Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Author notes
1
Executive Summary
This project is depending on the staff orientation project that might be a draw attendee is a huge
project. The author suggested a suitable project development plan and work breakdown structure
for developing a successful project. As per the critical path method network diagram helps to
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................3
WBS structure............................................................................................................................19
WBS dictionary..........................................................................................................................19
5.0 Conclusion...............................................................................................................................20
6.0 conclusion................................................................................................................................21
3
1.0 Introduction
In this study, the project depends on the planning and implementation of a national
symposium for a society, which will be delivered as a major project (Kheder, 2014, p.64). It
Symposium.
The study was formed with project goals and objectives, it also helped to deliver project
scope statements. This study also defines the WBS structure which might be implemented in the
project management.
1.1 Describe the entire scope of the work including project background, a list of specific
project goals, deliverables, exclusions, constraints, assumptions, and milestones.
1.1.1Project goals
● To implement a compile orientation for the area of improvement in the staff orientation
project
● Evaluate prepared proposals for developing a suitable staff orientation event in Sydnee.
program.
This was delivered compile orientation evaluation for the improvement area.
It was evaluated the prepared proposal with recommended changes, present to the
The case study is based on the implementing and planning staff orientation project. The
author assumes that this project can plan a successful program with the help of a society people
(Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, 2014, p.12). This program might help to develop
an entire society. The first expanded event is held in Sydney in December 2022. This is also the
This staff orientation program is being initiated for developing and faceplate the
orientation session. This project team is mainly required to attend the staff orientation program
that mainly helps to prepare for the national Symposium. Sydney is the selected city for the first
event of this project. On the other hand, Australian officer has one of the most primary
present in this session (Project Management Institute, 2013). In this staff orientation program, a
revised orientation re-program has been developing, but one day is a too short time to complete
this activity.
This project is not allowing people from different societies. This project was not planned to
develop their events in small cities, the first event was held in the host city Sydney.
The staff orientation project has eleven milestones to complete a successful project
(Project Libre, 2017, p.10). An orientation task force launched after complete this orientation
evaluation for the area of improvement, evaluate the proposal which was prepared then complete
orientation presentation, review the outcomes and evaluate the tools, then implement a changed
orientation program. After evaluating the first two orientation sessions present findings to the
executive team, and after evaluating feedback from the first six orientation process, develop a
1.2 Design activities to be implemented for Task 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 11 (between 2-4
activities per task). See Tasks 3.1-3.3 and 4.1-4.3 in Table 1 as examples.
or
Staff orientation project 198 days
1.Orientation task force launched 14 days
managers
1.2 Organize a meeting with staff and managers 4 days 1.1 Staff
representative
2. Compile orientation evaluation for area of 28 days
improvement
2.1 Identifying the area 20 days HR staff (1)
2.2 evaluate the area for improvement 8 days 2.1 HR staff (2)
3.Evaluate the Prepared Proposal 35 days
3.1 Draft recommended changes 20 days 1,2 Orientation
Task Force
3.2 Recommendation presented to the executive 5 days 3.1 Education
team Manager,
Project
Manager
3.3 Review and finalize orientation enhancements 10 days 3.2 Orientation
Task Force
6
manager
5.2 Measure the outcome 9 days 5.1 Education
manager
6.0 Facilitate physical changes necessary to 28 days 4
orientation room
6.1 Analyze physical changes 10 days Facilities staff
6.2 implement the changes 18 days 6.1 AV staff
7. Revised implement orientation program 1 day 5,6 Project
manager
8. Feedback from the first two orientation sessions 60 days 7
8.1 feedback from session 1 30 days Education staff
(1)
8.2 Feedback from session 2. 30 days 8.1 Education staff
(2)
9. present findings to execute team 14 days 8
9.1 Provide team financing method 7 days Project
manager (1)
9.2 Implement with execution team 7 days 9.1 Project
manager
(2)
10. evaluation feedback from first six months 180 days 7
orientation session
7
(1)
11.2 improvement in this process 2 days 11.1 Education staff
(2)
11.3 define a feedback result 6 days 11.2 Education staff
(1)
1.3 Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for the Activity list generated in 1.2.
2.1 Assign activity dependencies to the new activities in 1.2 (show at least 2 types of activity
dependencies) without changing the total duration of the task. Additional milestones should
and milestones must be presented in your project schedules (both Scenario 1 and 2).
In the staff orientation project, in this part, it was defined at least 2 activity dependencies
In the above study, it was shown that evaluate the prepared task the project duration time
is the same, but the subs task timings are changes. On the other hand, the review evaluates tool
project duration time is the same, but the subtask timings are changed.
2.2 Construct and present an original schedule (Scenario 1) for the project using project
2.3 Conduct a critical path analysis and carefully apply the 3-point estimate technique on
identified critical activities to develop an estimated project schedule. It is assumed that all
activities will be 25% shorter than the presented schedule if we fast-track the orientation
through crashing. On the other hand, without appropriate risk management planning, the
Based upon the changed activity (Scenario 2) critical path analysis is very much
important for identifying the shortest path to finish the project. As suggested by the author 3-
point technique is helps to involve people in the professional in tasks that are mainly estimating
with the help of this technique. In these three points of the estimation process, three figures are
produced initially for every kind of distribution which is required and based on the experienced
and development in this critical path analysis. Based on the changed activity schedule network
diagram and the shortest path was defined below with the 3-point technique.
12
Based upon the study it assumed that activity is 25% shorter than the presented schedule and also
E= estimate
O= Optimistic time
P= Pessimistic estimate
10.5 days
24.5 days
E= (10.5+14+24.5)/3
16.3 Days
21 days
49 days
E= (21+28+49)/3
32.66 Days
26.25 days
61.25 days
E= (26.25+35+61.25)/3
40.83 Days
52.5 days
122.5 days
E= (52.5+70+122.5)/3
81.6 Days
10.5 days
24.5 days
E= (10.5+14+24.5)/3
16.3 Days
21 days
49 days
E= (21+28+49)/3
32.66 Days
Task 7 Implement revised orientation program (G)
Most likely time = 1 days
0.75days
1.75 days
E= (0.75+1+1.75)/3
1.6 Days
Task 8 Evaluate feedback from the first two orientation sessions (H)
Most likely time = 60 days
45 Days
105 days
E= (45+60+105)/3
70 Days
5.25 days
12.25 days
E= (5.25+7+12.25)/3
8.16 Days
Task 10 Evaluate feedback from the first six orientation sessions (J)
Most likely time = 180 days
135 days
315 days
E= (135+180+315)/3
210 Days
Task 11 Develop continuous process improvement process for feedback results (K)
Most likely time = 28 days
21 days
49 days
E= (21+28+49)/3
32.66 Days
2.4 Perform a final, technical schedule analysis using the results obtained from project
scheduling conducted in the previous stages. A comparative analysis of the two developed
Based on the project schedule in the previous stage, the national symposium needs some
develop a local arrangement to complete this project. As per scenario 1, the project was mainly
dependent on this staff orientation project, 1250 attendees will draw which consists of is a major
project (Wysocki, 2014, p.10). On the other hand, in the second scenario, the estimated time is
the same, but activity dependency was changed this will be mentioned as a huge development for
this study.
Scenario 1
17
In the first scenario staff orientation project activity is divided into 11 tasks and six sub-
Scenario 2
1,2,5,6,7,8,9,11, and their subtask. In the previous study, it will also change the activity
Schedule methodology
In this project, the methodology is to develop a staff orientation project. On the other hand, it is
a non-profit event where the registration fees are $1500 as per 3 days symposium with free
This project uses a Gantt chart, a Critical path method with a network diagram, and a Work
break structure for scheduling the entire project and using 3 point estimation technique.
Level of Accuracy Unit of Measure Variance Thresholds
on time.
Schedule Reporting and format
The reporting format is spending upon the working activity and preventing the action with the
quality checked.
Process Management
18
Activity sequencing Describe the guideline for sequencing activity for developing a
network diagram.
duration
Updating, monitoring, and Document the process for updating including update frequency
WBS structure
19
WBS dictionary
The scope might be changed and each of activity was divided into two
to four activity for successfully implement the staff orientation
program.
Deliverable Acceptance
The project was delivered a staff orientation program and also planned
for a successful implementation.
5.0 Conclusion
With the help of analyzing the above study, it has been concluded that in the current
century most of the organizations drew up with a major project. $1500 registration fees were
charged for 3 days attendee. Additionally, the task is mainly involved with some hosting like
considerable events, and it is also being involved to arrange into the workshop.
21
6.0 conclusion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wvk9DZEgtw
Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge
(PMBOK Guide®) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management
Institute.
Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge
%20Sep%202018%20final.pdf
Snyder, C. S. (2013). A project manager’s book of forms: A companion to the PMBOK guide
https://search.proquest.com/openview/d2ecb30f7e9805ae0ec3ed7b3ea22d15/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar&cbl=51922&diss=y
Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme (7th ed.).
agile-project-management-become-the-future-of-non-it-sectors.pdf