You are on page 1of 6

Influence of oral calcium medication on nasal

resistance in the nasal allergen


provocation test

Claus Bachert, MD.” Sabine Drechsler,b Ulrich Hauser,” Waiter Imhoff, MD,b
and Dieter Welzel, MDb Dusseldorf and Niirnberg, Germany

Although calcium has been used for several decades to treat allergic diseases of the skin and
respiratory tract, controlled studies demonstrating the action qf oral preparations in allergic
rhinitis are lacking. This placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study shows that 1000 mg
calcium administered orally sign$cantly inhibits the allergen-induced swelling of the nasal
mucosa in the allergen provocation test. Sneezing and secretion, which are allergic symptoms,
were not reduced. This study is thehrst to confirm the positive effect oj’oral calcium on a
symptom of allergic rhinitis. (.I ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL1993;91:599-604.)
Key words: Oral calcium medication, nasal allergen challenge, airway resistance

Oral calcium medication has been used for many illary permeability (“vascular leakage”) is a function
decades in the treatment of allergic diseases of the of the partially calcium-dependent adhesion and con-
respiratory tract and skin. ‘-’ The use of calcium is traction of endothelial cells. 13,I4
based on reports of clinical experience and empirical In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover
findings, and few clinical studies have been con- study in patients with grass pollen allergy we were
ducted. In view of this situation, allergy as an indi- able to show that 9 mmol calcium administered
cation for calcium therapy has increasingly been the intravenously significantly inhibits the increase in air-
subject of controversial discussion in recent years. way resistance versus placebo after nasal allergen
Calcium is of central importance in allergic reac- provocation.‘5 We also observed a trend toward re-
tions. The transmembrane influx of calcium is an im- duction of secretion and urge to sneeze, although this
portant step in the activation and degranulation of was not statistically significant. After intravenous in-
basophils and mast cells after cross-linking of IgE jection of calcium, the serum calcium concentration
molecules on the cell membrane.4-6 In a number of in increased by 0.4 ? 0.05 mmol at the time of prov-
vitro studies on human basophils and rat mast cells it ocation. We repeated the study with oral administra-
was possible to reduce the release of histamine by tion of 1000 mg calcium to verify whether a less
means of calcium channel blocking drugs.7-9 Recent marked increase in the serum calcium level of the kind
studies suggest that altered calcium mobilization in expected to occur after oral dosing of calcium can also
respiratory tract muscle is directly implicated in the reduce the airway obstruction on allergen provocation.
induction of respiratory tract hyperreactivity,“‘. ” pos- This report shows that oral treatment with calcium
sibly caused by toxic oxygen products. ” Finally, cap- also significantly inhibits the increase in nasal airway
resistance after allergen provocation. The mean in-
crease in the serum calcium level was 0.11 i 0.08
From the Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic, Medical Department of mmol; sneezing and secretion symptoms were not
Heinrich-Heine-University, Diisseldorfp and the Clinical Re- significantly reduced.
search Department, Sandoz AG, Ntlmberg.h
Received for publication Oct. 25, 1991. MATERIAL AND METHODS
Revised Sept. 10, 1992.
Thirty patients (20 men and 10 women) with a history
Accepted for publication Sept. 24, 1992.
Reprint requests: Dr. med. Claus Bachert, MD, HNO-Klinik der of grass pollen allergy confirmed in a skin test were enrolled
Med. Einrichtungen der Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf, in the study outside the pollen season. The study was de-
Moorenstrage 5, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany. signed as a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind
Copyright 0 1993 Mosby-Year Book, Inc. trial with a crossover arrangement. It was conducted in
0091-6749193 $1.00 + .lO l/1/42819 accordance with the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki and

599
600 Bachert et al. J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
FEBRUARY 1993

serum calcium level M calcium


2,6- (mmol/l) e-m-a placebo

-I-
2,5-
*

2,4-

23 I I I 1
baseline w 60 min.*** 90 min. *** 120 min.***
FIG. 1. Serum calcium levels after oral aDplication of 1000 mg calcium or placebo in 27 patients
(crossover design). (***p < 0.0001).

was approved by the Ethical Committee of Mannheim Uni- and obstruction, 1 point for accompanying conjunctival or
versity; the patients gave their informed written consent to pharyngeal reaction).
participate. Pregnant women and patients with acute symp- Serum calcium was determined on a Hitachi 717 Au-
toms of rhinitis and bronchial asthma, diseasesof the gas- toanalyser(Hitachi Medical Corp., Tokyo, Japan)following
trointestinal tract, disorders of calcium and phosphate me- the manufacturer’s operating instructions.
tabolism, and diseasesof the kidneys or cardiovascularsys- The study was analyzed statistically in accordancewith
tem were excluded. The intake of any antiallergic the crossovermodel of Lehmacher.”
medication and drugs affecting the calcium metabolism was In addition to confirmatory analysisof the main end point
excluded for at least 1 week before the study, with the “allergen concentration,” an exploratory analysis was per-
exception of astemizole (excluded 6 weeks before the formed for the effect on the symptoms of rhinitis.
study). For clearer presentation of the results, the calculations
Nasal provocation was performed at l-week intervals, were performed with the decimal logarithm of the allergen
with patients being given a low-calcium diet 3 days before concentration. To eliminate intraindividual differences be-
each test. The tests were carried out after a standardized, tween the two examinations and similar period effects, the
low-calcium breakfast after a 12-hour fast. The participants difference examination 1 - examination 2 was calculated
received a single dose of 1000 mg calcium (4.954 gm cal- for both sequencesand compared by means of the two-
cium lactogluconate + 0.9 gm calcium carbonate) or pla- sample t test at (Y = 0.05. To test residual effects, the sum
cebo as an effervescent tablet in 200 ml of water, and blood of examination 1 + examination 2 was assessedfor both
samples were taken to determine the serum calcium level sequencesby means of the two-sample t test at a two-sided
before and 60, 90, and 120 minutes after the medication. a = 0.05. In a similar manner the secondarytarget variable
Ninety minutes after intake the patients were challenged “symptoms of rhinitis” was subjectedto exploratory analysis
with increasingconcentrations of a highly purified, freeze- by means of the two-sample Wilcoxon U test for tied
dried, six-grass extract (Allergopharma, Reinbek, Ham- samples.
burg, Germany): 3125, 6250, 12,500, 25,000, 50,000, and
100,000 BU/ml (biological units per ml). The provocation RESULTS
solution was applied to the head of the inferior turbinate on Patients. Twenty-seven of the 30 patients recruited
the side of the nose, with the lower initial airway resistance were included in the final analysis. The reasons for
measuredby means of a metered pump spray under spec- classification as dropouts were the following: lacking
ulum observation (two metered dosesof 0.04 ml each). The compliance, absence of flow reduction after provo-
nasal airway resistance was measured by active anterior cation, and incomplete documentation. The three
rhinomanometry before and 10 minutes after provocation
dropouts are included in the sample description but
by means of an MP 441 Rhinomanometer (Allergopharma,
Reinbek) following the guidelines of the International Stan- were eliminated from the analysis of efficacy. Four-
dardization Committee for Rhinomanometry.‘6 The study teen subjects received calcium, and 13 received pla-
target variable was a 40% reduction of the nasal flow value cebo treatment first.
at 150 Pa, representinga 66% increaseof unilateral airway The patients were between 18 and 3 1 years of age
resistance.At the same time, the symptoms of allergic rhi- (mean, 24.63 k 3.26 years) and had had allergic rhi-
nitis were quantified by means of a symptom score (max- nitis for a mean 10.8 ? 0.6 years. In the 2 years
imum 11 points, 0 to 3 points each for sneezing, secretion, before the study allergic symptoms occurred on av-
VOLUME 91 Bachert et al. 601
NUMBER 2

patients
b-0
181
LB calcium
E$j placebo

0
3125 6250 12500 25000 50000 100~0 BU/ml

FIG. 2. Allergen concentrations (BU/ml) needed for 40% reduction of nasal flow after oral ap-
plication of calcium or placebo in 27 patients (crossover design). Difference between both groups
is statistically significant (p < 0.05).

erage during 3.2 & 0.9 months, and two thirds of the TABLE 1. Allergen concentration thresholds
patients had further allergic disorders. No significant (BU/ml) for 40% reduction of flow after
differences were observed between the treatment placebo and after calcium treatment
groups for any of the variables mentioned.
Allergen
Serum calcium concentration. The baseline calcium
concentration
values were 2.42 + 0.08 mmol before adminis- threshold
tration of calcium and 2.40 + 0.08 mmol before
treatment with placebo (NS). Subject Sequence Calcium Placebo
All three measurements (60, 90, and 120 minutes)
1 CaliPla 9375 937.5
revealed that oral administration of calcium had led
3 CaliPla 9375 9375
to a significant increase in the serum calcium con-
4 CaliPla 9375 21875
centration to a peak level of 2.53 -+ 0.08 mmol 9 CaliPla 3125 3125
after 120 minutes, whereas after placebo no significant 10 CaliPla 9375 9375
changes occurred in serum calcium (Fig. I). 11 Cal/ Pla 3125 3125
Therefore at the time nasal provocation was per- 14 Cal/Pla 21875 9375
formed, increased serum calcium concentrations after 15 Cal / Pla 46875 21875
calcium medication were present, compared with 17 Cal i Pla 196875 96875
placebo. 21 Cal/ Pla 9375 3125
Flow reduction. The criterion of a 40% reduction 22 Cal/Pla 9375 3125
of nasal flow was already reached in 24 of 27 subjects, 26 CaliPla 46875 9375
with placebo medication at 3125 (n = 8) or 6250 27 CaliPla 21875 3125
30 Cal/ Pla 46875 9375
(n = 16) BUlml, whereas with calcium treatment
2 Pla/Cal 9375 9375
these concentrations led to a positive provocation test 5 Plai Cal 3125 3125
only 17 times (eight and nine persons, respectively). 6 Pla/Cal 3125 3125
Each of the concentration steps 12,500, 25,000, and 7 Pla/ Cal 9375 9375
50,000 BUiml was reached by three subjects, and 8 Plai Cal 96875 9375
one subject did not achieve a sufficient flow reduction 13 Pla/ Cal 3125 3125
even with 100,000 BU/ml (Fig. 2). The exact values 16 Pla/Cal 96875 9375
for the allergen thresholds in nasal provocation for 18 PlaiCal 21875 9375
40% reduction of flow for each of the 27 subjects after 19 PlaiCal 9375 9375
placebo and after calcium treatment are given in Table 23 Pla/Cal 3125 9375
I. 25 Plai Cal 96875 9375
28 Pla/Cal 9375 9375
An intraindividual comparison revealed that 13 sub-
29 PlaiCal 3125 3125
jects reached the same allergen concentration with
calcium and placebo, and that three subjects taking Cal, Calcium; P/a. placebo.
602 Bachert et al. J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
FEBRUARY 1993

placebo and 11 subjects taking calcium required a sible effects of nasal cycling would affect both groups
higher allergen concentration. A statistically signifi- the same way.
cant difference (p < 0.05) in favor of calcium was Although calcium belonged to the standard ther-
found between the allergen concentrations reached apeutic repertoire for allergic diseases in the 1920s
with calcium and concentrations reached with placebo and 1930s and is still widely used in the German
(Fig. 2). With calcium therapy the allergen concen- speaking countries, only a small number of controlled
tration required for flow reduction was 0.22 log units, studies, some of them contradictory, have been de-
that is, 66% higher. Assuming a flow reduction of voted to examining the effect of calcium on the skin.
50% as criterion, an even greater difference was ev- For example, a double-blind, crossover study with the
ident at the p < 0.01 level, where the superiority of antihistamine drug clemastine versus clemastine and
calcium over placebo represented an increase in the 500 mg calcium orally showed that calcium addition-
allergen concentration of 74%. ally reduces histamine-induced erythema of the skin
In contrast, no significant differences between up to 9 hours after medication.’ A controlled study
the treatment and placebo group were detected for on the effect of oral calcium in allergic rhinitis has
any of the rhinitis symptoms, either singly or collec- so far not been described.
tively. The degranulation of human mast cells and baso-
phils is associated with an increase of the intracellular
Adverse effects calcium concentration, with intracellular calcium
Four patients reported adverse effects such as tired- stores being depleted in a first phase, and extracellular
ness, nausea, sensation of warmth on physical effort, calcium ions flowing through membrane channels into
or diarrhea, although a relationship between the symp- the cell in a second phase.4 From this it has been
tom (diarrhea) and intake of calcium was assumed to concluded that preventing the influx of calcium into
be present in only one case. The study was not dis- the mediator cell is an essential therapeutic goal of
continued in any of the patients as a result of the antiallergic medication7 In past years it has also been
documented side effects. Therefore with one incon- reported that calcium channel blockers can exert pro-
clusive exception the tolerability of the calcium med- tective effects in the presence of allergic reactions in
ication was very good. animals and human beings.7-9 Two different types of
calcium channels have been described, and the re-
DISCUSSION ceptor-controlled calcium channel has been claimed
In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover to be implicated in the release of histamine from the
study in patients with grass pollen allergy we were human basophil granulocyte.5 Cromoglycate, a com-
able to show for the first time that the oral adminis- pound of recognized antiallergic efficacy, has also
tration of calcium significantly reduces the swelling been claimed to prevent the inward movement of cal-
of the nasal mucosa after nasal allergen challenge. cium through binding to specific membrane proteins.
This project therefore confirms a recently published From these findings it would follow that administra-
study of similar structure performed with intravenous tion of calcium and the consequent increase of extra-
dosing of calcium. I5 Administered orally, calcium acts cellular calcium levels would increase the release of
only on the airway obstruction monitored by rhino- histamine from basophils and mast cells in response
manometry, but not on the other nasal allergic to various stimuli. However, it has been reported that
symptoms. both the reduced and the supramaximal concentration
Nasal provocation testing was performed according of extracellular calcium reduces the secretory response
to the guidelines of the German Society of Allergy of peritoneal rat mast cells.‘9-2’ Pearcezoassumes that
and Immunology Research, ‘* with a 40% reduction of superficial calcium stores in the membrane regulate
the unilateral nasal flow value at 150 Pa as study target the influx of the cation into the cytosol of the cell.
variable. In this challenge model unilateral provoca- With high extracellular calcium levels, the cell mem-
tion is preferred to bilateral to reduce patients’ im- brane may be stabilized and the exocytosis of the cell
pairment, increase safety, and keep the unexposed side granules prevented.
open for active anterior rhinomanometry of the chal- Extracellular calcium is capable of reducing the
lenged nostril. However, we have to bear in mind that release of histamine induced by compound 48180 in
nasal cycling may lead to misinterpretation of a non- the rat mast ce11.6It has also been shown that dextran-
specific reaction as allergic. In this study reductions induced release of histamine in peritoneal rat cells can
of nasal flow were paralleled by increased symptoms, be suppressed by high extracellular calcium levels.**
indicating the specificity of these reactions. Further- An effect of this kind has also been described for
more, with the crossover design of the study the pos- human peripheral leucocytes: peripheral leukocytes of
VOLUME 91 Bachert et al. 603
NUMBER 2

patients with urticaria, pollinosis, and psoriasis were secretion, conjunctivitis, and throat irritation were not
stimulated with anti-IgE and the calcium ionophore significantly reduced. These findings are consistent
A23187, after which the release of histamine was with those of the previous study with intravenous ad-
reduced in a dose-dependent manner by the increase ministration of calcium. Evidently intraindividual dif-
in the extracellular calcium leveLz3 When extrapolat- ferences exist in the effect of calcium, and some pa-
ing these results to our study, however, two points tients therefore benefitted exceptionally well from the
should be borne in mind: First, the increase of the oral calcium treatment. On the other hand, oral cal-
serum calcium level by 0.1 mmol after oral intake cium was found to be well tolerated in this study with
remains within the physiologic limits for serum cal- a very low rate of side effects, and a similarly favor-
cium concentration (which is an important criterion able tolerability profile is also to be expected on long-
for safety of therapy). It has been shown that this term use of the preparation.29 This could explain the
increase influences hormonal regulation (parathyroid positive effect of calcium on the symptoms of patients
hormone secretion) in a remarkable manner and so with allergic diseases of the respiratory tract and skin
has more implications than just adding to the body frequently observed in clinical trials. It may also be
calcium,24 but still the increase of extracellular cal- assumed that long-term therapy with oral calcium
cium in the tissue is expected to be low. preparations over several weeks, for example, in pa-
Second, stabilization of the mast cells and an as- tients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, could petma-
sociated reduction of histamine release should also nently reduce nasal obstruction. Since antihistamines
lead to a reduction of sneezing and secretion after in particular do not adequately act on this symptom,
nasal allergen provocation. a combination with an oral calcium preparation would
However, we could demonstrate only a marked re- appear suitable. As might be expected, this combi-
duction of allergen-induced swelling of the nasal mu- nation causes fewer side effects than the combination
cosa. Therefore it seems unlikely that the antiallergic of an antihistamine with a-sympathomimetics, use of
effect of calcium primarily derives from stabilization which is not recommended for longer than 2 weeks.
of the mediator cells. A controlled study on the effect of long-term oral
Finally, calcium has a nonspecific effect on the calcium medication on symptoms of allergic rhinitis
membrane permeability of endothelial cells and on has not yet been conducted.
capillary permeability, the latter depending on the con- In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover
traction of the endothelial cells and the function of study we were able to demonstrate that oral calcium
the occluding junctions.25. I6 In addition to a calcium- reduces a major symptom of the allergic nasal reac-
independent mechanism, there is also a calcium-de- tion. Further studies are needed to define the nature
pendent mechanism for the intercellular adhesion of of the pharmacodynamic effect and explore the action
endothelial cells, which is specifically inhibited by of long-term oral medication in seasonal and perennial
monoclonal antibodies.27 Perfusion of cornea1 endo- symptoms of rhinitis.
thelium with a calcium-free or low-calcium medium
leads to a reversible breakdown of apical junctional
complexes resulting in cornea1 swelling.” An increase REFERENCES
of extracellular calcium lowers the permeability of the I. Solhnann T. A manual of pharmacology and its applications
vascular endothelium in the main capillaries of the rat to therapeutics and toxicology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders,
and also reduces the response to histamine, serotonin, 1948:787-891.
2. Debelic M, Haeseler K. Zur Objektivierung der antialler-
and brad ykinin . I4 Furthermore, the addition of low
gischen Wirksamkeit eines oralen Kalziumprlparates. Med
doses of calcium inhibits the formation of dextran- Welt 1977;25:346-9.
induced anaphylactoid edema in the rat.” This effect 3. Petersen KG, Kerp L. Zum EinAuR von Calcium auf die An-
of calcium on capillary permeability should at least tihistaminwirkung von Clemastin. Allergologie 1985;8:270-1.
partially explain the reduction of the swelling of the 4. Takei M, Uraschima H, Endo K, Muramatu M. Role of calcium
in histamine release from rat mast cells activated by various
tissue of the nasal concha after allergen provocation,
secretagogues; intracellular calcium mobilization correlates
since the transudation of serum proteins and fluid into with histamine release. Biol Chem Hoppc Seyler 1989;370:
the mucosal tissue is reduced, and the bradykinin and l-10.
histamine-induced vasodilatation may also be partially 5. Tedeschi A. Miadonna A, Lorini M, A&uati M, Zanussi C.
antagonized. Receptor-operated, but not voltage-operated, calcium channels
are involved in basophil leucocyte activation and histamine
In the nasal provocation model we were able to
release. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1989;90: 109-l I.
demonstrate a clinically relevant reduction of allergen- 6. Chakravarty N, Wei-Jun Yu. Regulatory role of calcium on
induced swelling. The other allergic symptoms mea- histamine secretion. Agents Actions 1986; 18: 1-2.
sured by means of symptom scores such as sneezing, 7. West GB. Further thoughts on mast cells. calcium channels
604 Bachert et al. J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
FEBRUARY 1993

and histamine release. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 19. Truneh A, Pearce FL. Characteristics of and calcium require-
1990;91:214-6. ments for histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells
8. Gianella E, Masini E, Palmerani B, Pistelli A, Mannaioni PF. treated with Concanavalin A. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol
Modulation of anaphylactic histamine release by calcium chan- 1981;66:68-75.
nel agonists and antagonists. Agents Actions 1988;23:3-4. 20. Pearce FL. Die Stimulus-Sekretions-Kopplung in der Mast-
9. Bindslev Jensen C, Clementsen P, Stahl Skov P, et al. Com- zelle. Allergologie 1984;7:27-9.
parison of the action of calcium antagonists on basophil his- 21. Day RO, Wade DN. Influence of flufenamic acid and calcium
tamine release. Allergy 1987;42:441-6. ion concentration on the histamine release from rat mast cells
10. Ahmed T, D’Brot .I, Abraham W. The role of calcium antag- induced by compound 48/80 and the calcium ionophore
onists in bronchial reactivity. J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL A23187. Biochem Pharmacol 1978;27:1385-7.
1988;81:133-43. 22. Hanahoe THP. Effects of calcium on dextran anaphylactoid
11. Black JL, Marthan R, Armour CL, Johnson PR. Sensitization oedema in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 1972;44:314-6.
alters contractile responses and calcium influx in human airway 23. KBnig W, Baron M, Ehring F. Effect of calcium mineral so-
smooth muscle. J ALLERGY CLM IMMUNOL 1989;84:440-7. lutions on the histamine release from human peripheral leu-
12. Weiss EB, Bellino JR. Leukotriene-associated toxic oxygen kocytes. ArzneimitelforschungiDrug Research 1984;34:52-4.
metabolites induce airway reactivity. Chest 1986;89:709-16. 24. Herfarth K, Drechsler S, Imhoff W, et al. Calcium regulating
13. Martinez-Palomo A, Meza J, Platy G, Cereijids M. Occluding hormones after oral and intravenous calcium application. (Sub-
junctions in cultures. J Cell Biol 1980;87:736-45. mitted for publication.)
14. Busch L, Tessler J, Bazerque PM. Effects of calcium and 25. Galdal KS, Stein AE. Effects of divalent cations and various
EDTA on rat skin capillary permeability and on its response vasoactive and haemostatically active agents on the integrity
to histamine, serotonin and bradykinin. Acta Physiol Phar- of monolayers of cultured human endothelial cells. Thromb
macol Latinoam 1989;39:227-34. Res 1981;21:273-84.
15. Bachert C, Drechsler S, Keilmann A, Seifert E, Schmidt R, 26. Baetscher M, Brune K. An in vitro system for measuring
Welzel D. Verminderung der Reaktivitiit bei Rhinitis allergica endothelial permeability under hydrostatic pressure. Exp Cell
durch intravenose Applikation von Kalzium. Arzneimittelfor- Res 1983;148:541-7.
schung/Drug Research 1990;40:984-7. 27. Heimark RL, Degner M, Schwartz StM. Identification of a
16. Clement PAR. Committee report on standardization of rhino- Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecule in endothelial
manometry. Rhinology 1984;22:151-5. cells. J Cell Biol 199O;llO: 1745-56.
17. Lehmacher W. Analysis of the cross-over design in the pres- 28. Araie M, Hamano K, Eguchi S, Matsumoto S. Effect of cal-
ence of residual effects. Stat Med 1991;10:891-9. cium ion concentration on the permeability of the cornea1 en-
18. Gonsior E, Bachert C, Berdel D, et al. Richtlinien fur die dothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:2191-3.
Durchfiihrung von nasalen Provokationstests mit Allergenen 29. Kochersberger G, Bales C, Lobaugh B, Lyles KW. Calcium
bei Erkrankungen der oberen Luftwege Allergologie supplementation lowers serum parathyroid hormone levels in
1990;13:53-5. elderly subjects. J Gerontol 1990;45: 159-62.

AVAILABLE NOW! The FIVE-YEAR (1986-1990) CUMULATIVE INDEX TO THE


JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY can be purchased from the
Publisher for $48.00. This comprehensive, 188page reference guide is a current presentation
of all topics included in the JOURNAL from January 1986 to December 1990 (volumes 77-
86)-the past 10 volumes. It incorporates complete references to over 1500 original articles,
abstracts, case reports, letters, editorials, and CME articles. It features 1662 subject headings,
under which there are 5863 entries. Each subject entry lists the complete article title, author(s),
volume, page, and year of publication. It also includes 5801 author entries, listing contrib-
utors, along with their respective titles, author-to-author referral, volume, page, and pub-
lication date.
To purchase, call or write: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 11830 Westline Industrial Dr.,
St. Louis, MO 63146-3318, or telephone FREE l-800-325-4177, Subscription Services, ext.
435 1, or 3 14-453-435 1. PREPAYMENT REQUIRED. Make checks payable to Mosby-Year
Book, Inc. (All payments must be in US funds drawn on a US bank.) Price: $48.00 in the
US, $54.35 in Canada, and $51 .OO international (price includes mailing charges).

You might also like