You are on page 1of 2

Exam Roll No.

Please write your Exam Roll No.)

END TERM EXAMINATIONN


FIRST SEMESTER [LLB] NoVEMBER-DECEMBER 2019 ContractI
Paper Code: LLB 103 Subject: Law of
(Batch: 2014 Onwards)
Maximum Marks: 75
Time: 3 Hours
from each untt of
all questions from part A. Select one question
Note Attempt relevant provisions
and case laws.
B.
urt Support your answers with

PART-A
(5x5-25)
Q.1. Write short notes on the following:
a. Standard form of contract.
b. Ratification of minor's agreement.
. Wagenng agreements
Anticipatory breach
Penalty
PART-B

UNIT-I
considered to
Q.2 what are the essentials of valid acceptance? When is acceptance
be revoked? Discuss in light of postal and online communication. (12.5)

answer
Q.3. Define What
proposal. are the different kinds of offer? Support your
with relevant case laws.
(12.5)

UNIT-II
Is Past Consideration a valid
Q.4. Explain the essentials of Consideration.
consideration? Support with the help of statutory provisions. (12.5)

to contract? the nature of minor's agreement in


Explain
Q.5. Who are competent
Bibee Dharmodas Ghose Case. (12.5)
light of Mohori v.

UNIT-II
A' sells by
Q.6. Define and differentiate between 'Fraud' and Misrepresentation'.
unsound. A says nothing to 'B'
auction to B' a horse which 'A' knows to be
about horse's unsoundness. Decide the liability
of 'A'. (12.5)

What the grounds for Frustration of contract'? Mr. Sudhakar entered into
Q.7. are
contract to serve as a manager for 10 years and not to serve any professional
A broke out and he was called up
engagement without employer's consent.
war
and was
for military services. After war, he undertook professional engagement
sued by employer. Explain whether frustration of contract has occured? If yes,
when and If no, why not? (12.5)

UNIT-IV
order
Anjala's retirement was due at the age of 55. She obtained staybeyond
a
Q.8. Mrs.
contending that she was entitled upto 60 yrs. and remained in services
55 yTs. before the matter was decided against her. Is she entitled for monetary
of certain relations
benefits for overlapping periods? Discuss in light
resembling those created by contract. (12.5)

Q.9 Explain the rules on damages as laid down in case of Hadley v. Baxendale. (12.5)
******
Plase write your Kxam Roll
No.) Exam Roll No.
END TERM EXAMINATION
FIRST SEMESTER [LLB]
Paper Code: LLB-103 NovEMBeR-DECEMBER-2018
Subject: Law of Contract
TNme 3 Hours (Batch-2014 Onwards)
vote:
Maximum Marks:75
Attempt all questions from Part A. Attempt one question Jrom edch
unit of Part B.

PART-A

Write short notes the (5x5- 25)


on
following.-
Mistake
Counter offer
Online Contracts
(d Quantum Merit
(e) Privity of Consideration

PART-B
UNIT-I
2 What are the essentials of Proposal mentioned in Indian Contract Act, 1872?
How is otfer different from invitation to offer? Support your answer with relevant
case laws. (12.5)
Q3 *Acceptance is to an offer what a lighted match is to a train of gun powder. It
produces something which can not be recalled or undone. But the powder may
have laid till it has become damp or the man who laid the train may remove it
before the match is applied". Explain this statemernt with help of judiciai
decisionas (12.5)
UNIT-II
04 "An agreement without consideration is void". Discuss the exceptions to this
rule. (12.5)
What is the law relating to minor's agreement? Aman, a minor borrowed Rs.
Q5
50,000/ from Ankit on a fraudulent representation that he is a major. Aman
spent the whole amount in a tour to South India. Decide the liability of Aman.
(12.5)
UNIT-III
What do you mean by Fraud' in Indian Contract Act, 1872? How is fraud
Q6 different from misrepresentation? Whether silence can amount to fraud? (12.5)

Discuss the doctrine of frustration. Discuss the instances of frustration of


Q7
contract. Also, what are the instances in which contract is not held to be
(12.5)
frustrated?
UNIT-V
the
Q8 Kiran, a goods at Bimal's house by mnistake. Bimal treats
tradesman leaves
goods as his own. Decide the liability of Bimal. Dicuss the statutory prov1S1Os
(12.5)
on Unjust Enrichment.

Discuss the principle on damages laid down in Hadley V.Baxendale case wt


Q9 (12.5)
the help of statutory provisions.

You might also like