Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The most appropriate quality standard is one that is based on clinical need. Clinical need based on biological variability would, in general, have some of our
Unfortunately studies that define analytical performance in terms of clinical outcome assays performing at a minimum standard e.g. calcium and sodium while other
are few. An example is the setting of desirable performance for HbA1c based on assays generally exceed optimal standards e.g. triglyceride and most enzymes. We
DCCT trial requirements. would not want to set goals that are not generally achievable, neither would we want
to set goals that are significantly below what most laboratories can achieve.
Broad clinical need can be defined in two ways; A clinicians survey may give an idea Nevertheless we will be reviewing our allowable limits over the next couple of years
if what would be required clinically, however the process of collecting that to more clearly reflect what is desirable for the profession and ultimately for the need
information needs to be rigorous and may still be biased by the clinicians historical of our patients.
experience of laboratory performance. Another broad based clinical approach is to
have analytical precision that can generally reveal the typical variability in patients Table 1. Heirarchical listing of procedures available for the determination of
results. These biological variability requirements can further be defined as minimal, analytical quality.
desirable and optimal standards of analytical performance in terms of the ability to
LEVEL APPROACH PROCEDURE
track patients changesii.
I Specific Clinical Need Clinical Outcome Studies
The profession defined method, or a set of analytical standards defined by an group II Broad Clinical Need Biological Variation
of experts in the profession, is the way that this programs ‘Allowable Limits of Clinician Survey
Performance’ have been defined. They have been defined over the last decade or III Profession Defined Expert Committee
more with the assistance of the advisory and target setting committees that the IV Proficiency Testing EQA survey
program relies on. State of the art
Proficiency Testing approaches are different. They are based on setting the V Other Existing practice
standard in terms of the results from proficiency testing e.g. setting a minimum Publications
standard on what most laboratories are able to achieve, or an optimal standard on
the state of the art as measured within the program.
i
Kaplan L.A., “Determination and application f desirable analytical performance goals: the
Finally when none of the above information is available, a quality standard may be ISO/TC 212 approach.” Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999; 59: 479-482.
based on some other estimate of performance that has been recorded by a group or ii
Fraser C.G., “General Strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance
even an individual laboratory in a publication. characteristics.” Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999; 59: 487-490.
iii
Ricos C. et al “Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress.” Scand J
Therefore, the QAP’s Allowable Limits of Performance are a good approach,
Clin Lab Invest. 1999; 59: 491-500.
especially as clinical outcome studies are so few and far between. We have been
© RCPA-AACB Chemical Pathology Quality Assurance Programs Group – Page 30