Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Standardization
Ethical Issues
Performance Measures
Attitude Measures
Behavioral Observations
Factual Information
Performance Tests
• They are used to assess an individual’s ability to perform on an
achievement test, intelligence test, aptitude test, interest inventory,
or personality assessment inventory. Participants take tests that
measure their achievement (e.g., the Iowa Test of Basic Skills), their
intelligence (e.g., Wechsler), or their aptitude (e.g., Stanford–Binet).
Literature Expert
Interview Observation
23
How can we decide whether the instrument
we choose is a good one?
Criteria for Choosing a Good Instrument
• Have authors developed the instrument recently, and can you obtain
the most recent version? (older than 5 years old is outdated)
• Is the instrument widely cited by other authors?
• Are reviews available for the instrument?
• Is there information about the reliability and validity of scores from
past uses of the instrument?
• Does the procedure for recording data fit the research
questions/hypotheses in your study?
Validity
Reliability
Usability
Validity
• Validity is the level in which a measuring tool can measure precisely
and accurately the property it wants to measure without mixing other
features. That is, the more accurate a measuring instrument can
measure the property it wants to measure, the more valid it is.
Construct Validity
Face validity
Criterion Validity
Predictive Validity
Reliability
• The measuring instrument should always be able to measure the
desired feature in the same way, be stable and consistent.
• Scores should be nearly the same when researchers administer the
instrument multiple times at different times. Also, scores need to be
consistent. When an individual answers certain questions one way,
the individual should consistently answer closely related questions in
the same way. Several factors can result in unreliable data, including
when:
ü Questions on instruments are ambiguous and unclear
ü Procedures of test administration vary and are not standardized
ü Participants are fatigued, are nervous, misinterpret questions, or
guess on tests
Reliability Methods
1. Methods Based on Single Application (Internal Consistency)
a. Kuder Richardson (KR20-KR21)
b. Cronbach Alpha
c. Gutman’s Split Half
• The instrument should be easy to apply, easy to score, and time and
cost effective.
Closing Remarks on Quantitative Data Collection
• When collecting data for a study, plan to engage in five steps: (1)
selecting participants, (2) obtaining permissions, (3) selecting types of
data, (4) identifying instruments, and (5) administering data
collection.
• Identify the population and sample for a study. There are several
types of probability and nonprobability sampling. The most rigorous
sampling will be simple random sampling. However, the research
circumstances may dictate a form of non-probability sampling.
• Select as large a sample as possible. Use sampling formulas to be
systematic in selecting the size of the sample.
• Obtain permission to conduct a study.
Closing Remarks on Quantitative Data Collection
• Consider how the research questions or hypotheses will be answered
when deciding on what data type(s) to use. Then identify your
variables, operationally define them, and select measures (e.g.,
performance and attitudes, observations of behavior, and factual and
personal data) that fi t the operational definitions.
• Decide whether to develop your own instrument or to use an existing
instrument for your research.
• Consider the types of scales you plan to use on your instruments.
These scales will affect the types of statistics to be used in analyzing
the data. Make sure they relate to your questions.
• Before deciding on an instrument to use, make sure that the scores
from past uses of it are reliable and valid.
Qualitative Data Collection
Qualitative Data Collection
Interview
Document
Audiovisual Materials
Observation
• Observation is the process of gathering open-ended, firsthand
information by observing people and places at a research site. As a
form of data collection, observation has both advantages and
disadvantages.
• Advantages include the opportunity to record information as it
occurs in a setting, to study actual behavior, and to study individuals
who have difficulty verbalizing their ideas (e.g., preschool children).
Some of the disadvantages of observations are that you will be
limited to those sites and situations where you can gain access, and
in those sites, you may have difficulty developing rapport with
individuals.
Interview
• Equally popular to observation in qualitative research is
interviewing. A qualitative interview occurs when researchers ask
one or more participants general, open-ended questions and
record their answers. The researcher then transcribes and types
the data into a computer file for analysis.
Individual
Focus
Telephone
Group
E-mail
Documents
• Documents consist of public and private records that qualitative
researchers obtain about a site or participants in a study. They can
include newspapers, minutes of meetings, personal journals, and
letters. These sources provide valuable information in helping
researchers understand central phenomena in qualitative studies.
Audiovisual Materials
Credibility
Transferability
Dependability
Confirmability
Credibility
• Describing not just the behaviour and experiences, but their context as
well, so that the behaviour and experiences become meaningful to an
outsider
Dependability
• The stability of findings over time. Dependability involves participants’
evaluation of the findings, interpretation and recommendations of the
study such that all are supported by the data as received from participants
of the study.