Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://carlosFmartinez.com
General Test Information
Title of Test: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II).
Author: Aaron T. Beck, Robert A. Steer, and
Gregory K. Brown.
Publisher: The Psychological Corporation, 1996
(revision).
Time to administer test: about 5 to10 minutes.
General Test Information
BDI-II Complete Kit (Beck’s Institute)- Includes
Manual and 25 Record Forms.
Restrictions in Administration: “C Level”
qualification. Users must be licensed, certified or
have a doctoral degree in psychology or related
field.
Purpose and Nature of the Test
Type: individual or group.
Purpose: to assess the existence and severity of
symptoms of depression, not to diagnose.
Population: adults and adolescents 13 years of age and
older.
Population for which designated: it is intended to
assess the severity of depression in psychiatrically
diagnosed patients.
Nature of content: Verbal (21 questions) with
numerical score for each question.
Purpose and Nature of the Test (Cont..).
Types of Items: Clients choose statements to
describe themselves in terms of the following 21
areas: sadness, pessimism, past failure, loss of
pleasure, guilty feelings, punishment feelings, self-
dislike, self-criticalness, suicidal thoughts or
wishes, crying, agitation, loss of interest,
indecisiveness, worthlessness, loss of energy,
changes in sleeping pattern, irritability, changes in
appetite, concentration difficulty, tiredness or
fatigue, and loss of interest in sex.
Practical Evaluation
Qualitative features: the BDI-II addresses the
major components of clinical depression, both
the psychological and physiological symptoms,
and it certainly is portable!
21 (4%) Black
18 (4%) Asian
7 (1%) Hispanic
Technical Evaluation
Standardization sample
Student Sample:
120 college students from University of New
Brunswick in Canada
56% women
44% men
100% White
Technical Evaluation
Reliability: a one-week test-retest correlation
of .93 resulted from a study of 26 outpatients
who had been referred for depression and took
the BDI-II during their first and second
therapy sessions (Beck et al., 1996).
Technical Evaluation
Validity: One of the main objectives of this
new version of the BDI was to have it
conform more closely to the diagnostic
criteria for depression listed on the DSM-IV.
It has demonstrated strong evidence of
convergent validity (i.e. r= .71 with the
Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for
Depression – HRSD).
Cultural Evaluation
Not enough research on the psychometric
properties of the BDI-II among minority groups.
The standardization sample is not
demographically representative of the U.S.
population.
Minority populations were extremely under-
represented.
Cultural Evaluation
There is no information regarding
socioeconomic status or residential location of
test users.
Most tests are based on western (US) definitions
and cultural practices, so clinicians should be
cautious when using it.
I would use it since there are no culture-free
tests.
Comments
Strengths:
carlos@carlosFmartinez.com