Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scholar articles The road to structural codes: the process and the Criteria adopted in the development of
Saudi Structural codes *
A Shuraim, A Al-Negheimish, K Al-Sheref, S Alsayed… - Saudi Engineering Conference
Related articles - All 4 versions
THE ROAD TO STRUCTURAL CODES: THE PROCESS AND THE
CRITERIA ADOPTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAUDI
STRUCTURAL CODES
ABSTRACT
The paper discusses the development of the structural parts of the Saudi Building Code
from the perspective of the structural technical committee (STC). It describes the main
events, defines the criteria adopted to produce rational and applicable codes that are
appropriate for the kingdom. The structural committee has produced the following
structural codes: SBC 301 “Design Loads for Buildings and Structures”; SBC 302
“Structural Tests and Inspections”; SBC 303 “Soils and Foundations”; SBC 304
“Concrete Structures”; SBC 305 “Masonry Construction”; and SBC 306 “Steel
Structures”. In the development of these codes, source international codes have been
chosen to constitute the framework upon which major modifications have been
implemented. The paper documents various aspects of the process including challenges
encountered and criteria involved in the development of the six structural codes.
Documentation of the process is significant for understanding the codes and for the
future modifications needed to keep these codes up-to-date.
INTRODUCTION
The evolution of codes in developed countries, such as USA, has progressed slowly
over many decades. The first concrete building code appeared in 1910 by ACI [1], and
the first enacted model code was the uniform building code in 1927[2]. Over the
decades, many changes, additions, and new codes have emerged reflecting the
In the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the process of code development took different path. It
seems logical to develop a building code over a short period of time to follow up with
the fast progress in the construction industry where thousands of infrastructures are to
be built. The royal directive of 2002 has set the path to develop a Saudi building code
on the basis of comprehensive international codes such as IBC, EC and NBC along
with Arab codes and local research and studies in the kingdom. For carrying out this
objective, the National Committee of the Saudi Building Code (NCSBC) was formed,
in accordance with the royal directive.
Under the auspice of the NCSBC, the code consultative committee (CCSBC) was
formed, which is composed of some members of NCSBC in addition to nominated
chairmen of the proposed technical code committees. The first formal meeting of
CCSBC was held on Jan 13, 2003 where a work methodology and technical committee
formation criteria were agreed upon. The technical code committees are:
administrative, architectural, structural, plumbing, electrical, mechanical, fire-resistant,
and seismic requirements. The framework of the various code committees is shown in
Figure 1.
This paper addresses the structural parts of Saudi Building Code from the perspective
of the structural technical committee (STC). It highlights some aspects of the process
including challenges encountered and criteria involved in the development of the six
structural codes. The paper also points to some of the steps that may enhance the
successful applicability of the code. It is believed that such documentation can play a
significant role in understanding the codes and in the future modifications needed to
keep these codes up-to-date.
GENERAL METHODOLOGY
The general methodology adopted by the national committee for the Saudi Building
Code (NCSBC) requires each of the technical committees to perform the following
tasks:
The source code mentioned in the NCSBC directive was identified as the set of codes
published by The International Code Council (ICC)[3]. The ICC was established in
1994 as a nonprofit organization dedicated to developing a single set of comprehensive
and coordinated model construction codes. The founders of the ICC are: 1) Building
Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc. (BOCA); 2) International
Conference of Building Officials (ICBO)[4]; and 3) Southern Building Code Congress
International, Inc. (SBCCI). Since the early part of the last century, these nonprofit
organizations developed the three separate sets of model codes used throughout the
United States.
The ICC issues about fourteen codes as shown in Figure 3, one of them is the
international building code (IBC) which has been considered as the default source code,
where its contents have been distributed among the various technical committees.
However, during the initial stage neither the ACI-318[5] nor the ASCE-7[6] was
considered as part of the source code. Upon reviewing the IBC, eight chapters have
been identified to have structural contents and were assigned to STC. Some of the ICC
codes such as International Mechanical Code and International Plumbing Code are
During the evaluation stage, the STC has divided the eight chapters of IBC among
themselves, and agreed on a methodology and criteria for the thorough reviewing
process. Tasks and Time table were defined as shown in Figure 4 where the time span
for this assignment began on April 2003 and planned to be completed by September
2003 in order to present its finding to a code workshop. The criteria considered at that
stage are the following:
ASCE-7:
ACI-318 (one of the 532 referenced codes and
(one of the 532 referenced codes and standards by IBC)
standards by IBC) Has 10 chapters, 2 appendices, and 130
contains 22 chapters, 6 appendices, and Consensus Standards. The consensus
more than 90 Referenced codes and standards are to be considered part of the
standards which are declared to be part of requirements
this code as if fully set forth herein
Figure 3: ICC codes and relationships with other codes and standards.
Seismic provisions of the source codes are very complex and play major influence on
the provisions of design, construction and quality control. In contrast to the high
seismicity of USA, the Kingdom has only low to moderate seismicity. Keeping the high
seismicity provisions was judged by the STC to be counterproductive for the goal of
applicability because engineers and building official will be required to master these
provisions though they may not be needed in the foreseen future as indicated by local
studies. Accordingly, STC has decided to remove any provisions related to seismic
categories E and F. Similarly, STC has decided to simplify wind provisions to reflect
the conditions of the Kingdom.
Prevalent foundation systems in the IBC are pile foundations while in the kingdom
single, combined, and mat foundations are more widely used. Accordingly, STC has
concluded that more provisions are to be added to address the latter systems while
minimizing some of the provisions of the former, especially those related to wood
construction.
Slab systems for single dwelling units are usually follow irregular layouts, making the
design procedures described by the source code inapplicable in a great number of cases.
This problem was marked by the STC. Therefore, the committee has decided to identify
these issues in the reviewing process for the sake of deleting, modifying or adding.
Vc = ⎜⎜1 + ⎟⎟
⎝ βc ⎠ 6
Here 1.7 is a power not a
multiplier
R = (Rn0.59 + pl)1.7
The interdependency of codes makes that code insufficient for design purpose unless
the referenced code or standard is present. Consider Table 4 with respect to steel
design. Section 2205.1 merely cites AISC-LRFD, AISC 335 or AISC-HSS. Therefore,
STC has prepared presentations on each of the topics, represented by the eight chapters
of IBC (16-23). Findings on each topic were summarized in a systematic way. Figure 5
shows the STC main sheet as presented in the workshop, comprising the scope,
divisions, criteria, and workshop outputs. The criteria are summarized as: 1) scientific
basis; 2) compact not voluminous; 3) relevant to national/local issues; 4) simplified
without unwarranted complexity; and 5) minimum shortcomings and deficiencies.
These criteria aims at achieving the main STC objective entitled “towards rational and
applicable codes”. A sample of the prepared form, as presented in the workshop, for
one of the topics is presented in Figure 6, while other samples are presented in the
appendix Figure 9 through Figure 11. A typical form is composed of five items:
1. Code documents: the IBC chapter as well as other referenced codes and
standards.
2. Subdivisions: the major parts comprising the topic.
1. Specialized code for each major division (loading, concrete, soils, steel,
masonry).
2. Codes should have commentaries.
3. The importance of avoiding complexity and irrelevant materials.
4. The need to add topics of great importance to the kingdom when not available
in the source code.
5. The need to remove topics that have no probable use in the kingdom, such as
wood construction.
6. The need to develop a code for small residential buildings.
7. The importance of inspections and quality control
Other benefits
SCOPE/ of having an
Divisions applicable Code Criteria for
PURPOSE
developing an
applicable code
minimum standards Extending life of
for SAFETY ; structures
Reinforced Loading and
SERVICEABILITY; forces Output of
Concrete Scientific bases
ECONOMY
workshop
Allowing for
realistic value
by engineering
Steel Masonry
Compact not
Major problems that
voluminous
regulating and controlling the Minimizing hinder applicability
engineering/
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, construction
QUALITY of materials, Aluminum wood disputes
Relevant to
national/ local
issues Proposals for
for
enhancing applicability
Soils and Testing and
Foundations inspection Simplified without
all buildings and structures
unwarranted
complexity
Needed research
under and data
Minimum
shortcomings
the influence of gravity and environmental loading and deficiencies
including: WIND LOADS ; SEISMIC LOADS.
100%
80%
Axis Title
60%
40%
20%
0%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
Disapprove 39% 0% 21% 18% 32% 7% 4%
Approve 61% 100% 79% 82% 68% 93% 96%
Immediately after the first workshop, STC drafted proposals for structural codes
naming source code for each proposed code. Summary of the proposed codes are
shown in Table 6 and Figure 8. The STC submitted a detailed report to NCSBC
showing justifications, contents, and proposed additional workgroups for the
development. A presentation was made to the general meeting of the NCSBC, about
two months after the workshop as shown earlier in the timeline. The fundamental
element of the report, as shown in Table 6, is the development of specialized codes for
concrete, steel, soils and foundations, loading, and masonry. The proposal requires that
additional members should join to form workgroup for each topic.
The NCSBC has accepted the proposal, and approved the formation of six workgroups
that are composed of members from STC in addition to the new members. The
workgroups have begun their assignments in mid-march 2004. The STC members and
workgroup names and their workgroup participations are summarized in Table 13.
STRUCTURAL
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
Based on chapter
Based on chapter 18 of Soils and Foundations Reinforced concrete 19 of IBC,
IBC, and a number of Workgroup Workgroup ACI-318 and other
codes and standards SBC 303 SBC 304 ACI standards
Steel
Based on chapter 17
Based on chapter 22 of workgroup Testing and inspections of IBC and other
IBC and on AISC-LRFD SBC 306 Workgroup standards
SBC 302
Masonry
Design loads Based on chapter 16
Workgroup of IBC,and ASCE-7-
Based on chapter 21 of workgroup
SBC 305 02
IBC,and ACI-530-02 SBC 301
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The Royal directive of 2002 represents a milestone in the evolution of the Saudi
Building Code. Many lessons have been learned from this experience, where
international codes and regulations are utilized for developing national codes and
standards. Through proper criteria and thorough knowledge of both the international
codes and local conditions, developers can identify differences and shortcomings and
propose solutions. STC has demonstrated the foregoing challenging task, in identifying
a number of differences, detecting and fixing some errors and making significant
changes in source codes in order to bring about rational and applicable codes.
The challenges reported in this paper do not necessarily constitute a complete list, but
they represent general categories. The fact that errors were detected in the original
source codes makes it natural to expect that some errors may not have been detected
and even some errors could have been generated. Shortcomings in codes are not
necessarily numerical errors; they can be confusing statements and complex provisions
that can be misinterpreted. Wrong references to sections, tables and equations can have
serious implications if not detected by well-qualified engineer; moreover, referenced
codes and standards that are not available to the engineer may diminish the value of the
code.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank the NCSBC, particularly its former chairman Dr.
Khalid Al-Khalaf and its current chairman Engr. Mohammed Al-Nagadi, and the
chairman of the consultative committee Engr. Ali Al-Zaid, and the general secretary of
the code Dr. Mohammed Ben Hussain. Without their encouragements, supports and
appreciations our work may not have been accomplished. Special thanks to all STC
members and workgroup members for their excellent work and sincere efforts.
REFERENCES
1. American concrete institute, “ACI: A Century Of Progress” special publication,
2003 123 pp.
2. Berg, G.V. “Elements of structural dynamics.” Prentice Hall 1989, 267pp.
3. International Code Council, Inc., International Building Code, 2003.
4. ICBO, et al. “Uniform Building Code (UBC),” by International Conference of
Building Officials (ICBO), Whittier, California; 1997.
5. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and
Commentary (ACI 318-02/ACI 318R-02),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington
Hills, 369 pp, 2002.
6. American Society of Civil Engineers, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other
Structures, SEI/ASCE 7-02, Reston, Virginia, 2002.
Output/ Major
Findings
Code
Documents Subdivisions
Needed research
and data
Problems Proposals
Foundations and
soils investigations
Irrelevant seismic
provisions Shortened and reduced Data-base on dynamic
Pier and pile coverage of pile foundations parameters for soil
foundations formations in West Coast
(Gizan, Jeddah, Tabuk)
Output/ Major
Findings
Code
Subdivisions
Documents Needed research
Problems Proposals
and data
Material properties
Major modifications
to the durability
Inadequate provisions for requirements
local severe environment Durability issues
Quality control
Modify other
IBC Chapter 19 provisions to account
ACI 318
for local conditions
ASTM Construction Hot weather
Other ACI requirements Questionable applicability of
Committes code provisions due to concreting
Irregularity of locally
prevalent structural system Remove irrelevant
Structural systems seismic provisions
Improving the
Compliance of material regularity of Locally
Special properties with ASTM Simplified provisions used Structural
requirements
Standards for residential systems
buildings
Output/ Major
Code Findings
Subdivisions
Documents
Figure 11: Summary of major findings regarding Structural Tests and Inspections as
presented at the first workshop
man
2 Prof. Saleh H. Alsayed KSU M CH
3 Dr. Faisal A. Al-Mashary KSU M CH
4 Prof. Magdy K. Moustafa MMRA M CH M
5 Dr. Nabeel S. Al-Gahtani SWCC M CH
6 Dr. Abdulaziz I. Al-Negheimish KSU M M M
7 Dr. Mosleh A. Al-Shamrani KSU M CH
8 Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi KFUPM M M
9 Dr. Yousef A. Al-Salloum KSU M M
10 Eng. Khaled M. Al-Sheref Aramco M M M
11 Dr. Abdulsalam A. Alshogeir KSU M M
12 Major Eng. Hani H. Alnabulsi MOI-DCD M M
13 Eng. Faisal O. Binsiddiq RCJ &Y M
14 Dr. Ahmad O. AlQasabi KSU M M
1 Dr. Rajeh Z. Al-Zaid KSU M
2 Dr. Mohammed S. Al-Haddad KSU M
3 Dr. Ali Al-Ghadib KFUPM M
4 Dr. Saleh Al-Deghaiter KSU M
SBC 301
King Saud University (KSU), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) ; King Faisal University
(KFU); King Abdulaziz University (KAU); Umm Al-Qura University (UAQU); Ministry of Municipal and Rural
Affairs (MMRA,: Royal commission for Jubail and Yanbu (RCJ &Y); Riyadh Municiplity (RM); Rashid Geotechnical
and Material Engineers( RG&ME); Nizar Kurdi Consulting Engineers(NKCE): Arriyadh Development Authority (ADA)
Ministry of Education (MOE) ; Saudi Oger Ltd.SOLtd.; ZSI: Zamil Steel Industries; Ministry of Interior – Directorate of Civil
Defense (MOI-DCD); Saudi Geological Survey( SGS) ; National Consultants (NC); Saline Water Conversion Corporation
(SWCC)