Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises have been defined in accordance with the provision of
Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006. MSME are broadly
classified in two Classes:
1. Manufacturing Enterprises- all enterprises engaged in the manufacturing or production of
goods pertaining to any industry specified in the first schedule to the industries (Development
and regulation) Act, 1951) or employing plant and machinery in the process of value addition to
the final product having a distinct name or character or use.
2. Service Enterprises:-The enterprises engaged in providing or rendering of services.
In India the MSME have been further classified on the basis of investment in plant and
machinery. The limit for investment in plant and machinery / equipment for manufacturing /
service enterprises, have been notified, by the government as under:
MANUFACTURING SECTOR
Enterprises Investment in plant & machinery
Small Enterprises More than twenty five lakh rupees but does not exceed five crore
rupees
Medium More than five crore rupees but does not exceed ten crore rupees
Enterprises
SERVICE SECTOR
Enterprises Investment in equipments
Small Enterprises More than ten lakh rupees but does not exceed two crore rupees
Medium Enterprises More than two crore rupees but does not exceed five crore rupees
In western countries the classification is based on number of employees employed and not the
investment in plant and machinery. It is as under
MICRO < 10 PERSONS
SMALL < 50 PERSONS
MEDIUM < 250 PERSONS
The Micro- Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are small sized entities, defined in terms of
their size of investment. They are contributing significantly to output, employment export etc. in
the economy. They perform a critical role in the economy by providing employment to a large
number of unskilled and semi-skilled people, contributing to exports, raising manufacturing
sector production and extending support to bigger industries by supplying raw material, basic
goods, finished parts and components, etc.
As per the ‘MSME at a Glance’ Report of the Ministry of MSMEs, the sector consists of
36 million units and provides employment to over 80 million persons. The Sector produces more
than 6,000 products contributing to about 8% of GDP besides 45% to the total manufacturing
output and 40% to the exports from the country.
Pre-Liberalization
● During the post-Independence period, small firms were expected to play an important role
in the development process, especially in absorbing surplus labor and achieving an
equitable income distribution. This is the traditional stylized role assigned to small
industries.
● At the beginning of the industrialization process, flexibility in production and the ability to
offer differentiated products allow smaller firms to grow rapidly.
● Later, large-scale firms come to dominate the size distribution, making up a greater share of
output, employment, and value-added because of scale economies, managerial efficiency,
better access to finance and infrastructure, and a favorable tariff structure.
Post-Liberalization
● The growth rate of MSME, on an average, has declined considerably in terms of units and
even employment but has improved marginally in terms of output and exports, in the
post-liberalization period compared to the pre-liberalization period.
● This could be probably due to – (a) With the threat of competition, new MSME units would
not have come up as significantly in the liberalization period as compared to the
pre-liberalization period (b) The new MSME units that came up after liberalization may have
been much more capital intensive than those that have come up in the past – with some
proportions of the existing MSME units having modernized themselves to rely less on
labour and also to take advantage of developments in the global market (c) Unable to face
the competition some MSMEs exited the market, thereby affecting MSME employment and
output initially.
● However, though it appears that the MSME growth performance (in terms of employment,
output, and exports) might have suffered initially but it has been able to recover
impressively subsequently in the decade of 2000s.
● The share of the registered MSMEs in India’s GDP more than doubled during this period
and its share in total organized sector employment increased to 34% during the same
period. Although the share of registered MSME exports declined sharply initially, it bounced
back to 12% in 2006-07.
● The improved economic health of registered MSME sector is reflected in another parameter
i.e. industrial sickness. Sickness in the registered MSME sector has declined both
absolutely and relatively. This may be the outcome of improvements in management
deficiencies, insufficient financial control, research and development, obsolete technology,
inadequate demand, shortage of raw materials, infrastructure bottlenecks, etc.
● There are two more issues concerning MSME performance:
1. Ancillarisation – the promotion of inter-firm linkages between large firms and MSME
through subcontracting and ancillarisation in both public and private sectors has been an
important dimension of India’s MSME policy. Any growth of ancillarisation and
sub-contracting would be advantageous to the MSME sector by way of assured marketing,
covered technical assistance, finance, and supply of raw materials and training. During this
period the percentage of ancillary units increased from 5 percent. Note that however a
significant proportion of MSME subcontracting and ancillarisation are informal in nature.
The growing inter-firm linkages, formal as well as informal, would have benefited the
economic performance of MSME sector.
2. The degree of internationalization – world over, an export strategy has been the primary
foreign market entry mode adopted by MSMEs in their internationalization efforts – this has
been observed in the Indian context as well. At the national level, several factors
contributed to the increasing trend of MSME internationalization like – structural shift in the
composition of MSME exports from traditional to non-traditional items, modes of entry such
as MNCs and e-Commerce etc.
CHALLENGES OF MSME
Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) play a vital role for the growth of Indian economy by
contributing 45% of industrial output, 40% of exports, employing 60 million people, create 1.3
million jobs every year and produce more than 8000 quality products for the Indian and
international markets. SME’s Contribution towards GDP in 2011 was 17% which is expected to
increase to 22% by 2012. There are approximately 30 million MSME Units in India and 12
million persons are expected to join the workforce in the next 3 years.
Despite of the importance of the MSMEs in Indian economic growth, the sector is facing
challenges and does not get the required support from the concerned Government
Departments, Banks, Financial Institutions and Corporates which is proving to be a hurdle in the
growth path of the MSMEs. The list of the problems that are faced by existing/new companies in
SME sector are as under:
It is very important to empower the SME sector to utilize the limited resources (human &
economic) they have in an optimum manner. The SMEs need to be educated and informed of
the latest developments taking place globally and helped to acquire skills necessary to keep
pace with the global developments. SMEs are now exposed to greater opportunities than ever
for expansion and diversification across the sectors. Indian market is growing rapidly and Indian
entrepreneurs are making remarkable progress in various Industries like Manufacturing,
Precision Engineering Design, Food Processing, Pharmaceutical, Textile & Garments, Retail, IT
and ITES, Agro and Service sector.
To counter the challenges faced by SME sector and grab the opportunities in the market, the
Chamber has developed key strategies to promote and support the SME sector. The Chamber
encourages SMEs to adopt innovative ideas and concepts for the promotion of their business.
The goal of the Chamber is to organise Seminars, Conferences, Workshops and Training
Programs and other trade promotional activities to educate & create awareness amongst the
SMEs. CIMSME has decided to start various activities to empower and educate the SME Sector
by organising various trade promotional activities
SMEs plays an important role in the economic development of a country. Their role in terms of
production, employment generation, contribution to exports & facilitating equitable distribution of
income is very critical. The SMEs broadly consists of:
1) The traditional cottage & household industries such as village industries, handicrafts, and coir
industries.
2) Modern SMEs.
The traditional village and cottage industries as distinguished from modern SMEs are mostly
unorganized and located in rural areas and semi urban areas. They normally do not use power
operated machines/appliances & use relatively lower levels of investment & technology. But they
provide part time employment to a very large number of poorer sections of the society. They
also supply essential products for mass consumption & exports.
The modern SMEs are mostly defined in terms of the size of investment & labour force. The
industries (Development & Regulation) defines, SMEs having less than 50 workers with the aid
of power or less than 50 workers with the aid of power.
Government is extending various steps towards SMEs. In addition, the SMEs has been
supported and encouraged by various government policies for infrastructure support, technology
up-gradation, preferential access to credit, preferential policy support, etc.
1. The contribution of Small scale sector to the manufacturing sector and GDP as a whole is
significant in terms of its share in total value added.
2. Small scale sector performs to the manufacturing sector and GDP as a whole is significant in
terms of its share in total value added.
3. SMEs can play a role in mitigating the problem of imbalance in the balance of payment
accounts through its export promotion.
4. While the large scale industries are expected to increase the inequities of income and
concentration of wealth, SMEs are expected to help widespread equal distribution of income
and wealth.
5. Small sector may provide opportunities to a large number of capable and potential
entrepreneurs who are deprived of appropriate opportunities.
6. It can help to release scarce capital towards productive use.
7. SMEs can reap the benefits of lean production and can find new cost-efficient techniques of
lean production.
8. As small units can use resources more efficiently to the full capacity without any wastage,
they may have higher allocation efficiency.
9. As the element of risk is low in SMEs, more resources will be employed by large number of
labor force.
PUBLIC SECTOR
At the time of independence, India was backward and underdeveloped – basically an agrarian
economy with weak industrial base, high rate of unemployment, low level of savings and
investment and near absence of infrastructural facilities. Indian economy needed a big push.
This push could not come from the private sector because of the lack of funds and their inability
to take risk with large long-gestation investments. As such, government intervention through
public sector was necessary for self-reliant economic growth, to diversify the economy and to
overcome economic and social backwardness.
OBJECTIVES: The public sector aims at achieving the following objectives:
Role of Public Sector: The public sector has been playing a vital role in the economic
development of the country. Public sector is considered a powerful engine of economic
development and an important instrument of self-reliance. The main contributions of public
enterprises to the country's economy may be described as follows:
1. Filling the Gaps in Capital Goods: At the time of independence, there existed serious gaps
in the industrial structure of the country, particularly in the fields of heavy industries such as
steel, heavy machine tools, exploration and refining of oil, heavy Electrical and equipment,
chemicals and fertilizers, defense equipment, etc. Public sector has helped to fill up these gaps.
The basic infrastructure required for rapid industrialisation has been built up, through the
production of strategic capital goods. In this way the public sector has considerably widened the
industrial base of the country.
2. Employment: Public sector has created millions of jobs to tackle the unemployment problem
in the country. Public sector accounts for about two-thirds of the total employment in the
organised industrial sector in India. By taking over many sick units, the public sector has
protected the employment of millions. Public sector has also contributed a lot towards the
improvement of working and living conditions of workers by serving as a model employer.
1. Poor Project Planning: Investment decisions in many public enterprises are not based upon
proper evaluation of demand and supply, cost benefit analysis and technical feasibility. Lack of a
precise criterion and flaws in planning have caused undue delays and inflated costs in the
commissioning of projects. Many projects in the public sector have not been finished according
to the time schedule.
2. Over-capitalization: Due to inefficient financial planning, lack of effective financial control
and easy availability of money from the government, several public enterprises suffer from
over-capitalization The Administrative Reforms Commission found that Hindustan Aeronautics,
Heavy Engineering Corporation and Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd were
over-capitalized. Such over-capitalization resulted in high capital-output ratio and wastage of
scare capital resources.
4. Overstaffing: Manpower planning is not effective due to which several public enterprises like
Bhilai Steel have excess manpower. Recruitment is not based on sound labour projections. On
the other hand, posts of Chief Executives remain unfilled for years despite the availability of
required personnel.
5. Under-utilisation of Capacity: One serious problem of the public sector has been low
utilisation of installed capacity. In the absence of definite targets of production, effective
production planning and control and proper assessment of future needs many undertakings
have failed to make full use of their fixed assets. There is considerable idle capacity. In some
cases productivity is low on account of poor materials management or ineffective inventory
control.
6. Lack of a Proper Price Policy: There is no clear-cut price policy for public enterprises and
the Government has not laid down guidelines for the rate of return to be earned by different
undertakings. Public enterprises are expected to achieve various socio-economic objectives and
in the absence of a clear directive, pricing decisions are not always based on rational analysis.
In addition to dogmatic price policy, there is lack of cost-consciousness, quality consciousness,
and effective control on waste and efficiency.
7. Inefficient Management : The management of public enterprises in our country leaves much
to be desired. Managerial efficiency and effectiveness have been low due to inept management,
uninspiring leadership, too much centralisation, frequent transfers and lack of personal stake.
Civil servants who are deputed to manage the enterprises often lack proper training and use
bureaucratic practices. Political interference in day-to-day affairs, rigid bureaucratic control and
ineffective delegation of authority hamper initiative, flexibility and quick decisions. Motivations
and morale of both executives and workers are low due to the lack of appropriate incentives.
It was, at one point of time, the prominent form of organisation of the public enterprises for two
reasons. First, it was easy for a government to create an enterprise within the organisational
framework of one of its already existing departments. Secondly, in the initial stages of
developmental planning, the number of such enterprises with commercial functions was small.
(a) The enterprise is financed by annual appropriation from the treasury and all or major share
of its revenues are paid into the treasury.
(b) The enterprise is subject to budget accounting and audit controls applicable to other
government activities.
(c) The permanent staffs of the enterprise are civil servants, the method by which they are
recruited and the conditions of service under which they are employed are ordinarily the same
as for other civil servants.
(d) The enterprise is generally organised as a major sub-division of one of the central
government departments and is subject to direct control of the need of the department.
(e) Wherever this applies in the legal system of the country concerned, the enterprise
possesses the sovereign immunity of the state and cannot be sued without the consent of the
government.
According to F.D. Roosevelt, the President of USA, it is an autonomous form of the organisation
"clothed with the power of the government, but possessed with the flexibility and initiative of
private enterprise". Public Corporation may be understood in general terms as an autonomous
commercial organisation established at government's insistence outside the framework of
government department and company legislation.
1. It is generally created by, or pursuant to, a special law defining its powers, duties, and
immunities and prescribing the form of the management its relationship to established
departments and ministries.
2. As a corporate body it is a separate entity for legal purposes and can sue and be sued, enter
into contract and acquire property in its own name.
3. Except for appropriations to provide capital or to cover losses, a public corporation is usually
independently financed.
5. It is ordinarily not subject to budget accounting and audit laws and procedure applicable to no
corporate agencies.
6. In majority of cases, employees of public corporations are not civil servants and they are
recruited and remunerated under terms and conditions, which the corporation itself determines.
10. Some of the employees of public corporations, especially at the top level, may be from the
civil services.
The joint stock company is another organisational form of public enterprises. The 'company
form' which may also be called a 'government company' is described in many countries as an
enterprise registered under the Companies Act of the land in which the government and/or
public enterprises hold at least 51 per cent of equity capital.
1. A government company is far easier to constitute than a public corporation, which requires
specific legislation, while only seven signatories of the memorandum and articles of association
are required to get a company, registered under the Companies Act in India.
2. The company form enables the government to diversify its ownership in the company by
either selling or buying equity shares. It can easily transfer the company to private sector by
simply reducing its share capital to less than 50 per cent.
3. The creation of a company form of public enterprise suggests the government's will to allow
the public enterprise to work under the same set of law as those applying to private sector
enterprise.
(d) Joint Enterprise
State participation in an economic activity along with the private sector has led to the creation of
a specific type of organisational form, which is known as joint enterprise.
1. Government's will to set up joint enterprises with private sector may be in either of the
following situations:
2. The government's decision to enter into partial ownership of a going private enterprise may
occur in the following situations:
(1) It promotes an activity which otherwise might not come into existence.
(2) It accelerates an activity which otherwise would materialize at a slow pace in small outputs
and in a sect orally unbalanced manner.
(3) It promotes a desired pattern of economic activity, meaning thereby the expansion of desired
sector of activity, promotion of units of desired sizes, attainment of desired balance of payments,
development of certain economic activity in the desired region, etc.
Public Sector undertakings refer to commercial ventures (registered under separate act of
Parliament) of the Government where user fees are charged for services rendered. The
tariff/fees may be market based or subsidised. They are usually fully owned and managed by
the Government such as Railways, Posts, Defence Undertakings, Banks etc.
To provide additional autonomy to Public sector enterprises there is a system of classifying the
PSU in Maharatna Navratna and Miniratna I and II. The Guidelines for awarding Ratna[11] status
are as In India to provide follow:
Miniratna Miniratna
Maharatna Navratna
Category-I Category-II
List of Navratna