Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
Statistical Hypothesis:
A statistical hypothesis is some statement or assertion about a population or
equivalently about the probability distribution characterizing a population, which
we want to verify on the basis of information available from a sample.
There are two types of hypothesis
1) Null hypothesis
2) Alternative hypothesis
Null hypothesis:
A null hypothesis is a statistical hypothesis which we want to test and reject. It is
denoted by . For example, if is a random sample of size n from a
Normal population with mean and variance where and are parameters.
Let us assume that has a specified value . One needs to verify whether
the assumption is true or false. Then the null hypothesis is
Alternative hypothesis:
Any hypothesis other than null hypothesis is alternative hypothesis. It is usually
denoted by . Thus if the null hypothesis regarding population parameter
is then the alternative hypothesis are
i.
ii.
iii.
Simple hypothesis:
A simple hypothesis is a statistical hypothesis which completely specifies the
distribution. Suppose is a random sample of size n from a Normal
population with mean and variance . Then
Composite hypothesis:
A composite hypothesis is a statistical hypothesis which does not completely
specifies all parameter of the distribution.
Suppose is a random sample of size n from a Normal population
with mean and variance Then
Test of hypothesis:
A Test of statistical hypothesis is a two action decision problem after the
experimental sample values have been obtained, the two action being the
acceptance or rejection of the hypothesis under consideration.
Types of error:
When we decide a hypothesis based on sample observation we may commit an
error. There are two type of error
i. Type –I error
ii. Type –II error
Type-I error:
On the basis of sample observation if we reject the null hypothesis which was
actually true then we commit an error which is known as type-I error. The
probability of type-I error is denoted by
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
Type-II error:
On the basis of sample observation if we do not reject the null hypothesis which
was actually false then we commit an error which is known as type-I I error.
The probability of type-II error is denoted by
Level of significance :
The probability of rejecting a null hypothesis that is true and this probability is
fixed in advance. This probability is sometimes expressed as a percentage. So a test
of significance level is referred to as a level test.
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
Sample size
Large Small
Population Known z-test z-test
variance
Unknown z-test t-test
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
:::::::::::::::Testing procedure::::::::::::::::::::
Where, - - .
Suppose is the tabulated value at level of significance.
If calculated value of z is greater than or equal to tabulated value then we reject the
null hypothesis otherwise do not reject.
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
Applications
1) A psychologist claims that the mean age at which children start walking is
12.5 months. Carol wanted to check if this claim is true. She took a random
sample of 18 children and found that the mean age at which these children
started walking was 12.9 months with a standard deviation of 0.80 month. It
is known that the ages at which all children start walking are approximately
normally distributed. Test whether his claim is true or not at 5% level of
significance and make a conclusion.
Solution:
Let be the mean age at which all children start walking, and let be the
corresponding mean for the sample. From the given information,
The claim of the psychologist is that the mean age at which children start walking
is months. we apply the following steps to test the hypothesis
Or,
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
Or,
Example:
The mayor of a large city claims that the average net worth of families living in
this city is at least 300,000 tk. A random sample of 25 families selected from this
city produced a mean net worth of 288,000tk. Assume that the net worth of all
families in this city have a normal distribution with the population standard
deviation of 80,000tk. Using the 2.5% significance level, can you conclude that the
mayor’s claim is false?
Solution:
Let be the mean net worth of families living in this city and be the
corresponding mean for the sample. From the given information,
Or,
Or,
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
The
The calculated value of the test
statistic is greater than the critical
value so we do not reject the null
hypothesis. So it can be concluded that
mayor’s claim is true.
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
Application of z-test
Solution:
The hypothesis is to be tested
Or,
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
Solution:
The hypothesis is to be tested
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn
Md. Nazir Uddin
Faculty of statistics-IUBAT
Solution:
Hypothesis is to be tested
Since the test value falls within the critical region, we reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the average number
of calories burned per hour is less than 546.
Details at :::::::::::::::::::::http://goo.gl/7Dztn