Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E∆1
Issue Date 1993-05
161Thorn Hill Road
AUDIT CRITERIA
Warrendale, PA 15086-7527 Revision Date 01-Jun-2020
Nadcap
AUDIT CRITERIA FOR MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES -
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
1. SCOPE
Guidance and definitions for terms used here can be found in the MTL
Audit Handbook and the corresponding Handbook Supplement. The
Handbook and Supplement should be used as companions to the Audit
Criteria. The Handbook and Supplements are located on
www.eauditnet.com under Resources → Documents → Audit Criteria
→ Materials Testing Laboratories (AC7101/AC7006) → Handbooks &
Guides.
Note: Throughout this audit criteria, the term ‘test method’ refers to a
definitive procedure that produces a test result, including standard
laboratory procedures.
2. ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS
PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising there from, is the sole responsibility of the user”
PRI values your input. To provide feedback on this document, please contact the appropriate commodity staff engineer. (Contact
information is located at http://www.eauditnet.com under “Contact Us”.)
t-frm-1115 21-May-2020
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -2-
This information must reflect the testing capabilities, near the extremes
of the calibration, for all elements per alloy base. The laboratory’s
actual quantitative range must be developed from data obtained from
laboratory specific equipment and reference materials.
2.1.2 Precision
2.2 Procedures are used for creating the Quantitative Analytical Range and YES NO
for defining the means by which the stated precision at the upper and
lower limits is determined. Objective evidence for supporting the table is
on file.
2.3 Procedures are used to define when the Quantitative Analytical Range YES NO
is to be revised or updated.
2.4 Procedures are used to define laboratory practice for reporting test YES NO
results that are outside of the Quantitative Analytical Range.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -3-
3. REFERENCE MATERIALS
3.2 Reference Materials purchased from an outside supplier used for YES NO
calibration, validation, or verification have the following information
documented.
• Assigned values for each element
• An estimation of the uncertainty or acceptance limits for each
certified element. In cases where reference materials do not
have an uncertainty estimate, the lab may estimate the
uncertainty.
• Metrological traceability (when available)
3.4.c Or other means of validation to show confidence in the assigned value. YES NO NA
(ex PTP data)
4.1 Procedure(s) are used for verification of instrument calibration and YES NO
verification results are documented.
4.3 Procedures are used to determine the conditions when calibration or YES NO
drift correction is required.
4.4 Procedures are used which ensure analytical balances are calibrated YES NO NA
and have the capacity and precision for the application according to the
test specification.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -4-
5. SPECIMEN PREPARATION
6. TEST RECORDS
6.1 Procedures are used to ensure the numeric expression of test results YES NO
(data) are recorded using at least the number of significant digits shown
in the precision data presented in Figure 1.
6.2 Procedures are used to ensure test records document all of the YES NO
following
6.2.a Unique Identification of analytical instrument used (e.g. serial number, YES NO
facility number, etc.).
6.3 Unspecified and/or unexpected elements found during analysis are YES NO NA
reported in accordance to customer requirements, if applicable.
7.1 Procedures are used which ensure analytical reagents and reference YES NO
materials meet the requirements specified in the test specification.
When not documented in the test specification, the laboratory’s
procedure documents the required purity. The laboratory has a record
of appropriate validation of purity.
7.2 Procedures are used to ensure that laboratory reagent water quality will YES NO
not adversely affect test results. Requirements for reagent water used
in testing are established and documented.
7.3 Procedures are used which ensure analytical reagents and reference YES NO NA
materials are shelf life controlled, if applicable.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -5-
7.4 Procedures are used which ensure analytical reagents and reference YES NO
materials susceptible to deterioration through evaporation, light
sensitivity, reaction with storage container, thermal sensitivity,
hygroscopic reaction, and/or other influences are controlled and labeled
consistent with original package, and properly stored.
7.5 Procedures are used which ensure analytical reagents, reference YES NO
materials and laboratory prepared mixtures (not applicable to prepared
samples) are identified with the following
• contents
• concentration of the contents
• date received/prepared
• date of expiry
7.6 Procedures are used which ensure laboratory ware meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test specification; example pipettes, flasks
etc.
8.1.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
8.1.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
8.1.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
8.1.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
8.1.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or Reference material of a known concentration.
8.2.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
8.2.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
8.2.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -6-
8.2.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
8.2.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or reference material of a known concentration.
8.3.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
8.3.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method or alternate wavelengths have been validated and documented.
8.3.3 The number of measurement(s) (burns) for the sample meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
8.3.4 Placement of the measurement (burns) on the sample meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
8.3.6 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
8.3.8 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO
the test method.
8.4.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
8.4.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method or alternate wavelengths have been validated and documented.
8.4.3 The number of measurement(s) (excitation) for the sample meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -7-
8.4.5 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
8.5.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
8.5.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
8.5.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
8.5.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
8.5.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or reference material of a known concentration.
9.1.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
9.1.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.
9.1.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
9.1.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.
9.1.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 -8-
9.2.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
9.2.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.
9.2.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
9.2.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.
9.2.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
9.3.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
9.3.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.
9.3.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
9.3.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.
9.3.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
9.4.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
9.4.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.
9.4.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
9.4.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.
9.4.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
9.5.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
9.5.2 Consumable reagents (catalysts, drying agents, etc.) and filters are YES NO
changed on a scheduled basis to meet the requirements specified in
the test method.
9.5.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
9.5.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO NA
the test method.
9.5.6 Instrument blank settings are verified and documented to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
10.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 10 -
10.2 Calibration models for matrix effects and interferences are applied to YES NO
meet the requirements specified in the test method.
10.3 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
10.5 Drift correction uses material(s) to meet the requirements specified in YES NO
the test method.
11.1 Procedures are used to control and record instrument tuning and drift. YES NO
11.2 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
11.3 Procedures are used to define the calibration of the instrument (e g YES NO NA
RSF curve, calibration to reference materials or other).
11.4 Procedures are used to ensure isotope peaks are correctly positioned YES NO
and integrated for all isotopes measured.
11.5 Isotope mass selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
11.6 Interfering isotopes and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
11.7 Ion extraction and detection meets the requirements specified in the YES NO
test method.
11.11 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
12.1.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
12.1.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
12.1.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
12.1.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
12.1.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or reference material of a known concentration.
12.2.1 Instrument parameters meet the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
12.2.2 Wavelength selection meets the requirements specified in the test YES NO
method.
12.2.3 Interference lines and matrix effects are established to meet the YES NO
requirements specified in the test method.
12.2.4 Sample and reference material preparation meet the requirements YES NO
specified in the test method.
12.2.5 When two-point calibration curves are utilized, the accuracy of the YES NO NA
calibration curve has been verified and documented with an
independent sample or reference material of a known concentration.
13.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
13.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
13.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
14.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 13 -
14.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
14.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
15.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
15.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
15.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
16.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
16.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
16.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
17.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
17.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
17.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
18.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
18.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
18.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 17 -
19.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
19.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
19.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 18 -
20.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
20.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
20.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 19 -
21.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
21.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
21.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 20 -
22.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
22.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
22.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 21 -
23.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
23.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
23.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 22 -
24.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
24.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
24.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 23 -
25.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
25.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
25.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 24 -
26.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
26.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
26.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 25 -
27.a. (INFO) Is the part controlled under U.S. Export Control Regulations as YES NO
declared by the Auditee?
If the part being audited is controlled under U.S. Export Control
Regulations, question in the Job Audit marked EC cannot be answered
as the information may be considered restricted. Simply record ‘EC’ in
the comment box for these questions.
27.11 Observations:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
27.12 The test was performed in accordance with the applicable procedures YES NO
and/or test specifications.
Nadcap AC7101/2 Revision E∆1 - 26 -
APPENDIX A
This information shown in figure 1 below is an example only. It is provided to assist in the preparation of the
Chemistry Quantitative Analytical Range. The data that is used to generate the Quantitative Analytical Range
must be kept on file at the laboratory and must be maintained and updated as described in section 2.
ALLOY FAMILIES
TEST CODES
Test Types/Codes:
S X-Ray Fluourescence
V Mass Spectrometry
W Atomic Absorption
W1 Flame (AAS)
W2 Graphite Furnace (GFAA)
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
LABORATORY NAME: The Laboratory DATE: June 1, 2013
CAPABILITIES
C G1 0.005 % to 0.100 %
± 0.001 % ± 0.005 %
H G2 1 mg/kg to 200 mg/kg
± 0.1 mg/kg ± 12 mg/kg
N G3 5 mg/kg to 1,000 mg/kg
± 1 mg/kg ± 53 mg/kg
O G4 5 mg/kg to 1,500 mg/kg
± 4 mg/kg ± 80 mg/kg
Al F2 0.1 % t o 8.0 %
± 0.01 % ± 0.1 %
V F2 0.05 % to 5.00 %
± 0.01 % ± 0.09 %
Fe F2 0.01 % to 0.50 %
± 0.002 % ± 0.01 %
Y F2 0.001 % to 0.010 %
± 0.001 % ± 0.001 %