Professional Documents
Culture Documents
QW-100.3 and QW-200.2, Procedure Qualification Record Time Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-04-10 BC04-601
QW-200.4, Combination of Welding Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-04-08 BC03-1770
QW-403.6, QW-451, and QW-401.3; Notch Toughness Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-04-04 BC03-1246
QW-403.9, Base Metal Thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-04-09 BC04-065
Interpretation: IX-04-04
Backgraound: A WPS is supported by three PQRs. Two PQRs are recorded on 12-mm and 28.5-mm
thick coupons using tensile, bend, and impact testing specimens. A third PQR was made using 5-mm thick
plate using the same welding parameters, but only impact specimens were tested.
Question (1): May these PQRs be combined to support a WPS for welding 2.5 mm through 57 mm
material requiring notch toughness testing?
Reply (1): No.
Question (2): May these three PQRs be combined to support welding base metal thicknesses of 4.8 mm
through 57 mm with or without notch toughness?
Reply (2): Yes.
Note: This interpretation originally appeared in Volume 54. The “WP” in Question (1) has been corrected
by Errata to read “WPS.”
Interpretation: IX-04-08
Question: A combination weld process PQR was qualified using the GTAW for the root pass, SMAW,
and SAW. May this PQR support a WPS for welding with only one or two of the processes shown on the PQR?
Reply: Yes, provided the following are met:
(a) The remaining essential, nonessential, and supplementary essential variables, when applicable, are
applied.
(b) The base metal and deposited weld metal thickness limits of QW-451 are applied.
Interpretation: IX-04-09
Question: An EGW procedure was qualified on 3⁄8-in. thick base material completing the weld joint in
one single pass. Is the WPS qualified to make a weld deposit greater than 1⁄2 in., in one pass, in base metal
greater than 1⁄2 in. in thickness?
Reply: No.
Interpretation: IX-04-10