Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analytical Technology
Presented by:
Steven Walfish
President, Statistical Outsourcing Services
steven@statisticaloutsourcingservices.com
http://www.statisticaloutsourcingservices.com
Agenda
• Introduction to Capability
– What is capability
– Histograms
– Normal Distribution
• Capability Indices
– Cp
– Cpk
– Pp
– Ppk
• Calculating Sigma
– Relating capability to percent nonconforming
±2S (95.4%)
30
±3S (99.7%)
Frequency
20 ±4.5S (99.9993%)
10
0
74.0 74.4 74.8 75.2 75.6 76.0 76.4
Examples of Capability
• Some examples of where capability
analysis can be used:
• We divide this problem into two parts. First the percent out of
specification on the high end (greater than the USL) and then the
percent out on the low end (less than the LSL).
The Normal Distribution
• The normal distribution is:
USL − X X − LSL
Z= ;
S S
• Z is the number of standard deviations that the specification is from
the mean.
• Normal probability tables give you the percent of the distribution that
would exceed the specification limit for a given z value
58 − 50 50 − 46
Z= ;
4 4
• Control charts
– Rbar
– Sbar
– Moving Range
– MSSD
• Pooled standard deviation
• Total standard deviation (Long-Term)
Short-Term
• Statistical Process Control methods such as control charting provide
estimates for short term variability.
• The moving range, like the average range for subgroup size greater
than 1 uses the constant d2. Here the value of d2 equals 1.128 and
the average range is the average of the range of successive points.
1 (∑ d )
2
i
*
2 (n − 1)
c4
Long Term
• Total variability can be estimated from the entire data set.
• If the specifications are larger than 6σ, the ratio will be less than 1.
Mean = 0.045
SD = 0.005
LSL = 0.042
USL = 0.048
Cp = 0.19
UpperSpec − LowerSpec 0.028 0.032 0.036 0.040 0.044 0.048 0.052 0.056
Cp =
6⋅S LSL
Mean = 0.045
USL
SD = 0.005
LSL = 0.03
USL = 0.06
Cp = 0.97
UpperSpec − X
C pU = Mean = 0.045
3⋅S SD = 0.005
LSL = 0.042
USL = 0.048
CpL = 0.17
CpU = 0.22
Cpk = 0.17
C pL =
3⋅S LSL USL
Mean = 0.045
SD = 0.005
LSL = 0.03
USL = 0.06
CpL = 0.95
CpU = 0.99
C pk = min( C pL , C pU ) Cpk = 0.95
Mean = 0.045
SD = 0.0054
LSL = 0.042
USL = 0.048
Pp = 0.19
UpperSpec − LowerSpec 0.028 0.032 0.036 0.040 0.044 0.048 0.052 0.056
Pp =
6 ⋅S LSL USL
Mean = 0.045
SD = 0.0054
LSL = 0.03
USL = 0.06
Pp = 0.93
• If Ppk is greater than 1 then the process mean is sufficiently far from
the specification limit.
Ppk
LSL USL
Mean = 0.045
SD = 0.0054
X − LowerSpec
PpL = LSL = 0.042
3⋅S USL = 0.048
PpL = 0.17
PpU = 0.21
Ppk = 0.17
Mean = 0.045
SD = 0.005
LSL = 0.03
USL = 0.06
Ppk = min(PpL , PpU ) PpL = 0.91
PpU = 0.95
Ppk = 0.91
• Mean = 0.465
• Standard Deviation (Short Term) = 0.0075
• Standard Deviation (Total) = 0.0067
Example – Continued
•Cp = 1.34
LSL USL
W ithin
•CpL = 1.99 Overall
•CpU = 0.69
•Cpk = 0.69
•Pp = 1.49
•PpL = 2.20
•PpU = 0.77
•Ppk = 0.77
0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.48
Attribute Data
• When examination of an item or event results in a PASS
or FAIL rather than a measurement, the capability
analysis must be based on a discrete distribution.
• Using the overall percent defective, calculate the upper and lower
95% confidence interval on percent defective.
1 4 1 2 4
2 3 1 0 7
3 2 5 8 8
2 3 4 9 6
3 2 3 0 0
4 1 4 4 5
3 2 5 5 6
2 3 9 0 0
3 4 4 1 2
5 2 3 2 4
P-Chart
P Chart
0.5
1 1
UCL=0.4156
0.4
0.3
Proportion
0.2 _
P=0.166
0.1
0.0 LCL=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Sample
Updated P-Chart
P Chart
0.4
UCL=0.3786
0.3
Proportion
0.2
_
P=0.1435
0.1
0.0 LCL=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Sample
Summary Statistics
Binomial Process Capability Analysis
P C har t Binomial P lot
0.4
Expected Defectives
U C L=0.3786
6
P r opor tion
0.2 4
_
P =0.1435
2
0.0 LC L=0 0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0.0 2.5 5.0
Sample O bser ved Defectives
Low er C I: 12.15
U pper C I: 16.78
10 Target: 0.00 5.0
P P M Def: 143478
Low er C I: 121452 2.5
U pper C I: 167814
5
P rocess Z: 1.0648 0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 Low er C I: 0.9628 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Sample U pper C I: 1.1678
Poisson Data
• First plot your data on a u-chart. This
allows you to assess if the process is in
statistical control. Remove any points
outside the limits and recalculate the
average defects per unit (DFU).
7 2 2 3 5
4 4 2 4 4
4 5 2 7 3
7 3 2 2 1
0 1 9 6 2
2 3 0 2 5
1 4 4 1 3
0 2 1 4 1
3 2 3 3 1
5 2 2 2 1
U-Chart
U Chart
1
9
8 UCL=8.12
7
Sample Count Per Unit
4
_
3 U=2.96
0 LCL=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Sample
Updated P-Chart
U Chart
8 UCL=7.890
6
Sample Count Per Unit
4
_
3 U=2.837
0 LCL=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Sample
Summary Statistics
Poisson Capability Analysis
U C har t P oisson P lot
Sample C ount P er Unit
U C L=7.890
7.5
Expected Defects
6
5.0
4
_
2.5 U =2.837
2
0.0 LC L=0 0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0.0 2.5 5.0
Sample O bser ved Defects
C umulative DP U Dist of DP U
8
M ean D P U : 2.8367
4 Low er C I: 2.3848
U pper C I: 3.3494 4
3
M in DP U : 0.0000
M ax DP U : 7.0000 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 Targ DP U : 0.0000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sample
Process Analytical Technology
• The goal of PAT is to achieve sufficient
process understanding and control to
enable quality assurance in “real-time”.
Adjust
Ranges as
Appropriate
Conclusions
• Process capability analysis can be predictive of
expected out of specification results.