Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vassar College
Poughkeepsie, NY USA
and speech already make use of the "big" theories of emotion,
ABSTRACT if sometimes only implicitly. Finally, I will outline what
students of emotion and speech might gain from an
Four major theoretical perspectives on emotion in integration of theories from the four perspectives.
psychology are described. Examples of the ways in which
research on emotion and speech utilize aspects of the various 2. FOUR THEORETICAL
perspectives are presented and a plea is made for students of
emotion and speech to consider more self-consciously the PERSPECTIVES
place of their research within each of the perspectives.
When Skinner (Skinner, 1950) talked about theories of
learning, he was actually talking about families or kinds of
1. ARE THEORIES OF EMOTION theories. I shall for the most part be doing the same. A
NECESSARY? survey of contemporary theory and research on emotion in
psychology reveals four different general theoretical
perspectives about how to define, study, and explain emotion.
Fifty years ago, B. F. Skinner (Skinner, 1950; Skinner, I have called these the Darwinian, Jamesian, cognitive, and
1972) asked "Are theories of learning necessary?" Calling social constructivist perspectives (Cornelius, 1996) . Each of
theories, especially those that traffic in intervening variables these perspectives has its own set of assumptions about the
or that appeal "to events taking place somewhere else, at nature of emotion, about how to construct theories about
some other level of observation, described in different terms emotion, and about how to conduct research on emotion.
and measured, if at all, in different dimensions" (Skinner, Each perspective is also associated with it own body of
1972, p. 69) from the phenomena they seek to explain, "fun" empirical research. Because each of the perspectives has its
but "useless," Skinner argued that theories of learning are own more or less unique way of thinking about emotions, has
ultimately "a refuge from the data" (Skinner, 1972, p. 72) endured in time, and has its sometimes passionate cadre of
and so should be abandoned by any self-respecting science of adherents whose research exemplifies "how things are done"
behavior. I would like to ask the same question of theories of within the perspective, it is appropriate to speak about each
emotion; namely, "Are theories of emotion necessary?" More perspective as embodying its own tradition of research.
specifically, I would like to ask, "Are theories of emotion There are, of course, several areas of overlap among the four
necessary--and useful--to students of emotion and speech?" perspectives and their associated research traditions, this is
Although it is beyond the scope of this paper, I believe it can especially true of the Darwinian and Jamesian perspectives.
be shown that Skinner's attack on theory was wrongheaded However, for the most part, each ultimately presents a quite
and that his conviction that a scientific psychology could different account of what emotions are all about.
make do without theories and just "get back to an observable
datum" (p. 72) was belied by his own arguments, which are
saturated by the kind of theoretical statements to which he
2.1 The Darwinian Perspective
objected. Contra Skinner, I will argue that theories of
The central organizing idea of the Darwinian perspective is
emotion are absolutely essential for students of emotion, no
matter what aspect of emotion they study. I will further argue the notion that emotions are evolved phenomena with
that both contemporary and classic theories of emotion are important survival functions that have been selected for
eminently useful to students of emotion and speech. because they have solved certain problems we have faced as a
species. As such, we should see the same emotions, more or
less, in all humans. In addition, since humans share an
I know that you all make reference in your work to very evolutionary past with other mammals, we should expect to
specific theories of how emotion gets encoded into speech observe similarities in the emotions of closely-related
and the like. I would like to convince you of the centrality species.
and usefulness of the "big" theories of emotion to your
research. To get there, I will first describe four of the most The Darwinian perspective and its associated tradition of
influential theoretical perspectives and research traditions in research had their beginnings in Darwin's 1872 book The
the study of emotion in the past 125 years or so. I will then Expression of Emotion in Man and Animals. The book,
briefly describe what I see as some of the ways in which the whose origin lay in Darwin's discomfort with earlier attempts
four perspectives have begun to converge. Next, I will to explain emotional expressions in terms of special creation,
attempt to locate some examples of the research presented at described in Darwin's typically marvelous attention to detail
this conference within the four perspectives. This will give the facial expressions and bodily movements that accompany
you a sense, I hope, of the ways in which students of emotion several emotions in humans and other animals and presented
a simple theory of the evolution of such expressions and insistence that emotional expressions must be understood in terms of
movements. Although contemporary students of emotion their functions and, hence, survival value.
within the Darwinian tradition rarely cite the specifics of his
theory of the evolution of emotion and emotional There are many contemporary students of emotion who have followed
expressions, Darwin's ideas have been enormously Darwin's lead in trying to understand emotions from an evolutionary
influential. His legacy to the study of emotion in psychology perspective, even if they do not always follow the particulars of how
and biology consists of his use of the theory of evolution by Darwin understood emotional expressions to have evolved. Foremost
natural selection as a framework for understanding emotional among these are, of course, Paul Ekman, Carroll Izard, Alan
expressions and, by extension, emotions themselves, and his Fridlund, and the late Sylvan Tompkins. The work of Joseph LeDoux
(1996) also fits neatly into this perspective. Under the
influence of Tompkins, Ekman and Izard and their colleagues If there are indeed a small number of basic or fundamental
and students have expended a great deal of effort over the last emotions, each corresponding to a particular evolved
30 years attempting to demonstrate the universality of certain adaptive response pattern, then we should see those emotions
human facial expressions of emotion. Although there are represented in more than just a set of universally recognized
those who question what these findings ultimately mean, facial expressions. It should be possible to see the traces of
most notably Alan Fridlund (1994) and James Russell evolution in other aspects of emotion as well. Philip Shaver
(1994) , Ekman and colleagues (Ekman, Friesen, O'Sullivan, and his colleagues have gathered evidence that they say
Chan, Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, Heider et al., 1987) have indicates that there are evolutionarily determined, cross-
amassed an impressive body of evidence for the universality cultural universals in the meanings of different emotions.
of a small number of facial expressions of emotion, what I Shaver and colleagues (Shaver, Schwartz, Kirson, &
call the Big Six: happiness, sadness, fear, disgust, anger, and O'Connor, 1987; Shaver, Wu, & Schwartz, 1992) asked
surprise (Cornelius, 1996) . people in three different cultures (Italy, China, and the
United States) to sort a long list of emotion names into
The number of such universal facial expressions varies
categories based on their similarity to one another.
somewhat depending on whom one is reading. Ekman says
Hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that six emotions
six (or seven--he sometimes includes contempt), Izard
could be described as "basic-level emotion categories" with a
identifies ten, Robert Plutchik figures there are eight.
high degree of overlap across the three cultures. The six
Whatever the number, these are seen to correspond to a set of
emotions were love, joy, surprise, anger, sadness, and fear.
so-called "fundamental," "basic," or "primary" emotions.
Notice how similar this list is to Ekman's.
These emotions are considered fundamental because they
represent survival-related patterns of responses to events in
the world that have been selected for over the course of our 2.1 The Jamesian Perspective
evolutionary history. According to Plutchik (1980) , each
fundamental, basic, or primary emotion, fulfills a specific Theory and research in the Jamesian tradition was inspired by
"adaptive role in helping organisms deal with key survival William James' writings on emotion, in particular, his 1884
issues posed by the environment" (p. 129). These emotions article "What is an emotion?" Almost since the day of its
are also considered to be fundamental because all other publication, psychologists of various kinds have debated the
emotions are thought to be somehow derived from them. truth of James' famous equation of emotions with the
perception of bodily changes: "bodily changes follow
Notice here how focusing on emotions as adaptive responses directly the PERCEPTION of the exciting fact, and... our
allows Darwinians to make comparisons of emotions across feeling of the same changes as they occur IS the emotion"
species with relative ease. Plutchik (1980) is able to say that (James, 1884, p. 189-190) . James insisted that it would be
the concept of emotion applies to all organisms, from impossible to have emotions without bodily changes and that
amoebae to humans, because he compares emotions in terms bodily changes always come first. To understand how James
of their functional equivalence. Although the specific adopted this position, one must first appreciate his debt to
behaviors involved in the fear response of a rat and a human Darwin.
may be very different, and may differ from rat to rat and
human to human, what those behaviors accomplish is the Although James was concerned with explaining the nature of
same. This is also what allows LeDoux to make inferences emotional experience while Darwin was concerned with
about the neural architecture of emotions from the brains of emotional expression, both thought of emotions as
rats to the brains of humans: The particulars of fear may environmental adaptations with important survival-related
differ, but "the brain systems involved in mediating the functions. Like Darwin, James considered emotions to be
function are the same in different species" (LeDoux, 1996, p. more or less automatic responses to events in an organism's
123) . environment that helped it to survive. According to James
(1884) , "the nervous system of every living thing is but a
bundle of predispositions to react in particular ways upon
contact of particular features of the environment" (p. 190).
The bodily responses associated with emotions, be they
expressive responses, visceral changes, or instrumental
behaviors, are examples of such predispositions.
Contemporary Darwinians and Jamesians who refer to
emotions as "action tendencies" (Frijda, 1986) are making a
similar claim. Given this deep level of connection between
Darwin and James, it should come as no surprise that there is
considerable cross-over between the Darwinian and Jamesian
traditions in psychology.
24. Lewis, M., & Haviland, J. M. (Ed.). (1993). 28. Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis.
Handbook of emotions. New York: Guilford. New York: Harper & Row.
25. Lutz, C. A. (1988). Unnatural emotions: Everyday 29. Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete
sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 161-200.
challenge to western theory. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press. 30. Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion
from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies.
26. Nussbaum, M. C. (1994). The therapy of desire. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102-141.
Theory and practice of Hellenistic ethics.
Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. 31. Scherer, K. R. (1987). Toward a dynamic theory of emotion:
The component process model of affective states. 37. Skinner, B. F. (1972). Cumulative record. A
Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 1, selection of papers. New York: Appleton-Century-
1-98. Crofts.
32. Scherer, K. R. (1998). Appraisal theories. In T. 38. Smith, C. A. (1989). Dimensions of appraisal and
Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of physiological response to emotion. Journal of
cognition and emotion (pp. 637-663). Chichester, Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 339-353.
UK: Wiley.
39. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of
33. Scherer, K. R. (1999). On the sequential nature of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of
appraisal processes: Indirect evidence from a Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.
recognition task. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 763-
793. 40. Smith, C. A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope,
L. K. (1993). In search of "hot" cognitions:
34. Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to
(1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social
a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 65, 916-929.
Social Psychology, 52, 1061-1086.
41. Speisman, J. C., Lazarus, R. S., Mordkoff, A., &
35. Shaver, P. R., Wu, S., & Schwartz, J. C. (1992). Davison, L. (1964). Experimental reduction of stress
Cross-cultural similarities and differences in based on ego-defense theory. Journal of Abnormal
emotion and its representation: A prototype and Social Psychology, 68, 367-380.
approach. In M. S. Clark (Eds.), Emotion (pp. 175-
212). Newbury Park: Sage. 42. Spellman, E. V. (1989). Anger and
insubordination. In A. Garry & M. Pearsail
36. Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning (Eds.), Women, knowledge and reality:
necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193-216. Explorations in feminist philosophy (pp. 263-
273). Boston: Unwin Hyman.