Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ITS
15.61
38.86
241.98
100.24
1
342.22
Ka 13.50%
L 57.72%
Kd 8.81%
T 34.00%
K* 11.70%
Given
Given
Given
Given
Given
Given
Given
Inventories
Given
Given
Given
Asset Sales
Given
Given
Given
18.51
Old Growth 2% 2.00%
New Growth 5% 5.00%
Unleveraged Rate 13.50%
se ?
Year 0 WACC
7.50%
8%
9.50%
9% Varying WACC.. since the debt goes on reducing.... the its would als
too takes the higher WaCC..
g 5%
4
125.4855
119.85
2
Year 0 WACC if you assume Kd as 9% or 9.5%
Source of funds
EBIT + 10% Debt: $ Amt % of funds
Tax Rate 34% 34.00% Revolving credit @ 7.5% $13 4.20%
Bank debt @ 8.0% 80 26.10%
Given Subordinated debt @ 9.5% 150 48.90%
Equity 64 20.80%
WC+Reduction Total funds 307 100.00%
CAPX+Sale
3
Where from re = 29.5%?
FCF Growth 5% 5.00% At D/E = 0 we have ra = 13.5%.
At D/E = 1 we have re = 18% = 13.5% + (13.5% - 9.0%) where 9
At D/E = 4 we have re = 13.5 + 4(13.5% - 9.5%) = 29.5% where
At D/E of 1.36 19.62
In 3.
Note the difference in Firm Value while you use first year WACC and
varying WACC
Specifically look at the change in terminal value
any day varying wacc is better
In 3.
Note the difference in Firm Value while you use first year WACC and
varying WACC
Specifically look at the change in terminal value
any day varying wacc is better
educing.... the its would also be lesser .. and the tv
or 9.5%