Factors Affecting Students Academic Performance during Pandemic for UniKL Undergraduate Students,

Malaysia
Literature Review Matrix

Author & Title Industry & Methodology Research Analysis & Findings Limitation
Year Location Question Result
1 Alalwan, Integrated Universiti Questionnaire To alleviate The results of The Sample size
N., Three Theories Teknologi s survey the disparity students' outcomes of was
Al-Rahmi, to Develop a Malaysia among 863 in literature behavioural this study restricted
W. M., Model of (UTM) university regarding intentions to use support the to one
Alfarraj, Factors students. social media social media for effective university in
O., Affecting use for collaborative students’ Malaysia.
Alzahrani, Students’ collaboration learning and interaction
A., Academic Collected data and online and Do not
Yahaya, Performance in were communicati communication engagement represent
N., & Higher evaluated on and its show that it has a for behavior of
Al-Rahmi, Education with IBM influence on positive impact on collaboration other
A. M. SPSS, and the their academic learning, and divisions for
(2019) Structural performance performance in ultimately, example
Equation of students at higher education affect their school
Modeling higher institutions, but academic teachers,
(SEM- education male students performance. private
Amos). were dissatisfied Universities.
with peer contact
for collaborative Used only
learning. questionnair
es with
no
 qualitative
data
2 Al-Kumai Exploring the Malaysia This research What are the A number of First, First, this
m, N.H.; Impact of the adopted a challenges elements may lead students can study was
Alhazmi, COVID-19 qualitative and to mental health keep better performed
A.K.; Pandemic on exploratory difficulties problems and control of in a limited
Mohamme University approach to facing cause anxiety and themselves population,
d, F.; Students’ analyse students stress. by being which was
Gazem, Learning Life: collected during the autonomous taken from a
N.A.; An Integrated textual COVID-19 Students declared and relying few
Shabbir, Conceptual lock down? that there are three on their universities
M.S.; Motivational The data were sources of personal in Malaysia.
Fazea, Y. Model for collected How are motivation to skills. The
(2021) Sustainable and using students overcome such second point Second,
Healthy Online snowballing dealing with challenges. to overcome up-to-date
Learning and purposive these these research on
sampling challenges Lack of guidance challenges the effect of
and for both pupils was through the
SPSS is used difficulties? and teachers in the family COVID-19
and the use of relevant motivation pandemic
NVivo12 What computer software and support, on the
software we stressors are and out-of-date and the third learning
reduced the affecting teaching plans source of lives of
data into students motivation, university
themes during the The related set of as the authors students was
through a COVID-19 issues we of this enriched in
process of lockdown? identified related research terms of
coding. to technology. anticipated, causes and
What factors was some
Followed might help university negative
Creswell’s students to support consequence
recommended overcome the programs. s, but
thematic data challenges further
analysis and Universities motivating
technique and difficulties tend to frameworks
did not they face underestimat also need to
exceed the during the e the be
development pandemic? importance developed
of 25–30 of providing as a
categories of training and response to
information infrastructure these causes
about the , which can and negative
phenomena. have a consequence
significant s in the field
impact of higher
education
institutions.

Third, the
conceptual
model that
was
introduced
in this
research
proposed
three
integrated
contexts.

Fourth, it
would be
 important to
consider the
impact of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
more
precisely on
the creative
thinking of
university
students as a
new
extension of
this research
work.
3 Andreas The Impact of Public A survey To Disruptions on the To ensure all The sample
Schleicher, Covid-19 on financing of recently investigates scale we have just students have taken only
(2020) Education education conducted by working in witnessed are the in single
in OECD the OECD close not limited to opportunity university in
countries and Harvard collaboration pandemics, but to benefit the survey.
University on with other may also result from
the education government from face-to-face
conditions sectors and natural,political, teaching in a
faced in the private economic and context of
countries. sector. environmental reduced class
disorder. sizes, schools
in about 60%
of OECD
member and
partner
 countries

4 Alhadabi, Grit, University in University To investigate The results Findings The sample
A., & self-efficacy, the student the demonstrated that supported the taken only
Karpinski, achievement Midwestern participants relationships ‘grit’ (i.e. positive in single
A. C. orientation U.S., (N = 258) between grit, perseverance of relationships university in
(2019). goals, and responded to self-efficacy, effort and between the
academic an online achievement consistency of mastery, Midwestern
performance in survey orientation interest) approach U.S.
University goals, and positively goals, and
students. academic associates with academic The data
performance academic performance, was
in parallel performance as well as the collected by
and through a negative self reported
serial sequential association measures,
mediation pathway of between which
models. mediators avoidance increase the
including goals and likelihood
self-efficacy and academic of response
achievement performance. bias.
orientation
goals.
5 Arias, J. J., Online Vs. Georgia Qualitative To compare The higher mean Students in Did not
Swinton, Face-to-Face: College the exam average for the have an exit
J., & A Comparison performance the face-to-face face-to-face survey
Anderson, of Student of online class is section have ready for
K. Outcomes with students to statistically statistically when
(2018). Random traditional significant at the significantly students
Assignment face-to-face 90% level of higher exam asked to
students with confidence (p = scores and withdraw
 their results. 0.06908), as is the statistically from the
higher mean significantly class.
improvement for greater
the instructor improvement Participation
TUCE questions on the was lower
(p = 0.08242). post-test than the
There is instructor expectation.
no evidence to questions.
reject equality There
between means in is no
the other two statistical
measures of difference in
performance the
improvement
on the
post-test
overall nor in
the
improvement
in the
post-test
standardized
questions.
6 Azis, Factors Faculty of Survey N/A The results show The finding N/A
Norilmiah, affecting Accountancy, method. that only lecturers’ indicates that
Radziah students ’ Universiti knowledge was lecturers’
Mahmud, academic Teknologi Questionnaire positive and knowledge
and Rosni performance in MARA, s were used as significantly has a positive
Muda. financial Puncak Alam, instrument in related to financial and
(2019) reporting Malaysia this study and reporting significant
course using were performance. influence on
framework-bas distributed to students’
ed teaching students The interaction of performance
approach. taking students and in financial
Advanced lecturers, and reporting
Financial lecturers’ course since
Accounting characteristics do knowledgeab
and Reporting not relate to the le lecturer
1 (FAR610) students’ will be able
during performance in to apply,
semester financial reporting summarised
March-July course. and link the
2017 at the related
Faculty of accounting
Accountancy, standards
Universiti with the
Teknologi concept
MARA, highlighted
Puncak Alam, in the
Malaysia. Conceptual
Framework.
Data were
randomly The
selected dan interaction of
analyzed students and
using lecturers, and
Statistical lecturers’
Package for characteristic
Social do not
Science influence
(SPSS). students’
performance.
7 Closs, L. Learning Australian Qualitative Is learning Show that not Physical, N/A
Mahat, M. environments’ Faculty of environments only the type of pedagogical,
Imms, W. influence on Business The –involving space (e.g. more and
(2021). students’ and researchers their or less psychosocial
learning Economics use mixed physical, student-centred) dimensions
experience in methods–obse pedagogical, but of the
an Australian rvations, and also the learning
Faculty of focus groups psychosocial combination of environment
Business and dimensions–i factors such as are closely
and Economics semi-structure nfluence room sizes, interconnecte
d students furniture, and d and have
interviews–to learning technology an impact on
provide experiences (un)reliability, the students’
triangulation in an influence students’ learning
of data Australian learning experiences.
collected. Faculty of experience.
Business and
Economics. Closely related to
pedagogical tact
was perceived as a
very
significant
element for
students’ learning
experience
involves the
relationship
dimension of the
learning
environment
8 Coman, Online Romania An online 1. What is the The results of the The N/A
Claudiu, Teaching and University survey based perception of research revealed advantages
Laurențiu Learning in on a students that higher of online
Gabriel Higher semi-structure about the way education learning
Țîru, Luiza Education d universities institutions in identified in
Meseșan-S during the questionnaire managed to Romania were not other studies
chmitz, Coronavirus was provide prepared for seem to
Carmen Pandemic: conducted. knowledge in exclusively online diminish in
Stanciu, Students’ the context of learning value, while
and Maria Perspective Data was exclusively disadvantage
Cristina collected online s become
Bularca. from 762 learning? more
(2020) students from prominent.
two of the 2. What is the
largest perception of The
Romanian students hierarchy of
universities. about the problems that
ability to arise in
The data were learn and online
analyzed assimilate learning
using IBM information changes in
SPSS in the context the context of
Statistics of exclusively the crisis
(version 23). online caused by the
Answers to learning? pandemic.
the open
items were 3. What is the Technical
analyzed perception of issues are the
qualitatively, students most
by recoding about the use important,
them into of E-learning followed by
 categories platform in teachers’ lack
which the process of of technical
describe the exclusively skills and
basic online their teaching
conditions for learning? style
successful improperly
online adapted to
learning. the online
environment.

However, the
last place
was assigned
by students
to the lack of
interaction
with teachers
or poor
communicati
on with
them.
9 Engin. M Analysis of Faculty of In the current Are The results of the Correlation self-control
(2017) Students' Business, study, emotional above-mentioned analysis skills
Online Uludağ correlational intelligence study results emotional
Learning University, research levels revealed that conducted to intelligence
Readiness Turkey method, one significant emotional determine the sub-dimensi
Based of the predictors of intelligence was relationships on
on Their relational online directly effective between had more
Emotional screening learning on the students’ prediction
Intelligence models, was readiness achievement of online power over
Level utilized. levels. students, which is readiness online
 Correlational compatible with levels and readiness
research the findings of the emotional level
method current study intelligence learner
scrutinizes the levels based control
relationship on the when
between two research compared to
or more question “Is other
variables. there a emotional
significant intelligence
relationship sub-dimensi
between ons. Results
emotional of the
intelligence present
levels and study
online demonstrate
learning d that one of
readiness the
levels of the predictors of
students students’
readiness,
which is a
significant
factor in all
settings.

10 Gilavand, The Effect of Educational Cluster To examine Results showed The results N/A
A., & Noise in Institutions in sampling was the effect of that the amount of showed that
Jamshidne Educational Ahvaz, done by noise in Chisquare test was noise in
zhad, A. Institutions on South-West of appropriate educational equal to 20.35 and educational
(2016). Learning and Iran allocation. institutions degree institutions
 Academic Questionnaire on the of freedom 2 with has a
Achievement s were academic a significance negative
of Elementary randomly achievement level impact on
Students in distributed of elementary 0.001 is of error learning and
Ahvaz, among school level is less than academic
South-West of students. students in the error achievement
Iran the academic level of 0.05; so of elementary
The data of year they accept the school
the study 2015-2016 in difference students in
were analyzed Ahvaz. between the Ahvaz
using observed (P<0.05)
descriptive frequency and
statistics expected
(frequency, frequency and
percentage, consider the test
mean, significant.
standard
deviation) and
inferential
statistics
(factor
analysis,
t-test,
Kolmogorov -
Smirnov test
and one-way
ANOVA
analysis) in
SPSS21.
11 Ghada How Did the University in a E use of e factor in Students’ For a total of The sample
Refaat El COVID-19 Developing multiple assessing satisfaction with 376 business has
Said, Pandemic Country research students’ the university students, the assessed
(2021) Affect Higher methods and performance distance education study qualitatively
Education the use of a differences portal during investigated by series of
Learning multiplicity of between COVID-19 the difference online
Experience? techniques are online and lockdown was in academic interviews.
An Empirical essential. face-to-face assessed performance,
Investigation of Having said instruction. quantitatively in terms of
Learners’ that, both using an online course
Academic descriptive survey grades,
Performance and quantified between
description of face-to-face
the learners
phenomenon taught
were aimed on-campus in
Spring
2019
12 Gopal, Impact Indian The study is N/A The result shows The results The data
Ram, of online quantitative in that all the show that collected in
Varsha classes nature, and hypothesis is four this study
Singh, and on the satisfacti the data were supported independent was
Arun on collected (H1,H2,H3,H4,H5 factors used cross-sectio
Aggarwal. and performanc from 544 ,H6) in the study nal in nature
(2021) e of students respondents viz. quality due to
during the pand through of instructor, which it is
emic period online survey course difficult to
of COVID 19 who were design, establish the
studying the prompt causal
business feedback, relationship
management and between the
 (B.B.A or expectation variables
M.B.A) or of students
hotel positively The data
management impact was
courses in students’ collected
Indian satisfaction from one
universities. and further type of
student’s respondents
To analyze satisfaction only, that is,
the data, positively the students.
SPSS and impact
AMOS students’ The current
software were performance. research is
used. For only limited
educational to theory
Extract the management, classes.
distinct these four
factors, an factors are The study is
exploratory essential to done on the
factor have a high Indian
analysis level of students
(EFA) was satisfaction only.
performed and
using performance This study is
VARIMAX for online limited to
rotation on a courses. check the
sample of performance
544. of students.
13 Haradhan Aspects of University of This study Do the The purpose of This study N/A
Kumar Mathematical Chittagong, focuses the economic any research is to spreads out a
Mohajan. Economics, Chittagong, collection and models of obtain solutions of set of crucial
Social Choice Bangladesh. analysis of optimization problems through sustainable
(2018) and Game only two have enough the issues of
Theory primary data, mathematical application of mathematical
and calculations scientific economics
some and procedures. In the and social
secondary theoretical research choice. It
data that are analysis to background we tries to find
available adjust them have highlighted out the
from the in any that underlying
qualitative changing use of socioeconom
and situation? mathematics is ic causes of
quantitative essential in modern
data modern globalized
collection economics and world. This
processes social choice study can be
theory. helpful as a
reference for
future
investigation
s and
monitoring in
the
mathematical
economics
and social
sciences
14 Hendrikus Attitude of Universitas Qualitative Examining All the The majority The study
Male, Erni Undergraduate Kristen research the participants stated of were only
Murniarti, Students’ Indonesia,bUn technique has attitudes of that they do not the students focus to
Masda toward online iversitas been used in the find any showed students
Surti learning during Indraprasta, this study. A undergraduat difficulties on partly who come
Simatupan Covid-19 Indonesia depth e students using the positive from rural
g, Julinda Pandemic. interview was towards the LMS. attitude area of
Siregar, used to collect online The majority of towards the Indonesia
Hotmaulin the data. learning in the participants current taking their
a which to said that they online undergradua
Sihotang , some of the enjoyed doing learning even te degree
Ronny students are online learning. t most of the majoring in
Gunawan not The majority of students English.
(2020) accustomed the participants preferred to
to learning stated that they have
online. could do the traditional
online classroom learning
activities well. instead of
online
learning.
15 Ishmael K. Perspective of Faculty of The sampling The research The average mean Findings N/A
Forson students Education, of question score for all the from the
(2019) enrolled In University of respondents sought to responses is 3.0. study showed
distance Oulu was done investigate mean score of 3.0 that students’
education in using a the and above suggest skills in ICT
Ghana multistage self-regulated respondents’ acquired
sampling learning skills agreement, from
procedure. of distance whereas mean pre-tertiary
The second education score below 3.0 institutions
stage students of suggest and their
involved the University of respondents’ ability to
 selection of Cape Coast. disagreement. self-regulate
six “study their own
centers” from learning are
the three important
regions using factors that
random could sustain
sampling an online
procedure. learning
model.
16 Ismaili, Y Evaluation of ELTE The study Study can be Data for the study The article Using a
(2021) students’ University surveyed 108 helpful and was collected shows that on quantitative
attitude toward students from serve as a through a Google the whole, approach,
distance Eotvos predictor of Form survey ELTE students’
learning during Lorand prospective instrument and students attitudes
the pandemic University students’ analysed found their toward
(Covid-19) (ELTE) in attitudes using a statistical e-learning e-learning
Budapest, toward package for the experience and their
Hungary e-learning. social sciences. favorable. access to
Quantitative Lack of prior tech-platfor
analysis and ICT ms, use of
descriptive instruction those
statistics were by students platforms
used to summarize did not and
and describe the significantly satisfaction
data collected deter this with online
from students. finding. courses are
The study processed
results and
suggest that analyzed via
future a statistical
e-learning package for
 initiatives the social
have great sciences.
potential in
Hungarian
universities.

17 Kamaruddi The Quality of UiTM An instrument Identified The result reveal The findings N/A
n, R., Learning was given to a how that housing also showed
Zainal, N. Environment 370 student the learning environment, that learning
R., and Academic randomly to environment basic needs (97%) environment
Aminuddin Performance measure the affects and are positively
, Z. M., & from a variables of students' study needs (88%) correlated
Jusoff, K. Student’s the study. learning shows high with
(2009) Perception. Data analysis outcomes. contribution to the students'
was done academic academic
using performance of performance
descriptive the student during that is
statistics and their high school housing
Product year. environment.
Moment
Correlation.
18 Khan, Communicatio Pakistan Data obtained How much The R square The research N/A
Alamgir, n Skills of a from (418, teacher is .034 which study that
Syed Teacher and Its thirty percent communicati means 3% effect good
Zia-ul-isla Role in the 30 from each on skills of teacher’s communicati
m, Development university) effect the communication on is not only
Manzoor of the samples of 14 academics skills is there on important for
Khan, and Students ’ universities of success of the students’ a teacher but
Physical Academic Pakistan. students? academic students also
Education. Success.” performance. The need to have
(2017) The gathered B is .236 good
data were (p=0.005) which communicati
coded and mean total 1 unit on skills.
faded in SPSS increase in
Version 20 teacher’s It was
and communication concluded by
Regression as skills will the
statistical tool cause .236 unit researcher
was used to overall increase. that
analyze the communicati
data and to The present study on skills of a
test the indicates that teacher
hypothesis of majority of the having
the study. students opined significant
that they learn role in the
well from those academic
teacher who has success of
good the students
communication
skills or who
adopt good
communication
 skills while
dealing inside and
out of the
institution.

The present study

indicated that
effective teaching
not only depends
upon the
knowledge base of
the teacher but
also it is related
with method and
style of teacher
communication
skills
19 Marmah, Students’ College Of Broadly, 1. What are The study shows The study N/A
A. A. Perception Technology survey the that there is no revealed that
(2014) About The Education, approach. perceptions statistical undergraduat
Lecture As a Kumasi of difference e students in
Method Of 197 undergraduat between gender this study do
Teaching In undergraduate e students and level in terms not totally
Tertiary s’ students about the of preference for share with
Institutions. from the lecture the lecture. education
Views Of College of method of However, there is experts
Students From Technology teaching? statistical negative
College Of Education, significance views of the
Technology Kumasi were 2. Is there difference lecture
Eduction, randomly any between full-time method.
Kumasi selected. difference in and part-time and
(Coltek). the age of students in
All the perception of terms of their
responses male and preference for the
were inputted female lecture method
into the students
computer for about the
computer lecture
analysis using method?
SPSS version
16 3. Is there
any
difference in
the
perception
among
students
concerning
the lecture
method in
terms of their
admission
status (full
time, part
time)?

4. Do older
students (25
years and
above) like
the lecture
method more
 than younger
students
(below 25
years)?

5. Is there
any
difference in
students’
perception of
the lecture
method with
regard to
their levels?
6. What do
students think
can be done
by lecturers
to make the
lecture more
effective?
20 Mazana, Investigating Tanzania The To investigate Indicates that The results Only one
M. Y., Students’ quantitative & students’ overall students show that district in
Montero, Attitude qualitative attitudes exhibited positive initially each of five
C. S., & towards data were towards attitudes towards students regions
Casmir, R. Learning collected learning mathematics, but exhibit a visited out
O. (2018). Mathematics. from 419 mathematics their attitudes positive of over 30
primary in Tanzania. were attitude regions.
school higher at primary towards
students, 318 school, which mathematics, The study
secondary dropped at but their used
 school secondary level attitude self-reported
students, 132 and maintained a becomes less mathematics
College similar trend in positive as grade that
students from higher education the students might have
17 schools with a slight move caused some
and 6 colleges increase (0.8%) in forward to bias.
in mainland higher education. higher levels
Tanzania of education.
using a A significant
survey. positive
weak
The collected correlation
data were between
analysed students’
using attitude and
percentages, performance
means, was
standard established.
deviations,
ANOVA,
correlation,
regression
and thematic
analysis.
21 Mohd Ali, The Uniten, The data was To investigate The entire The findings Data
M. A., Relationship Malaysia collected by the hypothesis of this of the review collected
Khamar Between using a survey relationship study indicates strongly from the
Tazilah, M. Environmental questionnaire between that they have a support the respondent
D. A., Factors, to 159 environmenta positive efficiency of might be
M.F.A., Learning Style students. l factor that relationship with the inaccurate.
Adnan, N. And highlighted academic environmenta
S., & Che Self-Managem Descriptive on peer to performance l factor, Respondent
Awang, N. ent Towards analysis, peer through learning style overlooked
H. (2016). Academic regression interaction correlation and self at the
Performance analysis, and learning analysis. management requirement
Of Accounting reliability test places' towards of the
Students: a and environment, academic questions.
Case Of correlation learning style performances
Uniten. analysis are which show Respondents
conducted focuses on significantly answers the
group positive question
discussion effect. without
and understand
self-learning, them.
and self
managements
towards
academic
performance
of the
students
22 Müller-Fro Introducing Technische Semi-structur N/A Twelve These results N/A
mmeyer, L. competency Universität ed interviews competencies support the
C., models as a Braunschweig. were were identified opportunities
Aymans, S. tool for holistic conducted (e.g. Applying learning
C., competency with lecturers Knowledge) factories
Bargmann, development in and students which can further offer for
C., learning who had be assigned to the higher
Kauffeld, factories: experiences three main education
S., & Challenges, working with clusters competency
Herrmann, example and the learning professional/meth development
C. (2017) future factory. The odological, social of
application recorded and professional
interviews personal as well as
were analyzed competencies. The social skills.
using distribution of Furthermore,
qualitative competencies in
content professional/meth
analyses with odological and
MAXQDA to social and
identify the personal
crucial competencies was
competencies even.
students
develop when
working with
the learning
factory. The
applied
coding
scheme was
built
 deductively
based on
literature of
learning
factories and
competencies.

23 Muzenda, Lecturers’ Ekurhuleni The results of What are the The results Results N/A
Allexander Competences District, the survey distinct indicate that indicate that
. (2013) and Students’ Gauteng were analyzed effects of lecturer attitude subject
Academic province, using lecturers’ has the highest knowledge,
Performance South Africa descriptive subject mean score teaching
statistics and knowledge, (=3.07); while the skills,
correlational lecturer least mean score lecturer
techniques. attendance, being for teaching attendance
The data teaching skill (=2.72). and lecturer
gathered was skills and attitude have
processed and lecturer The highest significant
analyzed attitude on correlation (= positive
using SPSS students’ 0.683) exists influence on
version 21 academic between lecturer students’
statistical performances attendance and academic
package for ? lecturer attitude. performance
windows.
The estimated
Before model indicated
conducting that about 88.0%
the (Adj. R 2 = 88.0)
 correlational variation in
analysis, students’
exploratory academic
factor performance was
analysis, the determined by
Cronbach’s teaching skills (t =
alpha and 9.938), subject
KMO tests knowledge (t =
were 8.668), lecturer
computed to attendance (t =
determine 6.412) and
scale lecturer attitude (t
reliability and = 4.219). The
adequacy of model’s F-test
the sampling value (= 276.045;
size; significant at 0.05
respectively. level) also
indicated that the
model was
statistically
significant.
24 Ngamporn Students’ Northeast of this study E-learning All 84 The data The
chai, A., & acceptance and Thailand. selected would help respondents were were participants
Adams, J. readiness for Technology measurement me improve undergraduate analyzed were
(2016) E-learning in (UTAUT) items from my academic students, 77 % using the undergradua
Northeastern these theories performance. female, 23 % statistical te students
Thailand mainly male. software in a small
for the Ninety percent PSPP. campus of a
purpose of of the respondents Pearson public
learning about were between correlation university
students’ 18–23 years old. test was in the
perception Most were performed to northeast of
and attitude. freshmen (40 %) uncover Thailand.
and juniors correlations The campus
(38 %). Of 78 between is located in
responses, 62 % variables and a city of
never enrolled in constructs. approximate
an online course; Factor ly 185,000
26 % had taken analysis and people.
one to Cronbach’s
three online alpha
courses; and 13 % reliability
had taken more test were
than three online used to
courses explore and
confirm
construct
validity
25 Noemy, M. Exploring Francisco de Conducted an To identifies Hierarchical The results N/A
S., Inés G., Academic Vitoria observational the multiple show that the
R., Performance: University, study with importance of regression aforemention
Cristina, I. Looking Madrid 217 each analyses have ed theoretical
G., & beyond psychology characteristic been models are
Patricia, A. Numerical students relative to carried out, isolated,
P. (2017) Grades academic whereby academic making it
performance. performance is the necessary to
dependent include other
variable or variables,
response (Y) and such as the
the meaning of meaning of
life, emotional life and
intelligence, emotional
impulsivity, intelligence
sociability, to explain
openness to academic
experience, performance
safety and
negotiation skills
and the academic
course are the
independent or
predictive
variables (Xn).
26 Oselumese Environmental Nigeria N/A The extent to N/A The school N/A
, I. B., Influence On which environment,
Omoike, Students’ students’ which
D., & Academic learning includes the
Andrew, Performance In could be classroom,
O. (2016). Secondary enhanced school
School. depends on location,
their location school
within the facility,
school school
compound, climate and
the structure technology,
of their etc, is a
classroom, variable that
availability of affects
instructional students’
facilities academic
and performance
accessories
27 Olaitan, Effects of National The study was What is the The factorial This study N/A
Akinleke Perceived Diploma (ND conducted in effect of ANOVA revealed concludes
W. 2018. Lecturers’ II) students of a classroom teacher that there was a that there
Competence the Federal environment competency significant was a
and Classroom Polytechnic, during regular and interaction effect statistically
Environment Ilaro, Ogun school hours. classroom for the teachers’ significant
on Students’ State, Nigeria environment competence by relationship
Academic Grade Point (independent classroom between
Performance. Average variables) on environment on teachers’
(GPA) in the academic GPA F(2,79) = competence
previous year performance 3.419, p<.05. and GPA,
were also of college and that there
 collected. students? Academic is a
performance statistically
GPA data What is the regressed on significant
were then relative effect perceived interaction
compared to of each of teachers’ between
the scores teacher competence classroom
obtained from competency significantly R2 = environment
the and 0.76. and students’
questionnaires classroom academic
environment Perceived achievement.
on the teachers’
academic competence
performance determined the
of the students,
students? performance
adjusted R2 =
0.63.

Results showed
that perceived
classroom
environment was
not relapsed upon
perceived
teachers’
competence as the
value of R2 is
0.078.

Although the
regressive value is
 small and
insignificant,
however, it means
that perceived
teachers’
competence did
not predict
perceived
classroom
environment as
shown by adjusted
R2 = 0.312.
28 Oliveira Will Virtual Brazil Qualitative The The most The lack of N/A
Dias, D. Replace research challenges significant stable online
M. D., Classroom approach, faced by advantages from connection;
Albergaria Teaching? such as teachers, and Virtual security
s Lopes, D. Lessons from multiple case executive classes via Zoom issues;
R. D. O., Virtual Classes study, education over the limited
& Teles, A. via Zoom in qualitative professors in classroom pedagogical
C. (2020). the Times of interviews, Brazil, teaching are the resources;
COVID-19 direct through live video recording, background
participation, online classes cloud storing, and noises;
and direct via the Zoom sharing,can be shortage of
observation. platform. downloaded and equipment
stored in the hard supply due to
drive. However, the
the lockdowns,
disadvantages as barriers to
exceed the online live
advantages, when classes
compared dispensed
 to classroom with the
interactions. Zoom
platform.

29 Obaid Students’ National This research To investigate The table below Results of the This study
Ullah, Attitude University of design was online showed that study mainly
Wasal towards Online Modern opted due to learning at 55(66%) of revealed no focused on a
Khan & Learning at Languages the undergraduat sample significant specific
Aamir Tertiary Level Islamabad exploration of e level in respondents were relationship aspects
Khan Various ideas, district male, between related to
(2017) notions and Peshawar. while 28(34%) interests online
thoughts of were female level of learning
respondent of students. students in dwelling on
the study. computer and variable i.e.
This indicated that the easiness and
undergraduate acquisition of usefulness
level study was knowledge of computer
predominantly through regarding
populated by male online academics
students compared learning at etc and
to their female Undergraduat don’t cover
counterpart. e level. or study
Similarly, the other
results also dimensions
stated that like
there was no students’
significance attitude
relationship regarding
between online
usefulness of learning on
computer to the basis of
students and computer
the anxiety,
acquaintance therefore
to online this study
learning at recommend
tertiary ed for future
level. studies to
explore
other
important
dimensions
related to
the adoption
of online
learning.
30 Prasetio, Lecturers ’ Indonesia 200 N/A Female student The findings N/A
A. P., Professional Questionnaire score slightly show that the
Dindi, D., Competency s Distributed higher on professional
& Fauziah, and Students ’ lecturers’ competency
A. F. Academic Descriptive competency. And does not have
(2017) Performance in analysis used, no surprisingly a
Indonesia either, female also significantly
Higher Used crosstab has better GPA relation with
Education from SPSS 21 than male student. students’
to measure academic
the relation The result performance
between both revealed that there
variables. is difference
regarding
Chi-square lecturers’
value will be competency and
used to GPA level based
determine on gender. Female
whether both student has higher
variables have GPA and also
relation or higher perception
not. towards lecturers’
competency.
31 Peytcheva- The Impact Of Sofia This study This study The optimistic The
Forsyth, Prior University was designed will attempt view of reducing introduction N/A
R., Mellar, Experience Of (BULGARIA) as a mixed to identify the cheating and of
H., & e-Learning And methods how the level plagiarism within e-learning
Aleksieva, Eassessment research – a of experience the process of and
L.(2018) On Students’ methodology in online implementing e-assessment
And Teachers’ for education and e-learning and provokes a
Approaches To conducting e-assessment e-assessment, is variety of
The Use Of a research that impacts on predominantly reactions and
Student involves the based on: a) the concerns
Authentication collecting, perspectives belief in among
And analysing and that teachers technology and teachers
Authorship integrating and students the availability of and
Checking quantitative have with specialized students,
System and respect to: (i) software to detect and they
qualitative the cheating and are not
research introduction plagiarism; b) the necessarily
methods. of assessment preventive related to
and (ii) the function of these; the prior
challenges and c) the experience.
related to the combination of
potential electronic and
increase in face-to-face forms
cheating and of assessment.
plagiarism. It
will
also try to
identify the
ideas the
students and
teachers have
 on prevention
and reduction
of cheating
and
plagiarism in
assessment
through
technology.

32 Rahardja, Leadership, Kopertis Iv This research To explain In this study using The results N/A
Untung, Competency, Banten uses the SEM analysis tool showed that
Anoesyirw Working Province explanatory-c relationship that is useful to leadership,
an Moeins, Motivation ausality between predict the competence
and Ninda And approach. leadership, dependent and
Lutfiani. Performance competence variable is the motivation
(2017) Of High The data and employee’s have a
Private source is motivation to performance with positive
Education primary. performance the number of effect on
Lecturer With with independent performance
Institution The time institution variables is the improvement
Accreditation dimension is accreditation variable . Good
b: Area one shot leadership, performance
Kopertis Iv study. competence and has a positive
Banten motivation and effect on
Province Methods of independent improving
data variables is the results of
collection are institutional institutional
surveys. accreditation, accreditation.
where the While
Respondents performance leadership
are college variable is an has a
stakeholders intervening negative
variable. effect,
competence
Number of has a positive
leadership effect and
variables motivation
coefficient has a positive
trajectory on effect on
performance at institution
Raharja College accreditation
of 0.401 with p
value 0.000
smaller than 5%,
meaning that
leadership has a
significant effect
on performance at
Raharja College.

Number of
competence
variables
trajectory track on
performance at
Raharja College
of 0.334 with a
value of 0.001 p is
smaller than 5%,
meaning that the
competence has a
significant effect
 on the
performance at
Raharja College.

- Number of
variables of track
coefficient
motivation on
performance at
Raharja College
equal to 0,278
with p value 0,002
less than 5%,
meaning
motivation have a
significant effect
to performance at
Raharja College.
33 Realyvásq The Impact of Mexico A To determine Specifically, for Results N/A
uez-Vargas Environmental questionnaire the impact the dependent showed that
, A., Factors on was that the variable temperature,
Maldonado Academic developed, lighting, (academic lighting, and
-Macías, Performance of which was noise, and performance) a R2 noise have
A. A., University applied to 206 temperature value equal to significant
Arredondo Students university levels 0.45 was direct effects
-Soto, K. Taking Online students (independent obtained, which on university
C., Classes during online. variables) declares that the students’
Baez-Lope the COVID-19 have on independent academic
z, Y., Pandemic in academic variables performance.
Carrillo-G Mexico. performance (lighting, noise,
utiérrez, T., (dependent and temperature)
 & variable) in explained
Hernández university this dependent
-Escobedo, students variable at 45%,
G. (2020). during the where 26.8%
COVID-19 corresponds to the
pandemic. noise variable,
11.3% to the
temperature
variable, and 6.9%
to the lighting
variable.
34 Rafique, Readiness for University of As this study What has The respondents Findings of A simple
G. M., Online Sargodha, used a been the were asked about the study linear
Mahmood, Learning Sargodha, pre-validated perceived their gender, age, revealed that regression
K., during Pakistan instrument for level of level of program Pakistani LIS analysis was
Warraich, COVID-19 data readiness of study, and GPA students run to assess
N. F., & pandemic: A collection, towards in the previous were the impact
Rehman, survey of therefore online semester to collect sufficiently of
S. U. Pakistani LIS Confirmatory learning their demographic prepared for age and
(2021) students Factor (OLR) of LIS information. The online grades
Analysis students results showed learning (previous
(CFA) was during the that the majority during the semester) of
run to validate COVID-19 of the COVID 19 LIS students
it on pandemic? study participants lockdown in on their
LIS students (n = 194, 57.1%) the country. OLR during
in the were female, They were COVID-19
Pakistani while 146 (42.9%) motivated to
context. were male. learn online,
were
receptive to
new ideas,
 learned from
their
mistakes, and
were willing
to
interact and
engage with
their fellow
students
while
learning
online.
35 Sharma, Online Chitwan A web-based N/A More than half The findings N/A
K., Deo, Learning in the Medical cross-sectiona (53.5%) of the indicated that
G., Face of College of l survey was students were the four
Timalsina, COVID-19 Nepal used. domains
satisfied with the
S., Joshi, Pandemic: under
A., Assessment of A structured online learning, consideration
Shrestha, Students’ questionnaire while 29.7% gave : learners
N., & Satisfaction at consisting of neutral views. dimension,
Neupane, Chitwan 31 items instructors’
H. C. Medical (5-point Bivariate analyses characteristic
(2020) College of Likert scale). found that all four s,
Nepal technological
domains scores
Distributed to characteristic
the students were positively s and course
using Google correlated with management
Form. each other as well and
as with the coordination
students’ overall all had
positive
 satisfaction relationship
towards learning. with the
overall
satisfaction
In multivariate
towards
analysis, female online
gender [aOR: learning,
2.72, p = 0.013], with learners’
WiFi as internet dimension
modality for being the
learning [aOR: strongest
predictor
3.36, p = 0.001)
and learners’
dimension score
[aOR: 1.27, p
36 Suleiman, Promoting Spain N/A To examines The impacts of According to N/A
Y., Ivey, T., Digital the digital digital life in the findings,
O. Bolaji, Competence In competence schools and a student
H., & O. Spanish and how it can who has been
Makinde, Secondary developments improve students’ certified as
S. School: done by the academic digitally
(2019) Indicator For Spanish performance were literate will
Academic Ministry looked into. perform
Performance of Education better in
Improvement (SME) as school.
well as the
Organization
for Economic
Co-operation
and
 Development
(OECD)
which offers
the guidelines
as well as the
pillars which
are
required in
setting up a
digitalized
competency
for students’
academic
performance
towards
achieving a
sustainable
goal in the
educational
field.
37 Selvanatha Students Malaysia The target To study the The students The N/A
n, learning population of students showed a high discussion
Mahiswara experiences this research learning dissatisfaction from the
n, Nur during was the experiences with the fact that above
Atikah COVID-19: students from through they cannot mentioned
Mohamed Work from various public online interrupt the showed that
Hussin, home period in and private teaching lecturers during the online
and Noor Malaysian universities in methods the teaching. learning and
Alyani Nor Higher Malaysia. The during teaching in
Azazi. Learning sample size of Covid-19 The result also Malaysia
(2020). Institutions this study is lockdown showed the required
 384 period in students’ improvement
respondents Malaysia. dissatisfaction to be done,
from 12 with the group especially in
different activity conducted the quality of
public and throughout the the
private pandemic. interaction
universities. and
For the Instruction instruction
Data were section, the result delivered
analysed exhibited that the during the
using IBM students showed course given
SPSS high to the
Statistics dissatisfaction students.
version 25.0. with their
Descriptive performances
statistics were during
used to COVID-19.
organize,
summarize, For the Instructor
and describe section, the
the data by students showed
mean, high disagreement
standard with the
deviation, accessibility and
percentage, availability of the
and frequency instructor.
38 Usman, Y. Evaluation of Nigeria Secondary To evaluate To examines the Learning N/A
D., & the Effect of research the effect of concept of environment
Madudili, Learning approach learning learning plays a
C. G. Environment environment environment and significant
(2019) on Student’s on academic its relationship student
Academic performance with students’ academic
Performance in of student’s performance in performance
Nigeria. in Nigeria Nigeria. in Nigeria.
39 Wahab Ali. Online and Canadian This process Universities Learning The ensuing Naturally,
(2020) Remote Center of uses rigorous need to environments are sections studies do
Learning in Science and qualitative negotiate diverse present the have certain
Higher Education methods to with internet platforms such as findings in limitations
Education synthesize vendors to Google Meet, collaboration and in this
Institutes: A existing help provide where users with case it was
Necessity in qualitative access to engage and pertinent the single
light of studies to online interact to learn literature on method used
COVID-19 construct learning for new skills. While the influence to collect
Pandemic greater students for learners can learn of data.
meaning free or at a in technology
through an cheaper rate an array of in
interpretative settings, the term conceptualizi
process. refers to the more ng pedagogy
preferred and and practice
accurate at HE level.
alternative to the
traditional
classroom
40 Yokoyama, Academic Institute of Studies SE can be With regard to the only six At present,
S.(2019) Self-Efficacy Science, examining strengthened effect of ASE on (11.3%) the limited
and Academic Choshi, Japan correlation or through the academic showed no findings do
Performance in modeling experience of performance in significant not permit a
Online between ASE mastery, an online learning correlation systematic
Learning: A and academic observing environment, four between meta-analysi
Mini Review performance someone studies revealed ASE and s of the
in online succeed, that ASE academic relationship
learning and social correlated with performance. between
setting were persuasion academic Two of the ASE and
selected performance six examined academic
manually. studies performance
(33%) show in an online
studies no significant learning
examining the correlation, environment
relationship and the ratio .
between ASE was larger Consequentl
and academic for online y, a focused
performance classes than narrative
including all traditional review
educational classrooms. based on the
settings. recent
findings of
examining the
correlation or relationship
modeling is outlined.
between ASE
and academic
performance
in online
learning
 setting were
extracted
from these
reference lists
in the above
extracted
studies
41 Žeravíková The analysis of N/A For the Questionnaire Participants of Lecturers‘ fie N/A
, I., professional statistical to identify the training see the ld of practice
Tirpáková, competencies evaluation of work biggest has a
A. & of a lecturer in the research activities/task differences significant
Markechov adult results, s of lecturer between the impact on
á, D. education. nonparametric in adult competencies of a their social
(2015) testing education. real and an ideal competencies
methods and lecturer in the and is closely
the method of Questionnaire field of lecturer’s linked to
semantic for lecturers social their
differential in the adult competencies professional
were used. All education and qualification,
calculations for On the contrary, length of
were done in participants according to the
EXCEL and of training lecturers, the Lecturers’
STATISTICA. highest practice has a
correspondence statistically
between the significant
competencies of a effect on
real and an ideal their
lecturer can be activities in
observed in the the field of
field of social social
competencies. competencies
 Internal or
external form
of
employment
has a
significant
impact on the
lecturers’acti
vities in the
field of social
competencies

Achieved
qualification
significantly
influences
lecturers’acti
vities in the
field of social
competencies
.
References

1) Alalwan, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alfarraj, O., Alzahrani, A., Yahaya, N., & Al-Rahmi, A. M. (2019). Integrated Three Theories

to Develop a Model of Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Performance in Higher Education. IEEE Access, 7,

98725–98742. [Link]

2) Al-Kumaim, N.H.; Alhazmi, A.K.; Mohammed, F.; Gazem, N.A.; Shabbir, M.S.; Fazea, Y. (2021). Exploring the Impact of the

COVID-19 Pandemic on University Students’ Learning Life: An Integrated Conceptual Motivational Model for

Sustainable and Healthy Online Learning. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2546. [Link] su13052546

3) Andreas Schleicher,. (2020). THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON EDUCATION, 1–31.

[Link]

4) Alhadabi, A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2019). Grit, self-efficacy, achievement orientation goals, and academic performance in

University students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 519–535.

[Link]

5) Arias, J. J., Swinton, J., & Anderson, K. (2018). Online Vs. Face-to-Face: A Comparison of Student Outcomes with Random

Assignment. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching. Published.

[Link]
6) Azis, Norilmiah, Radziah Mahmud, and Rosni Muda. 2019. “FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS ’ ACADEMIC

PERFORMANCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING COURSE USING FRAMEWORK-BASED TEACHING

APPROACH.” Asian Journal of University Education, v15 n3 p142-150 Dec 2019.

[Link]

7) Closs, L., Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2021). Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an Australian

Faculty of Business and Economics. Learning Environments Research. Published.

[Link]

8) Coman, Claudiu, Laurențiu Gabriel Țîru, Luiza Meseșan-Schmitz, Carmen Stanciu, and Maria Cristina Bularca. 2020. “Online

Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective.” Sustainability

(Switzerland) 12(24):1–22. doi: 10.3390/su122410367

9) Engin, M. (2017). Analysis of Students’ Online Learning Readiness Based on Their Emotional Intelligence Level. Universal

Journal of Educational Research, 5(12A), 32–40. [Link]

10) Gilavand, A., & Jamshidnezhad, A. (2016). The Effect of Noise in Educational Institutions on Learning and Academic

Achievement of Elementary Students in Ahvaz, South-West of Iran. International Journal of Pediatrics. Published.

[Link]
11) Ghada Refaat El Said. (2021). How Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Higher Education Learning Experience? An Empirical

Investigation of Learners’ Academic Performance at a University in a Developing Country, 1–10.

[Link]

12)Gopal, Ram, Varsha Singh, and Arun Aggarwal. 2021. “Impact of Online Classes on the Satisfaction and Performance of

Students during the Pandemic Period of COVID 19.” Education and Information Technologies (0123456789).

[Link]

13) Haradhan Kumar Mohajan (2018). Aspects of Mathematical Economics, Social Choice and Game Theory, 1–21(Aspects of

Mathematical Economics, Social Choice and Game Theory), 1–21.

[Link]

b41/AS:635879731232768@1528616950405/download/3rd+Times+PhD+[Link]

14) Hendrikus Male1 , Erni Murniarti2 , Masda Surti Simatupang3 , Julinda Siregar4 ,Hotmaulina Sihotang 5 , Ronny Gunawan6

ATITTUDE OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT’S TOWARDS ONLINE LEARNING DURING COVID-19PANDEMIC.

(2020)., PJAEE, 17 (4) (2020), 1–10. [Link]

15) Ishmael K. Forson , ONLINE LEARNING READINESS: PERSPECTIVE OF STUDENTS ENROLLED IN DISTANCE

EDUCATION IN GHANA. (2019b). Volume 7, Issue 4, 1–18.

[Link]
16) Ismaili, Y. (2021). Evaluation of students’ attitude toward distance learning during the pandemic (Covid-19): a case study of

ELTE university. On the Horizon, ahead-of(ahead-of-print). [Link]

17) Kamaruddin, R., Zainal, N. R., Aminuddin, Z. M., & Jusoff, K. (2009). The Quality of Learning Environment and Academic

Performance from a Student’s Perception. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4).

[Link]

18) Khan, Alamgir, Syed Zia-ul-islam, Manzoor Khan, and Physical Education. 2017. “Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its

Role in the Development of the Students ’ Academic Success.” 8(1):18–21.

Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Online Learning: A Mini Review, 1–4.

[Link]

19) Marmah, A. A. (2014). Students’ Perception about the Lecture as a Method of Teaching in Tertiary Institutions. Views of

Students from College of Technology Eduction, Kumasi (COLTEK). International Journal of Education and Research,

2(6), 601–612. [Link]

20) Mazana, M. Y., Montero, C. S., & Casmir, R. O. (2018). Investigating Students’ Attitude towards Learning Mathematics.

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1). [Link]

21) Mohd Ali, M. A., Khamar Tazilah, M. D. A., M.F.A., Adnan, N. S., & Che Awang, N. H. (2016). The Relationship Between

Environmental Factors, Learning Style And Self-Management Towards Academic Performance Of Accounting Students:

a Case Of Uniten. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law. Published.

[Link]

S_LEARNING_STYLE_AND_SELF-MANAGEMENT_TOWARDS_ACADEMIC_PERFORMANCE_OF_ACCOUNTING_S

TUDENTS_A_CASE_OF_UNITEN

22) Müller-Frommeyer, L. C., Aymans, S. C., Bargmann, C., Kauffeld, S., & Herrmann, C. (2017). Introducing Competency

Models as a Tool for Holistic Competency Development in Learning Factories: Challenges, Example and Future

Application. Procedia Manufacturing, 9(December), 307–314. [Link]

23) Muzenda, Allexander. (2013). “Lecturer s ’ Competences and Students ’ Academic Performance.” 3(1):6–13. International

Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714

[Link] Volume 3Issue 1 ǁ January. 2013ǁ PP.06-13.[Link]

24) Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for E-learning in Northeastern Thailand.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1).

[Link]
25) Noemy, M. S., Inés G., R., Cristina, I. G., & Patricia, A. P. (2017). Exploring Academic Performance: Looking beyond

Numerical Grades. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 1105–1112.

[Link]

26) Oselumese, I. B., Omoike, D., & Andrew, O. (2016). Environmental Influence On Students’ Academic Performance In

Secondary School. International Journal of Fundamental Psychology and Social Sciences, 6(1), 10–14.

[Link]

27) Olaitan, Akinleke W. 2018. “Effects of Perceived Lecturers’ Competence and Classroom Environment on Students’ Academic

Performance.” Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences 6(5):68–77. Global Journal of Arts, Humanities

and Social Sciences Vol.6, No.5, pp.68-77

[Link]

vironment-on-Students%e2%80%[Link]

28) Oliveira Dias, D. M. D., Albergarias Lopes, D. R. D. O., & Teles, A. C. (2020). Will Virtual Replace Classroom Teaching?

Lessons from Virtual Classes via Zoom in the Times of COVID-19. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy,

04(05), 208–213. [Link]

29) Obaid Ullah, Students’ Attitude towards Online Learning at Tertiary Level. (2017)., 1–21.

[Link]
30) Prasetio, Arif Partono, Darin Dindi, and Annisa Fitri Fauziah. 2017. “Lecturers ’ Professional Competency and Students ’

Academic Performance in Indonesia Higher Education.” (March). [Link]

31) Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Mellar, H., & Aleksieva, L. (2019). Using a Student Authentication and Authorship Checking System

as a Catalyst for Developing an Academic Integrity Culture: a Bulgarian Case Study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17(3),

245–269. [Link]

32) Rahardja, Untung, Anoesyirwan Moeins, and Ninda Lutfiani. 2017. “Leadership, Competency, Working Motivation and

Performance of High Private Education Lecturer with Institution Accreditation B: Area Kopertis IV Banten Province.”

Man in India 97(24):179–92.

[Link]

FORMANCE_OF_HIGH_PRIVATE_EDUCATION_LECTURER_WITH_INSTITUTION_ACCREDITATION_B_AREA_KOP

ERTIS_IV_BANTEN_PROVINCE

33) Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., Arredondo-Soto, K. C., Baez-Lopez, Y., Carrillo-Gutiérrez, T., &

Hernández-Escobedo, G. (2020). The Impact of Environmental Factors on Academic Performance of University Students

Taking Online Classes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico. Sustainability, 12(21), 9194.

[Link]
34) Rafique, G. M., Mahmood, K., Warraich, N. F., & Rehman, S. U. (2021). Readiness for Online Learning during COVID-19

pandemic: A survey of Pakistani LIS students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 102346.

[Link]

35) Sharma, K., Deo, G., Timalsina, S., Joshi, A., Shrestha, N., & Neupane, H. C. (2020). Online Learning in the Face of COVID-19
Pandemic: Assessment of Students’ Satisfaction at Chitwan Medical College of Nepal. Kathmandu University Medical
Journal, 18(2),
40–47. [Link]
essment_of_Students'_Satisfaction_at_Chitwan_Medical_College_of_Nepal

36) Suleiman, Y., Ivey, T., O. Bolaji, H., & O. Makinde, S. (2019). Promoting Digital Competence In Spanish Secondary School:

Indicator For Academic Performance Improvement. Journal of Library, Science Education and Learning Technology

(JOLSELT). Published. [Link]

37) Selvanathan, Mahiswaran, Nur Atikah Mohamed Hussin, and Noor Alyani Nor Azazi. 2020. “Students Learning Experiences

during COVID-19: Work from Home Period in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions.” Teaching Public

Administration. doi: 10.1177/0144739420977900.

38) Usman, Y. D., & Madudili, C. G. (2019). Evaluation of the Effect of Learning Environment on Student’s Academic

Performance in Nigeria. [Link]

39) Wahab Ali. (2020). Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16. [Link]

40) Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Online Learning: A Mini Review. Frontiers in

Psychology, 9. [Link]

41) Žeravíková, I., Tirpáková, A. & Markechová, D. (2015).The analysis of professional competencies of a lecturer in adult

education. SpringerPlus 4, 234. [Link]