Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SIMULTANEOUS DETRMINATION OF
ANASTROZOLE AND TEMOZOLOMIDE
IN
TEMOZOLOMIDE CAPSULES 20 MG AND
ANASTROZOLE TABLETS 1 MG
FOR
ASSAY
43
2.1 Introduction
is developed on reverse phase Fast LC. The assay method for Anastrozole tablets 1 mg and
Temozolomide capsules 20 mg has been subjected for validation. All the parameter has been
covered during the validation, which are illustrated in the table no.01.The analytical method
This analytical method validation report is prepared and proved capability of analytical
method for its specific nature, accuracy, linearity, preciseness and robust nature.
Anastrozole Tablet 1 mg
Temozolomide capsules 20 mg
2.3 References
Validation references
44
2.4 Analytical method validation program as per ICH guideline
Method validation activities has been conducted as per following validation program,
Parameter Assay
Specificity +
Accuracy +
Detection Limit ( LOD ) +
Quantitation Limit (LOQ) +
Linearity +
Range +
Precision
Injection repeatability +
Analysis repeatability +
Intermediate precision +
Solution Stability
Stability of analytical +
solutions
Robustness
Influence of variations of +
test parameters
45
2.5 Details of the API, standard, sample and placebo used in validation activity
Table No. 02 : Details of the API, standard, sample and placebo
Sr. B.No./Lot % Purity as is Manufactured
Name
No. No. basis date
Anastrozole Tablet 1
5 TANA 81009 NA NA
mg
Temozolomide
6 CTZA91003 NA NA
Capsule 20 mg
2-Azahyooxanthine NA
7 474.01.09.03 99.3%
Iimpurity standard
AIC HCL NA
8 TS-22/T01 98.5%
ImpurityStandard
TMZ II Impurity NA
9 TS-22/T03 99.2%
Standard
Anastrozole Impurity NA
10 TS-21/A5 99.9%
A Impurity standard
Anastrozole Impurity NA
11 0098.056-01 98.9%
B Impurity standard
Anastrozole Broomo NA
12 Compound Impurity TS/C/A62/01 99.0%
standard
46
2.6 Details of chemicals and reagents used for validation activity
1 Column : Inertsil C8
Dimentions : 25 mm x 5-cm, 4.6-µm
Serial No. : ILU9976500341 and ILU9976500768
47
2.9 Method validation parameters for assay by LC method :
SYSTEM SETUP
A. Chromatographic Conditions
Column OvenTemperature: 25 C
Mobile Phase A Ammonium acetate buffer (0.1%)
Mobile Phase B Acetonitrile
Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min
Injection Volume: 10 µL
Detection: UV at 215 nm
Gradient Program:
Time (min.) %A %B
0 95 05
7.0 95 05
12.0 93 07
17.0 50 50
40.0 30 70
45.0 95 05
55.0 95 05
For this study first upon a 10 μl of blank solution (Acetonitrile: water 50:50) and
placebo was injected and ran with the gradient programme. After this 10 μl of
Resolution solution was injected followed by Individual Impurity standard solutions
and injected standard solutions in 6 replicate and the % relative standard deviation (%
R.S.D) of the response peak areas was calculated.
48
Preparation of Placebo solution for Anastrozole tablets 1 mg:
49
Preparation of Impurity solutions for Identification.
50
Specimen chromatograms for specificity are as follows :
51
Figure No. 7 : Placebo Temozolomide chromatogram in specificity
52
Figure No. 10 : Anastrozole chromatogram for Identification in specificity
53
Figure No. 13 : AIC HCL Impurity chromatogram for Identification in
specificity
54
Figure No. 16 : Anastrozole Bromo Compound chromatogram for
Identification in specificity
55
Table No. 05 : System suitability of specificity study
56
2.9.2 ACCURACY
Accuracy was carried out at 50.0%, 100.0% and 150.0% of the target concentration of
Anastrozole (10.0 µg per mL) and Temozolomide (10.0 µg per mL) .Solutions were
prepared in triplicate at each level.
For blank solution, standard solution preparation, refer the solution preparation under
specificity parameter.
A Placebo about 0.90 gm was weighed and transferred in to 100 ml volumetric flask
equivalent excluding 10 mg of Anastrozole, then weighed and added specified quantity of
Anastrozole API (quantity as per Table given below) to the same volumetric flask.to this
flask added 60 mL of equal volumes of Acetonitrile and water respectively and the
mixture was subjected to vigorous shaking for 10 min and diluted up to volume with
same solvent. Further diluted 10 mL of these solutions to 100 ml with Acetonitrile: water
50:50.. The solution was filtered through 0.45µ nylon filter before analysis. 10 µl of this
solutions were injected in to the HPLC system
57
Table No. 06 : Preparation of accuracy levels as per following table:
For Anastrozole
For Temozolomide
58
Table No. 07 : % Recovery at difference levels for Anastrozole
% Level Conentr-
wrt. ation Conentration %
Level No. added in recovered in Recovery % Assay Rounded
working µg per µg per mL Unrounded
conc. mL
STDev 1.4
RSD 1.4
59
Table No. 08 : % Recovery at difference levels for Temozolomide
% Level Conentr-
wrt. ation Conentration %
Level No. added in recovered in Recovery % Assay Rounded
working µg per µg per mL Unrounded
conc. mL
STDev 0.251
RSD 0.3
60
Specimen chromatograms of accuracy study are given below,
61
Figure No. 20 : Temozolomide chromatogram in accuracy at 50% level.
62
Table No. 09 : Mean results of accuracy study for Anastrozole
63
2.9.3 LOD AND LOQ SENSITIVITY
Table No. 11: The Concentrations of LOD and LOQ level experiment.
64
2.9.4 LINEARITY AND RANGE
The linearity of an analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test results
which are directly proportional to the concentration (amount) of analyte in the sample.
Linearity was carried out with minimum 8 concentration levels in duplicate within a range of
LOQ to 150% of the target concentration of analyte by using test sample. Linearity and range of
assay method from LOQ to 150.0% of working concentration of anastrozole (Coonc.10.00 µg
per mL) and Temozolomide (Coonc.10.00 µg per mL).
Evaluation
65
Linearity graph of concentration in µg per mL against area response, plotted on basis of above
information is as follows,
66
2.9.5PRECISION :
Injection repeatability
Analysis repeatability
Intermediate precision
Injection repeatability
Analysis repeatability
Analysis repeatability for assay carried out with six preparations of assay samples.
67
Evaluation
Mean 99.98
S.D 0.57
%RSD 0.57
Mean 95.67
S.D 0.55
%RSD 0.57
68
Specimen chromatograms are given below,
69
2.9.6 INTERMEDIATE PRECISION
1. Different analyst
2. Different day
3. Different instrument
For this study first 10 μl of blank solution (Acetonitrile: water 50:50) and placebo was
injected and ran with the gradient programme. After this 10 μl of Resolution solution was
injected followed by Individual Impurity standard solutions and injected standard solutions in
6 replicate and the % relative standard deviation (% R.S.D) of the response peak areas was
calculated.
A Placebo about 0.90 gm was weighed and transferred in to 100 ml volumetric flask
equivalent excluding 10 mg of Anastrozole, to this flask added 60 mL of equal volumes of
Acetonitrile and water respectively and the mixture was subjected to vigorous shaking for 10
min and diluted up to volume with same solvent. Further diluted 10 mL of these solutions to
100 ml with Acetonitrile: water 50:50. The solution was filtered through 0.45µ nylon filter
before analysis. 10 µl of these solutions were injected in to the HPLC system.
A Placebo about 0.270 gm was weighed and transferred in to 100 ml volumetric flask
equivalent excluding 10 mg of Temozolomide, to this flask added 60 mL of equal volumes of
Acetonitrile and water respectively and the mixture was subjected to vigorous shaking for 10
min and diluted up to volume with same solvent. Further diluted 10 mL of these solutions to
100 ml with Acetonitrile: water 50:50. The solution was filtered through 0.45µ nylon filter
before analysis. 10 µl of these solutions were injected in to the HPLC system.
70
Preparation of Standard solution
A sample about 0.350 gm was weighed and transferred in to 100 ml volumetric flask
(equivalent to 10 mg of Anastrozole), to this flask added 60 mL of equal volumes of
Acetonitrile and water respectively and the mixture was subjected to vigorous shaking for 10
min and diluted up to volume with same solvent. Further diluted 10 mL of these solutions to
100 ml with Acetonitrile: water 50:50.. The solution was filtered through 0.45µ nylon filter
before analysis. 10 µl of this solutions were injected in to the HPLC system.
A sample about 0.270 gm was weighed and transferred in to 100 ml volumetric flask
(equivalent 10 mg of Temozolomide), to this flask added 60 mL of equal volumes of
Acetonitrile and water respectively and the mixture was subjected to vigorous shaking for 10
min and diluted up to volume with same solvent. Further diluted 10 mL of these solutions to
100 ml with Acetonitrile: water 50:50. The solution was filtered through 0.45µ nylon filter
before analysis. 10 µl of these solutions were injected in to the HPLC system.
71
Evaluation
Table No. 19 : Results of Intermediate precision study for Anastrozole
% Assay of
Lable Claim of Anastrozole
Anastrozole
72
Comparative result of precision and intermediate precision results
Table No. 21 : Comparison between % Assay in precision study and intermediate precision study
for anastrozole
% Assay values in
% Assay values in Precision
Intermediate Precision for
Sr.No. for anastrozole
anastrozole
(Analyst I)
(Analyst II)
1 99.74 101.68
2 99.33 100.29
3 99.49 99.29
4 100.09 100.50
5 100.84 100.74
6 100.39 100.60
Average 99.98 100.52
SD 0.57 0.77
RSD 0.57 0.76
% Absolute difference 0.5
For Temozolomide
1 95.44 97.30
2 95.05 95.97
3 95.20 95.02
4 95.78 96.17
5 96.49 96.40
6 96.07 96.26
Average 95.67 96.19
SD 0.55 0.74
RSD 0.57 0.76
% Absolute difference 0.5
73
Specimen chromatograms are given below,
74
2.9.7 SOLUTION STABILITY
Solution stability study for standard solution has been conducted for 72 hours by keeping the
solution on bench top at normal illuminated laboratory condition.
1. Sample solution stability at bench top condition (At normal illuminated laboratory condition)
This study has done for 72 hours for standard and sample solutions.
For standard solution preparation, refer the solution preparation under specificity parameter
Solution stability study for standard and test solution has been established by calculating %
relative difference of the standard area and test area at each time interval with respect to initial
solutions area.
75
Evaluation
Table No. 22 : Solution stability study of standard solution at bench top condition for
Anastrozole (i.e. at normal illuminated laboratory condition) as given below
Table No. 23 : Solution stability study of Sample solution at bench top condition for
Anastrozole (i.e. at normal illuminated laboratory condition) as given below
76
Table No. 24: Solution stability study of Sample solution at bench top condition for
Temozolomide (i.e. at normal illuminated laboratory condition) as given below
Table No. 25: Solution stability study of Sample solution at bench top condition for
Temozolomide (i.e. at normal illuminated laboratory condition) as given below
Results:
% Relative difference between area of standard solution upto 72 hours on bench top under
normal illuminated laboratory condition with respect to area of initial area is within limit i.e.
less than 2.0%.
% Relative difference between areas of test solution up-to 72 hours on bench top under
normal illuminated laboratory condition with respect to area of initial test solution area is
within limit i.e. less than 2.0%.
Conclusion :
Standard solution is stable up-to 72 hours at normal illuminated laboratory condition on bench
top.
Test solution is stable up-to 72 hours at normal illuminated laboratory condition on bench top.
77
2.9.8 ROBUSTNESS
Sr.
Parameters Deliberate changes
No.
1 Flow rate of mobile phase. 0.9 And 1.1 (i.e. ± 0.1 mL per minute).
For preparation of blank, standard and placebo solutions refer the solution preparation
under specificity parameter and for test solution refer precision parameter.
Robustness 1
Table No. 27: Results of Robustness at the flow rate of 0.9 ml /mim for sample solution.
1 99.86 98.75
2 100.46 99.06
3 100.47 97.63
78
Robustness 2
Table No. 28 : Results of Robustness at the flow rate of 1.1 ml /mim for sample
solution.
1 99.45 99.88
2 100.90 100.03
3 100.17 100.05
Robustness 3
Table No. 29 : Results of Robustness at the column oven temperature 23°C sample
solution.
1 98.02 98.63
2 97.72 98.66
3 98.53 97.78
79
Robustness 4
Table No. 30 : Results of Robustness at the column oven temperature 23°C sample
solution.
1 99.94 98.90
2 100.11 98.41
3 100.87 97.93
Conclusion: Robustness studies signified that the results of the method remained unaffected
by small, deliberate changes in the flow rate and column temperature.
80
Figure No. 30: Mix Standard chromatogram in Robustness I study.
81
Robustness II: - Low flow rate
82
Figure No. 36 : Temozolomide Sample chromatogram in Robustness II study.
83
Figure No. 39 : Temozolomide Sample chromatogram in Robustness III study.
84
Figure No. 42: Mix Standard chromatogram in Robustness IV study.
85
2.9.9. CONCLUSION
The advantages of the proposed method involve a simple procedure for sample preparation
and relatively short time of analysis. Apart from this, it can be used for assays of Anastrozole
and Temozolomide in biological fluids or in pharmacokinetic investigations. The proposed
method was validated by testing its linearity, accuracy, precision, limits of detection, and
limit of quantitation. Robustness and stability of solutions. The results of the analysis of
pharmaceutical dosage forms by the proposed methods are highly reproducible, reliable, and
are in good agreement with the label claims of the drug. The additives usually present in the
pharmaceutical formulations of the assayed samples did not interfere with Anastrozole and
Temozolomide. It may be said that the proposed methods are precise, sensitive, and accurate,
so that these can be used as standard Pharmacopeial methods for the simultaneous
determination of Anastrozole and Temozolomide using the HPLC systems with PDA
detector.
86