You are on page 1of 15

GENDER EQUALITY and

SOCIAL INCLUSION
FRAMEWORK 2.0

JUNE 2018
GENDER EQUALITY and
SOCIAL INCLUSION
FRAMEWORK 2.0

FHI 360 Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Hub

Prepared by Elise Young and Andrea Bertone

June 2018
Acknowledgements
The FHI 360 Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Framework (GESI) 2.0 is
the result of a collaborative effort, with substantial input, recommendations
and review from FHI 360 employees at all levels within the organization, and
across Business Units, Regional Offices, departments, countries and practice
areas. The document was spearheaded by Elise Young, Senior Technical
Advisor, and Andrea Bertone, Director, of FHI 360’s Gender Equality and
Social Inclusion Hub. A diverse group of FHI 360 staff members gave
valuable input into either the Framework 2.0 or the suite of accompanying
GESI resources. This includes the following people:
Elise Young (Chair), Andrea Bertone (GESI Hub), Maryce Ramsey (GESI Hub), Lori
Reid (G3E), Barney Singer (G3E), Laura Dominguez (G3E), Rose Wilcher (GHPN),
Robyn Dayton (GHPN), Berengère de Negri (GHPN), Nilufar Rakhmanova (GHPN),
Katherine Lew (GHPN), Kevin Osborne (GHPN), Thad Pennas (GHPN), Johannes van
Dam (GRS), Esther Ko (OCIA), Joanne Kochuk (BDD), Brooke Mattocks (BDD US),
Elisa Chen (Strategy), Susan Voskuil (CMS), Patricia Shehata (CMS), Katje Vanden
Heuvel (COMMS), Lezanne Wollenschlaeger (HR), Tricia Petruney (ID), Philippe
GESI Task Force Sanchez (WAMERO), Shawn Malone (ESARO), Tembeka Sonkwele (ESARO), Srunya
Nopsuwanwong (BDD APRO), John Strand (USBU), John Ward (USBU), Hayley
Bryant (Mozambique), Cara Endyke Doran (Mozambique), Khin Zarli Aye (Myanmar),
Sumita Taneja (India), Robert Mwadime (Uganda), Satish Raj Pandey (Nepal),
Mirriam Dogimab (PNG), Bridget Lombardo (DRC), Blaise Kouadio (Ivory Coast),
Misti McDowell (Ethiopia), Kilyelyani Kanjo (Malawi), Tosin Akibu (Nigeria), Dorothy
Muroki (Kenya)

Rebecca Sewall (G3E), Jennifer Linkletter (G3E), Ahlam Kays (G3E), Jacqueline
Bass (G3E), Caroline Averch (G3E), Stephen Luke (G3E), Carina Omoeva (G3E),
Joy Cunningham (GHPN), Kate Plourde (GHPN), Donna McCarraher (GHPN), Merle
Operating Units Froschl (USBU), Maryann Stimmer (USBU), Michele Feist (USBU), Jacqueline Hess
(USBU), Ivan Charner (USBU), Todd Charner (USBU), Bethe Almeras (USBU), Amy
Detgen (USBU)

Andy Turner (BDD), Wellington Pak (BSAI), Priyanka Rao (BSAI), Justin Garrido
(BSAI), Sean Temeemi (OCIA), Kevin Pettit (OCIA), Greg Beck (CR), Art Carlson
Departments (CR), Merywen Wigley (CR), Kevin Young (L&D), Steven Hayes (BSGS), Martina Ban
(OM), Paula Pazderka (OM), Jessye Brick (BDD GHPN), Jason Kelleher (BDD G3E)

Nadra Franklin, Michael Tetelman, Rebecca Sewall, Barney Singer, Michael Stalker, Rose Wilcher, Laura
Kayser, Aleta Williams, Pam Myers, Debbie Kennedy and Patrick Fine provided final review and ensured
alignment with FHI 360 policies and strategies.

iv
Introduction
The GESI Framework 2.0 reflects a multi-year process to better assess
our organizational GESI strengths and gaps, examine promising practices
both internally and within the international development and humanitarian
communities, and set a collective vision for our future. It began with an
assessment of 35 projects FHI 360 implements across Africa and continued
with the input of the GESI Task Force and operating units and departments.
In addition to the Framework 2.0, this collaboration generated a suite of GESI
guidelines, tools and resources for use by FHI 360 staff, interns, consultants
and partners to integrate the GESI standards. The GESI Framework 2.0 will be
available publicly to our funders and partners as a demonstration of FHI 360’s
commitment to the standards described herein. Staff can find the following
full suite of internal GESI resources on the Connect site.

• GESI Framework 2.0 We want all staff to fully engage with the
• GESI Standards International Cheat Sheet principles, commitments and standards within
this Framework, and to benefit from and add to
• GESI Standards U.S. Cheat Sheet the larger set of available GESI resources. The
• International BD-Capture GESI Cheat Sheet principles are aspirational, and offer ideas for
• International BD-Proposal GESI Cheat Sheet how we can focus our attention to help
advance the larger goal of GESI at FHI 360. The
• International Project Implementation GESI commitments offer qualitative targets, that can
Cheat Sheet help us to better measure our progress towards
• International Business Development GESI achieving more specific results. The standards
Guidelines provide action steps, to help all staff integrate
• International Business Development GESI the principles and work towards achieving the
Toolkits commitments throughout different stages of
the business development and project
• International Project Implementation GESI implementation life cycles.
Guidelines
For more information or to share questions or
• International Project Implementation GESI feedback on the different available GESI resources
Toolkits and initiatives at FHI 360, staff can send an email
to GESI@FHI360.org.

1
Forward
Since 2012, when FHI 360 launched the Gender Integration Framework, we have learned a great
deal about the depth of the commitment required, and the need for alignment of our organizational
processes and project implementation practices, in order to fully integrate approaches to achieve gender
equality in all aspects of our work. We have benefited from deep engagement with our staff, partners,
funders, fellow coalition members, and especially project participants/beneficiaries about the need for
intersectional approaches that address social exclusion. Now, we seek to stretch ourselves even further
by prioritizing social inclusion for people of diverse identities across race, color, national or ethnic origin,
disability, sex, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, marital status, veteran status, and all
other protected class status.

This Framework 2.0 establishes a clear set of GESI principles, commitments, and standards. It is based
upon the international development community’s Minimum Standards for Mainstreaming Gender
Equality, of which FHI 360 is a co-founder and endorser. It is our foundational document for a suite of
GESI tools and resources that guide our efforts to mainstream GESI across our entire organization and
throughout our projects. GESI 2.0 is in line with and reinforces FHI 360’s Diversity and Inclusion Strategy
and Code of Conduct. It also supports our strategic goal of increasing equity. It reflects promising
practices within both international and U.S. development efforts that will help us to collectively advance
our vision of supporting all individuals and communities to have the opportunity to reach their highest
potential.

I hope you will find this document inspiring and useful in the work you do to improve lives in meaningful
ways throughout the world.

Patrick C. Fine
Chief Executive Officer, FHI 360

2
Background
The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals recognize that gender equality and
social inclusion (GESI) are fundamental issues in and of themselves, as well as
contributing to the end goal of reducing poverty and advancing a healthier, safer,
cleaner, better educated, connected, just and empowered world. Addressing
gender equality and social inclusion are crucial to achieving success within our
organizational practices, business development and programming.

These goals require integrated solutions built on Opportunity, Professional Standards of Conduct,
a deep belief that all people, communities and and ensuring Harassment-free and Violence-free
countries should have equal rights and the power Work Environments can be found in our Code of
to control their own fate. These goals also apply Ethics and Conduct, which is required learning for
to U.S.-based programs, and align with U.S. laws all employees.
requiring equal employment opportunity and non-
discrimination. As such, both U.S.-based programs FHI 360 supports a strong commitment to
and international development programs are addressing equality gaps, and finding ways to
expected to uphold universally recognized rights respond to them head on. For example, FHI
regarding gender equality and social inclusion, and 360 recognizes that we need more women in
to actively work on the measures of equity needed leadership positions among staff across several
to help achieve them. This includes embracing the country offices in order to reach greater gender
principles, commitments and standards that are equity. The same is true for people with diverse
set forth within this framework, and weaving identities across race, color, national or ethnic
these values into our organizational DNA and origin, disability, sex, age, gender identity, sexual
program implementation. orientation, religion, marital status, and veteran
status. FHI 360 believes in looking at its own
FHI 360 is committed to advancing GESI through internal processes to identify where inequality
both organizational mainstreaming and project might exist and working to improve our systems
integration. This is a part of the organization’s so that all staff across the globe may have the
larger Diversity and Inclusion Strategy. FHI 360 same opportunities, support systems, and
seeks to strengthen the ways in which we recruit, enabling environment.
hire, build the capacity of, evaluate, and treat
our staff. FHI 360 has multiple policies in place Integrating GESI principles must simultaneously
that help reinforce the Diversity and Inclusion take place within our diverse U.S. and international
Strategy, as well as its commitment to achieving portfolios, which include health, education,
gender equality and broader principles of social STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and
inclusion. Our policies on Equal Employment Math), civil society, workforce development,

3
youth empowerment, technology, livelihoods, and Evidence on Why GESI Is Important
research. Many FHI 360 projects – including in the U.S.
and globally – have addressed GESI over the years.
Under the Women’s Studies Project in the 1990s, FHI FHI 360 PROJECTS IN AFRICA
conducted groundbreaking research on the impact ÎÎ90% of projects have staff that focus on
implementing gender activities. Of those, 65% have
of family planning on women’s lives—including their
a qualified gender focal point.
educational attainment, employment status and marital
ÎÎ60% of projects had done a gender analysis,
relations. More recently, FHI 360 has researched the
yet only 15% of staff say gender was sufficiently
reproductive health and decision-making power of integrated in the proposal. Only 10% were satisfied
adolescent girls around the world through Passages; with the quality, content and resourcing of gender
worked with key populations1 to prevent HIV/AIDS and activities.
gender-based violence through LINKAGES; advanced ÎÎ100% of interviewed staff who received gender
research and practice in supporting girls in STEM in trainings found them very helpful and say additional
training is needed to keep knowledge fresh, build
the U.S. through Furthering Girls’ Math Identity; helped
capacity, and improve project outcomes.
young people from disadvantaged communities in the
U.S. to stay in school, excel academically, and elevate INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
their career aspirations through Bridge to Employment,
ÎÎ Development Assistance Committee (DAC)
and enabled cross-border communities in East Africa members invested over $25 billion in aid to support
to take an integrated, gender-equitable approach to gender equality and women’s empowerment in
economic development, governance and improved 2013, with $2.2 billion from the U.S. government.
health through ROADS (Regional Outreach Addressing (Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s
Empowerment, OECD, 2015.)
AIDS through Development Strategies), ROADS II and
ÎÎ The U.S. government has multiple GESI mandates
CB-HIPP (Cross-Border Health Integrated Partnership
across different agencies. For example, USAID’s
Project). ADS 205 establishes clear requirements for
implementation of the USAID Gender Equality
Despite these important projects and the many and Female Empowerment Policy. PEPFAR, the
places where FHI 360 has already been working to Millennium Challenge Corporation and the U.S.
State Department all have gender guidelines in
integrate GESI, two challenges remain. First, despite place. Multiple agencies have disability inclusion,
the fact that FHI 360 rolled out a Gender Integration child protection, and youth development
Framework in 2012 to provide guidance on integrating requirements as well.
gender into strategic business development, projects ÎÎ Almost 2,000 private-sector companies
and research endeavors, results have not always been have endorsed the United Nations Women’s
uniform or consistent across all sectors or regions. Empowerment Principles.
Second, the previous Framework focused solely on U.S. DEVELOPMENT
gender, and did not provide guidance on other social
inclusion issues such as disability, race/ethnicity, age or ÎÎ Companies in the top 25th percentile for gender
diversity on their executive teams were 21% more
sexual orientation. likely to outperform on profitability, and those in
the top quartile for ethnic/cultural diversity were
The FHI 360 GESI Framework 2.0 addresses both 33% more likely. (Delivering Through Diversity,
challenges by focusing on the integration of gender McKinsey, 2018.)
equality and social inclusion principles, commitments ÎÎ Foundations investing in U.S. programs have
and operational standards across all sectors and regions. shown an increased prioritization on equity and
inclusion. Ford Foundation has invested $630
The organization has also created complementary
million in programs that challenge inequality,
guidelines and toolkits for GESI integration within including across gender, race and ethnicity.
business development and project implementation. We ÎÎ FHI 360 leads the Post-secondary Success
are working to build GESI capacity to establish greater Collaborative with support from Citi Foundation.
systems of accountability across the organization. By focusing on issues of ethnicity and equity, the
project has helped achieve a 24% increase in
college enrollment among participating African-
American and Latino students compared with a
5% increase among students from the same
1. Key populations refers to the population most-at-risk to HIV ethnic groups in the districts overall.
transmission, including men who have sex with men, transgender
people, people who inject drugs and sex workers.

4
Based on our vision, mission and values, the GESI framework serves a three-fold purpose:

1. To embed GESI principles across the organization.


2. To set specific GESI commitments towards which FHI 360 will work.
3. To provide standards for achieving these commitments in all spheres of our work.

In addition, the FHI 360 GESI Framework 2.0 is designed to improve the quality, impact and competi-
tiveness of our work.

Guiding Principles
1. We maintain that gender equality and social
inclusion are essential components of
FHI 360’s development work that will
improve program outcomes. We address
harmful gender and social norms and utilize
equity measures at all stages of
the project life cycle, in both U.S. and
international programs.

2. We support approaches that address


inequalities experienced by people with
overlapping or intersectional social
identities. This includes better understanding
the realities of and supporting the
empowerment of women of color, LGBTQIA
youth, and men and women with disabilities.

3. We recognize that youth, adults and older


people have special strengths and needs
when it comes to GESI. We support the
empowerment of people of different ages
throughout our development work.

4. We emphasize the human rights and


dignity of all people, including those who
identify as LGBTQIA2 and/or as gender
non-conforming. We work to embrace,
engage and partner with LGBTQIA individuals
and groups, support their empowerment,
and collectively work to advance rights and

2. LGBTQIA stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender,


Queer or Questioning, Intersex and Asexual.

5
better development outcomes. In countries 7. We support country- and community-led
with legal restrictions, we will obey all laws development, and will work with community
while still upholding the concepts of LGBTQIA members, civil society organizations,
respect and access. governments, the private sector and
academia to support culturally relevant
5. We prioritize the inclusion of people living solutions to advance GESI. We support
with disabilities through our partnerships context-specific adaptation of the GESI
and programming, including physical, mental, Framework 2.0 to ensure the implementation
emotional, and learning disabilities, as well speaks to a country’s cultural and legal norms,
as both visible and invisible disabilities that as long as the Framework’s principles and
might not be immediately apparent. We commitments are respected.
also seek to create a welcoming, respectful,
inclusive work environment for people with 8. Our approach is grounded in empirical
disabilities. evidence and rigorous methodologies.
We are committed to generating and
6. We underscore the importance of sharing quality data about gender equality
addressing racial and ethnic inequality and social inclusion and their impact on
within our internal practices and development. We are further committed to
programming.This includes having greater basing our programs on the best available
awareness of diversity gaps across our quantitative and qualitative evidence.
organization and projects, actively recruiting Monitoring and evaluation of our activities
people of color and minority ethnic groups, and programs should include gender
and pursuing equity measures to help equality- and social inclusion-related
increase the participation and leadership of measures as a critical component of overall
people from underrepresented racial and progress and outcomes.
ethnic groups.

FHI 360 makes the following organizational and project commitments in ways that are inclusive of
the full spectrum of race, color, national or ethnic origin, disability, sex, age, gender identity, sexu-
al orientation, religion, marital status, veteran status, genetic information and all other protected
class status.

Organizational Commitments
1. Support hiring, advancement and leadership support increased clarity, engagement and
opportunities across the entire organization accountability for staff.
for people of diverse identities. These
commitments are included in recruitment, 3. Prevent and respond to harassment,
hiring, onboarding, professional development, violence, abuse, or discrimination among
compensation and staff support. staff, interns, consultants, and partners,
including sexual harassment and abuse,
2. Integrate GESI commitments into relevant any forms of gender-based violence and
job descriptions, and track progress discrimination. We will uphold the strictest
through annual performance reviews to standards of protection and will work to create

6
a safe environment for project participants 5. Strengthen GESI measurement and
and other stakeholders against harassment, accountability mechanisms, including within
violence, abuse and discrimination by our regular global surveys, audits, project tracking
staff, interns, and consultants. (See FHI 360’s tools, assessment reports, and partner and
Policies on Equal Employment Opportunity, staff performance reviews.
Harassment-Free Work Environment, and
Violence-Free Work Environment.)

4. Prioritize the safety and security of all


FHI 360 staff, interns and consultants
throughout the course of their work with
increased attention on how to mitigate unique
safety and security risks.

Project Commitments
1. Engage with, measure, and increase the 4. Track numbers of diverse partners. When
involvement of individuals who have identifying new potential partnerships,
historically been excluded in all points of the proactively seek out underrepresented groups,
project life cycle. This could include women, such as women’s organizations and disabled
men, boys, girls, and people of diverse gender persons’ organizations.
identities, depending on the context. We will
measure and support the empowerment and 5. Measure and increase the number of
leadership of women and girls. projects that conduct GESI analyses, create
GESI project strategies, hire project-level
2. Create systems to measure, prevent and GESI specialists where possible, utilize GESI
decrease GBV. We will also promote activities to indicators, and build evidence among all FHI
measure, prevent and respond to GBV whenever 360 projects to help inform programming
possible. and achieve the first three programmatic
GESI commitments.
3. Seek partners with a commitment to
integrate GESI into their work, or willingness
to build their capacity to do so. Work with
all partners to learn from one another and
collectively increase shared GESI integration,
knowledge and capacity.

7
GESI Standards
The following are standards that can help FHI 360 racial or ethnic equity. Both international and U.S.
achieve GESI within our business development programs, however, can increase their awareness
and project life cycles. Certain international and integration of issues across the GESI
projects may make a strategic choice to focus spectrum. FHI 360 can also work with its

FHI 360 Gender Equality & Social


solely or more exclusively on standards of gender
integration, depending on funder requirements,
partners to create an enabling environment
for gender equality and social inclusion, and

Inclusion (GESI) Standards


project goals and available resources and capacity.
Certain U.S. programs may focus more intently on
proactively implement equity mechanisms to help
achieve them.

Strategic Planning Opportunity Identification


& Market Analysis to Assessement

Integrate GESI into Engage GESI experts during


funder & competitor Bid Board processes and
Capture & Proposal
analyses within the BJM Development

Integrate rapid GESI


analysis & strategy into
1 2 capture & proposal:
TOC, Design, Partners,
Activites, MEL, Budget

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 3
Implement Plan Startup

Create GESI Complete GESI analysis Hire GESI Specialist &/or


capacity-building and & strategy in first 6 knowledgeable staff.
implementation plans for months. Adapt work plan Integrate GESI into staff
staff and partners & budget accordingly & partner onboarding

6 5 4
Monitor
& Improve

Include SADD* & GESI


indicators & qualitative PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
assessment in quarterly
& annual reports Monitor
Closeout
& Improve

Include GESI metrics in Record & share GESI


official staff and partner achievements & lessons learned
7 with staff, partners & funders
performance reviews

8 9
* SADD stands for sex- and
age-disaggregated data

The GESI Standards are integrated throughout practices that nearly all FHI 360 proposals and
the project lifecycle under nine distinct stages. projects can endeavor to achieve.
The first three stages take place during the
business development processes, while the For more information on how the GESI Standards
remaining six happen during implementation. apply to U.S. Projects, please review the FHI
These standards may need to be adapted for 360 U.S. GESI Standards Cheat Sheet. For more
specific proposals or projects depending on information on how they apply to International
their size, nature, and requirements. However, Projects, please review the FHI 360 International
they provide a set of strong steps and promising GESI Standards Cheat Sheet.

8
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

FHI 360 has standardized its Business Project implementation may differ greatly
Development (BD) 2.0 process, which provides between projects when it comes to GESI. For
for a certain level of flexibility to meet funders’ example, it may make most sense for a USAID
needs. We must understand the changing education project in Malawi to perform a full
GESI landscape for prospective funders and GESI analysis in country within the first 6 months
competitors, and be competitive by having GESI after startup, to better understand the impact
capabilities in place. Different priorities also of gender and social norms on project design. By
exist between U.S. and international programs. contrast (or by comparison), an education project
For example, many U.S. programs may pursue funded by a foundation in the U.S. might require
projects with a heavy focus on equity, especially a different approach. This can still include a GESI
across different racial, ethnic or socio-economic analysis, but it may need to be a much shorter
backgrounds. Many international programs desk review that is well tailored to the specific
respond to specific requirements around gender funder.
integration. Despite these differences, all business
development initiatives can benefit from a more For more information on how to integrate GESI
expansive approach to GESI. into international projects, review the International
Project GESI Cheat Sheet, or the full International
For more information on how to integrate Project Implementation GESI Guidelines.
GESI into international business development
initiatives, review the International Capture
GESI Cheat Sheet, International Proposal GESI
Cheat Sheet, or the full International Business
Development Guidelines.

9
For more information on the
GESI Framework 2.0, please
contact the FHI 360 Gender
Equality and Social Inclusion Hub at
GESI@fhi360.org

You might also like