PLEASE INSERT THE TABLE BELOW IN CHAPTER II METHODOLOGY

UNDER/AFTER STATISTICAL TOOLS / ANALYSIS OF DATA

 Make sure to explain why did you choose this statistical

tool
 Incorporate definition/s of SPSS Tool
 Arrange your table from Table 1 and so on………

Interpretation Table for Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient

Range of correlation Degree of correlation

coefficients
0.80 – 1.00 Very strong positive
0.60 – 0.79 Strong positive
0.40 – 0.59 Moderate positive
0.20 – 0.39 Weak positive
0.00 – 0.19 Very weak positive
0.00 – (-0.19) Very weak negative
(-0.20) – (-0.39) Weak negative
(-0.40) – (-0.59) Moderate negative
(-0.60) – (-0.79) Strong negative
(-0.80) – (-1.00) Very strong negative
 CHAPTER III

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

(PLEASE INSERT THIS AFTER THE DATA INTERPRETATION OF

THE WEIGHTED MEAN FOR THE DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE)
3. Is there a significant relationship between the profile

variables of the respondents and their climate change perception?

Correlation of the Respondents’ Age and Their Perceptions on

Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Correlation
Coefficient
-.590 -.623 -.561 -.568 -.105 .004
Age
Pearson’s
r Sig. .295 .073 .116 .111 .722 .988
(2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient shows that

there is no significant positive relationship between the

respondents’ age and their perceptions on climate change.

Correlation of the Respondents’ Gender and Their Perceptions on

Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Correlation .016 .119 .221 -.296 -.335 -.338
Coefficient
Gender

Pearson’s Sig.
(2-tailed)
.980 .848 .721 .569 .242 .237
r

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

 Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient shows that

there is no significant positive relationship between the

respondents’ gender and their perceptions on climate change.

Correlation of the Respondents’ Civil Status and Their

Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Correlation
Coefficient
.907* .608 .907* .568 -.103 -.167
Pearson’s Civil
r Status
Sig. 0.34 .276 .033 .318 .726 .567
(2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is a significant positive relationship between the

respondents’ civil status and the respondents’ perception on the

Basic knowledge on climate change and that climate change

represents the changes in temperature over the past 10 years.

Correlation of the Respondents’ Highest Educational Attainment

and Their Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Correlation
Coefficient
.614* .692** .436 .063 -.111 -.156
Pearson’s
 r Highest
Educational
Sig.
(2-tailed)
.019 .006 .119 .830 .706 .594
Attainment

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is a strong positive relationship between the respondents’

highest educational attainment and the respondents’ perception on

the basic knowledge on climate change and the sources of climate

change information.

Correlation of the Respondents’ Length of Residency in the

Community and Their Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Correlation -.663 -.525 -.373 -.420 -.117 -.029
Coefficient
Pearson’s Length of *
r Residency
Sig.
(2-tailed)
.026 .098 .258 .198 .692 .922

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is a strong positive relationship between the respondents’

length of residency and the respondents’ perception on the basic

knowledge on climate change.

 Correlation of the Respondents’ Number of Household Members and
Their Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Pearson’s
Correlation
Coefficient
.380 -.060 -.404 .011 .021 .062
r Number of
Household
Members Sig. .313 .878 .281 .977 .945 .841
(2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is very weak relationship between the respondents’ length

of residency number of household members and the respondents’

perception on climate change.

Correlation of the Respondents’ Number of Working Household

Members and Their Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Correlation .589 .591 .627 .286 -.294 -.321
Pearson’s Coefficient
r Number of
Working
Household Sig. .124 .123 .096 .493 .308 .264
Members (2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is weak relationship between the respondents’ number of

working household members and the respondents’ perception on

climate change.

Correlation of the Respondents’ Number of Working Household

Members and Their Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Correlation
Coefficient
.589 .591 .627 .286 -.294 -.321
Pearson’s Number of
r Working
Household Sig. .124 .123 .096 .493 .308 .264
Members (2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

Correlation of the Respondents’ Monthly Income and Their

Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Monthly
Correlation
Coefficient
.726* .636 .605 .376 -.309 -.338
Pearson’s Income
r
Sig. .027 .066 .084 .319 .282 .237
(2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is a strong positive relationship between the respondents’

monthly income and the respondents’ basic knowledge on climate

change.

Correlation of the Respondents’ Residence Type and Their

Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Residence
Correlation
Coefficient
.525 .520 .547* .142 -.339 -.353
Pearson’s Type
r
Sig. .054 .057 .043 .627 .236 .216
(2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is a moderate positive relationship between the

respondents’ residence type and the respondents’ perception on

the changes in temperature for the last ten (10) years brought by

climate change.
 Correlation of the Respondents’ Type of House and Their
Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Type of
Correlation
Coefficient
.644* .764** .945** .484 -.295 -.346
Pearson’s House
r
Sig. .013 .001 .000 .080 .306 .226
(2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is a moderate to strong positive relationship between the

respondents’ type of house and the respondents’ perception on

basic knowledge on climate change, sources of information of

climate change and the changes in temperature for the past ten

(10) years brought about by climate change.

Correlation of the Respondents’ Family Type and Their Perceptions
on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Correlation
Coefficient
.572* .743** .977** .573* -.225 -.286
Family
Pearson’s Type
r Sig. .033 .002 .000 .032 .440 .321
(2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is a moderate to very strong positive relationship between

the respondents’ family type and the respondents’ perception on

basic knowledge on climate change, sources of information of

climate change, and the changes in temperature and rainfall for

the past ten (10) years brought about by climate change.

 Correlation of the Respondents’ Flood and Drought Experience and
their Perceptions on Climate Change

BKCC SICC CT10 CR10 ECC1 ECC2

Pearson’s Flood and

Correlation
Coefficient
.546* .724** .987** .603* -.193 -.256
r Drought
Experience
Sig. .044 .003 .000 .023 .509 .377
(2-tailed)

N 150 150 150 150 150 150

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Results of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient showed that

there is a moderate to very strong positive relationship between

the respondents’ flood and drought experience and the

respondents’ perception on basic knowledge on climate change,

sources of information of climate change, and the changes in

temperature and rainfall for the past ten (10) years brought

about by climate change.

 4. Is there a significant difference between the climate change

perception of barangay captains and barangay councilors?

Comparison of the Perception of Captains and Councilors

Variable Significance Decision Interpretation

Level
BKCC 0.888 Accept Ho, There is no significant
Reject Ha difference between the
perception of captains and
councilors
SICC 0.198 Accept Ho, There is no significant
Reject Ha difference between the
perception of captains and
councilors
CT10 0.558 Accept Ho, There is no significant
Reject Ha difference between the
perception of captains and
councilors
CR10 0.318 Accept Ho, There is no significant
Reject Ha difference between the
perception of captains and
councilors
RECC1 0.838 Accept Ho, There is no significant
Reject Ha difference between the
perception of captains and
councilors
RECC2 0.894 Accept Ho, There is no significant
Reject Ha difference between the
perception of captains and
councilors

NOTE/LEGEND:

BKCC BASIC KNOWLEDGE ON CLIMATE CHANGE

SICC Source of Information about Climate Change

CT10 Represents the changes in temperature over the

past 10 years.
 CR10 Perception of the respondents about changes in
rainfall over the past 10 years

RECC1 Perception of the respondents about the Effects of

Climate Change

RECC2 Perception of the respondents about the Effects

of Climate Change

ADDITIONAL GUIDELINE/S IN PURSUING YOUR THESIS/MANUSCRIPT

1. Follow the APA format

2. You may now use past tenses for the interpretations

3. Allow some members to look for supporting details when it

comes to interpretations of the perceptions.

4. As your informal statistician, we ONLY computed the data

based on the details given to us. We advise all of you guys

to look for your statistician since your department do not

accept statisticians outside the university.

5. Your interpretation of data should be aligned with your

statement of the problem.

6. Any revisions that will arise later are excluded in the

package since we believe that your all of your data are

reliable and accurate.

7. Thank you and God Bless.

8. GOOD LUCK!