Hollywood physics

Matteo Lombardo, Tiziano Pasini, Daniele Rimondi

our cartoon; a short animation “Alike”

https://youtu.be/PDHIy
rfMl_U?t=14
 strengths and weaknesses
● the camera is fixed and the ● the boy goes behind the
the animation is on a white, books
still and with no ● the boy is jumping, making it
perspective, making it easy difficult to set precise points
● the frames where the boy is
to analyze
still on the ground uses a lot
● we have a possible of frames
calibration reference: the
height of the father
● it is a simple video
axis

1.80
Displacement-time
 Displacement-time
● The graph shows a non-uniform motion,
● After reaching point 0, the child still goes forward until he falls and stops,
then immediately continues.
● We can see a strong negative correlation.

● There are 86 frames

● A random error is that the child jumps so it is difficult to calculate where
to plot the point
velocity time graph
 Velocity-time
We cannot see a relation in the first part of the graph, probably because the child
is jumping and we pointed on the furthest point the boy reached. Then the child
stops so velocity remains 0 for a period of time. We can see a continuous negative
speed because even though he stops, he is going in the same direction always.
 jumps
if we look at the video in slow motion we can see that when the child jumps, there is a little
delay in the next step, this is a reason why the first and the third part are not uniform;
indeed I think that the points are the points in which the boy touches the ground.
Moreover, we could have put even more frames in the plotting, and the graph would have
been more precise, but I still think that it is good enough.