Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P.M. Bakshi*
I Introduction
LEGISLATIVE DRAFTING is a well-cultivated art in most civilised
countries in the modern era. But there is not much theoretical writing
about it. As a result, persons outside the profession of draftsmen are
not aware of the joys and sorrows of this discipline, the thrills and dis-
comfitures, the preliminaries and the fruition of the process.
II The goals
What are the goals of a good legislative draft? In any intellectual activity,
one can employ one's talent to the best degree, if one knows the goal.
Workshops and conferences and training courses do help in devising the
means, in improving the means for attaining such goals, and sometimes in
enabling one to think of self-improvement. Those who embark on draf-
ting are not beginners in law. Mostly, they are persons with experience in
legal matters and would be able to devise some methods of self-improvement.
Of course, success in drafting requires a continuous process of self-scrutiny
and self-criticism, a desire to see imperfections in one's own product, a
keenness at perceiving one's own deficiencies and a readiness t© learn
throughout the career.
* Director, Indian Law Institute, New Delhi. Member, Law Commission of India,
New Delhi.
legislation, which flow from the legislation, which emanate from the legis-
lation. While legislation is the parent, from that parent is born a very
large number of off-spring, which we generally call "subordinate legislation1'.
Legislative drafting, therefore, is not merely drafting of legislation proper,
but also of the subordinate legislation. This means, that the quantity of
the written material which can come to the draftsman in the course of
his professional career has no limits. Any kind of subject can form the
topic of legislation and subordinate legislation.
IV Knowledge required
Is it enough for the draftsman to know only the technique of drafting?
It is not so. Normally, people think that a draftsman is a specialist; of
course, he is. But that does not mean that his eyes are blind, or his ears
are deaf, or his mind is closed, to everything which is outside drafting,
because no mental discipline, no intellectual activity stands in isolation
and, certainly not, legislative drafting. The draftsman is drafting some-
thing which is going to be tested in the world. It is going to affect human
activity, the work of the administrators, the task of the judiciary and the
business of the law-enforcing people. Besides this, it is also going to affect
the people in general So, legislative drafting stands in very close contact
with reality.
About fifty years ago, a young boy in the United States wanted to
take up law as a profession and wrote a very polite letter to an eminent judge
saying that he wanted to take law, as his career* and requested the judge
to let him know how he should prepare, what he should read and how he
should equip his mind. He thought, that perhaps the judge will give him
a long list of books on law, legislation and political science and some case-
books. But the reply was simple. It was, "My dear friend, lam glad
that you are going to take up law as a profession. If you want to
equip yourself properly, forget everything about the law in the beginning.
Try to see as many beautiful paintings as you can. Try to hear great spiri-
tual music if possible. Try to read the classics if you have got a taste.
Read some beautiful novels, some good poetry and other great works of
literature. Make your mind full of the richness and variety of real life.
The law will then come naturally to you".
In legislative drafting also, we cannot close our mind to something
which is going outside the small cell in which we are working, because the
law which is going to be drafted, will have an impact on real life. The
draftsman is not performing mental gymnastics. Nor is it an intellectual
entertainment. It is something which is going to have a very great practical
effect on the lives of men and women.
V Qualities of a good draftsman
What, then, are the qualities of a good draftsman? It would appear
that three major qualities ate needed. First, a good familiarity with the
VI Knowledge of law
The importance of these three types of mental equipment needed for
the draftsman requires elaboration. He needs, first and foremost, familia-
rity with the law in general. The reason why an emphasis has been laid
on familiarity with the law in general is, that it is fundamental. Very
often, particularly in countries where there is a lot of work in the govern-
ment, people outside the drafting branch try to create a mental bifurcation
by saying that a certain person is knowledgeable only about drafting
and that another person is knowledgeable only about law. They assume
that a person who is good at drafting, will have no legal scholarship or
legal knowledge. That is not correct; it should not be so. One cannot
draft satisfactorily, unless one knows the law in general. What one is
going to produce, is a part of the law, if it is enacted. Law is not a block of
apartments where each tenant lives separately from each other. Rather,
the law is like a continuous stream. One may divide the law into several
compartments, for convenience. But, really speaking, the law is a conti-
nuous stream. If you touch the stream at one point, it is bound to affect
many other points in the stream. It is a running stream. It is not like
stagnant water. It is not like a small pool where you can plunge into the
pool and come back and take rest and then you can plunge into another
pool and come back. The moment you touch any part of the law, some
other part of the law is also going to be directly or indirectly affected,
although one may not always be able to visualise that. That is why, the
foremost emphasis is to be placed on knowledge of the law in general. Of
course, all draftsmen are persons with legal qualifications. But the law
goes on changing. In a busy official life, sometimes one does not have
the time to keep oneself abreast of the legal developments. But that is
what is necessary. In official life, if six hours are allotted for office work
each day, then at least half-an-hour should be kept apart for refreshing
the study of law. The law which one had studied in schools or colleges
about ten years ago, might have completely changed today. In most
countries, judicial decisions pour forth a great deal of law every day. Thus,
familiarity with the law in general is a very important part of the drafts
person's equipment.
what will be the repercussions? Some practical aids are fortunately avai-
lable. For making a choice of words, we have got, what is called, a
"thesaurus". This "thesaurus" is a word with a history. The Romans
used to put the government money in the thesaurus. That was their
treasury. The Thesaurus is a very helpful tool, because it gives, against
each word, its analogous words, words which are similar to it, but which
still have a different shade of meaning. The mind gets some help. It is a
kind of reservoir from which the draftsman can make a selection. This
is not the only source, of course, because there are legal dictionaries also.
There are now-a-days available even multilingual legal dictionaries, which
give you the words in English, French, German and Latin. Even if one is
drafting in English, the corresponding Latin or German or French compa-
rative words given in the dictionaries will strike a chord in the draftsman's
mind. It will enable him to choose a more appropriate word in his own
language. The regular legal dictionaries are also helpful. Supposing you
want to understand what are the implications of choosing the word
'reasonable', and what are the implications of choosing the words 'just'
and 'proper'. Or, supposing the draftsman wants to understand the impli-
cations of 'moral turpitude'. These are words which one may not find
in the ordinary non-legal dictionary. But these are legal words explained
in great detail in legal dictionaries.
aspect, i.e.) if it is already covered, he does not have to make the law. The
second is a positive aspect. Sometimes, it may happen that the activity
in question is already covered, but in different words or on a different
scale. It may be that the draftsman would like to make a more severe
penal provision, a better worded law or a law which now directly meets
the current demand. But he has in any case to see, how far there is going
to be overlapping between the existing and the new law, and what will be
its consequences. The draftsman must know the implications of what the
legislature is going to enact; and that is where the relationship between
the existing statute book and the new law is of prime importance.
When this is done, the creative work or the third stage begins, where the
draftsman reduces the proposals to words. This is the most fascinating
part of the draftsman's job, although it is also the most difficult. The
fascination which the draftsman gets when he reduces something abstract
to concrete material on the paper, carries its own reward. The work is
difficult, because it will require him to bring all his knowledge of the three
things which have been already mentioned. It will require him to bring
to bear his knowledge of the law; his knowledge of the language and his
knowledge of the legislation. This stage of creation is the most fascinating.
The draftsman is basically an architect in words. He is basically the creator
of a linguistic specimen which reflects the proposed law and that linguistic
specimen, reflecting the law, must harmonise with the Constitution and the
existing law. Here is a reservoir from which the draftsman has to draw
his material. English is a rich language. It is a storehouse of words,
verbs, adverbs and adjectives. Similarly, legislative usage has also got a
very profuse variety of formulas. There are so many avenues. All this
comes in handy at the third stage, which is the creative stage, and that
is why one finds it the most interesting stage.
Of course, the draft so prepared is not the final draft. Having employed
his creative faculty to the maximum, the draftsman has created something
which at least looks like a legislative draft. He will then start striking out
a word here and there and re-arranging the words. It can be called the
technical stage. It is a kind of revision. It is a necessary part of the draf-
ting process. In fact, it is to this stage that the draftsman should devote
his maximum time. For various reasons, this does not happen, but that
should be the goal. The draftsman should always try to "sleep over" his
earlier draft. This means, that if he has completed a rough draft of an
important part of the Bill today, then he should leave it aside for tomorrow,
and may re-write it tomorrow. In 90 per cent of the cases, he is found
to get some new ideas, at the second sitting. He will see that some words
which he had selected in the beginning, can be improved upon. Or he may
see some ambiguity in a particular phrase.
XV Avoiding ambiguity
not geniuses; we cannot see the entire picture of reality or its totality at
one go. But we can weigh things at our leisure. The draftsman often
consults his colleagues, not worrying about protocol. Sometimes lay persons
can also make good suggestions. Those who are in the legal profession or
always engaged in law making, may forget the layman's angle. The layman
can often infuse a breath of fresh air. Harold Laski used to say that the
vision of the expert tends to become limited and may need the corrective
of lay person's approach.