Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T.N., India
Abstract
The ever-changing market and evolving power sector poses a constant need for cost reduction and reducing
atmospheric emissions. This has led to a worldwide impetus to improve the power plant efficiency thereby reducing
emissions and improving cost effectiveness. This necessitate the requirement for materials with improved elevated
temperature and high strength properties. These new and critical materials need the reliable NDE techniques which
can provide more accurate flaw detection.
Among all non-destructive examination methods, Advanced Ultrasonic examinations (PAUT and TOFD) are some
of the most reliable volumetric examinations along with conventional Ultrasonic Examination for the most used and
advance materials. The change in microstructures of the materials affect acoustic properties of the material, resulting
in change of attenuation, scattering, SNR etc. Heat treatment and mechanical work (cold or hot) modifies the
microstructure of the material. This provides a correlation between heat treatment, mechanical work and responses
from ultrasonic examination
Ultrasonic testing suffers from some inherent drawbacks which can be correlated with the microstructure of the
materials. Microstructural variations can cause varied ultrasonic response because of changes in attenuation,
velocity, scattering, SNR. Further, it is well known that prior heat treatment and mechanical working also plays a
key role in modifying microstructure of the material. Hence a correlation is often derived between the heat treatment
and variation in ultrasonic response.
The intent of this paper is to present the unique study of the variations in the ultrasonic responses with respect to the
changes in microstructure of various material used in industry. Specimen was heat treated at different heat treatment
cycles and this study was carried out to find the correlation between microstructural changes and acoustic response
of the material. Further investigation was done to improve the detectability from PAUT and TOFD.
Keywords
UT (Ultrasonic Testing), PAUT (Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing), NDT (Non-Destructive Testing), SNR (Signal to
Noise Ratio)
1. Introduction
The prime objective of NDT is to detect and characterize flaws in a component to assure that the
component meets the required quality standards and hence fit for its intended service. There are
several NDT techniques which are used for volumetric examination like RT (Radiographic
Testing), UT (Ultrasonic Testing), PAUT (Phased Array Ultrasonic testing), TOFD (Time of
Flight Diffraction). However, application of PAUT, TOFD or a combination of both is
increasingly being used in volumetric examination owing to its benefits of versatility, cost
effectiveness and sensitivity in detection of subtle defects [1-2]. We know that among many
other factors, material microstructure plays a very significant role in affecting the performance of
ultrasonic systems. It is also a very well-established fact that the material microstructure can be
altered greatly with different heat treatments cycles. Hence there is close interplay of factors like
heat treatment, material microstructure and performance of PAUT, TOFD testing.
Polycrystalline materials with grain structure will cause attenuation and backscatter which will
1
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
significantly alter the ultrasonic response of the system. Grain boundary which the interface
between two adjacent grains exists in polycrystalline metals and will cause scattering of the
propagating ultrasonic wave which causes attenuation as well as noise echo. Sometimes even the
noise echoes can be strong enough to mask defect echoes from small indications [3].
Hence a better understanding of factors like heat treatment, subsequent microstructural changes
and how it effects the performance of testing is of paramount interest to NDT personnel. It is the
goal of this work to understand experimentally, the effects of different heat treatments upon the
microstructure of the material and its interaction with PAUT and TOFDs response of the system.
This study can help to understand the interaction of the factors which in turn can help to design
better inspection system [4].
2. Experimental Study
A plain low carbon steel plate was identified for the study as specimen for this work. To start
with, sample was prepared and analyzed with OES (Optical Emission Spectroscopy) to confirm
the grade of the material. Artificial discontinuities were simulated by inserting SDHs through
machining to get PAUT and TOFD responses. Various heat treatment cycles were attempted to
create the changes in the microstructure and obtain a grain size variation. After each heat
treatment, a detailed metallurgical and acoustic study with several changes in parameters of
PAUT and TOFD was carried out in the plate to understand the correlation of these parameters
with changes in microstructure and possibilities of optimization of the ultrasonic response.
2.1 Material:
Material selected for this study was plain low carbon steel plate (ASTM Number SA516 Gr 70)
which is supplied in as rolled condition. Great weldability, numerous applications in structural
and power sector were the main reason to select this material.
2
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
1/4 T 25 mm
PAUT/TOFD
PROBE
1/2 T
SDH
145 mm
290mmm
185 HT-2
HT-1 950
Rate of cooling:
180 40-50(°C/hr)
650
Temperature (° C)
Temperature (° C)
Rate of cooling:
20-30(°C/hr)
3
Time (min) Time (min)
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
HT-3
370
950
Rate of cooling:
Temperature (° C) 40-50(°C/hr)
Rate of heating:
80-90(°C/hr)
Time (min)
a. As rolled condition
4
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
5
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
As rolled sample shows banded microstructure with alternating bands of ferrite and pearlite
aligned parallel to the rolling direction (Fig. 3 & Fig. 4). After the first heat treatment cycle
which was performed below lower critical temperature there was minor increase in the grain
size, however the banded microstructure was still evident (Fig. 5 & Fig. 6). After the full
annealing heat treatment performed above Upper Critical Temperature, an increase in grain size
was observed and there was homogenization of the banded structure as evident from
microstructure in the transverse direction (Fig. 7 & Fig. 8). In the third heat treatment cycle, full
annealing was performed with increase in soaking time from the second heat treatment cycle,
this resulted in more homogenization of the structure, since it’s a diffusion based process
complete homogenization may take extremely long annealing time, partial homogenization was
noticed (Fig 8 & Fig 10) at the second and third heat treatment cycle which was performed
above Upper Critical Temperature.
150
ASTM Grain Size Number(G)
10,1
10,05 10 148
9,89
146 145 145
Hardness (Hv10)
144
9,54 9,49 144
9,4 9,44
142
140
As rolled HT-1 HT-2 HT-3 As rolled HT-1 HT-2 HT-3
Fig. 11 Grain Size variation with Heat Treatment Fig 12 Hardness variation with Heat Treatment
As evident from Fig. 11 the ASTM Grain Size Number (G) reduced subsequently after annealing
heat treatment. The reason behind this reduction in G is the corresponding grain growth that
resulted from annealing treatment. The major increase in grain size happened in HT-2 i.e. after
full annealing treatment performed above the Upper Critical Temperature. However, there was
not much of a change noticed in grain size after the soaking time was increased in annealing
treatment (after HT-4).
The sudden drop in the hardness value (Fig. 12) after the first sub critical annealing (HT-1) can
be attributed to the recovery process that happens during annealing which reduces the dislocation
density in the material. However, there was no major change in the hardness values after HT-2 &
HT-3. The results obtained after hardness and grain size survey are in conformance with the
microstructural changes than happened due to the annealing treatments given to the sample.
6
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
0,106
0,104
0,102
0,1
0,098
0,096
0,094
0,092
Fig. 13 Variation in attenuation coefficient with heat treatment
The attenuation that takes place in the material is having two components, absorption and
scattering. Energy loss due to absorption is a combined effect of mechanisms like dislocation
damping, hysteresis losses, thermos elastic effects, etc. Loss due to scattering is predominantly
dependent upon ratio of grain size and wavelength. Attenuation in the material is strongly
influenced by the microstructure of the material and the same has been studies in this work. It is
established that heat treatment plays an important role to modify the microstructure which causes
a change in the attenuation within the material. The parameters playing a role may include grain
size, grain boundaries, the relative amounts of phases, the layer thickness of the pearlite [6-7].
As illustrated in Fig. 13, attenuation was found to increase with heat treatment which can be
attributed to the factor of increase in grain size due to heat treatment. However, there was a
minor decrease in attenuation coefficient noticed after the final heat treatment which can be due
to partial removal of banding structure and the onset of homogenization of the structure, however
this needs to be investigated in detail in future work to study the effect of homogenization on
attenuation within the material.
7
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
interdependence, multiple scans were performed with variation in beam path, indication depth
(SDH at different depths), frequency, filter, averaging. The same number of scans were repeated
for both PAUT and TOFD after each heat treatment to understand the effect of microstructural
changes upon PAUT and TOFD response and to get the optimum response with changes in UT
parameters.
Scanning variables can be well understood from the attached details (Table 3, Table4):
Probe
Angle Index Probe Frequency Wedge Angle PCS
Probe Frequency Wedge Scan
(Deg) Half Full
Skip Skip C543-
5 MHz
ST1-
60 Deg 57.74
5L64A12/ 5MHz/ SA12- SM 60L-IHC
45 Linear +26 -5 C543- ST1-
2.25L64A12 2.25MHz N55S 5 MHz 70 Deg 91.58
5L64A12/ 5MHz/ SA12- SM 70L-IHC
55 Linear +14 -24
2.25L64A12 2.25MHz N55S C563- ST1-
5L64A12/ 5MHz/ SA12- 10 MHz 60 Deg 57.74
60 Linear +14 -34 SM 60L-IHC
2.25L64A12 2.25MHz N55S
5L64A12/ 5MHz/ SA12- 40 to C563- ST1-
Sectorial +22 -8 10 MHz 70 Deg 91.58
2.25L64A12 2.25MHz N55S 67 SM 70L-IHC
8
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
60 30
40 20
SNR
SNR
Filter 2
20 10
Filter 5
0 0
As HT-1 HT-2 HT-3 Filter 4
Rolled
Fig 17 Variation in SNR with heat treatment for ½ T SDH Fig 18 Variation in SNR with heat treatment for ½ T SDH
(2MHz, 45 °) (2MHz, 60 °)
3. Conclusion
9
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
192 scans of PAUT and 112 scans of TOFD at a specimen with different heat-treated conditions
provided great amount of information. Changes in grain size were noticed in subsequent heat
treatment cycles. This results in more noise level in the indications of PAUT and TOFD of the
same specimen compared to the indication observed at as rolled condition
a 5 X 60 b 10 X 70 c 5 X 70
Averaging Averaging Filter
30 40 10
Noise Level
Noise Level
Noise Level
20 4 4
20 5 4
10 8 8
0 0 As… 0 7
As…
As…
16 16
HT-1
HT-2
HT-3
HT-1
HT-2
HT-3
HT-1
HT-2
HT-3
d 10 X 60 e Noise - 2MHz, 45 f
Amp - 1/2 SDH - 5
Filter Deg, FS MHz, FS
20 6 100
Noise Level
Noise Level
Indication Level
4 2 5
10 10 50
2 5 8
0 7 0 0
As…
As…
As…
4 4
HT-1
HT-2
HT-3
HT-1
HT-2
HT-3
HT-1
HT-2
HT-3
Fig. 19. a, b, c, d are the responses for TOFD where N is Frequency in MHz and M is angle in
(N x M) format. e. represents noise level for PAUT and f. represents amplitude for all heat
treatments
This is far evident and as expected. When specimen was heat treated above upper critical
temperature, even though grain size increases, onset of homogenization of the banded structure
was also noticed. The probable reason for reduction in noise level and attenuation of PAUT and
TOFD after HT2 may be due increase in homogeneity of the structure and it can be an extended
scope of this work.
The selection of appropriate filtering and averaging is the key for improving SNR which reduces
due to increase in grain size in due course of different heat treatment cycles.
4. Acknowledgment
We sincerely thank Supriyo Roy, Supervisor – Metallurgical Laboratory, and Subhendu Saha,
Engineer - Metallurgical Laboratory for carrying out the spectroscopy and metallography of the
samples.
5. Reference
1. Characterization of Material Properties by Ultrasonics, P.P. Nanekar and B. K. Shah
2. Future of Volumetric Examination in Power Sector – Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing
(PAUT) and Time of Flight Diffraction(TOFD), Dharmveer Singh, Abhishek Banerjee
10
NDE 2017 Conference & Exhibition of the Indian Society for NDT (ISNT), 14-16 December 2017, Chennai, T.N., India
3. Effects of material microstructure and surface geometry on ultrasonic scattering and flaw
detection , Yanming Guo
4. Analysis of relation between Ultrasonic Testing and Microstructure : A Step Towards
Highly Reliable Fault Detection , A Khaira , S Srivastav, A Suhane
5. Ultrasonic Attenuation and Velocity in Steel Standard Reference Blocks , M.G.S. Ali ,
N.Z. Elsayed, Ahmed M. Eid
11