Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
2 Numerical Model
Figure 1 presents the model geometry and stratigraphy. The foundation soil is 5.8 m thick. A 200 mm
thick region is placed at the top of the domain to model the snow pack for Case 2. A 150 mm thick
concrete culvert is constructed near the ground surface and extends to just over 700 mm depth. The
geology comprises a silty sand fill material overlying a sandy native soil material. The local water table
elevation is located just below the contact between the fill and native soil. For simplicity, the native soil
is assumed to be fully saturated. It should be noted that only half the domain could have been modeled in
this case, as the center-line of the culvert is also a line of symmetry.
4
Elevation
Native Soil
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Distance
Figure 1 - Model geometry
3 Material properties
A full-thermal material model was used for the fill and native soil materials. Figure 2 and Figure 3
present the thermal conductivity verses temperature function and normalized unfrozen water content
function, respectively. Both functions demonstrate that the thermal properties change over a narrow
temperature range below the phase change temperature. This phenomenon is a result of capillary forces
that hold the water in the void space of soils. The transition from an unfrozen material property to a
frozen material property occurs at a lower temperature for finer grained soils.
260
250
Thermal Conductivity (kJ/days/m/°C)
240
230 Fill
220
210
200
Native
190
180
170
-2 -1 0
Temperature (°C)
0.8
Unfrozen Water Content (m³/m³)
Fill
0.6
0.4
Native
0.2
0
-2 -1 0
Temperature (°C)
The water content for the fill material was assumed to be 18% by volume (~ 12% by weight) and the
native soil was assumed to be 40% by volume (~ 30% by weight). The volumetric heat capacity of both
soils was assumed to be 2700 kJ/m3/C for the unfrozen case and 2600 kJ/m3/C for the frozen case.
The concrete and snow were modeled using a simplified thermal model with constant thermal properties
in the frozen and unfrozen states. The snow was assumed to have a thermal conductivity of 31.1
kJ/day/m/C (0.36 W/m/K) with a heat capacity of 740 kJ/m3/C. The concrete thermal conductivity was
set at 155.5 kJ/day/m/C (1.8 W/m/K) with a heat capacity of 2600 kJ/m3/C.
4
Elevation
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Distance
Figure 4 – Temperature contours for the spatial function
The bottom boundary condition for both analyses was set to a constant temperature of 5 C while the top
boundary is set to a temperature of -8.5 C for the duration of the analysis. In the first case, the boundary
condition is applied to the top of the fill and culvert. In the second case, the snow material has been
applied to the upper region, so the boundary is applied to the top of the domain.
Figure 6 presents a plot of temperature verses time beneath the culvert (1 m below ground surface) for the
case that includes the snow pack. The temperature drops very rapidly as heat flow towards the freezing
boundary. Eventually, the steep thermal gradient between the ground surface and the warmer
temperatures within the domain begins to diminish as the freezing front propagates downward. As a
result, the upward thermal flux reduces and the cooling rate diminishes.
T vs Time at 1mdepth
6
4
Temperature (°C)
-2
-4
-6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (days)