You are on page 1of 27

AC7101/2 REV.

E∆1
Issue Date 1993-05
161Thorn Hill Road
AUDIT CRITERIA
Warrendale, PA 15086-7527 Revision Date 01-Jun-2020

Editorial ‘Δ’ Change 08-Jul-2020

Superseding AC7101/2 Rev. D

Nadcap
AUDIT CRITERIA FOR MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES -
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS

*TO BE USED ON AUDITS STARTING ON OR AFTER 30-AUG-2020*

1. SCOPE

This audit criteria supplements PRI AC7101/1. This audit criteria


applies to auditees seeking Nadcap accreditation for Materials Testing
Laboratories – Chemical Analysis.

Guidance and definitions for terms used here can be found in the MTL
Audit Handbook and the corresponding Handbook Supplement. The
Handbook and Supplement should be used as companions to the Audit
Criteria. The Handbook and Supplements are located on
www.eauditnet.com under Resources → Documents → Audit Criteria
→ Materials Testing Laboratories (AC7101/AC7006) → Handbooks &
Guides.
Note: Throughout this audit criteria, the term ‘test method’ refers to a
definitive procedure that produces a test result, including standard
laboratory procedures.

2. ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Chemistry Laboratory Quantitative Analytical Range (Figure 1, see YES NO


Appendix A) is completed for all types of chemical analysis within the
scope of accreditation.
• The purpose of the chemistry laboratory Quantitative Analytical
Range is to demonstrate the analyte levels, both minumum and
maximum, that the laboratory is able to show testing capability
at a stated precision level.
• Quantitative Analytical Range information for Figure 1 is
described in Appendix A.
• An example of a Quantitative Analytical Range is provided in
Appendix A.

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising there from, is the sole responsibility of the user”

PRI values your input. To provide feedback on this document, please contact the appropriate commodity staff engineer. (Contact
information is located at http://www.eauditnet.com under “Contact Us”.)

Copyright 2020 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.

t-frm-1115 21-May-2020
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -2-

• Figure 1 summarizes Quantitative Analytical Range and


Precision .
• The data listed in Figure 1 (including Quantitative Analytical
Range and Precision) is generated by the laboratory, using
applicable equipment, and is documented.
• The use of the instrument manufacturer’s data for Figure 1 is
prohibited.
• Figure 1 must be completed for each element per test code for
each alloy family within the laboratory scope of accreditation.
• The Quantitative Analytical Range does not have to be
developed by using Certified Reference Materials. When CRM’s
are not available, other reference materials or in-house
reference materials may be used. Laboratories may refer to
ASTM E2972 - Standard Guide for Production, Testing, and
Value Assignment of In-House Reference Materials for Metals,
Ores, and Other Related Materials - as guidance for qualifying
In-house reference materials(IRM’s). Other qualification
methods may be used, refer to section 3.
• Reference materials, developed prior to the publishing of ASTM
E2972 or other published reference material development
guidance are acceptable as long as the analyte values were
developed using a thorough value assignment process. Refer to
section 3 for the requirements of these reference materials.

2.1.1 Quantitative Analytical Range

This information must reflect the testing capabilities, near the extremes
of the calibration, for all elements per alloy base. The laboratory’s
actual quantitative range must be developed from data obtained from
laboratory specific equipment and reference materials.

2.1.2 Precision

This information must reflect the Precision as determined by the


laboratory for each extreme of the Quantitative Analytical Range (the
low end and the upper end). The methodology for determining the
Precision results must be documented. See example in Appendix A
Figure 1. Precision is often referred to as repeatability.

2.2 Procedures are used for creating the Quantitative Analytical Range and YES NO
for defining the means by which the stated precision at the upper and
lower limits is determined. Objective evidence for supporting the table is
on file.

2.3 Procedures are used to define when the Quantitative Analytical Range YES NO
is to be revised or updated.

2.4 Procedures are used to define laboratory practice for reporting test YES NO
results that are outside of the Quantitative Analytical Range.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -3-

3. REFERENCE MATERIALS

3.1 Certified Reference Materials, Reference Materials or internal (in- YES NO NA


house) reference materials are used for calibration, validation, or
verification as required by the applicable test method.

3.2 Reference Materials purchased from an outside supplier used for YES NO
calibration, validation, or verification have the following information
documented.
• Assigned values for each element
• An estimation of the uncertainty or acceptance limits for each
certified element. In cases where reference materials do not
have an uncertainty estimate, the lab may estimate the
uncertainty.
• Metrological traceability (when available)

3.3 Laboratory developed in-house reference materials (iRM) were YES NO NA


developed in accordance with ASTM E2972 or other published
reference material development guidance.

3.4 Laboratory developed reference materials assigned values are YES NO NA


traceable to reference materials from a recognized national metrology
institute or reference material producer.

3.4.a Or multiple laboratory analysis or multiple analytical techniques. YES NO NA

3.4.b Or natural physical constants. YES NO NA

3.4.c Or other means of validation to show confidence in the assigned value. YES NO NA
(ex PTP data)

3.5 Documentation is available by the laboratory detailing the process of YES NO NA


value assignment of reference materials from 3.4.

4. INSTRUMENT OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION SECTION NA

4.1 Procedure(s) are used for verification of instrument calibration and YES NO
verification results are documented.

4.2 Instrument verification is performed in accordance with a lab defined YES NO


schedule.

4.3 Procedures are used to determine the conditions when calibration or YES NO
drift correction is required.

4.4 Procedures are used which ensure analytical balances are calibrated YES NO NA
and have the capacity and precision for the application according to the
test specification.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -4-

5. SPECIMEN PREPARATION

5.1 Procedures are used to ensure sample preparation is performed YES NO NA


without over-heating, if applicable.

5.2 Procedures are used to ensure sample preparation is performed YES NO


without contamination of the specimen.

5.3 Procedures are used to ensure preparation is performed without YES NO


depletion of surface elements.

5.4 Procedures are used to ensure equivalent preparation of reference YES NO


materials and samples used in the analysis.

6. TEST RECORDS

6.1 Procedures are used to ensure the numeric expression of test results YES NO
(data) are recorded using at least the number of significant digits shown
in the precision data presented in Figure 1.

6.2 Procedures are used to ensure test records document all of the YES NO
following

6.2.a Unique Identification of analytical instrument used (e.g. serial number, YES NO
facility number, etc.).

6.2.b. Reference Materials/ Quality Control material used. YES NO

6.2.c Test results (data). YES NO

6.2.d Analyst name/identification YES NO

6.2.e Date of analysis. YES NO

6.2.f Identification of the analytical program used. YES NO NA

6.3 Unspecified and/or unexpected elements found during analysis are YES NO NA
reported in accordance to customer requirements, if applicable.

7. WET CHEMISTRY TEST CODES D, V, W, F1, AND F2 SECTION NA

7.1 Procedures are used which ensure analytical reagents and reference YES NO
materials meet the requirements specified in the test specification.
When not documented in the test specification, the laboratory’s
procedure documents the required purity. The laboratory has a record
of appropriate validation of purity.

7.2 Procedures are used to ensure that laboratory reagent water quality will YES NO
not adversely affect test results. Requirements for reagent water used
in testing are established and documented.

7.3 Procedures are used which ensure analytical reagents and reference YES NO NA
materials are shelf life controlled, if applicable.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -5-

7.4 Procedures are used which ensure analytical reagents and reference YES NO
materials susceptible to deterioration through evaporation, light
sensitivity, reaction with storage container, thermal sensitivity,
hygroscopic reaction, and/or other influences are controlled and labeled
consistent with original package, and properly stored.

7.5 Procedures are used which ensure analytical reagents, reference YES NO
materials and laboratory prepared mixtures (not applicable to prepared
samples) are identified with the following
• contents
• concentration of the contents
• date received/prepared
• date of expiry

7.6 Procedures are used which ensure laboratory ware meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test specification; example pipettes, flasks
etc.

8. ATOMIC OR OPTICAL EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY (AES OR OES) SECTION NA


TEST CODES F

8.1 Direct Current Plasma (DCP) Test Code F1 SECTION NA

8.1.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

8.1.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

8.1.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

8.1.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

8.1.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or Reference material of a known concentration.

8.1.6 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

8.2 Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Test Code F2 SECTION NA

8.2.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

8.2.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

8.2.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -6-

8.2.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

8.2.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or reference material of a known concentration.

8.2.6 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

8.3 Spark/Arc (OES) Test Code F3 SECTION NA

8.3.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

8.3.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method or alternate wavelengths have been validated and documented.

8.3.3 The number of measurement(s) (burns) for the sample meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

8.3.4 Placement of the measurement (burns) on the sample meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

8.3.5 Electrode selection, preparation, installation, gapping, and cleaning YES NO


meet the requirements specified in the test method.

8.3.6 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

8.3.7 Calibration uses reference material(s) to meet the requirements YES NO


specified in the test method

8.3.8 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO
the test method.

8.3.9 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

8.4 Glow Discharge (GD-OES) Test Code F4 SECTION NA

8.4.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

8.4.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method or alternate wavelengths have been validated and documented.

8.4.3 The number of measurement(s) (excitation) for the sample meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -7-

8.4.4 Placement of the measurement(s) (excitation(s)) on the sample meet YES NO


the requirements specified in the test method.

8.4.5 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

8.5 High Temperature Hollow Cathode Test Code F5 SECTION NA

8.5.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

8.5.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

8.5.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

8.5.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

8.5.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or reference material of a known concentration.

8.5.6 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

9. ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS (COMBUSTION OR FUSION) TEST CODES SECTION NA


G

9.1 Carbon G1 SECTION NA

9.1.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

9.1.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.

9.1.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

9.1.4 Calibration uses reference material(s) to meet the requirements YES NO


specified in the test method.

9.1.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.

9.1.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -8-

9.1.7 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

9.2 Hydrogen G2 SECTION NA

9.2.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

9.2.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.

9.2.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

9.2.4 Calibration uses reference material(s) to meet the requirements YES NO


specified in the test method.

9.2.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.

9.2.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

9.2.7 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

9.3 Nitrogen G3 SECTION NA

9.3.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

9.3.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.

9.3.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

9.3.4 Calibration uses reference material(s) to meet the requirements YES NO


specified in the test method.

9.3.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.

9.3.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

9.3.7 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

9.4 Oxygen G4 SECTION NA


Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -9-

9.4.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

9.4.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.

9.4.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

9.4.4 Calibration uses reference material(s) to meet the requirements YES NO


specified in the test method.

9.4.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.

9.4.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

9.4.7 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

9.5 Sulfur G5 SECTION NA

9.5.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

9.5.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.

9.5.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

9.5.4 Calibration uses reference material(s) to meet the requirements YES NO


specified in the test method.

9.5.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.

9.5.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

9.5.7 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

10. X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (XRF) TEST CODE S SECTION NA

10.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 10 -

10.2 Calibration models for matrix effects and interferences are applied to YES NO
meet the requirements specified in the test method.

10.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

10.4 Calibration uses reference material(s) to meet the requirements YES NO


specified in the test method

10.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO
the test method.

10.6 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

11. MASS SPECTROMETRY TEST CODE V SECTION NA

11.1 Procedures are used to control and record instrument tuning and drift. YES NO

11.2 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

11.3 Procedures are used to define the calibration of the instrument (e g YES NO NA
RSF curve, calibration to reference materials or other).

11.4 Procedures are used to ensure isotope peaks are correctly positioned YES NO
and integrated for all isotopes measured.

11.5 Isotope mass selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

11.6 Interfering isotopes and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

11.7 Ion extraction and detection meets the requirements specified in the YES NO
test method.

11.8 Procedures are used to control external sources of contamination. YES NO

11.9 Procedures are used to ensure sample carryover is minimized. YES NO

11.10 Placement of the measurement(s) on the sample meets the YES NO NA


requirements specified in the test method.

11.11 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

11.12 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 11 -

12. ATOMIC ABSORPTION TEST CODE W SECTION NA

12.1 Flame (AAS) Test Code W1 SECTION NA

12.1.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

12.1.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

12.1.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

12.1.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

12.1.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or reference material of a known concentration.

12.1.6 Procedures are used to ensure instrument inspection/maintenance YES NO


frequency are established and documented.

12.2 Graphite Furnace (GFAA) Test Code W2 SECTION NA

12.2.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

12.2.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.

12.2.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.

12.2.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.

12.2.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or reference material of a known concentration.

13. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE F1 – DIRECT CURRENT SECTION NA


PLASMA (DCP)
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 12 -

13.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

13.1 Customer: ___________________

13.2 Subscriber: ___________________

13.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

13.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

13.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

13.6 Operator: ___________________

13.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

13.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

13.9 Material Specification: ___________________

13.10 Material: ___________________

13.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

13.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.

14. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE F2 – ATOMIC EMISSION SECTION NA


SPECTROSCOPY – INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP-
OES/AES)
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

14.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 13 -

14.1 Customer: ___________________

14.2 Subscriber: ___________________

14.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

14.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

14.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

14.6 Operator: ___________________

14.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

14.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

14.9 Material Specification: ___________________

14.10 Material: ___________________

14.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

14.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.

15. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE F3 – ATOMIC EMISSION SECTION NA


SPECTROSCOPY – SPARK/ARC (S/A-OES)
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

15.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

15.1 Customer: ___________________

15.2 Subscriber: ___________________

15.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________


Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 14 -

15.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

15.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

15.6 Operator: ___________________

15.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

15.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

15.9 Material Specification: ___________________

15.10 Material: ___________________

15.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

15.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.

16. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE F4 – ATOMIC EMISSION SECTION NA


SPECTROSCOPY – GLOW DISCHARGE (GD-OES)
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

16.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

16.1 Customer: ___________________

16.2 Subscriber: ___________________

16.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

16.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

16.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

16.6 Operator: ___________________


Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 15 -

16.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

16.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

16.9 Material Specification: ___________________

16.10 Material: ___________________

16.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

16.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.

17. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE F5 – ATOMIC EMISSION SECTION NA


SPECTROSCOPY – HIGH TEMPERATURE HOLLOW CATHODE
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

17.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

17.1 Customer: ___________________

17.2 Subscriber: ___________________

17.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

17.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

17.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

17.6 Operator: ___________________

17.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

17.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

17.9 Material Specification: ___________________


Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 16 -

17.10 Material: ___________________

17.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

17.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.

18. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE G1 – CARBON SECTION NA


Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

18.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

18.1 Customer: ___________________

18.2 Subscriber: ___________________

18.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

18.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

18.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

18.6 Operator: ___________________

18.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

18.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

18.9 Material Specification: ___________________

18.10 Material: ___________________

18.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

18.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 17 -

19. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE G2 – HYDROGEN SECTION NA


Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

19.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

19.1 Customer: ___________________

19.2 Subscriber: ___________________

19.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

19.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

19.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

19.6 Operator: ___________________

19.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

19.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

19.9 Material Specification: ___________________

19.10 Material: ___________________

19.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

19.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 18 -

20. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE G3 – NITROGEN SECTION NA


Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

20.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

20.1 Customer: ___________________

20.2 Subscriber: ___________________

20.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

20.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

20.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

20.6 Operator: ___________________

20.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

20.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

20.9 Material Specification: ___________________

20.10 Material: ___________________

20.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

20.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 19 -

21. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE G4 – OXYGEN SECTION NA


Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

21.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

21.1 Customer: ___________________

21.2 Subscriber: ___________________

21.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

21.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

21.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

21.6 Operator: ___________________

21.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

21.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

21.9 Material Specification: ___________________

21.10 Material: ___________________

21.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

21.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 20 -

22. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE G5 – SULFUR SECTION NA


Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

22.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

22.1 Customer: ___________________

22.2 Subscriber: ___________________

22.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

22.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

22.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

22.6 Operator: __________________

22.7 Equipment ID: __________________

22.8 In-process/demo/paper: __________________

22.9 Material Specification: __________________

22.10 Material: __________________

22.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

22.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 21 -

23. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE S – X-RAY SECTION NA


FLUORESCENCE (XRF)
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

23.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

23.1 Customer: ___________________

23.2 Subscriber: ___________________

23.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

23.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

23.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

23.6 Operator: ___________________

23.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

23.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

23.9 Material Specification: ___________________

23.10 Material: ___________________

23.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

23.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 22 -

24. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE V – MASS SECTION NA


SPECTROMETRY
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

24.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

24.1 Customer: ___________________

24.2 Subscriber: ___________________

24.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

24.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

24.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

24.6 Operator: ___________________

24.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

24.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

24.9 Material Specification: ___________________

24.10 Material: ___________________

24.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

24.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 23 -

25. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE W1 – FLAME (AA) SECTION NA


Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

25.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

25.1 Customer: ___________________

25.2 Subscriber: ___________________

25.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

25.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

25.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

25.6 Operator: ___________________

25.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

25.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

25.9 Material Specification: ___________________

25.10 Material: ___________________

25.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

25.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 24 -

26. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE W2 – GRAPHITE SECTION NA


FURNACE (GFAA)
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

26.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

26.1 Customer: ___________________

26.2 Subscriber: ___________________

26.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

26.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

26.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

26.6 Operator: ___________________

26.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

26.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

26.9 Material Specification: ___________________

26.10 Material: ___________________

26.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

26.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 25 -

27. OBSERVATION OF TEST – TEST CODE D – WET CHEMISTRY SECTION NA


(GRAVIMETRIC)
Assessment to be performed to verify conformance to: applicable
testing specifications, lab procedures, and Purchase Order/Customer
requirements. Guidance: review calibrations, training, maintenance
records, equipment logs, etc.

27.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.

27.1 Customer: ___________________

27.2 Subscriber: ___________________

27.3 Test Code / Process: ___________________

27.4 Testing Specifications/Standard: ___________________

27.5 Test Procedure/Part Number: ___________________

27.6 Operator: ___________________

27.7 Equipment ID: ___________________

27.8 In-process/demo/paper: ___________________

27.9 Material Specification: ___________________

27.10 Material: ___________________

27.11 Observations:

_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

27.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 26 -

APPENDIX A

Nadcap Chemistry Quantitative Analytical Range


AC7101/2, Figure 1

This information shown in figure 1 below is an example only. It is provided to assist in the preparation of the
Chemistry Quantitative Analytical Range. The data that is used to generate the Quantitative Analytical Range
must be kept on file at the laboratory and must be maintained and updated as described in section 2.

ALLOY FAMILIES

Alloy Families for Chemical Analysis


Al Base
Co Base
Cu Base
Fe Base
Mg Base
Ni Base
Ti Base

REPORTED ELEMENTS must be listed individually for each Alloy Family.

TEST CODES
Test Types/Codes:

D Wet Chemistry (Gravimetric)

F Atomic or Optical Emission Spectroscopy (AES or OES)


F1 Direct Current Plasma (DCP)
F2 Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP)
F3 Spark/Arc (OES)
F4 Glow Discharge (GD)
F5 High Temperature Hollow Cathode

G Elemental Analysis (Combustion or Fusion)


G1 Carbon
G2 Hydrogen
G3 Nitrogen
G4 Oxygen
G5 Sulfur

S X-Ray Fluourescence

V Mass Spectrometry

W Atomic Absorption
W1 Flame (AAS)
W2 Graphite Furnace (GFAA)

FIGURE 1 –Chemistry Quantitative Analytical Range


Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 27 -

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
LABORATORY NAME: The Laboratory DATE: June 1, 2013
CAPABILITIES

ALLOY FAMILY Ti Base


Page 1 of 1

ELEMENTS TEST CODES QUANTITATIVE PRECISION PRECISION


ANALYTICAL RANGE LOW HIGH

C G1 0.005 % to 0.100 %
± 0.001 % ± 0.005 %
H G2 1 mg/kg to 200 mg/kg
± 0.1 mg/kg ± 12 mg/kg
N G3 5 mg/kg to 1,000 mg/kg
± 1 mg/kg ± 53 mg/kg
O G4 5 mg/kg to 1,500 mg/kg
± 4 mg/kg ± 80 mg/kg
Al F2 0.1 % t o 8.0 %
± 0.01 % ± 0.1 %
V F2 0.05 % to 5.00 %
± 0.01 % ± 0.09 %
Fe F2 0.01 % to 0.50 %
± 0.002 % ± 0.01 %
Y F2 0.001 % to 0.010 %
± 0.001 % ± 0.001 %

Refer to eAuditNet.com for guidance on completing Figure 1. www.eAuditNet.com under Resources →


Documents → Audit Criteria → Materials Testing Laboratories (AC7101/AC7006) → Handbooks & Guides.

You might also like