Professional Documents
Culture Documents
00
Printed in Great Britain. All tights reserved Copyright © 1993 Pergamon Press Ltd
Aiwnct--Treatment of textile wastewaters from several dyeing and finishing mills by an electrochemical
method is investigated. The batch experimental results are assessed in terms of color (turbidity) and COD
reductions. Several operating variables, such as the wastewater conductivity, pH, power requirement and
amount of polyelectrolyte added, are explored to ascertain their respective effects on the treatment
efficiency.Optimum operating ranges for each of these operating variables are experimentally determined.
The electrochemical method is found to be quite effective and is highly competitive as an alternative
chemical method for treating textile wastewater. A continuous experimental apparatus is designed and
test runs are performed using the operating conditions obtained in the batch experiments. The preliminary
data show similar satisfactory results to those of the batch runs.
Key words--electrochemical method, textile wastewater, color and C O D reductions, conductivity effect
277
278 SHENG H. LIN and CHI F. PENG
Such a strong color, if untreated, would have a m e d i u m strength wastewater may also have a very
m a r k e d negative impact o n the e n v i r o n m e n t o f the strong color. The degree of difficulty in treating these
receiving water body. wastewaters is largely in p r o p o r t i o n to their relative
The large p H swing in the textile wastewater is strength. Fortunately, most textile wastewaters be-
a n o t h e r strong negative point. The p H variation is long to the medium a n d low strength varieties. The
primarily caused by different kinds o f dyestuff used majority of textile wastewaters employed in this study
in the dyeing process. The pH of the wastewater belonged to these two types.
can change from 2 to over 12 ( G u r n h a m , 1965). Such
a big pH variation is particularly troublesome be-
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
cause of the rather limited p H tolerance of the
activated sludge process or chemical treatment pro- The batch experimental apparatus is shown in Fig. I. The
cess. Hence p r o p e r pH a d j u s t m e n t has become a cathode and anode consist of four pieces of cast iron each,
situated approx. 1.5 cm apart from each other and dipped
necessary part of the textile wastewater treatment
in the wastewater. The power input was controlled by an
process. ammeter and the total power consumption was integrated
In comparison to most industrial wastewaters, the and registered by a power integrator. In each run, approx.
t e m p e r a t u r e of textile wastewater is unusually high. 1000 cm 3 of textile wastewater was placed in the electrolytic
During the dyeing process, rinse waters of up to 90°C cell. The total effective surface area of the cast iron elec-
trodes was 324 em 2. The initial pH of most of the textile
are used in various steps. The near 40°C temperature wastewaters in the electrolytic cell was adjusted to around
of the textile wastewater is a t t r i b u t a b l e to these hot 7, except for those samples intended to investigate the pH
rinse waters. The high t e m p e r a t u r e renders immediate effect on the COD removal efficiency. The conductivity of
treatment of the textile wastewater released directly raw textile wastewater was adjusted by dilution with deion-
ized water or by adding sea water. Experimental runs using
from the dyeing process impractical a n d usually the same wastewater and operated under the same operating
entails proper prior heat dissipation to lower the conditions were repeated for a complete set of color and
temperature to 30°C or below. COD measurements at various treatment times.
O t h e r i m p o r t a n t pollutants of textile wastewater The color of the treated textile wastewater was deter-
may consist of small a m o u n t s of polyvinyl alcohol mined using an apparatus similar in basic structure to the
candle turbidimeter (APHA, 1985) which is used for
(PVA), carboxymethyl cellulose ( C M C ) a n d starch measuring the Jackson unit. The color (or turbidity) of the
used for sizing of the chemical or m a n - m a d e fibers. raw and treated wastewater was determined in terms of its
The sizing agents have a very high C O D content of transparency (centimeter). According to the Taiwan EPA
over 10,000 mg/1, depending on their concentrations. stipulations, the acceptable transparency of all treated in-
dustrial wastewaters needs to exceed 15 cm. The COD was
They enter the wastewater after the desizing process measured by the standard method (APHA, 1985).
and contribute significantly to the C O D content of After the batch experiments were completed, a continuous
the textile wastewater. electrolytic reactor system was designed based on the experi-
A l t h o u g h the pH, BOD, total solids a n d the ences gained in the batch studies. The continuous system
a m o u n t o f wastewater produced vary widely from was intended to investigate the performance of the electro-
chemical treatment for potential practical implementation.
one operation to another, mixing of these waste- The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. The electrolytic
waters in the equalization tank forms a final waste reactor was made of Pyrex glass with the dimensions
effluent which possesses more stable physical and 17.5 × 17.5 x 25 era. With the wastewater flow rate kept at
chemical properties. In general, the final textile waste 0.75 l/rain, the reactor permits an equivalent residence time
of about t0 rain. The pH of the textile wastewater was
effluent can be broadly categorized into three types o f monitored continuously and adjusted if necessary. PAC was
wastewater according to their C O D content a n d the then added before the wastewater entered the electrolytic
color intensity (Lin a n d Lin, 1992), these are the high, reactor. Before the continuous experiments were started, the
medium and low strength wastewaters. The high system was filled with raw textile wastewater. Hence samples
taken at the exit of the electrolytic cell showed a transient
strength wastewater has a C O D concentration ex-
period. The COD and other parameters were measured
ceeding 1600 mg/l and a strong dark color with very using the same methods as the batch runs.
low transparency. The m e d i u m strength wastewater
has a C O D content between 800 a n d 1600 mg/l while
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
the low strength wastewater has the lowest C O D
concentration o f less t h a n 800 mg/1. Table 1 lists the The mechanism o f the electrochemical process in
average characteristics of these three textile waste- aqueous systems is quite complex (Pietcher and
waters. The color in the wastewater usually varies in Walsh, 1990). It is generally believed t h a t there are
intensity according to the above strength classifi- three possible mechanisms involved in the process:
cation. But in m a n y circumstances, the low or electrocoagulation, electroflotation a n d electrooxida-
Iciott
2 1 3
°ti °
1. D.C. power supply
2. Digital ammeter
4 5
3. Power integrator
+
4. Parallel iron-anodes
5. Parallel iron-cathodes
6. Magnetic bar-stirrer
7. Sampling valve
8. Electrolytic cell
tion. Oxidation and reduction of the electrochemical The textile wastewater samples were obtained from
process occur, respectively, at the anode and cathode three large dyeing and finishing mills in northern
of the iron electrodes according to (Pletcher and Taiwan. The wastewaters had a COD within the
Walsh, 1990): range of 800-1600mg/l and were strongly colored
Anode: 4Fe~-4Fe 2+ + 8 e- with a transparency invariably less than 4 cm. The
suspended solids were consistently less than 200 mg/1
4Fe 2+ + 10H20+ O 2~,-~4Fe(OH)3 + 8H +
due primarily to partial sedimentation occurring in
Cathode: 8H + + 8 e-~-4H2
the equalization tanks. The pH of the wastewater was
With sufficient power supply, the dye molecules are also partially adjusted in the equalization tanks and
reduced at the cathode to small organic molecules. was usually within the range of 6-9. Due to signifi-
Some of the small organic molecules and the sus- cant heat dissipation in these tanks, the wastewater
pended solids are captured by Fe(OH)3 which is temperature had been maintained below 35°C which
removed by sedimentation or by H 2 flotation. This facilitates the ensuing treatments.
perhaps accounts for the rather satisfactory decol- Figure 3 displays the transparency of the treated
orization and COD reduction of the textile waste- wastewater as a function of time for a typical run of
water by the electrochemical process. In fact, during medium strength wastewater. The transparency im-
the experiments, either batch or continuous, small proves slowly with treatment until 6min. Marked
amounts of sludge were scraped off from the top and improvement was then observed up to l0 min and
the bottom of the electrolytic cell, evident of the beyond that not much improvement was realized. In
sedimentation and flotation actions. fact, the color of the treated wastewater had become
Textile pH control
PAC
r_ Effluent
Feed
pump Electrolytic cell
Fig. 2. Continuous experimental setup.
WR 28/2---C
280 SHENOH. Dr~ and Cm F. PENO
..../'/
conductivity on the COD removal efficiency, the
textile wastewater was artificially adjusted to the
g- 15 range between 1000 and 6000#mho/cm using sea
[- 'water or deionized water. Results of a typical run are
lO displayed in Fig. 5. COD removal is seen to increase
rapidly with increasing conductivity between 1000
and 2000#mho/cm. It increases mildly beyond
2000 #m.ho/cm and peaks out at 3000 #mho/cm. It is
I I I I I I also apparent that corresponding to the range of
2 4 6 8 10 12
conductivity between 2000 and 3000 #mho/cm, there
Time (rain)
is a rapid decrease in power requirement. Hence, it
Fig. 3. T r a n s p a r e n c y as a function o f time. can be concluded that a conductivity in the range
between 2000 and 3000 #mho/cm appears to be the
optimum operating range in terms of optimum COD
very light with a transparency over 20cm. This
removal and power utilization. CoincidentaUy, over
corresponds to about 8 min of electrolytic treatment.
80% of the textile wastewater samples gathered
The Taiwan EPA stipulates that treated industrial
from the various dyeing and finishing mills fell within
wastewater needs to meet the requirement of 15 cm
this range of conductivity. Hence adjustment of
transparency, as mentioned earlier. Hence electrolytic
the conductivity is usually not necessary. Only on
treatment of 8 rain amply satisfies this requirement.
rare occasions did the wastewater samples have a
Due to the potential pH variation in the textile
conductivity much more than 3000 or less than
wastewater, the effect of pH on the electrochemical
2000 #mho/cm. In these cases, the conductivity could
treatment efficiency was examined next. Figure 4
be easily adjusted to the optimal operating range.
shows the results of a typical run on the pH effect.
Figure 6 displays the COD removal as a function
The pH of the raw textile wastewater collected from
of time and power requirement. Two plateaux appar-
the textile mills was adjusted using sodium hydroxide
ently exist in this figure. The first plateau of COD
or sulfuric acid to the desired pH for each experimen-
removal occurs at 4 rain after the electrolytic process
tal run. It is apparent that the pH effect of the
began and with a COD removal efficiency of about
wastewater on the COD removal is not very signifi-
50%. The measured transparency, not shown in the
cant within the range of 5-10. This result is particu-
figure, barely reached 15 cm even at 8 min. However,
larly meaningful since the majority of textile
beyond that time, considerable improvement in the
wastewaters from the equalization tanks have a pH
within that range, implying that adjustment of the pH
Power (Wh)
1 2 3 4
80 I r I I
50
75
48
7O
"~ 46
o~ 65
O
~ 44 ~ e
¢~ 6o
0
O
• Power
42 55 ~, Conductivity
50 I 1 I t l
40 t I I I I 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
6 7 8 10 11
Conductivity Otmho/cm)
pH
Fig. 5. Effect o f w a s t e w a t e r c o n d u c t i v i t y o n the C O D
Fig. 4. Effect o f w a s t e w a t e r p H o n the C O D removal. removal.
Electrochemical treatment of textile wastewater 281
Power (Wh) 55 J •
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 f • ~ •
60 I I I I I I I 50
50 - ~ [ 45
/
"-" 40
40
>
0
;> I~ 35
0
.o
~ 3o
~ 3o
O 20
25
• Power
20 '--
10 A Time
15 I I [ I I [ t I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 PAC (mg/I)
Time (min)
Fig. 8. Effect of PAC on COD removal.
Fig. 6. COD removal as a function of time.
64 -
50
62 m
40
60
O
>.
0
i= 30
20
i
~ 56
58
54
10 / A Time
52 •/ I
_l I I I [ I I I I I I I I I 50 I J I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415 0 1 2 3
Time (min) Current (amp)
Fig. 7. COD ~moval as a function of time with 5 mg/1 PAC. Fig. 9. Effect of current on COD removal.
282 Sr~NG H. LI~ and Cm F. I~NG