You are on page 1of 5

MoD: SparQ Created Date: 15/09/2019 SC: INTERNAL

How SparQ determine risk, likelihood and threat rating

Contents
Risk Identification ................................................................................................................................... 1
Asset Value.............................................................................................................................................. 2
Single Loss Expectancy ............................................................................................................................ 2
Likelihood table ....................................................................................................................................... 3
Annual Loss Expectancy .......................................................................................................................... 3
Consequences/Impact table ................................................................................................................... 4
Threat Rating........................................................................................................................................... 4

Risk Identification
In order to detect risk in every SparQ’s departments, we have developed threat
scenarios for each department. The head of every department (HoDs) took this
responsibility by simulating threat scenarios on their own information assets. In order
to do this, a process has been created to assist HoDs

Identifying threats
Developing threat Clarifying type of
and vulnerabilities
scenarios (1) threat (3)
(2)

Determining the Determing threat


impact (5) vector (4)

3. Clarifying type of threat


To detect if a threat is a consequence of an accidental activity or intentional
activity
4. Determining threat vector
Where is the threat come from? Internally or Externally or from both
MoD: SparQ Created Date: 15/09/2019 SC: INTERNAL

5. Determining the impact


HoD determine what type of impact by the threat on Information Security triad
(Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability)

Asset Value
The list of Asset Value (AV) of every Information Assets (for both tangible and
intangible assets) will be provided from accounting department.

Type of Estimated Asset Value


Information Asset Owner Assets (AV) $
Meeting Of Minute
(MoM) CEO Intangible $100,000.00
Legal paper
documents CEO Intangible $200,000.00
Technical Logs TM Intangible $100,000.00
Technical Procedures TM Intangible $70,000.00
Employee Database HRM Intangible $200,000.00
Payroll Database HRM Intangible $300,000.00
Inspection reports MGF Intangible $90,000.00
Analysis reports MGF Intangible $60,000.00
Quality control
reports MFG Intangible $100,000.00
Financial report CFO Intangible $200,000.00
Accounting Data CFO Intangible $150,000.00
Server CISO Tangible $50,000.00
Risk Register CISO Intangible $ 100.000.00

Single Loss Expectancy


In order to calculate the Single Loss Expectancy (SLE), we have developed the excel
sheet which help to determine the percentage of information asset lost (EF) caused by
MoD: SparQ Created Date: 15/09/2019 SC: INTERNAL

identified threats

By applying the formula SLE = Asset Value (AV) * Exposure Factor (EF), we come
to the list of SLE for each of department.

Likelihood table
A likelihood table has been developed in five level 1 (Almost Certain), 2 (Likely), 3
(Possible), 4 (Unlikely), 5 (Rare). In addition, the frequency of occurrence (ARO)
also integrated with likelihood table to help HoD choosing the ARO that fit with their
threat scenarios.

Annual Loss Expectancy


After we determine the SLE and ARO, we come to the calculation of Annual Loss
Expectancy (ALE) by using the formula: ALE = SLE * ARO.
MoD: SparQ Created Date: 15/09/2019 SC: INTERNAL

Consequences/Impact table
A consequence/impact table has been developed to determine threat rating. It came
with five rating: 5 (Insignificant), 4 (Minor), 3 (Moderate), 2 (Major) and 1
(Extreme)

Threat Rating

NOT VALID
FOR
REFERENCE

By mapping the two value Likelihood and ALE, this table help us to determine the
right risk rating for each of threats
For example: The threat ID #101 of CEO’s department have the ARO is 0.3 which is
match with level 4 Unlikely in likelihood table. And the ALE of the ID #101 threat
is 15,000$ which is match with rating 4 (Minor) in the consequence table. By using
MoD: SparQ Created Date: 15/09/2019 SC: INTERNAL

the above “Likelihood&Impact” table, we can map the threat rating by 4 x 4 mean
Minor

Update after consultation with Milton: We will use the Consequence Table to justify
the Risk of an Information Assets.

You might also like