their‌‌will‌‌that‌‌the‌‌state‌‌government‌‌should‌‌be‌‌bound,‌‌and‌‌to‌‌which‌‌the‌‌state‌‌  
constitution‌‌should‌‌be‌‌made‌‌to‌‌conform.‌C ‌ hisholm‌‌v.‌‌Georgia‌,‌‌2‌‌U.S.‌‌419‌‌(1793).‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌the‌‌U.S.‌‌Constitution‌‌is‌‌a‌‌compact,‌‌but‌‌a‌‌private‌‌(man)‌‌person‌‌is‌‌not‌‌a‌‌party‌‌to‌‌it.‌‌The‌‌  
States‌‌are‌‌a‌‌party‌‌to‌‌it,‌‌which‌‌is‌‌the‌‌compact/contract‌‌for‌‌the‌‌public‌‌servant,‌‌who‌‌is‌‌bound‌‌by‌ 
their‌‌Oath‌‌or‌‌Affirmation‌‌of‌‌Office.‌P ‌ adelford,‌‌Fay‌‌&‌‌Co.‌‌v.‌‌The‌‌Mayor‌‌and‌‌Alderman‌‌of‌‌the‌‌City‌‌  
of‌‌Savannah‌,‌‌14‌‌Ga.‌‌438,‌‌520‌‌(1854).‌  ‌
 ‌
  ‌ ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌I‌‌am‌N ‌ OT‌‌SUBJECT‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌territorial‌‌limits‌‌``Exclusive‌‌Legislation”‌‌and‌‌its‌‌foreign‌‌  
jurisdiction‌‌mandated‌‌for‌‌New‌‌York‌‌[Art.‌‌1:8:17-18‌‌U.S.‌‌Const.]‌‌including‌‌its‌‌foreign‌‌“internal”‌‌  
government‌‌organizations‌‌therein‌‌or‌‌by‌‌contract‌‌adhesion‌‌[nexus]‌‌thereto‌‌intertwined‌‌  
throughout‌‌our‌‌land,‌‌including‌‌any‌‌‘STATE(S)‌‌OF’‌‌I‌‌therefore‌‌lawfully‌‌“squarely‌‌challenge”‌‌all‌‌  
fraudulent‌‌JURISDICTION/AUTHORITY,‌‌that‌‌is‌‌allegedly‌‌applies‌‌to‌‌me.‌M ‌ aine‌‌v.‌‌Thiboutot‌,‌‌448‌‌  
U.S.‌‌1‌‌(1980);‌H ‌ agen‌‌v.‌‌Lavine‌,‌‌415‌‌U.S.‌‌528‌‌(1973),‌‌and‌‌that‌‌jurisdiction‌‌can‌‌be‌‌challenged‌ ‌at‌‌  
any‌‌time.‌B ‌ asso‌‌v.‌‌Utah‌‌Power‌‌&‌‌Light‌‌Co.‌,‌‌495‌‌F.2d‌‌906‌‌(10‌‌th‌‌Cir.‌‌1974).‌‌Unless‌‌the‌‌party‌‌  
somehow‌‌learned‌‌of‌‌the‌‌action‌‌and‌‌made‌‌an‌‌appearance‌‌to‌‌contest‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌jurisdiction‌‌  
over‌‌the‌‌person,‌‌the‌‌judgement‌‌is‌‌void‌‌on‌‌Due‌‌Process‌‌grounds‌‌in‌‌this‌‌circumstance.‌B ‌ aldwin‌‌v.‌‌  
Iowa‌‌State‌‌Traveling‌‌Men’s‌‌Ass.n.‌,‌‌283‌‌U.S.‌‌522‌‌(1931);‌D ‌ ufee‌‌v.‌‌Duke‌,‌‌375‌‌U.S.‌‌106‌‌(1963).‌‌  
And,‌‌where‌‌there‌‌is‌‌absence‌‌of‌‌jurisdiction,‌‌all‌‌administrative‌‌and‌‌judicial‌‌proceedings‌‌are‌‌a ‌‌
nullity‌‌and‌‌confer‌‌no‌‌right,‌‌offer‌‌no‌‌justification.‌T ‌ hompson‌‌v.‌‌Tolmie‌,‌‌27‌‌U.S.‌‌157‌‌1829);‌G ‌ riffith‌‌  
v.‌‌Frazier‌,‌‌12‌‌U.S.‌‌9‌‌(1814),‌‌title‌‌5‌‌U.S.C.‌‌Sec.‌‌558(b),‌‌and‌‌with‌‌the‌‌“Supreme‌‌Law‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Land”,‌‌  
upholding‌‌the‌‌Sovereign‌‌America‌‌[Citizen,‌‌in‌‌that‌‌“All‌‌laws‌‌which‌‌are‌‌repugnant‌‌to‌‌the‌‌  
Constitution‌‌are‌‌NULL‌‌and‌‌VOID”].‌M ‌ arbury‌‌v.‌‌Madison‌,‌‌5‌‌U.S.‌‌137‌‌1803).‌‌It‌‌is‌‌therefore‌ 
incumbent‌‌upon‌‌any‌‌form‌‌of‌‌Legislative‌‌government,‌‌and/or‌‌any‌‌of‌‌its‌‌jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌the‌‌  
People‌‌and‌‌this‌‌Affiant.‌‌[Title‌‌5‌‌U.S.C.‌‌556(d)].‌‌Any‌‌and‌‌all‌‌persons‌‌violating‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌shall‌‌  
be‌‌charged‌‌under‌‌‘Your’‌‌Title‌‌Eighteen‌‌of‌‌the‌‌United‌‌States‌‌Criminal‌‌Code‌‌[Title‌‌18‌‌U.S.C.‌‌Sec.‌‌  
241,‌‌242,‌‌872,‌‌1001,‌‌1621,‌‌1622,‌‌2383,‌‌2384,‌‌2385,‌‌2386],‌‌and‌‌all‌‌applicable‌‌laws,‌‌for‌‌their‌‌  
higher‌‌understanding‌‌and‌‌superior‌‌knowledge‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law‌‌and‌‌perjury‌‌of‌‌oaths.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌I‌‌hereby‌‌give‌‌LAWFUL‌‌NOTICE‌‌and‌‌DECLARE:‌‌I‌‌have‌‌never‌‌resided‌‌in‌‌the‌‌‘District‌‌of‌‌  
Columbia’‌‌and/or‌‌any‌‌STATE(S)‌‌OF,‌ ‌that‌‌I‌‌am‌‌NOT‌‌a‌‌‘subject’,‌‌‘citizen’,‌‌‘resident’,‌‌‘taxpayer’,‌‌  
‘servant’,‌‌‘slave’,‌‌‘person’,‌‌(artificial‌‌person),‌ ‌‘corporate‌‌entity’,‌‌‘chattel’,‌‌or‌‌‘property’‌‌to‌‌any‌‌form‌‌  
of‌‌government,‌‌nor‌‌equal‌‌under‌‌the‌‌(color‌‌of‌‌law)‌‌with‌‌corporations‌‌or‌‌politicians,‌‌insidiously‌‌  
created‌‌by‌‌some‌‌form‌‌of‌‌Government,‌‌to‌‌confuse,‌‌deceive,‌‌dominate,‌‌and‌‌usurp‌‌the‌‌Sovereign‌‌  
American‌‌People,‌‌as‌‌created‌‌by‌‌the‌‌13th‌‌and‌‌14th‌‌Articles‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Amendments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌National‌‌  
Constitution.‌‌    ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
‌ HAT,I‌‌have‌‌read,‌‌studied‌‌and‌‌understand‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌o
T ‌ f‌‌‌the‌‌United‌‌States‌f‌or‌‌‌the‌‌united‌‌  
States‌‌of‌‌America‌‌and‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌of‌‌The‌‌State‌‌of‌‌New‌‌York‌‌Republic,‌‌and‌‌that‌‌alleged‌‌  
government‌‌and‌‌their‌‌agents,‌‌employees,‌‌assigns,‌‌successors,‌‌and‌‌their‌‌principal‌‌actors‌‌have‌‌  
taken‌‌an‌‌Oath‌‌or‌‌affirmation‌‌to‌‌protect‌‌and‌‌defend‌‌the‌‌above‌‌Organic‌‌document‌‌from‌‌all‌‌  
enemies,‌‌both‌‌foreign‌‌and‌‌domestic,‌‌prior‌‌to‌‌taking‌‌office‌‌and/or‌‌serving‌‌the‌‌people‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  
several‌‌Sovereign‌‌States‌‌of‌‌the‌‌republic‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Grand‌‌American‌‌Union.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌my‌‌rights,‌‌having‌‌been‌‌endowed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Creator‌‌of‌‌all‌‌things‌‌in‌‌Heaven‌‌and‌‌Earth‌‌  
(Universe),‌‌and‌‌declare‌‌as‌‌unalienable,‌‌can‌N ‌ OT‌‌‌be‌‌alienated‌‌from‌‌this‌‌Affiant,‌‌by‌‌any‌‌form‌‌of‌‌  
Government‌‌without‌‌serious‌‌consequences‌‌(Trespass).‌‌All‌‌who‌‌would‌‌transgress,‌‌usurp,‌‌  
dominate,‌‌and‌‌violate‌‌these‌‌rights‌‌will‌‌be‌‌held‌‌accountable‌‌before‌‌The‌‌One‌‌Supreme‌‌Being‌‌and‌‌  
Creator‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Universe‌‌and‌‌Judge‌‌of‌‌all,‌‌by‌‌which‌‌judgement‌‌is‌‌reserved‌‌to‌‌him.‌  ‌
 ‌
‌THAT,‌‌this‌L
‌ awful‌‌Public‌‌Notice‌i‌s‌N ‌ unc‌‌Pro‌‌Tunc‌,‌‌superseding‌‌and‌‌replacing‌‌any‌‌and‌‌all‌‌  
previous‌‌alleged‌‌or‌‌other‌‌such‌‌filings‌‌of‌‌some‌‌record.‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
CAVEAT‌‌    ‌
 ‌
 ‌
N
‌ OTICE:‌I‌f‌‌within‌‌thrifty‌‌(10)‌‌days‌‌of‌‌filing‌‌this‌‌document‌‌out‌‌of‌‌necessity,‌‌as‌‌a‌‌public‌‌record,‌‌
 
the‌‌courts‌‌of‌‌this‌‌state‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌interested‌‌parties‌‌having‌N ‌ OT‌‌‌provided‌‌verifiable‌‌lawful‌‌ 
evidence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌contrary‌‌to‌‌this‌‌affidavit,‌‌on‌‌a‌‌point‌‌by‌‌point‌‌basis,‌‌under‌‌the‌‌penalty‌‌of‌‌perjury,‌‌
 
having‌‌firsthand‌‌knowledge,‌‌as‌‌cited,‌‌the‌‌foregoing‌‌facts‌‌are‌T ‌ RUTH‌‌‌and‌S ‌ HALL‌‌‌stand‌‌as‌‌  
prima‌‌facie‌‌and‌‌ultimate,‌‌being‌‌undisputed,‌‌and‌‌failure‌‌to‌‌respond‌‌by‌‌silence‌‌acquiescence‌‌  
SHALL‌‌BE‌‌DEEMED‌,‌‌‌This‌‌is‌‌not‌‌limited‌‌to‌‌any‌‌Legislative,‌‌Judicial,‌‌or‌‌Executive‌‌branches‌‌of‌‌  
government‌‌and‌‌all‌‌concerned‌‌or‌‌interested‌‌parties‌‌with‌E ‌ XPRESS‌‌AFFIRMATION‌t‌o‌‌all‌‌that‌‌is‌‌  
declared‌‌with‌‌this‌‌document‌‌are‌‌true,‌‌as‌‌affirmed,‌‌and‌‌that‌‌I‌‌enjoy‌‌complete‌‌absolute‌‌diplomatic‌‌  
immunity‌‌under‌‌my‌‌flag‌‌of‌‌Peace.‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
Further‌‌Sayth‌‌I‌‌naught‌‌    ‌
Done‌‌this‌‌_________‌‌day‌‌of‌‌____________________‌‌2021‌‌A.D‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
Sword‌‌to‌‌before‌‌me‌‌this‌‌    ‌
 ‌
_______‌‌day‌‌___________________‌‌2021‌‌A.D.‌  ‌
 ‌
  ‌ ‌
Without‌‌Prejudice‌‌    ‌
UCC‌‌1-308‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
Lamont‌‌Hanif‌‌Walker‌
 ‌