Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5. Oliver, E. C. et al. Nature Commun. 9, 1324 10. Di Lorenzo, E. & Mantua, N. Nature Clim. Change 6,
(2018). 1042–1047 (2016).
6. Frölicher, T. L., Fischer, E. M. & Gruber, N. Nature 11. Alexander M. A. et al. Elementa 6, 9 (2018).
560, 360–364 (2018). 12. Pinsky, M. L., Worm, B., Fogarty, M. J.,
7. Oliver, E. C. J. Clim. Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/ Sarmiento, J. L. & Levin, S. A. Science 341,
s00382-019-04707-2 (2019). 1239–1242 (2013).
8. Yeh, S.-W. et al. Nature 461, 511–514 (2009). 13. Connell, J. H., Hughes, T. P. & Wallace, C. C. Ecol.
9. Cai, W. et al. Nature Clim. Change 4, 111–116 (2014). Monogr. 67, 461–488 (1997).
T
he origin and early dispersal of comparative analysis indicates that this fossil the Apollo 12 astronauts … will be
Homo sapiens has long been a subject is an early member of H. sapiens. The poste- instructed to look out for will depend
of both popular and scholarly interest1. rior part of the cranium is rounded like that on the first-hand descriptions of
It is almost universally agreed that H. sapiens of H. sapiens, and it lacks classic Neander- the surface radioed by Armstrong
(modern humans) evolved in Africa, with the thal features, such as the distinctive occipital and Aldrin on Monday morning
earliest known fossil representatives of our ‘chignon’ — a bulge at the back of the skull that (BST) and on preliminary analyses
species dated to around 315,000 years ago in is shaped like hair tied in a bun. of the samples … Armstrong’s first
Morocco (at a site called Jebel Irhoud)2 and Earlier dating8 of a fragment of Apidima 2 description that “the surface appears
approximately 260,000 years ago in South using a method called uranium-series anal- to be very finely grained as you get
Africa (at Florisbad)3. Stone tools comparable ysis indicated a minimum age of around close to it, it’s almost like powder”
to those found with both of these fossils have 160,000 years. Harvati and colleagues report matches the Surveyor results
been excavated in Kenya (at Olorgesailie)4 and a more extensive set of uranium-series dating which point to a matrix made up of
dated to about 320,000 years ago. On page 500, analyses, which surprisingly reveal that Api- finely divided particles sometimes
Harvati et al.5 describe their analysis of a fossil dima 1 and Apidima 2 are of different ages, aggregated in lumps.
from Apidima Cave in southern Greece that even though they were found in close proxim- From Nature 26 July 1969
they report to be an early modern H. sapiens ity. Apidima 2 is around 170,000 years old —
at least 210,000 years old. This fossil is the well within the age range of other Neanderthal
oldest known modern human in Europe, and
probably in all of Eurasia, and is more than
160,000 years older than the next oldest known
fossils found across Europe (Fig. 1). Apidima 1
is dated to be at least 210,000 years old, which
is much older than any other widely accepted
100 Years Ago
European fossil of H. sapiens6. H. sapiens fossils found outside Africa. The possibility of growing New
The Apidima Cave complex was excavated This finding reveals that at least two species Zealand flax (Phormium tenax)
in the late 1970s. Two partial crania (skulls of hominin (humans and human relatives from on a commercial scale in the
without the lower jaw), named Apidima 1 and the branch of the family tree after our split British Isles has for many years
Apidima 2, were recovered in a single block from chimpanzees) inhabited southeastern been under consideration, and the
of a type of rock called breccia. Neither fossil Europe approximately 200,000 years ago. The publication of an important paper
was previously described in detail. Apidima 2 discovery of an H. sapiens fossil in Apidima on the subject … is of considerable
includes the facial region of the skull and had raises questions about what happened to this interest… The article, which mainly
been identified as a Neanderthal7. Apidima 1 population. Given that this H. sapiens existed consists of an account of Lord
consists of only the back of the skull and had at a time when there is substantial evidence Ventry’s successful experiments in
not been previously allocated definitively to a for a Neanderthal presence at other Euro- co. Kerry, is illustrated by several
species. Harvati and colleagues used computed pean sites, was it part of a population that was photographs of New Zealand flax
tomography to scan the fossils, and generated unable to compete successfully with Neander under cultivation in Ireland showing
a 3D virtual reconstruction of each specimen. thals, especially in the unstable climate of that a remarkably vigorous growth … It
They analysed each fossil to assess aspects of time? Perhaps one or more times, the two spe- is pointed out in the article that only
its shape, and thus to determine the fossils’ cies replaced each other as the main hominin certain parts of the United Kingdom
similarity to those of other species. group present in this region. are suitable for the growth of New
Apidima 2 is badly damaged owing to Such patterns of replacement characterize Zealand flax … but as the results so
previous breakage and distortion. Analyses the distribution of modern humans and far obtained are promising, it is to
of all four generated reconstructions of the Neanderthals in the Levant region of the be hoped that every encouragement
fossil were consistent with it being an early Middle East between 250,000 and 40,000 years will be given to the enterprise.
Neanderthal. Apidima 1 is also damaged, ago. Homo sapiens replaced Neanderthals From Nature 24 July 1919
but the specimen is not too badly distorted, across Europe between approximately 45,000
2 5 J U LY 2 0 1 9 | V O L 5 7 1 | N AT U R E | 4 8 7
©
2
0
1
9
S
p
r
i
n
g
e
r
N
a
t
u
r
e
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
.
A
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
RESEARCH NEWS & VIEWS
4 8 8 | N AT U R E | V O L 5 7 1 | 2 5 J U LY 2 0 1 9
©
2
0
1
9
S
p
r
i
n
g
e
r
N
a
t
u
r
e
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
.
A
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.