Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Dolphins
The speaker of this poem (a dolphin) narrates how its freedom has been usurped, how
its dreams have been shattered and how drastically its world has changed, thanks to
the insatiable greed of man. The lives of these beautiful sea creatures are completely
controlled by man and they are made to dance to the tunes of the Master. The sense
of alienation, their loss of freedom and the overarching hopelessness makes the poem
all the more poignant, especially when they express their awareness of the inevitable
fate that awaits them.
It is important to note that even their swimming isn’t a voluntary one: the dolphins’
natural movements are controlled by man whether it be through the limits of the pool or
the instructions he gives through his whistle.
The dolphins are made to play any role that pleases the master, whether it is dancing,
swimming or balancing balls. Their identity is made to occupy various molds, quite
like water, the “element” they live in which takes the shape of any container it is stored
in.
The first stanza makes it clear that the dolphins have no option. Though it is placed in
water (we are in our element), it is not free, for the moment it tries to escape, and
death will become inevitable as it will not be able to “breathe for long”. The pool is a
stagnant space where the native becomes a captive and motion becomes stasis.
The freedom the dolphins long for lies beyond the aquarium but any attempt to get out
of it will result in immediate death. The denial of their freedom by the shrinking of the
“world” they inhabit merely allows them to exist without letting them actually live. In
other words, the dolphin makes it clear that one can go on existing without
actually living and that freedom is a prerequisite to a full-blown life. This is
exactly what has been denied. The dolphins are caught between the devil and the
deep sea. Only in this case, the Devil is Man himself and the deep sea is but a shallow
aquarium.
One of the distinctive features of this poem is its ambiguity. The poem throws up
interesting questions precisely at points where one is most confident about its
meanings. A case in point is the use of the word ‘other‘ in the first stanza:
What does the word actually stand for? Does it refer to the ocean which commands its
physical and emotional yearning (forms my thoughts)? Or is it the ‘other’ dolphin, its
companion, whose movements in the aquarium shapes its thoughts while mirroring its
tricks? Or is it its own reflection on the aquarium walls which he seems to take for
another dolphin? Or is it all of these?
Page 3 of 5
Also, what does the line “And also mine.” signify? More importantly whose ‘mine‘ is
this? Is it the dolphin who is wistfully repeats his own sentence? Or is it (as seems
probable) an utterance of another dolphin who is seconding the voice of his inmate by
echoing his thoughts? If this is the case, we then begin to see that there is no single
speaker involved. The poem attacks our assumption of such a poem being
a monologue spoken by an individual. In such a case, the poem doesn’t remain a
monologue of a dolphin but rather collective voices of dolphins who are expressing
their collective misery. Again, the use of we gains a heightened meaning as it doesn’t
merely stand for the collective but is voiced by the collective. The title of the poem The
Dolphins then gains a greater relevance in the same way.
The water that contains and controls the dolphins isn’t devoid of man and his tools of
oppression whether it be in the form of hoops or plastic balls. It is clear that the
aquarium is flooded with waters of guilt. But then again, whose guilt is it? Is the
dolphin’s self guilt for having fallen to the nets of man? Or does it represent man’s
unacknowledged ‘guilt’?
The waters where the dolphins are kept isn’t their friend and certainly not a medium of
justice where Truth may be sought: We have found no truth in these waters. Rather, it
is complicit in the ruthless exploitation of the dolphins by functioning as a tool of
oppression – one with which the dolphins may be kept alive just so that they may be
exploited. It is with the aid of water that the existence of dolphins becomes a means to
someone else’s ends. The dolphins were blessed when they freely traversed the vast
expanse of the ocean. Unfortunately, they are not blessed anymore. Their erstwhile
blessed life has become a cursed existence and Man is the cause of this reversal.
The dolphins took days to register the grave, undeserved injury inflicted on them.
However, after days of the traumatic experience they have begun to realize (translate)
that there’s not much difference between the large ocean or a small pool . ‘It is the
same space ‘ as both spaces are not free from the domination of man.
The third stanza takes the reader to poignant heights through the loss of depth which is
the ocean. A sad reality of the dolphins is that their “world will not deepen to dream
in “: they have nothing beyond their present condition. Their self-realization and
self-fulfillment stops with the bottom of the pool. Their life has become a forgotten
memory and their identity a reflection on the aquarium glass where they see the
reflection “flash by like memory of somewhere else”.
The ‘coloured ball ‘which they have to balance and the plastic toy” referred in the third
stanza lends a form of artificiality their life has been reduced to.
“Music of loss forever from the other’s heart which turns my own to stone”
One remarkable quality the dolphin embodies (and which is clearly lacking in Man)
is empathy. Like most social animals, dolphins have a developed sense of
communication. Coupled with the fact that they use high frequency sounds
(echolocation) to communicate in the form of clicks, it is quite natural how the music of
loss for one dolphin should be instantly detected by another. Also, the use of internal
Page 5 of 5
The ‘plastic toy‘ in this stanza not only highlights the artificial external addition to the
dolphin’s life but also refers to the dolphins themselves for they have become toys as
well. The dolphins sink to the limits of the pool but their freedom to do so isn’t just
restricted by the bottom of the pool, for they are free to do only until the whistle blows “.
The last line of the poem betrays a sign of fatalism and hopelessness which weighs
down these magnificent creatures:
The fact that they are fully aware of their inevitable death, that they are dancing to the
tunes of man despite this knowledge and moreover that there’s nothing they can do
about it imbues this poem with a dark reality which throws up an uncomfortable truth
before us and presents before us a reality which we have had a hand in making. Thus,
by giving a voice to the voiceless creatures and pointing at the crimes man has
committed against other life forms, the poem also emerges as a fine example
of ecocritical writing.
As mentioned earlier, the entire monologue uses a plural instead of a singular, always
‘we’ instead of an ‘I’ which suggests that this is not an isolated case. Rather, the mode
of oppression exercised by man extends over a large number of creatures. This sense
of solidarity of the oppressed highlighted by the collective noun ‘we’ lends a great
magnitude to the voice of the oppressed. The poem can also be seen as
a commentary on the power relation between man and vast swathes of society
that have faced the full force of oppression based on their gender, race, caste,
creed or nationality. The poem bears a strong feminist undertones by the virtue of
which ‘we’ could be used to designate women who have been marginalized in the
socio-economic power structures deeply embedded in our society. The repeated use of
‘man‘ as the oppressor to the collective “us” lends some weight to this reading.
Thus, one could argue that by using the trope of animals Duffy is also highlighting the
forms of oppression within human society where various sections of the society are
denied agency and whose lives have been reduced to mere existence.