Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P H Y S I C S
ELECTROSTATICS
INTRODUCTION TO ELECTROSTATICS
The word ‘electrostatics’ is an amalgamation of two words: electro and statics. Electro means that
it has something to do with electricity derived from electrons, and static means ‘not in motion’.
q
We know that the electric current (i) is defined as, i = , where q denotes the electric charge and
t
t denotes the time. This means that the charge flowing per unit time gives the electric current.
However, electrostatics deals with static charges and therefore, this formula can be kept aside for
some time.
Now, the question is: if moving charges are the cause of electric current, what possibly could
charges at rest do? To understand this in detail, let us have a look at the following phenomena:
1. If you rub amber (a fossilised resin that is used to make jewellery) with a cloth, the amber
attracts the pieces of dry leaves.
2. If you rub a glass rod with a silk cloth, the glass rod attracts the pieces of dry paper. If you rub
a plastic rod with a woolen cloth, the plastic rod also attracts the pieces of dry paper. Although
the different materials of the rod and the cloth are used, they show the same property.
It is time to look at phenomenon 2 in greater detail. It was mentioned that because of rubbing the
rod with the cloth, it got charged and the rod became capable of attracting the pieces of dry paper.
Because of this, the scientists called the charge in the first case of phenomenon 2 (the glass rod
and the silk cloth combination) by A and the charge in the second case of phenomenon 2 (the
plastic rod and the woolen cloth combination) by B. However, the question that arises is if both
the rods get charged by the same charge, why are they called by two different names, A and B? Is
there any chance to prove that both A and B are the same? To answer this question, the following
experiment is done.
Suppose that a glass rod and a plastic rod are charged individually by rubbing them with a silk cloth
and a woolen cloth, respectively, in such a way that the glass rod is able to attract 10 pieces of dry
paper and the plastic rod is also able to attract 10 pieces of dry paper. Hence, it is likely that when
02
these two rods are brought together, they should be able to attract 20 pieces of dry paper. On the
contrary, what is actually seen is that they do not attract any pieces of dry paper. This proves that
the effectiveness with which the rods were able to attract the dry papers gets nullified when the
rods are brought together. Hence, it can be concluded that charge A and charge B are opposite
to each other.
The following three phenomena are also seen from the experiment.
1. When two glass rods are charged by charge A and brought close to one another, they repel
each other.
hen two plastic rods are charged by charge B and brought close to one another, they repel
2. W
each other.
hen one glass rod is charged by charge A and one plastic rod is charged by charge B, and
3. W
they are brought close to one another, they attract each other.
From these observations, it can also be concluded that there are two types of charges and charges
of the same type repel each other, whereas charges of different types attract each other. Later,
these two kinds of charges were denoted by positive and negative charges.
Do you wonder why glass was rubbed with only silk cloth? Why not any other rod or any other cloth?
How does the rod get charged by rubbing it with a cloth? When two materials are rubbed, it seems
that the friction between the objects produces the charge. However, that is not the case. When
two objects come in contact, a transfer of charge occurs. Some materials attract negative charges
(electrons), while other materials cannot wait to lose the negative charges, thereby obtaining the
positive charges (protons).
Triboelectric series
Materials that attract charge and materials that want to lose charge are listed in a series known as
the triboelectric series. The series is listed as follows:
Air Positive Nickel, Copper Positive
Human body Gold, Platinum
Nylon Sulphur
Triboelectric series
Triboelectric series
Wool Acetate
Decreases
Decreases
Lead Polyester
Cotton Celluloid
Aluminium Urethane
Paper Polyethylene
Steel Vinyl
Wood Sillicon
The conclusions that one gets from the triboelectric series are the following:
s one goes down the series, the capability of accepting the electron by the material increases
1. A
and therefore, it gets negatively charged. As one goes up the series, the capability of donating
the electron by the material increases and therefore, it gets positively charged.
2. Farther apart are the substances in this series, easier it is for them to transfer the charges
between them.
BOARDS
Properties of Charge
– + + + – –
3. C
onservation of charge: Just like energy, the net charge of an isolated system remains constant
throughout any process. In other words, charge can neither be created nor be destroyed.
4. R
elativistic invariance: Charges obey relativistic invariance. It means the quantity and quality
of charge is independent of the frame of reference. No matter how fast or slow the frame of
reference is moving, the quantity and quality of the charge remain the same. If there is one
electron in a frame of reference moving with the speed of light, the value of the charge (–1.6 ×
10–19 C) remains unchanged.
5. Q
uantisation of charge: All free charges are integral multiples of a basic unit of charge denoted
by e. Therefore, the net change on a body is always, Q = ne, where n is any integer. The basic
unit of charge ‘e’ can either be positive or negative. By convention, the charge on an electron
is taken as negative.
6. C
harges obey algebraic addition. Example: Suppose there are three protons and five electrons
in an object. Therefore, we have, np = 3, and ne = 5 and hence, the net charge in the object is,
Q = Charge of protons + Charge of electrons
Q = np(+e) + ne (–e)
Q = 3e + (– 5e)
Q = –2e
Unit of charge
Method of Charging
Charging by friction
Charging by conduction + + +
+
+
Consider that a charged source is brought in
+ + +
+ + +
contact to a neutral object as shown in the figure.
When the source is brought in contact with
the neutral object, the charges get distributed
+
+
between both the bodies. Remember that this +
+
+
distribution of charges on the neutral object fully
depends on its shape. If the charged object and + +
the neutral object have the same shape, then it +
+
+
+
is safe to say that the charge will be distributed
equally.
+
+
This method of charging is known as charging by
conduction. + +
+
+ +
Charging by induction
– –
In this case, let us consider two objects: one is a
–
negatively charged object and the other is a neutral – –
object. The neutral object has both the positive and –
negative charges but in equal proportion. Consider that –
these objects are placed very close to each other but –
not in contact.
– –
Let us assume that a glass rod is negatively charged.
–
When the glass rod is brought near the neutral object (we – + – –
choose a ball here), due to electrostatic attraction and – – + + –
repulsion, the glass rod attracts all the positive charge – – + +
–
– +
towards itself and pushes all the negative charges in the –
– –
Due to this separation of the charges, the polarisation
–
of the charges takes place, which means that it is now + – –
possible to identify which side of the ball is positive – – – + + –
and which side is negative. – – + +
– –
– – +
– –
Now, the ball is connected to the ground. Since the
earth is an infinite sink of charges, i.e., it can take any
amount of charge, the negative charges of the body
go into the ground. Now, unearthing the ball from +
+
grounding the body only contains excess positive +
+ +
charges that spread on the object and become +
positively charged.
By this method, we can charge a neutral body in the opposite nature to that of the source.
Photocopy Machine
Firstly, let us take a look at a photocopy The electrostatics has application in this.
machine as shown in the figure. Consider the side view of the inside of a
photocopy machine.
MAIN BOARDS
Coulomb’s Law
Charles-Augustin de Coulomb discovered this law, which states that the force between two static
point charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the charges and is
directly proportional to the product of the magnitude of the two charges and the force acts along
the line joining the two charges.
Mathematically, if Q1 and Q2 are two point charges separated by distance r, then the electrostatic
force between them is,
F ∝ Q1Q2 ........... ( i )
1
F∝ ........... ( ii )
r2
By combining the equation ( i ) and eqaution ( ii ) , we get,
Q1Q2
F∝
r2
kQQ
⇒ F =e 12 2
r
Where ke is the proportionality constant known as Coulomb’s constant
The electrostatic force (F) as defined looks similar to the the gravitational force between two masses
GM1 M2
defined by F = . The comparison between the expression of the electrostatic force and the
r2
gravitational force is given.
GM1 M2 keQ1Q2
Expression of force F = F =
r2 r2
Coulomb’s constant
1
The Coulomb constant ke is defined as ke = , where ε is known as the permittivity of the
4πε
medium, and it is the deciding factor of the Coulomb’s constant.
In the case of vacuum, the permittivity of the medium is given by, ε0 = 8.854 × 10–12 C 2N–1m–2
Therefore, the value of Coulomb constant at vacuum is, ke = 9 × 109 Nm2C –2
Relative permittivity
If the permittivity of vacuum is denoted by ε0 and the the permittivity of any medium is denoted by ε,
then the relative permittivity (or dielectric constant) of the given medium is defined by the following
expression:
ε
εr =
ε0
08
It may seem that the force between two point charges placed in a medium other than the vacuum
changes from what was the force between them in vacuum. However, this statement is incomplete.
The correct statement is that the force between two charges placed in a medium other than
vacuum does not change from what was the force between them in vacuum, but the force
experienced by each charge alone in totality changes. To understand this statement clearly, let
us consider the scenario shown in the figure.
– + – +
F – + – + F1
+Q1 F1 – + – + +Q2 F
r
In this figure, the yellow particles are the charged particles of the medium. Here, F is the force on
Q1 due to Q2 and vice versa, and F1 is the force on the charges by the medium.
keQ1Q2
Therefore, the net force on the charge is, Fnet = ( F − F1 ) <
r2
Let us consider that two like charges, Q1 and Q2, are placed somewhere in space. According to
Coulomb’s law, the electrostatic forces act along the direction of the line joining the two charges.
Since we have taken the charges of the same nature, there must be a repulsive force acting
between them.
The force on charge Q1 due to charge Q2 is F12 . The position vector of charge Q1 as seen from
charge Q2 is r12 = r rˆ12 , where r is the separation between the charges.
By applying Coulomb’s law, we get the following: r
kQ1Q2
F=
r2
Also, the position vector is given by, F12 Q Q2
1
r12 = r rˆ12
Therefore, force acting on charge Q1 due to charge Q2 is given by,
kQ Q
F12 = 12 2 rˆ12 .......... ( i )
r
The unit position vector is given by,
r
ˆr = 12
Also, the position vector is given by,
09r12 = r rˆ12
Therefore, force acting on charge Q1 due to charge Q2 is given by,
kQ Q
F12 = 12 2 rˆ12 .......... ( i )
r
The unit position vector is given by,
r12
rˆ12 =
r
By substituting rˆ12 in equation ( i ) , we get,
kQ1Q2 r12
= F12 ×
r2 r
kQ Q
⇒ F12 =13 2 r12 .......... ( ii )
r
Similarly, the force on charge Q2 due to charge Q1 is F21 . The position vector of charge Q2 as seen
from charge Q is, r21 = r rˆ21
1
• For unlike charges, the forces become attractive in nature and hence, their directions
kQ1Q2
get changed. Therefore, the force on Q1 due to Q2 is expressed as, F12 = r21 and
r3
kQ1Q2
the force on Q2 due to Q1 is expressed as, F21 = r12
r3
• Only the formulas for the like charges are enough to remember because to obtain the
formulas for the unlike charges, we just need to put the value of charges with sign.
• Since r12 = − r21 , what we get from equations (i) and (ii) is, F12 = − F21 . Thus, Coulomb’s
law agrees with Newton’s third law of motion.
–Q2
The resultant electrostatic force on a point will be the r21
vector sum of electrostatic forces due to individual Q3 Q4
point charges. r13 r14
Consider a system with five charges as shown in the
r15 Q5
figure.
Q1
10
For finding the net force on any charge, we have to find the forces
by each charge present in the vicinity of it.
F12
Let us consider charge Q1 and analyse all the forces acting on it.
The forces acting on Q1 are shown in the figure. F13
Q1
The net force acting on Q1 is the vector sum of all the electrostatic
force acting on it, which is given by, F14
F15
Fnet = F12 + F13 + F14 + F15
The force applied by one charge does not affect the force by other charges. They have their
individual effects, but the net force acting on the charge changes.
Five balls numbered 1 to 5 are suspended using separate threads. Pairs (1, 2), (2, 4), and
(4, 1) show electrostatic attraction, while pairs (2, 3) and (4, 5) show repulsion. What should
ball 1 therefore be?
(A) Positively charged (B) Negatively charged (C) Neutral (D) Made of metal
Solution
Now, for electrostatic attraction to take place between two charges, it is not necessary that both
the charges should have opposite charges. The electrostatic attraction can also happen between
a charge particle and a neutral particle (recall the example of the glass rod attracting dry papers).
Now, since ball 4 and ball 5 are repelled to each other, they should have the same charge. Therefore,
ball 4 cannot be neutral. On top of this, ball 2 and ball 4 are attracted to each other and since ball 4
cannot be neutral, it should have the opposite charge of type A. Let ball 4 have a charge of type B.
Therefore, ball 1 gets attracted by ball 2 having charge of type A and also gets attracted by ball 4
having charge of type B. Hence, it is possible only if ball 1 is neutral.
Therefore, option (C) is the correct answer.
11
Two identical charges in vacuum are separated by a distance of r. The electrostatic force
between them is given by F. If 75 % of the charge is taken from one of the charges and given
F
to the other, then the new force becomes F’. Find the ratio .
F'
16 16 7
(A) 1 (B) (C) (D)
9 7 16
Solution
Initially, let there be two identical charges of magnitude Q separated by a distance of r. Therefore,
according to Coulomb’s law, the magnitude of the electrostatic force is,
kQ 2 ........(i)
F = 2
r
3 Q
Now, if 75 % (or ) of one charge is given to the other, then those two charges become, Q1 =
4 4
3Q 7Q
and Q2 = Q + =
4 4
However, the separation between them remains the same.
Therefore, the electrostatic force in between is,
kQ1Q2
F′=
r2
Q 7Q
k
4 4
⇒ F ′ = 2
r
7 kQ 2
⇒ F′= 2
16 r
7
⇒ F′= F
16
F 16
⇒ =
F′ 7
Thus, option (C) is the correct answer.
Two charge particles, each having charge q and mass m, are apart with a distance of d from
each other. If two particles are in equilibrium under the gravitational and electrostatic force,
q
then find the ratio .
m
Solution
According to the problem, both the particles are in equilibrium under the gravitational and
electrostatic force. So, it can be said that the electrostatic force is balanced by the gravitational
force. Therefore,
Felectrostatic = Fgravitational
kq2 Gm2
⇒ =
d2 d2
2
q G
⇒ =
m k
q G 10− 11
⇒ = ≈
m k 109
q
⇒ ≈ 10− 20 ≈ 10− 10
m
Thus, option (B) is the correct answer.
y
Two identical point charges +Q are fixed in a gravity-free
space at points (L, 0) and (–L, 0). Another particle with mass
m and charge –q is placed at the origin. Now, this particle +Q +Q
is displaced by a distance of y along the y-axis and then (–L, 0) –q (L, 0) x
released. Show that this particle will execute oscillatory
motion.
Solution BOARDS
Now,
Fnet = 2F cos θ
kQq y
⇒ Fnet =
2 2
r r
kQq
⇒ Fnet =
2 3 y
r
r
From the figure, it is seen that= L2 + y 2
Thus,
kQq
Fnet = 2 2 3 y
(
L + y2 2
)
Since the charge − q is displaced slightly along the y -axis, y << L.
Hence,
kQq
3
Fnet = 2 3 y
2 2
y
L 1 + 2
L
kQq
⇒ Fnet 2 3 y [Since y << L]
L
Therefore, the net force on the charge –q is proportional to the displacement of the charge from its
equilibrium position and hence, the charge will execute SHM with time period,
m
T = 2π
kQq
2 L3
mL3
2π
⇒T =
2kQq
NOTE
P H Y S I C S
ELECTROSTATICS
ELECTRIC FIELD AND ELECTRIC
LINES OF FORCE
When any two point charges of equal magnitude, Q, are separated by a distance r at some region
in space, they exert force on each other according to Coulomb’s law. Now, we need to understand
how charges exert force on each other without being in contact (this is also known as action
at a distance). This is answered by Michael Faraday in his research paper named ‘Experimental
Researches in Electricity’. He did a simple experiment, which is as follows:
A bar magnet was placed under light on a dry paper
and some iron filings were spread on the paper. It was
seen that the iron filings were arranged in a particular
way on the paper instead of in a random way as shown
in the figure.
In this figure, the bar magnet (mentioned by NS) was
placed under the paper. The curves that are seen
around the magnet is the pattern that the iron filings
got on the paper. Although the iron filings were not in
contact with the bar magnet, they were influenced by
something that the bar magnet produced.
02
Fields are like any other physical quantities, describing both scalars and vectors.
Scope of fields
Both scalar and vector
Electric Field
Electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted
on other charged particles or objects.
The force that is exerted by the source charge on the test charge is a two-step process:
1. A
t first, the source charge creates its own field, which means that it creates a region up to
which it will be able to exert force on any other charged particle or object.
2. Whenever the test charge comes in that region, it feels the force due to the source charge.
The term ‘field’ signifies how some distributed quantity (scalar or vector) varies with position
Electric field strength ( E )
The electric field strength (often simply called electric field) at a point is defined as the electrostatic
force Fe per unit positive charge at that point.
Consider a source charge Q (it creates the field) and a test charge q (it feels the force) as shown in
the figure. Let the separation between them be r.
The magnitude of electrostatic force on the test charge
1 Qq
q is, Fe = . The magnitude of this electrostatic
4πε r 2
force will remain unchanged as long as the test charge
is at the surface of a sphere of radius r. The field from
E
the source charge can be visualised as light spreading Q r q
out from a bulb in all directions.
The electric field strength or the electric field of a
Fe 1 Q
charge Q at a distance r is given by, E
= = .
q 4πε r 2
SI unit: The SI unit of the electric field is NC–1.
04
1. The nature of the electric field produced by a point charge is non-uniform because
at every point in space, even though the magnitude is the same, the direction of the
electric field is different.
Fe 1 Q
2. The electric field of a charge Q at a distance r is given by, E
= = .
q 4πε r 2
3. The direction of the electric field is radially outwards for a positive charge and radially
inwards for a negative charge.
Graphical plot of electric field strength variation with distance from a point charge
Calculate the electric field strength at a point 1 cm away from a point charge of magnitude,
10 μC. (Assume no other electric charge to be present)
Solution
Given,
The charge is, Q = 10 μC.
The distance from the charge where the electric field strength is to be measured is,
r = 1 cm = 0.01 m.
1 Q
E=
4πε 0 r 2
10 × 10− 6
(
⇒ E = 9 × 109 )
( 0.01)
2
10 × 10− 6
(
⇒ E = 9 × 109 ) −4
10
⇒ E =9 × 108 NC − 1
The direction of the electric field strength will be radially outward.
05
BOARDS
Properties of Electric Field Lines
1. F
or a positive charge, the field lines will be radially
outwards, and for a negative charge, the field lines +q –q
will be radially inwards.
2. Electric field lines always begin on a positive charge and end on a negative charge.
+ +
+ –
E P EQ E R
E P EQ E R
4. The tangent to a field line at any point gives us the P
E P EQ E R
direction of electric field at that point. R
6. The field lines never form closed loops, as a line can never start and end on the same charge.
06
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
7. In a region of a uniform electric field, the field lines
+
are straight, parallel, and uniformly spaced.
+
+
+
AT P1 AT P2
+q –q
Electric Field P2 P2
High Low
strength
P1 P1
The strength of the electric field is greater where the density of the field lines is larger.
MAIN
Principle of Superposition
The resultant electric field at a point will be the vector sum of the electric fields due to all individual
point charges.
Consider three point charges q1, q2, and q3, as shown q2
EEnet
in the figure. EE1E1+1+,+
Enetnet==If= EE2E2+,2++
EE3E3 3are the electric fields due to
q1, q2, and q3, respectively, then the net electric field at
point P is, q1
r2
E net = E1 + E2 + E3 r1
r3 q3
Therefore, if n number of charges are present in the
space, then the electric field at point P will be, E net = E1 + E2 + E3
P
n E net = E1 + E2 + E3
E net = E1 + E2 + E3 + .... + E n = ∑
∑
i =0i
EEi i
E net = E1 + E2 + E3
20 cm
Find the electric field at the midpoint of the
line joining two charges separated by 20 cm. +ve
10 μC P 5 μC x-axis
07
Solution
1 q11 ˆ
The electric field due to q1 is, E11 = 2
i.
4πε 00 r 2
The electric field due to q=
2
is, E 2
2
1 q22
4πε 00 r 22
( )
− iˆ .
10 × 10− 6 5 × 10− 6
(
⇒ E net =9 × 109 ) − iˆ
( 0.1) (0.1)
2 2
10− 6 ˆ
( )
⇒ E net = 9 × 109 [10 − 5] × i
(0.1)
2
10− 6
( )
⇒ E net = 45 × 109 × − 2 iˆ
10
5 ˆ
⇒ E net =45 × 10 i NC − 1
60 cm
Find the electric field at the midpoint of the
+ve
line joining two charges separated by 60 cm.
50 μC P –10 μC x-axis
Solution
The electric field due to q=
2
is, E 2 =
2
4πε 00 r 22
( )
1 q22 ˆ − iˆ
i.
1 q2 ˆ
E2 = i
4πε 0 r 2
08
In this case, the directions of the electric field at point P due to both the charges are along the
positive x-axis. Hence, the net electric field at point P is,
E net
= E1 + E 2
1 q1 q2 ˆ
⇒ E= + i
4πε 0 r 2 r 2
net
50 × 10− 6 10 × 10− 6
(
⇒ E net =9 × 109 ) + iˆ
( 0.3) (0.3)
2 2
10− 6 ˆ
( )
⇒ E net = 9 × 109 [50 + 10] × i
(0.3)
2
10− 6 ˆ
(
⇒ E net = 9 × 60 × 109 × ) 9 × 10− 2
i
6 106 iˆ NC − 1
⇒ E net =×
–q –2q
a
P a –q
Solution
The magnitude of the electric field due to − 2q is, E net = EP1 + E2 + E3a –q
1 2q x
E3 = O
(
4πε 0 a 2 2
)
Now, the magnitude of the resultant electric fields of E1 and E2 is,
2 2
E12 = E1 + E2 [Since the angle between them is 90°]
2 2
1 q 1 q
⇒
= E12 2
+ 2
4πε 0 a 4πε 0 a
2
E3 =
4πε 0 a 2
( )
2
09
Now, the magnitude of the resultant electric fields of E1 and E2 is,
2 2
E12 = E1 + E2 [Since the angle between them is 90°]
2 2
1 q 1 q
⇒
= E12 2
+ 2
4πε 0 a 4πε 0 a
1 q
2
⇒ E12 = 2 2
4πε 0 a
1 q 2
⇒ E12 = 2
4πε 0 a
E12 will be along the direction of E3 . Therefore, the net electric field at point P is,
E= net E 12 + E 3
1 q 2 2q
E net
⇒= +
2
4πε 0 a
( )
2
a 2
1 q 2 q
Enet
⇒= + 2
4πε 0 a2 a
⇒ Enet =
1 ( 2 +1 q )
4πε 0 a 2
E net
The resultant electric field will also be along the = E1 + E2of+ E3.
direction
q q
a
Solution
Short trick :
By polygon law, if we have any number of vectors forming the polygon, and they obey cyclic
symmetry, the resultant of that vectors will always be zero.
Enetnet
In this Ecase, =EE=
E=net ,+1 E+
E
1 1+ E
E+2 E+
2 2+ E
and E can also form a triangle and they have a cyclic symmetry since the angle
33 3
between each of them is 120°.
Equilibrium
Equilibrium is a state for a mass/charge/particle when its state of motion remains unaffected, which
implies that the net force acting on it is zero. Since the force is interconnected with the field, the
previous statement also implies that the net field acting has to be zero.
Types of equilibrium
The electric charges also possess different states of equilibrium. To begin the discussion, we should
remember that the electric field lines always begin on a positive charge and end on a negative
charge.
When we talk about positive and negative charges, we can consider them on the same level, as
shown in the figure.
+q –q
11
However, if the concept of field lines is incorporated with positive and negative charges, then
the position of the positive charge can be thought of as the top of a hill from which a fountain
originates. It is because field lines originate from the positive charge. The position of the negative
charge can be thought of as a valley or the bottom of a funnel, because field lines originate from
the positive charge and end at the negative charge.
+q
–q
Hence, it can be said that the positive charge acts as the source and the negative charge acts as
the sink. Therefore, it can be concluded that from the topological point of view, the positive charge
and the negative charge are not at the same level. The side views of the geography of the charges
are shown below.
+q
–q
+q
• Suppose that two positive charges of unequal
magnitude are placed side by side. For this
case as well, the valley or region between the +q
two peaks is at the stable equilibrium position,
but the region becomes smaller here and it is
closer to the charge with less magnitude.
Null Point
The null point is a position where the net field turns out to be zero as a vector sum.
q q2
⇒ 12 =
r1 r22
q q
Find the position along the line joining two point
charges where the net electric field is zero.
d
Solution
Let the electric field be zero at point P, which is x distance away from the charge on the left as
shown in the figure.
13
Since both the charges are positive, the direction of the electric field on P due to these charges
will be opposite.
Also, we assumed the net electric field at point P to be zero.
Thus,
E net = 0
q x q
⇒ E1 = E2 P
1 q 1 q
⇒ =
4πε 0 x 2
4πε 0 ( d − x )2 d
⇒x=± (d − x )
d
⇒x= [By taking only the positive value]
2
Therefore, the equilibrium position or the null point will be at the middle of the line joining the two
equal positive charges.
q 4q
Find the position along the line joining two point
charges where the net electric field is zero.
d
Solution
Let the electric field be zero at point P, which is x distance away from the charge at the left.
Since both the charges are positive, the direction of the electric field at P due to these charges will
be opposite.
Also, we assumed the net electric field at point P to be zero.
Thus,
E net = 0
⇒ E1 = E2 x
q 4q
P = E1 + E 2 + E3
E net = E1 + E2 + E net
1 q 1 4q 3
⇒ =
4πε 0 x 2
4πε 0 ( d − x )2
d
⇒ 4 x 2 =( d − x )
2
± (d − x )
⇒ 2x =
⇒ 2x = ( d − x ) [By taking only the positive value]
d
⇒x=
3
Therefore, the equilibrium position or the null point will be closer to the smaller positive charge
along the line joining the two unequal positive charges.
NOTE
P H Y S I C S
ELECTROSTATICS
ELECTRIC FIELD AND
ELECTRIC LINES OF FORCE
• Electric field strength due to a point • Electric dipole in a uniform electric field
charge • Electric field due to a continuous charged
• Superposition of Coulomb’s force and body
electric field strength
It is given that the particle has a positive charge q and mass m, and it is placed in a uniform
electric field. It is known that when a charged particle is placed in an electric field, it experiences
an electrostatic force; positively charged particles experience an electrostatic force in the direction
of the electric field, while negatively charged particles experience an electrostatic force in the
opposite direction of the electric field.
Therefore, neglecting the effects of gravity, the charged particle experiences the Coulombic force
or electrostatic force only, which is given by F = qE, and the direction of this force is along the
direction of the electric field.
F qE
a
Therefore, the acceleration of the particle is, = =
m m
02
Since the electric field is uniform, the acceleration of the particle is constant. Also, since the particle
is released from rest, its initial speed is zero. Hence, by applying the first equation of motion in 1D,
we get the speed of the particle in time t as, = qEt
v at=
m 2
2 1 2 1 qEt
Therefore, the kinetic energy1 2of the qEt at time t =
1 particle is, K = mv m
= K = mv m 2 2 m
2 2 m
Now, by applying the second equation of motion in 1D, we1 get the qEtdistance
2 travelled by the
1 2 qEt 2 = S = at 2
particle in time t as,
= S = at 2 2m
2 2m
= K = mv m u +
2 m
Now, by applying the second2 2
equation ofmmotion
in 1D, we get1the2 distance qEt1travelled
2
byqEt
the
2
S= ut + at = Sut=+
ut + at 2
=ut +
1 qEt 2
2 2m2 2m
particle in time t as, S =ut + at 2 = ut +
2 2m
This charged particle will undergo projectile motion just like the motion of a projectile under
gravity. In projectile motion, a constant gravitational force acts in the downward direction, which
is responsible for the parabolic motion of the projectile. In this case, instead of gravity, a constant
electrostatic force acts in the downward direction and it produces a constant acceleration along
the vertically downward direction.
By neglecting the effects of gravity on the charged particle, only the Coulombic force or electrostatic
force acts on the charged particle, which is given by F = qE, and the direction of this force is along
the direction of the electric field, as the particle has positive charge.
F qE
a
Therefore, the vertical acceleration of the particle is, = =
m m
This vertical acceleration plays the role of the gravitational acceleration for projectile motion.
qE
qEqE g' = qEqE
Therefore, we can denote this acceleration as, g ' = g' = m g ' g=' = m
mm m
2u sin θ
θ θT =
u sin
2u 2sin θθ
u sin
2u2sin
Thus, the time of flight of the changed particle is,T =T = g' TT ==
g' g' g' g'
u sin θ
2 2
θ
θ = level is, H u=2 usinsin
2 2
The maximum height that the particle can reachHfrom u2 usin
the
2 2 2
sinθHmax
horizontal
2
θ
Hmax= = 2 g ' Hmaxmax=
2 g2' g '
max
2 g2' g '
u sin 2θ
2
2 u sin 2θ
2
The range of the projectile motion of the charged particleu2 usin
2
2θis,2θR =
sin R u= sin 2θ
R =R = g' R=
g' g' g' g'
If the gravity is not neglected, then the gravitational acceleration wouldqE act along the same qE direction
qEqE g=' g + g =
' g qE
+
g=' g=' g acceleration
of the electric field, and therefore, the net downward +g + be, g=' g + m
will m
mm m
Electric Dipole
+q
The electric dipole is a system consisting of two point charges, equal in
magnitude but opposite in nature, and separated by an infinitesimally 2a
small distance.
–q
The axis of the dipole is the line joining the negative and 2a
positive charges. The highlighted dotted line in the figure
is the axis of the dipole.
–q
04
Equatorial line
+q
a
The equatorial line is the line that is the perpendicular bisector of
the axis of the dipole. The highlighted dotted line in the figure is the
equatorial line of the dipole.
a
–q
Equatorial plane
+q
a
The plane that is perpendicular to the dipole axis and passes through
the equatorial line of the dipole is known as the equatorial plane.
The highlighted grey-shaded plane in the figure is the equatorial
plane of the dipole. a
–q
p
Dipole moment ( p )
An HCl molecule has a dipole moment of 3.4 × 10–30 Cm. Assuming that equal and opposite
charges lie on the two atoms forming the dipole, what will be the magnitude of the charge?
[The separation distance between the two atoms of HCl is 1 × 10–10 m]
(A) 3.4 × 10–20 C (B) 2.4 × 10–20 C (C) 2 × 10–20 C (D) 1 × 10–20 C
Solution
The dipole moment is given by the formula, p = q(2a), where 2a is the separation between the
positive and the negative charges and q is the magnitude of the charges.
05
Given,
The distance between the charge, 2a = 1 × 10–10 m
The dipole moment, p = 3.4 × 10–30 Cm
Therefore,
p
q=
2a
3.4 × 10− 30 Cm
⇒q=
1 × 10− 10 m
⇒ q = 3.4 × 10− 20 C
Notes
Electric dipole need not necessarily be only two point charges that are equal in magnitude and
opposite in nature. Fundamentally, an electric dipole is an electrically neutral system and the
smallest possible case of an electrically neutral system is that of one positive and one negative
charge. It can also be a system of charges but it should be neutral.
Consider an electrically neutral system consisting of equal numbers of positive and negative
charges. If the centre of the positive charges, which is known as the centre of positivity ( just like
the COM of many discrete particles), and the centre of negative charges, which is known as the
centre of negativity, do not coincide with each other, i.e., they are separated by a small distance,
they will form an electric dipole. This is the reason an HCl molecule has an electric dipole moment.
However, an H2 molecule does not have an electric dipole moment because for the H2 molecule,
due to symmetry (linear molecule with the same atom at both the sides of the bond), the centre of
the positive charge and the centre of the negative charge coincide with each other.
–q
–q 2q
Solution MAIN
Hence, there will be two dipole moments with the same magnitude but different directions, and the
angle between them will be 60° as shown in the figure.
Here, p1 = p2 = qd
A –q
Therefore, the magnitude of the resultant dipole moment will be,
pres = p12 + p22 + 2p1 p2 cos 60°
1 q
( qd ) + ( qd ) + 2( qd )( qd ) × C p1
2 2
⇒ pres
= B
2
–q q 60°
⇒ pres
= 2q d + q d
2 2 2 2
p2
⇒ pres =3qd
The direction of the resultant dipole moment will be along the angle bisector of the angle subtended
by p1 and p2
Method 2
In this method, let us consider that the two negative charges are concentrated at the centre of the
line joining them (similar to the concept of COM) and the charge 2q remains at C. Thus, it forms an
electric dipole consisting of charges 2q and –2q.
The length CD is equal to d sin 60°.
A
Therefore,
The dipole moment is given by, –2q D
p (2q )[d sin 60°] q
60°
3 B C
⇒ p = 2q × d q
2
⇒ p =3qd
From the study of electric dipole, we know that an electrically neutral system has the
possibility to become an electric dipole, but for a non-zero electric dipole moment, the
centre of the positive charges (centre of positivity) and the centre of negative charges
(centre of negativity) of the system must be separated by a small distance.
07
MAIN BOARDS
Electric Field Due to an Electric Dipole
1 2px
E net =
4πε 0 x 2 − a2( )
2
1 2px
⇒ E net =
4πε 0
2
a
2
x 1 −
4
x
a
2
Since x >> a , 1 − x ≈ 1,
1 2p
⇒ E net =
4πε 0 x3
1. Along the axis of an electric dipole, the direction of the net electric field is always parallel
to the direction of the electric dipole moment.
1
1 and p
2. For a given medium and a given dipole, and p are constants. 4πεTherefore, the
4πε 0 0
1
away
electric field due to a dipole at a long distance 1 along its axis is E ∝ 3 .
E∝ 3 x
3. The mathematical definition of the electrical dipole x is, 'If an electrically neutral system
produces an electric field in its surroundings and the electric field obeys the inverse cubic
law with the distance, then the system will be known as an electric dipole'.
Two charges, each of 5 μC but opposite in sign, are placed 4 cm apart. What is the electric
field intensity at a point distance of 4 cm from the midpoint on the axial line of the dipole?
–8 –1 –8 –1 –8 –1 –8 –1
(A) 1 × 10 NC (B) 2 × 10 NC (C) 3 × 10 NC (D) 4 × 10 NC
Solution
Given,
–6
The magnitude of the charges, q = 5 μC = 5 × 10 C
–2
The separation between the charges, 2a = 4 cm = 4 × 10 m
–2
The electric field to be found at a distance, x = 4 cm = 4 × 10 m
This is the case of finding the electric field due to a dipole at a nearby point. Therefore, the electric
field due to the dipole moment is,
1 2px
E=
(
4πε 0 x 2 − a2 2 )
1 2( 2qa ) x
⇒E =
4πε 0 x 2 − a2 2 ( )
⇒E =
( )
9 × 109 × 2 × 5 × 10− 6 × 4 × 10− 2 × 4 × 10− 2 ( )
2
4 × 10− 2 2 − 2 × 10− 2 2
(
) ( )
1 2px
E=
(
09 4πε 0 x 2 − a2
)
2
1 2( 2qa ) x
⇒E =
4πε 0 x 2 − a2 2( )
⇒E =
( ) (
9 × 109 × 2 × 5 × 10− 6 × 4 × 10− 2 × 4 × 10− 2 )
2
( ) (
4 × 10− 2 2 − 2 × 10− 2 2
)
⇒E =
(18 × 10 ) × ( 80 × 10 )9 − 10
(12 × 10 )
2
−4
144
⇒E =
144 × 10− 8
⇒E =
108 NC − 1
Thus, option (A) is the correct answer.
Two point charges, 0.2 × 10–12 C and –0.2 × 10–12 C, are separated by 10–8 m. Find the electric
field intensity at an axial point at a distance of 0.1 m from their midpoint.
–8 –1 –8 –1 –8 –1 –8 –1
(A) 1.2 × 10 NC (B) 2.4 × 10 NC (C) 3.6 × 10 NC (D) 4.8 × 10 NC
Solution
Given,
–12
The magnitude of the charges, q = 0.2 × 10 C
–8
The separation between the charges, 2a = 10 m
The electric field to be found at a distance, x = 0.1 m
This is the case of finding the electric field due to a dipole at a far point (since a << x).
Therefore, the electric field due to the dipole moment is,
1 2p
E net =
4πε 0 x 3
⇒E =
( 9 × 10 ) × 2 × (0.2 × 10
9 − 12
× 10− 8 ) 0.1 m
(0.1)
3
⇒E =
( 9 × 10 ) × ( 4 × 10 × 10 )
9 − 13 −8
O Q
(10 )
3 –8
−1
10 m
⇒E =
( 9 × 10 ) × ( 4 × 10 )
9 − 21
10− 3
⇒ E = 3.6 × 10− 8 NC − 1
Thus, option (C) is the correct answer.
10
E−
Case 2: At a point on the equatorial line
E+
θ
Consider that an electric dipole is placed in such E+ sin θ + E– sin θ M
a way that its midpoint is at the origin as shown E−
in the figure. The length of the dipole is 2a and θ θ
E− E+
the magnitude of the charges is q. Therefore, x
the magnitude of the dipole moment is, E+
p = 2qa y
–q +q
The direction of the dipole moment vector is x
along the positive x-axis (from negative charge
to positive charge). a a
Suppose that we want to find the electric field at point M on the equatorial line, which is x distance
away from the origin.
The magnitude of the electric field at point M due to the + q charge is,
1 q
E+ =
(
4πε 0 x 2 + a2 2
)
The magnitude of the electric field at point M due to the − q charge is,
1 q
E− =
(
4πε 0 x 2 + a2 2
)
1 q
Hence, E= E
= = E
( )
+ −
4πε 0 x +a2 2
2
By component division of the elecctric field vector at point M , we get the net electric field as,
E net = − 2E sin θ iˆ
1 q
⇒ E net =− 2 × sin θ iˆ
(
4πε 0 x 2 + a2 2
)
1 q a
⇒ E net =− 2 × × iˆ
4πε 0
( )
2
x +a2 2 x +a2 2
1 2qa
⇒ E net =
− iˆ
2
(
4πε 0 x + a 2
x +a
2 2
)
1 p
⇒ E net =
− .............. ( i )
4πε 0 2 3
x +a( 2 2
)
Equation (i) gives the general relation for the electric field along the equatorial axis of an electric
dipole at a near point.
11
Note:
The negative sign in equation (i) indicates that the electric field vector is in the opposite direction
to the dipole moment vector.
Now, if x >> a (field at far point), then the given equation takes the form of the following equation:
1 p
E net = −
4πε 0 2 3
(
x + a2 2 )
1 2p
⇒ E net = −
4πε 0 3
a
2 2
x3 1 + 2
x
a2
Since x >> a , 1 + 2 ≈ 1,
x
1 p
⇒ E net =
−
4πε 0 x 3
Consider two charges of magnitude 10 μC separated by 5 mm. Find the electric field at a
point 0.2 m away from the midpoint on a line that is passing through the midpoint and the
normal to the axis of the dipole.
4 –1 4 –1 4 –1 4 –1
(A) 5.6 × 10 NC (B) 6.7 × 10 NC (C) 7.8 × 10 NC (D) 8.9 × 10 NC
Solution
Given,
1 p
The magnitude of the charges, q = 10 μC = 10 × 10–6EC= 4πε x 3 [By taking the magnitude only ]
0
The separation between two charges, 2a = 5 mm = 5 × 10–3 m
⇒ Efrom
( ) (
9 × 109 × 10 × 10− 6 × 5 × 10− 3
= the midpoint on3 a line that is passing
)
We want to find the electric field at a point 0.2 m away
through the midpoint and the normal to the axis of the dipole. Therefore, (0.2
x =) 0.2 m
9 × 10
Since a (2.5 × 10–3 m) << x (0.2 m), we have to apply the formula
⇒E =
9
× 5field
for the (
× 10at−8
) ( )
a far point to get the
electric field at x.
( )
3
−
2 × 10 1
1 p 450
E=
4πε 0 x 3
[By taking the magnitude only ] ⇒E =
8 × 10− 3
⇒E =
( 9 × 10 ) × (10 × 10
9 −6
× 5 × 10− 3 ) E 5.625 × 104 NC − 1
⇒=
(0.2)
3
⇒E =
( 9 × 10 ) × (5 × 10 )
9 −8
(2 × 10 )
3
−1
E1
E2
Case 3: At a general point a << x
E net E1
E1 𝛼 E2
at point M that
Suppose that we want to find the electric field
p
makes an angle of θ with dipole moment and is x distance E2 E net
M
away from the centre of the dipole with dipolep moment p. Let us E net
divide the dipole moment vector in two components asp shown
p cos θ the axial point of
the figure. As a result, point M becomes
in x
p cos θ and the equatorial point of p sin θ .
p cos θ
p θ know, a << x (field at a far point)
sinalso
We pθsin θ p
The magnitude of the electric field at point M due to p cos θ is, p θ
p cos
1 2p cos θ p sin θ
E1 =
4πε 0 x3
The magnitude of the electric field at point M due to p sin θ is,
1 p sin θ
E2 =
4πε 0 x 3
Therefore, the magnitude of the net electric field is,
E=
net E12 + E22
2 2
1 2p cos θ 1 p sin θ
⇒ E net = +
4πε 0 x 4πε 0 x
3 3
1 p
(2cos θ ) + ( sin θ )
2 2
=⇒ E net
4πε 0 x 3
E1
1 p E2
⇒ E net
= 4 cos2 θ + sin2 θ
4πε 0 x 3
E net E1
1 p
⇒ E net
=
4πε 0 x 3 (
4 cos2 θ + 1 − cos2 θ ) E1 𝛼 E2
1 E2 E net
⇒ E net =
(
1 p 1 + 3cos θ
2
) 2
E net
M
4πε 0 x3 𝛼
The direction of the net electric field is given by,
x
E
tan α = 2
E1
p cos θ
sin θ θ+𝛼
⇒ tan α = 2 cos θ pθsin θ
p cos θ
p
tan θ p sin θ
⇒ tan α = 2 p
tan θ
⇒α = tan − 1
2
This angle is shown in the figure. Therefore, the angle between the dipole moment vector and
the net electric field is (θ + α).
13
Consider an electric dipole placed in a uniform electric field as shown in the figure.
E B
The force on the positive charge, F+ q = + qE
+q F +q
The force on the negative charge, F− q = − qE
F −q
Therefore, the net force on the dipole is,
F=
net F+ q + F− q O
( ) (
⇒ Fnet = + qE + − qE ) F +q
⇒ Fnet = 0 F −q –q
A
Thus, we can say that the dipole in a uniform electric field is in translatory equilibrium.
Although the net force acting on the dipole is zero, the lines of action of the two equal and opposite
forces on the dipole are different. Thus, it will rotate about its COM. Therefore, there will be a net
torque acting on the dipole.
The torque on positive charge about point O,
E B
(
τ + q= OB × +qE ) +q
F +q
The torque on negative charge about point O,
F −q
( ) ( )
τ −q= OA × −qE = AO × +qE [Notice the change]
Therefore, the net torque on the dipole is, O
τ net
= τ +q + τ −q
F +q
⇒ τ net
( )
= OB × +qE + AO × +qE
( )
F −q –q
⇒ τ net= q AO + OB × E A
⇒ τ net= q AB × E
⇒ τ net = p × E Since AB is the separation distance between the two charges, p =
q AB
( )
• Magnitude: The magnitude of the net torque acting on the dipole, τnet = pE sin θ
• Direction: The direction of the net torque is perpendicular to the plane containing the dipole
axis and the electric field. We can use the right-hand grip rule to find the direction of the net
torque.
14
Cases of equilibrium
3
An electric dipole, when held at 30° with respect to a uniform electric field of 10 NC ,
–1
experiences a torque of 9 × 10–26 Nm. Calculate the dipole moment of the electric dipole.
Solution
Given,
3 –1
The magnitude of the electric field, E = 10 NC
–26
The net torque acting on the dipole, τ = 9 × 10 Nm
The angle between the dipole and the electric field, θ = 30°
We know that the net torque on the dipole is,
τ = pE sin θ
τ
⇒p= E
E sin θ p
9 × 10− 26 p
⇒p=3
10 × sin 30° 30°
− 26
9 × 10
⇒p=
1
103 ×
2
⇒ p = 18 × 10− 29 NC − 1
15
BOARDS
Electric Field Due to a Uniformly Charged Thin Ring
dq
Consider a uniformly charged thin ring of radius
R. Let us take two tiny elements of charge dq as x 2 + R2
R
shown in the figure. We want to find the electric dEy
field at point P, which is at distance x on the axis of x θ dE
P
the ring from its centre. Let the electric fields due dEx
to these charged elements be denoted by dE. dq dE
dEy
we resolve the electric vector dE , due to the symmetry of the ring, the vertical component
Now, if
of the dE gets cancelled and the net electric field is along the axis of the ring. The component of
the electric field along the axis of the ring is,
dE x = dE cos θ
1
dq x
⇒ dE x =
4πε 0
( )
2
x +R
2 2 x 2
+ R 2
1 xdq
⇒ dE x =
4πε 0 3
(x 2
+ R2 ) 2
1 x
⇒ ∫ dE x = ∫ dq
4πε 0 3
(x 2
+R 2 2
)
If the net charge of the ring is q, then,
1 qx
Ex = E net
4πε 0 2 3
( x +R 2 2
)
16
Therefore, the net electric field on the axis of a thin, uniformly charged ring is,
1 qx
E net = iˆ [By assuming the x-axis along the axis of the ring]
4πε 0 2 3
(
x + R2 2 )
We know that the electric field due to a uniformly charged ring is,
1 qx
E net = iˆ
4πε 0 2 3
x +R (
2 2
)
To find the position of the maxima, let us take the magnitude of the electric field and differentiate
it with respect to x. By doing this, we get the following:
dE net d 1 qx
= 3
dx dx 4πε 0 2
(
x + R 2 2 )
For the maxiumum,
dE net
=0
dx
d 1 qx
⇒ 3
= 0
dx 4πε 0 2
(
x + R
2 2
)
1 q 3qx 2
⇒ − =
0
4πε 0 2 3 5
( x +R
2 2
) (
x + R
2 2 2
)
q 3qx 2
⇒ 3
= 5
(x +R
2
)
2 2
(
x +R
2 2 2
)
(
⇒ 3x 2 = x 2 + R 2 )
R
⇒x=±
2
The value of the electric field at different points on the axis of the ring is tabulated as follows:
At the centre x
of the ring Enet = 0
R
17
E
–x
1 qx
|x| << R E net = x
4πε 0 R3 +x
R
R E
x=
2
–x
R 1 2q
x= E net = x
2 4πε 0 3 3R 2 +x
R
1 2q
E net =
4πε 0 3 3R 2
E
1 q –x
|x| >> R E net = x
4πε 0 x 2 +x
R
1 qx
For |x| << R, we know that the electric field due to the uniformly charged ring is, E net = .
4πε 0 R3
Therefore, if we place a charged particle of charge q0 at x (<< R), it will feel an electrostatic force,
1 qq0 x
F = − .
4πε 0 R3
It can be easily seen that the force is restoring in nature, and we can also see that the force is
proportional to the displacement x. Hence, the particle will execute SHM.
NOTE
P H Y S I C S
ELECTROSTATICS
ELECTRIC FIELD DUE TO A CONTINUOUS
CHARGE DISTRIBUTION
• Electric field strength due to a point charge • Electric field due to a quarter ring
and a semicircle at its centre
• Superposition of Coulomb’s force and electric
field strength • Electric field due to a disc along its
axis
• Motion of charges in electric fields
• Electric field due to a uniform infinite
• Electric dipole charged sheet
• Electric field due to a continuous charged body
BOARDS
Electric Field Strength Due to a Uniformly Charged Rod
Consider a rod of length l with charge (positive) per unit length (or linear charge density) λ. Consider
a small element of length dx. The charge of the element of small length is, dq = λ dx.
The electric field at point P due to the element of small length of charge dq is given by,
k dq 1
dE = 2 Where k = in vacuum
x 4πε 0
r+l
1 λ
⇒ E =∫ dx
r
4πε 0 x 2 l
r+l
λ dx dx
⇒E =
4πε 0 ∫
r
x2
r P
dE =
k dq
r+l
x2
λ 1
E
⇒= − x
4πε 0 x r dq = λ dx
λ 1 1
⇒E =− −
4πε 0 ( r + l ) r
λ r − (r + l )
⇒E =−
4πε 0 r ( r + l )
λl
⇒E =
4πε 0 r ( r + l )
The direction of the electric field depends on the polarity of charge.
02
( r tan θ ) + r
2
1 λr sec θ cos θ dθ
2
⇒ dE x =
(
4πε 0 r 2 tan2 θ + r 2 )
1 λr sec2 θ cos θ dθ
⇒ dE x =
4πε 0 r 2 1 + tan2 θ( )
1 λ cos θ
⇒ dE x = dθ ......... ( i ) 1 + tan2 θ =
sec2 θ
4πε 0 r
03
Therefore, the net electric field along the horizontal direction is,
θ1
1 λ cos θ
∫ dE x =
− 2
4πε 0
∫θ r
dθ
1 λ dy +
⇒ Ex
=
4πε 0 r
[sin θ1 + sin θ2 ]
kλ
⇒ Ex
= [sin θ1 + sin θ2 ] ........... ( ii ) B
r
Due to the concerned charge element, the electric field along the vertical direction is,
dE y = dE sin θ
1 λr sec2 θ sin θ dθ
⇒ dE y =
(
4πε 0 r 2 tan2 θ + r 2 )
1 λr sec2 θ sin θ dθ
⇒ dE y =
4πε 0 r 2 1 + tan2 θ ( )
1 λ sin θ
⇒ dE y = dθ
4πε 0 r
Therefore, the net electric field at point P along the vertical direction due to the rod is,
θ1
1 λ sin θ
∫ dE y = ∫θ
−
4πε 0 r
dθ
2
θ
1 λ 1
4πε 0 r −∫θ2
⇒ Ey = sin θ dθ
1 λ
[ − cos θ ]−1θ
θ
Ey
⇒=
4πε 0 r 2
1 λ
⇒ Ey
=
4πε 0 r
[cos θ2 − cos θ1 ]
kλ
⇒ Ey
=
r
[cos θ2 − cos θ1 ] ........... ( iii )
04
Special cases
1. When θ1 = θ2 = θ
A
From equation (ii), we get,
kλ θ1 = θ2 = θ
=Ex
r
[ sin θ1 + sin θ2 ]
λ
From equation (iii), we get,
kλ
=Ey
r
[cos θ2 − cos θ1 ] r θ P
Enet
Now, while substituting the values of θ1 θ
2λ sin θ 2k λ sin θ
and θ2, it is important to remember that we =Ex =
4πε 0r r
have to put only the magnitude of the angle
and not the sign, as the sign of the angle is
already taken into account.
Therefore, B
2λ sin θ 2k λ sin θ
=Ex = and Ey = 0
4πε 0r r
2λ sin θ 2k λ sin θ
Hence, the net electric field will be, E=
net
= Ex = and the direction will be
4πε 0r r
along the horizontal direction as shown in the figure.
Note:
For a body of uniform shape and size having a uniformly distributed charge, the electric field
will be along the unique line of symmetry. In this case, the perpendicular bisector will act as the
unique line of symmetry.
2 2 Enet
1 λ 1 λ
⇒
= E net + Ey
4πε 0 r 4πε 0 r
2λ 2k λ
⇒ E net= ≡
4πε 0r r
The horizontal component of the electric field Ex will be pointing away from the rod. We know
that for any symmetrical point, the field will always be along the symmetric line. Thus, the vertical
component of the electric field Ey will be zero.
Therefore, the net electric field will be,
1 2λ 2k λ
E net
= E= x =
4πε 0 r r
∞
y
x
λ
Solution
Assuming the linear charge density of the rod to be +λ, the electric field at a distance r from the
1 2λ ˆ
rod is, E = i.
4πε 0 r
Therefore, for a positive charge +q at a distance r from the rod, the net electric force on this charge
2qλ ˆ
by the rod is, =F qE= i.
4πε 0r
dx = r dθ
+ r
dx P B
dθ
07
∫ dE cos θ
⇒ E net =
1 λ dθ
∫ 4πε 0 r cos θ
⇒ E net = A
φ
+
1 λ 2 λ y
⇒ E net =
4πε 0 r ∫φ cos θ dθ
−
2
r P
φ
1 λ + x
⇒ E net = [sin θ ] φ2
4πε 0 r −
2λ φ
2
E net = sin
1 λ φ 4πε 0r 2
⇒ E net = 2 sin
4πε 0 r 2
1 2λ φ
⇒ E net = sin ............. ( iv ) B
4πε 0 r 2
Equation (iv) is the general relation for the electric field at the centre of any shape of arc. ϕ is the
total angle subtended by the arc at its centre.
The net electric field will be radially outwards for a positively charged arc and radially inwards
for a negatively charged arc.
2λ 2λ
For a semi-infinite wire, E = For a quarter ring (at the centre), E =
4πε 0r 4πε 0r
2λ 2λ
For an infinite wire, E = For a semi-circular ring (at the centre), E =
4πε 0r 4πε 0r
09
λ
A
Find the electric field at point P.
λ
r P r
B
Solution
As per the question, point P is the centre of the quarter ring and a point at distance r from a semi
2λ
infinite wire. Thus, the electric field at point P due to the semi-infinite wire is, E = . If we divide
4πε 0r
this electric field vector in two components, then along the horizontal direction, the component of
λ
the electric field is, E x = , and along the vertically downward direction, the component of
4πε 0r
λ λ λ
the electric field is, E y = . Ex = Ex =
4πε 0r 4πε 0r 4πε 0r
As the electric field at the centre of the quarter ring is equal to
the electric field by a semi infinite wire, the scenario described E = 2λ E =
2λ
above happens for the quarter circular wire as well. The whole 4πε 0r 2λ 4πε 0r
discussion is depicted in the figure. E =
4πε 0r
2λ 2λ
P
Therefore, the net electric field at pointE= E=
net is, 2 Ey .
Enety 2=
4πε 0r 4πε 0r
Mathematically, this can be derived as follows:
The electric field due to the semi-infinte wire is,
∞
1 λ ˆ ˆ
E wire
=
4πε 0 r
(
−i − j )
λ
The electric field due to the quarter ring is,
A
1 λ ˆ ˆ
E ring
=
4πε 0 r
(
i− j ) λ
y
Therefore, the net electric field at point P is,
1 λ ˆ ˆ
E net
=
4πε 0 r ( ) ( )
− i − j + iˆ − ˆj
r P r
x
B
2λ
⇒ E net = − ĵ
4πε 0r
( )
10
A ∞
Solution
As per the question, point P is the centre of the semi-circular ring and a point at distance r from an
infinite wire. The electric field at a distance r from an infinite rod and that at the centre of the semi
2λ
circular ring is the same, and it is given by, E = .
4πε 0r
P
According to the configuration of the given figure, the electric field due to
the semi-circular ring and an infinite wire at point P is oppositely directed asE = 2λ E = 2λ
shown in the figure. 4πε 0r 4πε 0r
Therefore, the net electric field at point P is zero.
A ∞ ∞ D
Solution
The given structure can be splitted into three parts: two semi-infinite rods and one semi-circular
ring of radius r.
2λ
We know that the electric field at a distance r due to the semi-infinite rod is, E = . If we divide
4πε 0r
this electric field vector in two components, then along the horizontal direction, the component of
λ
the electric field is, E x = , and along the vertically downward direction, the component of the
4πε 0r
λ
electric field is, E y = .
4πε 0r 2λ
The electric field at the centre of the semi-circular ring is given by, E = .
4πε 0r
11
Therefore, the direction of the component of the electric field at point P is as follows:
A D
r P λ λ P r
Ex = Ex =
B 4πε 0r 4πε 0r C
λ λ
Ex = Ex =
4πε 0r 2λ 4πε 0r
E =
4πε 0r
B C
P
r
A careful observation of the figure tells us that the net upward electric field and the net downward
electric field balance each other. Therefore, the net electric field at point P is zero.
–3λ
4λ
l
Solution
All the sides can be considered as the charged rods of finite length
with different linear charge density as shown in the figure. Αll of these –3λ
rods make the same angle at point C, and those angles are 45° on each 2
side of the median of the rod. For better understanding, the angles are
shown for the rod with linear charge density λ in adjacent figure.
45°
Therefore, λ 2λ
1 45° C 3
The electric field at point C due to the rod with linear
charge density λ is, 4
1 λ 1 2λ
E1
4πε 0 l
[ =
sin 45° + sin 45°]iˆ
4πε 0 l
(2 sin 45° ) iˆ 4λ
l
2
1 2 2λ ˆ
⇒ E1 = i
4πε 0 l
The electric field at point C due to the rod with linear
12charge density λ is,
1 λ 1 2λ
E1
4πε 0 l
[ =
sin 45° + sin 45°]iˆ
4πε 0 l
(2 sin 45° ) iˆ
2
1 2 2λ ˆ –3λ
⇒ E1 = i
4πε 0 l E4
The electric field at point C due to the rod with linear
E2
charge density − 3λ is, C
λ 2λ
1 (3λ ) 1 6λ E3 E1
E2 =
4πε 0 l
[ 45° + sin 45°] ˆj
sin =
4πε 0 l
(2 sin 45° ) ˆj
2
4λ
1 6 2λ ˆ
⇒ E2 = j l
4πε 0 l
The electric field at point C due to the rod with linear charge
density 2λ is,
1 ( 2λ ) 1 4λ
E3
4πε 0 l
[ sin 45°= ( )
+ sin 45°] −iˆ
4πε 0 l
(2 sin 45° ) −iˆ ( )
2
1 4 2λ ˆ
⇒ E3
=
4πε 0 l
( )
−i
The electric field at point C due to the rod with linear charge density 4λ is,
1 ( 4λ ) 1 8λ
E4
4πε 0 l
[ 45° + sin 45°] ˆj
sin =
4πε 0 l
(2 sin 45° ) ˆj
2
1 8 2λ ˆ
⇒ E4 = j
4πε 0 l
Therefore, the net electric field at point C is,
E net = E1 + E2 + E3 + E 4
1 2 2λ 4 2λ ˆ 1 6 2λ 8 2λ ˆ
⇒ E net = − i + + j
4πε 0 l l 4πε 0 l l
1 2 2λ ˆ 14 2λ ˆ
⇒ E net = − i+ j
4πε 0 l l
q
13
dF = ( dq ) E
∞
1 qx
∫0 4πε 0
⇒F = 3 [λ dx ]
Solution MAIN (x 2
+R 2 2
)
∞
Consider an infinitesimal element of length dx in⇒the qλ at xa dx
thread
4πε 0 ∫0 2
F= 3
distance x from the centre of the ring as shown in the figure.
x +R 2 2
( )
Since the linear charge density of the thread is λ, the charge of the R
element is, dq = λ dx. Let, λ
x = R tan θ
Now, since the ring has a total charge q and the radius of the ring
dx E
⇒ dx = R sec 2
θ
is R, the electric field due to the ring at a point on its axis, which is x dθ
x
distance away from its centre, is given by, Now,
1 qx When x = 0, tan θ = 0 ⇒ θ = 0
E =
4πε 0 2 2 32
x +R ( ) π
When x = ∞ , tan θ = ∞ ⇒ θ = q
2 field created
Therefore, the force experienced by the small element of the thread due to the electric
by the ring is, Therefore,
π
dF = ( dq ) E qλ 2 ( R tan θ ) ( R sec2 θ dθ )
∞
qx
F=
4πε 0 ∫ 3
∫0 4πε 0
⇒F =
1
3 [λ dx ] 0
(R 2
tan θ + R
2
)
2 2
(x 2
+R 2 2
) π
qλ 2 R 2 tan θ sec2 θ dθ
qλ
∞
x dx ⇒F = ∫
⇒F = ∫ 4πε 0 0 3 3
4πε 0 0
( x 2 + R2 )
3
2
R tan2 θ + 1 2 ( )
π
Let, qλ tan θ sec2 θ dθ
2
4πε 0R ∫0
⇒F =
x = R tan θ sec3 θ
⇒ dx =R sec2 θ dθ π
qλ 2
4πε 0R ∫0
Now, ⇒F = sin θ dθ
When x = 0, tan θ = 0 ⇒ θ = 0
qλ π
When x = ∞ , tan θ = ∞ ⇒ θ =
π F
⇒=
πε R
[ − cos θ ]02
2 4 0
Therefore, qλ π
⇒F =− cos − cos 0
π 4πε 0R 2
qλ 2 ( R tan θ ) R sec θ dθ
2
( ) qλ
4πε 0 ∫0
F= 3 ⇒F =
(
R 2 tan2 θ + R 2 2 ) 4πε 0R
π
Alternative
qλ 2method
R 2 tan θ sec2 θ dθ
⇒F = ∫
We know 4πεthat 3
the electric field at a distance r due to the uniformly charged semi-infinite rod (or
0 0
R3 tan2 θ + 1 2
2λ
( )
wire) is given πby, E = . We also know that this electric field can be splitted vectorially into two
qλ 2 tan θ sec 4πε2 r
θ0 dθ λ
⇒F =
perpendicular
4πε 0R 0∫ components
sec θ
3 Ex =
of magnitude
4πε 0r
, one component is along the axis of the rod and
qλ π
F
⇒=
πε R
[ − cos θ ]02
4 0
qλ π
⇒F =− cos − cos 0
4πε 0R 2
14
Therefore, the ring is in this electric field. Since the ring has dFy
charge q and its centre coincides with the finite end of the
rod, every element in the ring is R distance away from the dFx
semi-infinite wire. λq
dFx = dFy =
Therefore, the electric field that is R distance away from the R 4πε 0R
semi-infinite wire in every direction is the same. Hence, each λ
element in the ring that experiences the force on it due to the
rod also has two components that are same as the electric
λq
field but with magnitude . Due to the symmetrical
4πε 0R
configuration of the ring, the perpendicular components of
the force get vanished. Therefore, the net interactive force dFx
λq q
between the rod is along the axis of the rod which
4πε 0R dFy
passes through the centre of the ring.
BOARDS MAIN
Electric Field Due to a Disc Along Its Axis
(
x + R2 2 ) dq
Therefore, the electric field at point P due
to the elementary ring is,
σ
dE =
1 ( dq ) x y
4πε 0 3
(x 2
+ y 2 2
) θ P
x
1 (σ 2π y dy ) x
⇒ dE =
4πε 0 3
x 2 + y2 2 ( )
1 (σ 2π y dy ) x
R
∫0 4πε 0 2 2 3
⇒E =
x + y 2 ( )
R
σ 2π x y dy
4πε 0 ∫0
⇒E = 3
(x 2
+ y )
2 2
Let,
1 ( ) σ 2π x ( )( )
4πε 0 ∫0
⇒ dE = E=
4πε 0 3 3
15 (x 2
+ y )
2 2
(x 2
tan2 θ + x )
2 2
1 (σ 2π y dy ) x
R φ
σ 2π x x 2 tan θ sec2 θ dθ
∫0 4πε 0 2 2 3
⇒E = ⇒E =
4πε 0 ∫0 3 3
x + y 2 ( ) x tan2 θ + 1 2 ( )
R
σ 2π x y dy σ
φ
tan θ sec2 θ dθ
4πε 0 ∫0
⇒E = 3 ⇒E = ∫
2ε 0 0 sec3 θ
(x 2
+ y2 ) 2
φ
σ
Let, ⇒ E = ∫ sin θ dθ
2ε 0 0
y = x tan θ
σ
⇒ dy =x sec2 θ dθ E
⇒=
2ε 0
[1 − cos φ ]
Now,
When y = 0, tan θ = 0 ⇒ θ = 0 y
Since θ = tan − 1 =φ ⇒ φ =θ
R
y y
When y = R , tan θ = ⇒ θ = tan − 1 = φ Also,
R R
x
Therefore, cos θ = cos φ
=
x 2 + R2
σ 2π x ( x tan θ
φ
) ( x sec2 θ dθ )
4πε 0 ∫0
E= 3
Finally,
2
(x tan θ + x
2
)
2 2
σ x
φ =E 1 −
σ 2π x x 2 tan θ sec2 θ dθ 2ε 0 x 2 + R 2
4πε 0 ∫0 3
⇒E = 3
x tan2 θ + 1 2 ( )
φ
σ tanofθthe
The direction 2
θ dθ field will be along the axis of the disc.
secelectric
⇒E = ∫
2ε 0 0 sec θ
3
φ
σ
⇒ E = ∫ sin θ dθ Electric Field Due to a Uniform Infinite Charged Sheet
2ε 0 0
σ
An=
⇒ Einfinite[1sheet
− cosisφ ]nothing but a disc having an infinite
ε 0 the surface charge density be σ.
radius. 2Let
We know that− 1the y electric field at a distance x from the
Since θ = tan =of φ ⇒ φ =θ
centre along the R axis
a disc is, σ
σ xx
=
=Also,σ 1
E
E 1 −
−
σ x
E 2 2εε 00 1 −x xx 2 + R 2
2 2
= + R 2
=cos θ2ε 0 = x 2
+ Rcos φ
x 2 + R 2
Finally, σ
σ 1 − xx
⇒ =E
⇒= E 2σε 1 −
x R 22 P
⇒= E 2ε 0 1 − x 1 + R
0
x
σ 2ε 0 xx 1 + R 22
=E 1 − x 2
2ε 0 x 2x +1R+2 xx 2
Now,
Now,
Now,
R 2
R 22 ≈ ∞
For the case of infinite sheet, x
For the case of infinite sheet, x << R, thus, 1 + R2 ≈ ∞ << R , thus, 1 +
For the case of infinite sheet, x << R, thus, 1 + xx 22 ≈ ∞
Therefore, x
Therefore,
Therefore,
σ
≈ 2σε [[1 0]]
E σ
E≈ 1− −0
E ≈ 2ε 0 [1 − 0]
0
2ε 0 σ
⇒ E = σ ............. ( v )
⇒E = 2σε 0 ............. ( v )
⇒E = 2ε 0 ............. ( v )
Therefore, 2ε 0 from equation (v), it is clear that the electric field due a uniform infinite charged sheet is
constant.
NOTE
P H Y S I C S
ELECTROSTATICS
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL ENERGY
Potential Energy
Recall what we have learnt about potential energy till now. We cannot define absolute potential
energy. However, what we can define is the change in potential energy.
The change in potential energy is negative of the work done by the conservative force, as the
system changes from initial to final configuration. Mathematically, the change in the potential
energy is defined as,
ΔU = Uf – Ui = (–W)i → f
It is very important to note that the potential energy can be defined only for conservative force
fields. Thus, change in the potential energy of a system in a conservative force field does not
depend on the path through which the system changes from the initial to final configurations.
It is because the change in potential energy is not a path function but a state function, i.e., it
depends only on the initial and final states of the system.
r
q1q2 1 2
⇒ W= −
4πε 0 r r1
q1q2 1 1
⇒
= W −
4πε 0 r1 r2
Therefore, the change in electric potential energy is,
q q 1 1
U 2 − U1 = − W =1 2 −
4πε 0 r2 r1
Now, if the charge q1 already exists at a position in space, charge q2 is brought from infinity
(i.e., r1 = ∞) to the final position r2 = r from charge q1, and we choose the potential energy to be
zero at infinity (reference position), i.e., U (∞) = 0, then the change in the potential energy in this
process is given by,
q1q2 1 1
U2 −=
U1 −
4πε 0 r2 r1
q1q2 1 1
⇒ U (r ) − =
U (∞) −
4πε 0 r ∞
q1q2 1 1
U2 −=
U1 q1q2 −
⇒ U ( r )4πε
= 0 r2 r
4πε 0r 1
q1q2 1 infinity
1
⇒U (r ) − =U ( ∞by
Therefore, ) choosing − as the reference position (datum), it can be said that the potential
energy of two charges4πε 0 r ∞
separated by a distance of r is given by,
q1q2
⇒ U (r ) =
4πε 0r
03
The potential energy of a system of charged particles is defined as the negative of the work done to
bring those charges from infinity to the desired position. Let charges q1 and q2 be separated initially
by infinite distance. Now, charge q2 is brought from infinity to r. Thus, the separation between the
two point charges is r. Therefore, the potential energy is,
qq
U ( r ) = U ( r ) − U ( ∞ ) = 1 2 = ( − Wel )∞→r
4πε 0r
Where, Wel is the work done by the electrostatic force.
Now, suppose those two charges are brought at a separation of r because of the work done (Wext)
by some external agent. Hence, according to the work-energy theorem,
Wext + Wel = Δ(K.E.)
Assuming the charges are brought quasi-statically, it can be said that Δ(K.E.) = 0 Therefore,
Wext + Wel = 0
⇒ Wext = – Wel
Thus, ΔU = Wext if and only if Δ(K.E.) = 0.
q1q2
1. While calculating the potential energy by using the formula, U ( r ) = , the charge
4πε 0r
value should be put with the sign. It means that if +q1 and –q2 are separated by a
distance of r, then the potential energy of the system will be,
qq
U (r ) = − 1 2
4πε 0r
2. ΔU = Wext if and only if Δ(K.E.) = 0
3. ΔU = – Wel (Always)
Solution
Since q1 and q2 are the like charges, there will be an electrostatic repulsive force between them.
Therefore, as the charge q1 moves close to charge q2, the velocity will decrease up to the closest
distance, and at the distance of closest approach, the velocity will become zero.
Let the distance of the closest approach be r as shown
in the figure.
As charge q1 moves closer to charge q2, an electrostatic
force with an increasing magnitude will act on charge q1 q2 (Fixed)
q2, but as it is fixed in space, the net work done by the v0
external force on the system is zero. Therefore, the + m
+ +
principle of conservation of mechanical energy can r
be applied to the given system.
04
The potential energy and kinetic energy of the system at the initial and final positions are listed in
the table.
Total energy = K.E. + P.E.
At ∞ 1 2 kq1q2
mv0 = 0
2 r
At distance r 1 2 2kqkq1q12q2
r=
⇒0mv 0 =
2 mv0r
2
2kq q
1 ⇒ r = 12 2
Where k = in the case ofmv
vacuum.
4πε 0 0
Charge +q1 starts from infinity with an initial velocity of v0 towards charge +q2, which is initially
at rest and is not fixed. Find the distance of closest approach between these two charges.
Solution MAIN
q1 q2 (Rest)
Initially, charge +q1 has velocity v0 and the charge v0
m + +
+q2 is at rest, and they are separated by an infinite
distance. In this case, both the charges are not fixed
as shown in the figure. ∞
As charge +q1 moves towards charge +q2, charge +q2 starts moving away from +q1, as there is a
repulsive force between them. Now, the force on +q1 due to +q2 opposes the momentum of +q1,
whereas the force on +q2 due to +q1 reinforces the momentum of +q2. Hence, as +q1 moves towards
+q2, the velocity of +q1 decreases and the velocity of +q2 increases. At some instant, the velocity
of both the charges become equal, i.e., the relative velocity between them becomes zero. At that
instant, the distance of separation between them is the minimum and it is known as the distance
of closest approach.
q1 q2
Let the velocity of each of the charged particles be v v0 v v
at the distance of the closest approach. + + +
The potential energy and the kinetic energy of the m1 m2
system at the initial and final positions are listed in
the table. r
The initial and final linear momenta of the charged particles are listed in the following table:
Momentum q1 q2
Initial m1v0 0
⇒ v =
2 ( m1 + m2 ) 0 r
1 m2 + m1m2 − m12 2 kq1q2
⇒ 1 v0 =
2 ( m1 + m2 ) r
m1m2v02 kq1q2
⇒ =
2( m1 + m2 ) r
2kq q ( m + m )
⇒r = 1 2 1 2 2
m1m2v0
MAIN
Electric Potential Energy of a Multiple-Charge System
–q1 +q2
Consider a system of four charges as shown in the figure.
First, let us focus on –q1 and +q2 only. There is only one potential
energy term between them, which is,
k ( − q1 ) q2
U21 (or U12 ) = +q4 –q3
r
06
Now, let us focus on –q1, +q2, and –q3. In this case, there will be three potential energy terms: U21, U31
(= U13), and U32 (= U23). The number of the potential energy term can also be obtained by applying
the method of combination given as follows:
For a system consisting of n charges, the total potential energy of the system will be the sum of the
potential energy of the interaction between n possible pairs of interaction.
To find the number of pairs of possible interactions within the system, we use permutation and
combination (without repetition), i.e., if a system consists of three charges, we always need a pair
of charges for an interaction. Therefore, out of three charges, we have to consider two charges
at a time to calculate the potential energy between them. Hence, the number of possible pair
combinations is,
3! 3×2×1
=3
C2 = = 3 terms
2!(3 − 2 )! 2 × 1 × 1
n!
(By the formula, nCr = )
r ! ( n − r )!
If we consider all the four given charges, then there are
4! 4×3×2×1
=4
C2 = = 6 terms and the terms are,
2!( 4 − 2 )! ( 2 × 1) × ( 2 × 1)
U21, U31 (= U13), U32 (= U23), U41 (= U14), U42 (= U24), and U43 (= U34)
Hence, if we generalise this concept to a system consisting of n charges, then it will be
n n ( n − 1)
C2 = potential energy terms.
2
2.0 × 10–5 C
10 cm
Solution
Looking at the figure, it can be concluded that there will be three potential energy terms.
Assume that initially, the charges are infinitely separated from each other. Therefore, the initial
potential energy of the system is, Ui = 0.
If we consider q = 10–5 C, then the charges at the vertices of the equilateral triangle are 2q, 3q, and
4q. Let the length of the side of the triangle be, r = 10 cm = 0.1 m.
Therefore, the final potential energy of the system is,
Uf =
1 (2q )( 4q ) + 1 (2q )(3q ) + 1 (3q )( 4q )
4πε 0 r 4πε 0 r 4πε 0 r
1
⇒ Uf
= 8q2 + 6q2 + 12q2
4πε 0r
2
07
Uf =
1 (2q )( 4q ) + 1 (2q )(3q ) + 1 (3q )( 4q )
4πε 0 r 4πε 0 r 4πε 0 r
1
⇒ Uf
= 8q2 + 6q2 + 12q2
4πε 0r
26q2
⇒ Uf =
4πε 0r
We know that if the change in kinetic energy is zero, then the change in potential energy of the
system is equal to the work done by the external agent, i.e., ΔU = Wext if and only if Δ(K.E.) = 0.
In the given problem, the charges are assumed to be at rest at infinity initially. Assume that the
charges are brought quasi-statically and finally, they are placed at the vertices of the equilateral
triangle.
Therefore, Δ(K.E.) = 0
Hence,
26q2
Wext = U f − Ui =
4πε 0r
( 9 × 10 ) × 26 × (10 )
2
9 −5
⇒ Wext =
0.1
26 × 9 × × 109 × 10− 10
⇒ Wext =
10− 1
⇒ Wext 234 J
=
An electric field E = 20 NC–1 exists along the x-axis in space. A charge of −2 ×10–4 C is moved
from points A to B. Find the change in the electrical potential energy (UA – UB) when points A
and B are given by the following:
(a) A = (0, 0); B = (4 m, 2 m)
(b) A = (4 m, 2 m); B = (6 m, 5 m)
(c) A = (0, 0); B = (6 m, 5 m)
Solution
The electric field, E = 20 iˆ NC −1
The electrostatic force on charge q = −2 ×10–4 C, F =qE =− 4 × 10−3 iˆ N
⇒ Wel = ( )(
− 4 × 10− 3 iˆ ⋅ 2iˆ + 3 ˆj ) A q
⇒ Wel =− 8 × 10− 3 J
(0, 0) x (m)
Now, E = 20 NC −1
− (Wel ) A → B
UB − U A =
⇒ ∆U = 8 × 10− 3 J
BOARDS
Electric Dipole in a Uniform External Electric Field
− pE [ − cos θ ]θ2
θ
⇒W =
1
⇒ W pE [cos θ2 − cos θ1 ]
=
Therefore, the change in potential energy is,
− (Wel ) =
Uθ2 − Uθ1 = −W
− Uθ1 pE [cos θ1 − cos θ2 ]
⇒ Uθ2=
We know that the potential energy or the change in potential energy is always measured from a
reference position (datum) and we assume the potential energy at the reference position to be
π
zero. In this case, the reference position is, θ = .
2
Therefore, the potential energy of the dipole is,
π π
U (θ ) − U=
2 pE cos 2 − cos θ
π π Uππ =
⇒ U (θ ) = − pE cos θ θ = is(θthe
U ) − reference
U= pE level,
cos −cos 0θ
2 2 22
π π
⇒ U (θ ) =− p ⋅ E U (θ ) − U= pE cosπ − cos θ π
⇒ U (θ ) = − pE cos 2θ θ = is
2the
reference level, U = 0
Hence, it can be concluded that the potential energy 2
of a dipole that makes an angle of 2θwith the
π π
uniform external electric field ⇒is, U (θ ) ⇒=−Up(⋅θE) =
= − pE cos θ , θ=
provided is the
the reference level, U is =
position 0
π 2 2
θ = .
2 ⇒ U (θ ) =− p ⋅ E
01
NOTE
P H Y S I C S
ELECTROSTATICS
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL
Electric Potential
The electric field in a region of space is described by a ssigning a vector quantity E at each point.
Pictorially, the uniform electric field can be described as equispaced, parallel electric lines of force,
and the direction of the electric field is denoted by the arrowheads as shown in the figure.
The same field can also be described by assigning a s calar quantity V at each point known as
electric potential.
V
E = Ax iˆ
Assume that a particle of charge +q is moving from point A to point B in a non-uniform electric
field and the potential energy at point A and point B is UA and UB, respectively, with respect to the
reference position fixed at any point in space.
If VA and VB are the electric potentials at points A and B,
respectively, then the change in the electric potential is
E = Ax iˆ UB
defined as,
U −U A B
VB − VA =B
q
Therefore, the change in potential is defined as the q
change in potential energy per unit charge. U A
A
Hence, the change in potential energy is,
UB – UA = q(VB – VA) = –Wel
02
Now, suppose that we choose some point (P) at infinity where the electric potential is, VP = 0
It means that we chose the datum of the electric field at infinity. However, there are no restrictions
to choose the datum of the electric potential at infinity. Rather, it can be chosen at any point in
space, depending on the given scenario. This is also true for the electric potential energy.
If a particle of charge +q is brought from point P (at infinity) to point A, then the change in electric
potential is,
U A −UP
VA − VP = VA =
q
(1) If a particle of charge +q is moving from point A to point B in an electric field and the
potential energy at point A and point B is UA and UB, respectively, then the change in
potential energy is, UB – UA = q(VB – VA) = – Wel.
(2) If a particle of charge +q is moving from point A to point B in an electric field under the
action of an external force and the potential energy at point A and point B is UA and UB,
respectively, then the change in potential energy is UB – UA = q(VB – VA) = Wext, provided
that Δ(K.E.) = 0
E = Ax iˆ UB
The kinetic energy of a charged particle B
decreases by 10 J as it moves from a point at
potential 100 V to a point at potential 200 V. Find
the charge of the particle. q
UA
A
Solution
It is given that the kinetic energy decreases by 10 J as the charged particle moves from point B to
point A. Therefore, Δ(K.E.) = Kf – Ki = –10
Since the potential energy is a scalar quantity, path-independent, and a state function, it
depends only on the initial and final positions. Similarly, electric potential is a scalar quantity and
path-independent.
Given,
The electric potential at point A is, VA = 100 V.
The electric potential at point B is, VB = 200 V.
By applying the work-energy theorem, we get,
Wext + Wel = Δ(K.E.)
⇒ 0 + (– ΔU) = –10 {Since there is no external agent, the external work done is zero.}
⇒ ΔU = 10
⇒ Uf – Ui = 10
⇒ q(Vf – Vi) = 10
03
⇒ q(VA – VB) = 10
⇒ q(200 – 100) = 10
⇒ q = +0.1 C
Therefore, the charge of the particle is +0.1 C.
q q
Point charge +q rˆ
4πε 0r 2
4πε 0r
( −q ) ( −q )
Point charge –q rˆ
4πε 0r 2
4πε 0r
BOARDS MAIN
Electric Potential Due to an Electric Dipole
Therefore, at any point on the equatorial line of the dipole, the net electric potential is zero. Not
only on the equatorial line, if we assume that a plane is passing through the equatorial line or along
the perpendicular bisector of the dipole, then the electric potential will be zero at any point on
the plane. This is why the equatorial line is also known as the equipotential line, and the plane is
known as the equipotential plane or surface.
⇒
= Vaxis
( +q ) + ( −q )
4πε 0 ( r − a ) 4πε 0 ( r + a )
q 1 1
⇒ Vaxis
= −
4πε 0 ( r − a ) ( r + a )
q (r + a) − (r − a)
⇒ Vaxis =
4πε 0 ( r − a )( r + a )
q 2a
⇒ Vaxis = 2
(
4πε 0 r − a2
)
p
⇒ Vaxis = The dipole moment is, p q ( 2a )
(
4πε 0 r 2 − a2 )
a
If r >> a, then << 1. Therefore,
r
p
Vaxis =
a2
4πε 0r 2 1 − 2
r
p
⇒ Vaxis = 2
4πε 0r
4πε 0r 3 4πε 0r 3
4πε 0r 3
Electric potential at p p⋅r
V= V=0 V=
r (>> a) 4πε 0r 2 4πε 0r 3
Therefore, mathematically, the electric potential is negative of the line integral of the electric field.
y
From equation (i), we get the relationship between the electric
field and the electric potential as, dV = − E · dr .
Let the electric field in the 3D space be E = E x iˆ + E y ˆj + E z kˆ and
the elementary displacement vector be dr = dx iˆ + dy ˆj + dz kˆ .
Therefore, the small change in electric potential will be, x
dV =− E ⋅dr
z
( )(
− E x iˆ + E y ˆj + E z kˆ ⋅ dx iˆ + dy ˆj + dz kˆ
⇒ dV = )
⇒ dV =
− E x dx − E y dy − E z dz
Therefore, if dy= 0= dz, then,
dV
Ex = −
dx
And if dy ≠ 0 and dz ≠ 0, then,
∂V
Ex = −
∂x
[Partial differentiation]
∂V ∂V
Similarly, E y = − and E z = −
∂y ∂z
It means if the electric potential in 3D space is given as, V = V ( x , y , z ) , then,
∂V
The electric field along the x -direction is, E x = −
∂x
∂V
The electric field along the y -direction is, E y = −
∂y
∂V
The electric field along the z -direction is, E z = −
∂z
Therefore, the electric field is given by,
∂V ˆ ∂V ˆ ∂V ˆ
E= − i+ j+ k
∂x ∂y ∂z
∇ is known as "Nabla" or "gradient" and is
⇒ E = − ∇V ∂ ∂ ∂
defined as: =∇ iˆ + ˆj + kˆ
∂x ∂y ∂z
∂V
The electric field along the z -direction is, E z = −
07 ∂z
Therefore, the electric field is given by,
∂V ˆ ∂V ˆ ∂V ˆ
E= − i+ j+ k
∂x ∂y ∂z
∇ is known as "Nabla" or "gradient" and is
⇒ E = − ∇V ∂ ∂ ∂
defined as: =∇ iˆ + ˆj + kˆ
∂x ∂y ∂z
Therefore, the electric field is the negative gradient of the electric potential.
Solution ADVANCED
(a) Given,
The expression for the electric potential is,
V(x, y, z) = A(xy + yz + zx)
Therefore, the x-component of the electric field is,
∂V
Ex = −
∂x
∂
⇒ Ex = − A ( xy + yz + zx )
∂x
⇒ E x =− A (1) y + 0 + z (1)
− A[ y + z ]
⇒ Ex =
The electric field along the y -direction is,
∂V
Ey = −
∂y
∂
⇒ Ey = − A ( xy + yz + zx )
∂y
− A x (1) + (1) z + 0
⇒ Ey =
− A[ x + z ]
⇒ Ey =
The electric field along the z -direction is,
∂V
Ez = −
∂z
∂
⇒ Ez = − A ( xy + yz + zx )
∂z
⇒ Ez = − A 0 + y (1) + (1) x
− A[ x + y ]
⇒ Ez =
Therefore, the expression of the electric field is,
E= − A ( y + z ) iˆ + ( x + z ) ˆj + ( x + y ) kˆ
08
(b) From part (a), we get the expression for the electric field as,
E= − A ( y + z ) iˆ + ( x + z ) ˆj + ( x + y ) kˆ
Given,
A = 10 SI unit
( x , y , z ) = ( 1 m, 1 m, 1 m )
Therefore, the electric field becomes,
E= − 10 (1 + 1) iˆ + (1 + 1) ˆj + (1 + 1) kˆ
E =− 20 iˆ + ˆj + kˆ
Hence, the magnitude of the electric field is,
E 20 12 + 12 + 12
=
⇒E =
20 3 NC − 1
y (m)
P iˆ
E = Ax
An electric field,= E ( 20 iˆ + 30 ˆj ) NC − 1, exists in space. If (2, 2)
the potential at the origin is taken to be zero, then find the
potential at (2 m, 2 m).
r2
r2
V −V
V22 − − ∫∫ E
V11 =
−
= E ⋅⋅ dr
dr O x (m)
r1
r1
P
P
Solution MAIN ⇒ V − V − ∫∫ E ⋅⋅ dr
=
−
⇒ VPP − VOO = E dr
O
O
Given, P
P
E ( 20 iˆ + 30 ˆj ) NC − 1 ⇒V
⇒ − ∫∫ E
VPP =
−
=
E ⋅⋅ dr
dr [[
V 0]]
VOO =
0
=
The electric field,= O
O
The electric potential at the origin O, VO = 0 ((22 ,, 22))
Let the electric potential at point P be VP.
Therefore,
⇒V
⇒ VPP =
−
=
− ∫∫ ((20 ˆ 30 ˆˆj ) ⋅ ( dx iˆˆ + dy ˆˆj )
+ 30 j ) ⋅ ( dx i + dy j )
20 iiˆ +
( )
0, 0
( 0 , 0)
r2
((22 ,, 22))
V2 − V1 = − ∫ E ⋅ dr
r1
⇒V
⇒ VPP =
−
=
− ∫∫ ((20
20 dx
((00 ,, 00))
dx +
+ 30 dy ))
30 dy
P
20[[ xx ]]00 − 30[[ yy ]]00
2 2
− ∫ E ⋅ dr
⇒ VP − VO = ⇒V
⇒ =
−
− 20 − 30
2 2
VPP =
O
P ⇒V
⇒ VP P
=
−
= 40 −
− 40 − 60 60
− ∫ E ⋅ dr
⇒ VP = [ VO =
0] ⇒V
⇒ VPP =
− 100 V
− 100
= V
O
( 2 , 2) Therefore, the potential at P (2 m, 2 m) is –100 V.
⇒ VP =
− ∫( )(
20 iˆ + 30 ˆj ⋅ dx iˆ + dy ˆj )
( 0 , 0)
( 2 , 2)
⇒ VP =
− ∫ (20 dx + 30 dy )
( 0 , 0)
− 20[ x ]0 − 30[ y ]0
2 2
⇒ VP =
⇒ VP =
− 40 − 60
⇒ VP =
− 100 V
09
y (m)
E = Ax iˆ
V=0
An electric field exists in a space given by E = Ax iˆ NC − 1 , where (10, 20)
A = 10 Vm–2. Take the potential at (10 m, 20 m) to be zero. Find
the potential at the origin.
(0, 0) x (m)
Solution
Given, y (m) E = Ax iˆ
V=0
E Ax = iˆ and A 10 Vm− 2 (10, 20)
⇒E = 10x iˆ
We know that,
(0, 0) x (m)
dV =− E ⋅ dr
(
− 10x iˆ ⋅ dx iˆ + dy ˆj
⇒ dV = )( )
VP (10 , 20)
⇒ ∫ dV =
− ∫ (10x ) dx + 0 dy
VO ( 0 , 0)
(10 , 20)
⇒ VP − VO =
− ∫ (10x ) dx
( 0 , 0)
(10 , 20)
⇒ − VO = − 10 ∫ x dx [ VP = 0]
( 0 , 0)
10
x2
⇒ VO =
10
2 0
⇒= (
VO 5 102 − 02 )
⇒ VO = 500 V
If the electric field and the electric potential at a point are E and V, respectively, then which
of the following statements is/are incorrect?
Solution
Consider an equilateral triangle with three positive charges at the vertices as shown in the figure.
10
It is easily seen that the magnitude of all the three electric fields at point
O is equal, and the resultant of any two electric field vectors perfectly q
balances the third electric vector. Therefore, the net electric field is zero
E r0 E
at point O.
However, if we assume that the distance from the vertices to point O is r0 O
and try to calculate the electric potential at point O, then that would be,
3q q E q
VO =
4πε 0r0
Therefore, the statement ‘If E = 0, V must be zero’ is false.
Thus, option (A) is incorrect.
Now, consider a square with two equal positive charges and two equal
negative charges as shown in the figure. q q
In this case, the net electric potential at the centre of the square is
zero, but the net electric field is non-zero and its direction is vertically O
downwards as shown in the figure.
Therefore, the statement ‘If V = 0, E must be zero’ is false.
–q –q
Thus, option (B) is incorrect.
Consider the statement given in option (C): if E ≠ 0, V cannot be zero.
From the case of the square, we get,
E ≠ 0, V = 0
Therefore, this statement is also false.
Thus, option (C) is also incorrect.
The discussion about the equilateral triangle also implies that the statement in option (D), ‘If V ≠ 0,
E cannot be zero’ is also incorrect.
Therefore, all the given options are incorrect.
Note
• We know that dV = − E · dr . So, we might assume that if E = 0, V = 0. We should be careful. In
the expression, dV = − E · dr , if we put E = 0, then we get dV = 0, which means that the change
in potential is zero and this in turn implies that the potential is constant.
The significance of the negative sign in the expression dV = − E · dr can be understood in the
following two ways:
1. Along the direction of the electric field, the value of the potential decreases.
2. The direction of the electric field is from a high potential to a low potential.
• For dV = 0, the electric field E need not always be zero. This is because if E ⊥ dr , then dV = 0
again. Hence, V becomes constant. This is the concept of equipotential surfaces.
11
Equipotential Surface
An equipotential surface can also be defined as a surface on which potential is the same at every
point.
Example: The equatorial plane of a dipole is an equipotential surface, i.e., the electric potential is
constant all along the equatorial axis (/plane) of the dipole.