Professional Documents
Culture Documents
d) Issues of human development – nature v/s nurture, goodness and badness, activity
Human development is the scientific study of processes of change and stability throughout
the human life span.
Life span development is the concept of development as a lifelong process, which can be
studied scientifically.
From the moment of conception, human beings undergo processes of development. The field
of human development is the scientific study of those processes.
Since the early nineteenth century, efforts to understand children’s development have
gradually expanded to include the whole life span.
Early Approaches to the scientific study of development were baby biographies, journals kept
to record the early development of a child.
It was Charles Darwin, originator of the theory of evolution, who first emphasized the
developmental nature of infant behavior. By the end of the nineteenth century, several
important trends in the western world were preparing the way for the scientific study of
development. Scientists had unlocked the mystery of conception and were arguing about the
relative importance of “nature” and “nurture” (inborn characteristics and the influence of
experience).
As the field of human development became a scientific discipline, its goals evolved to
include description, explanation, prediction and modification of behaviour.
These four goals work together, as we can see by looking at language development. For
example, to describe when most normal children say their first word or how large their
vocabulary typically is at a certain age, developmental scientists observe large groups of
children and establish norms, or averages, for behavior at various ages. They then attempt to
explain what causes or influences the observed behaviour-'for example, how children acquire
and learn to use language. This knowledge may make it possible to predictwhat language
ability at a given age can tell about later behaviour. Finally, awareness of how language
develops may be used to modify behaviour.
The questions that developmental scientists seek to answer, the methods they use, and the
explanations they propose are not the same today as they were even twenty-five years ago.
These shifts reflect progress in understanding, as new investigations build on or challenge
earlier ones. They also reflect advances in technology and changes in cultural attitudes.
1. Physical Development
It is the growth of body and brain and change or stability in sensory capacities, motor
skills and health.
For example, a child with frequent ear infections may develop language more slowly
than a child without this problem.
During puberty, dramatic physical and hormonal changes affect the developing sense
of self. And, in some older adults, physical changes in the brain may lead to
intellectual and personality deterioration.
2. Cognitive Development
It is the change or stability in mental abilities, such as learning, attention, memory,
language, thinking, reasoning and creativity.
Cognitiveadvancesare closely related to physical and emotional growth. The ability to
speak depends on the physical development of the mouth and brain. A child who has
difficulty expressing themselves in words may evoke negative reactions in others,
influencing their popularity or self-worth.
3. Psychosocial Development
4. Moral Development
Moral development is the process through which individuals develop proper attitudes
and behaviors toward other people in society, based on social and cultural norms,
rules, and laws.Moral development focuses on the emergence, change, and
understanding of morality from infancy through adulthood.
Paul B. Baltes and his colleagues (1987) have identified six key principles of the life-span
developmental approach. Together these principles serve as a widely accepted conceptual
framework for thestudy of life-span development:
1. Development is lifelong.
Development is a lifelong process of change in the ability to adapt to the situations one
selects, or in which one finds oneself. Each period has its own unique characteristics and
value; none is more 'or less important than any other. Although it was once widely believed
that development stops at adolescence, we now know that even very old people can grow.
The experience of dying can be a final attempt to come to terms with one’s life.
3. Relative influence of biology and culture shift over the life span
The process ofdevelopment is influenced by both biology and culture, and the balance
between these influences changes over time. Biological influences, such as sensory accuracy,
muscular strength and coordination become weaker as aperson gets older, but cultural
supports, such as education, relationships, and technologically age-friendly environments,
may help compensate.
4. Development involves a changing allocation of resources
Individuals choose to “invest” their resources such as time, energy, talent money, and
social support in varying ways.
Resources may be used for three purposes:
(a) growth (for example, learning to play an instrument or improving one’sskill),
(b) maintenance or recovery (practicing to maintain or regain proficiency), and
(c) dealing with loss when maintenance and recovery are not possible.
The allocation of resources to these three functions changes throughout life as the total
available pool of resources decreases. In childhood and youngadulthood, the bulk of
resources typically goes to growth; in old age, to regulation of loss. In midlife, the
allocation is more evenly balanced among thethree functions.
5. Development is modifiable
Throughout life, development shows plasticity. Manyabilities, such as memory, strength,
and endurance, can be significantly improved with training and practice, even late in life.
However, the potential for change has its limits.
There are a number of important issues that have been debated throughout the history of
developmental psychology. The major questions include the following:
In the middle was English philosopher John Locke (1632-1704), who maintained that
infants are tabulaerasae, or “blank slates,” waiting to be written on by their
experiences. That is, children were neither innately good nor innately bad but could
develop in any direction depending on their experiences.
2. Nature-Nurture
The nature versus nurture debate involves the extent to which aspects of human
development is a result of either nature or nurture. The nature refers to the inherited
(i.e., genetic) influence and nurture refers to the acquired (i.e., learned) influences.
The nature-nurture issue is the most important and most complex issue in the study of
human development. Strong believers in nature stress the importance of individual
genetic and biological makeup. They are likely to claim that all normal children
achieve the same developmental milestones at similar times because of maturation.
By contrast, strong believers in nurture (like Locke, who claimed experience shapes
development) would emphasize environment or the range of influences outside the
person. Nurture includes influences of the physical environment (crowding, pollution,
and the like) as well as the social environment (for example, learning experiences,
child-tearing methods, peers, societal trends, and the cultural context in which the
person develops).
3. Activity-Passivity
The activity-passivity issue focuses on the extent to which human beings are active in
creating and influencing their own environments during the process of their
development or are passively shaped by forces beyond their control. Some theorists
believe that humans are curious, active creatures who plan their own development by
exploring the world around them and shaping their environments.
Other theorists view humans as passive beings shaped largely by forces beyond their
controlusually environmental influences but possibly strong biological forces.
4. Continuity-Discontinuity
One aspect of the continuity-discontinuity issue focuses on whether the changes
people undergo over the life span are gradual or sudden. Continuity theorists view
human development as a process that occurs in small steps, without sudden change. In
contrast, discontinuity theorists tend to view the course of development as more like a
series of huge steps, each of which causes a huge change in the individual.
5. Universality-Context Specificity
Finally, developmental theorists often disagree on the universality and context
specificity issue. Theorists who believe in universality suggests that the
developmental changes are common to all humans across different cultures. For
example between 6 and 9 months, babies babble in syllables and start imitating tones
and speech sounds and this is same throughout the world. In contrast, theorists who
agree to context specificity believe that human development is different for different
cultures. The stages of development followed in one culture may be different from the
other culture.
Overview of theories of Human Development
Human development is complex. It is multidimensional, multidirectional, contextual,
and in many ways, quite particular to each individual. These characteristics make it
difficult to study and challenging to know accurately.
Since human development is complex, there is a need for multiple perspectives and
theories. Theories provide a structure for the study of human development. Some of
the theories of human development are:
1. Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development
2. Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
3. Lawrence Kohlberg’s theory of moral development
The infant knows the world through their movements and sensations. Children learn
about the world through basic actions such as sucking, grasping, looking, and
listening. Infants learn that things continue to exist even though they cannot be seen
(object permanence).
Children begin to think symbolically and learn to use words and pictures to represent
objects. Children at this stage tend to be egocentric and struggle to see things from the
perspective of others. While they are getting better with language and thinking, they
still tend to think about things in very concrete terms. Children become much more
skilled at pretend play during this stage of development, yet continue to think
concretely about the world around them. Children at this stage will still struggle with
logic and understanding the point of view of other people i.e., they are egocentric.
They also often struggle with understanding of law of conservation.
During this stage, children begin to thinking logically about concrete events. They
begin to understand the concept of conservation. Their thinking becomes more logical
and organised. Children begin to use inductive reasoning, a logical process in which
multiple informations are combined to obtain a generalised conclusion. The
egocentrism of the previous stage begins to disappear as kids become better at
thinking about how other people might view a situation. During this stage, children
also become less egocentric and begin to think about how other people might think
and feel. Kids in the concrete operational stage also begin to understand that their
thoughts are unique to them and that not everyone else necessarily shares their
thoughts, feelings, and opinions.
At this stage, the adolescent or young adult begins to think abstractly and reason
about hypothetical problems. Teens during this stage begin to think more about moral,
philosophical, ethical, and social issues that require theoretical and abstract reasoning.
The adolescent begins to use deductive reasoning at this stage, it is a logical process
in which from one or more information to reach the children learn to come to a logical
specific conclusion. The ability to plan for future and reason about hypothetical or
abstract situations are the other important abilities the emerge during this stage.
Stage 1: Obedience-and-Punishment Orientation
It focuses on the child’s desire to obey rules and avoid being punished. For example,
an action is perceived as morally wrong because the child is punished; the worse the
punishment for the act is, the more “bad” the act is perceived to be.
This stage involves a limited interest in the needs of others, only to the point where it
might add to the individual’s own interests. Therefore concern for others is not based
on loyalty or fundamental respect, but rather a ‘you help me and I will help you’
mentality. An example would be when a child is asked by his parents to do some
work. The child asks “what’s will I get if I do it?”.
Throughout the conventional level, a child’s sense of morality is tied to personal and
societal relationships. Children continue to accept the rules of authority figures, but
this is now due to their belief that this is necessary to ensure positive relationships and
societal order. Adherence to rules and conventions is somewhat rigid during these
stages, and a rule’s appropriateness or fairness is rarely questioned.
In stage 3, children want the approval of others and act in ways to avoid disapproval.
Emphasis is placed on good behavior and people being “nice” to others.
In stage 4, the child blindly accepts rules and convention because of their importance
in maintaining a functioning society. Rules are seen as being the same for everyone,
and obeying rules by doing what one is “supposed” to do is seen as valuable and
important. Here morality is still predominantly dictated by an outside force.
In stage 5, the world is viewed as having different opinions, rights, and values. And
these difference in opinions are mutually respected as unique to each person or
community. Laws are regarded as social contracts rather than rigid laws. Laws that do
not promote the general welfare should be changed when necessary to meet the
greatest good for the greatest number of people. This is achieved through majority
decision and inevitable compromise.
In stage 6, moral reasoning is abstract rather than concrete and focus on ideas such as
equality, dignity, or respect. Laws are valid only insofar as they are grounded in
justice, and a commitment to justice carries with it an obligation to disobey unjust
laws. People choose the ethical principles they want to follow, and if they violate
those principles, they feel guilty. In this way, the individual acts because it is morally
right to do so (and not because he or she wants to avoid punishment), it is in their best
interest, it is expected, it is legal, or it is previously agreed upon.