You are on page 1of 1

Dutch firm takes DCI to NCLT

over ₹93.12-crore unpaid dues


Charges relate to a wasn’t tendered out to the lowest bid-
der – the preferred way to determine
sub-contracting deal market rates – instead of giving it to
between the two firms DCI on a nomination basis, resulting
in “unjust gain to DCI” from sub-con-
for work at JNPT tracting the work at a lower value.

P MANOJ Seeking refund


Mumbai, September 5 Dredging industry sources said that
Dredging contractor Van Oord India this was the first such instance in the
has filed a petition in the National sector where the employer (JNPT) is
Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seek- seeking refund from the dredging
ing to recover unpaid dues of ₹93.12 contractor (DCI).
crore from Dredging Corporation of It is considered significant because
India (DCI) on a contract it had under- DCI is now part-owned by JNPT.
taken at the Jawaharlal Nehru Port In a strategic disinvestment deal, Vi-
Trust (JNPT) on behalf of DCI. sakhapatnam Port Trust, Paradip Port
The petition seeks to initiate cor- Trust, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and
porate insolvency resolution process Deendayal Port Trust together ac-
(CIRP) against DCI under quired the Central govern-
Section 8 and 9 of the In- ment’s 73.47 per cent stake
solvency and Bankruptcy in DCI for ₹1,056 crore in
Code (IBC). March 2019. Wiser from the
Van Oord India is the experience of spending
wholly-owned Indian unit more than the market rates
of Dutch dredging giant for annual dredging in the
Van Oord Dredging and first year of the contract,
Marine Contracting Co. JNPT decided not to pay the
NV. full amount estimated by
DCI for the second and
Contract on nomination basis third year’s work. Instead, JNPT said it
The unpaid dues relate to a sub-con- will only pay DCI the amount it final-
tracting deal between DCI and Van ised with the sub-contractor, plus a 10
Oord at JNPT, India’s biggest State-run per cent extra as supervision/project
container port. management consultancy charges.
In 2019, DCI secured a three-year an- DCI sub-contracted the second
nual maintenance dredging contract year’s work to Van Oord India, which
from JNPT on nomination basis was completed in March. The unpaid
(without a tender). dues for the work done is the subject
In the first year’s contract, DCI out- matter of the petition filed before
sourced a big portion of the work to NCLT.
another contractor, ISDPL, making Van Oord India declined to com-
“extra money” in the process. ment on the NCLT petition, which was
JNPT later sought refund of the “ex- filed on August 31.
tra money” from DCI to avoid poten- GYV Victor, Managing Director and
tial adverse observations or queries Chief Executive Officer of DCI, said the
from the government auditor, the company was yet to receive any notice
Comptroller and Auditor General of from NCLT on the petition. He de-
India (CAG), on why the contract clined to discuss the matter further.

You might also like