You are on page 1of 4

IA ASB INTERNATIONAL AUDITING AND ASSURANCE STANDARDS BOARD

The IAASB is an independent standard-setting board of the International Federation of Accountants.


JULY 2007

INTERNATIONAL AUDITING AND ASSURANCE STANDARDS BOARD:


A BRIEF HISTORY OF ITS DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESS

Celebrating Its 100th Meeting IAASB Chairs


The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
Robert L. May United States 1978-1982
(IAASB) marks a milestone in Warsaw, Poland in July 2007,
Gijs Bak Netherlands 1983-1985
when it meets for the 100th time in its 29-year history.
Justin Fryer Canada 1985-1987
Since March 1978, the group, originally named the Inter- Alan Talbot Australia 1988-1992
national Auditing Practices Committee (IAPC), has gained Matthew Patient United Kingdom 1993-1995
increasing recognition for the quality of its standards and Robert S. Roussey United States 1995-2000
the credibility of its standard-setting process. This has Dietz Mertin Germany 2000-2003
resulted in greater use of its standards worldwide – an John Kellas United Kingdom 2004-present
important step in strengthening financial reporting globally
and enhancing public confidence in the work of auditors. IAPC’s initial work focused on three areas: object and scope
Points of Progress of audits of financial statements, engagement letters, and
• The IAASB has published 32 International Standards general auditing guidelines. Canada, Germany and Austra-
on Auditing (ISAs) and approximately 20 Interna- lia, respectively, led the subcommittees in these areas.
tional Auditing Practice Statements (IAPSs) and During this initial meeting, the IAPC also agreed to respond
other pronouncements on topics such as quality to a request from the International Accounting Standards
control. The ISAs have been developed over the Committee (IASC) chairman and Governors of the Central
IAASB’s 29-year history with increasing input from Banks to develop guidance on inter-bank confirmations.
the public to ensure that auditors have the necessary Richard Wilkes of the United Kingdom was asked to lead
guidance to address those issues of greatest concern the project. In November 1984, the IAPC issued IAPS 1000,
to the public as well as the markets. Inter-Bank Confirmation Procedures.

• Over 100 countries are now using or in the process Another area of focus was emerging technology and how
of adopting or incorporating ISAs into their national it could be used in an audit environment. In July 1981, a
auditing standards. task force was created to address auditing in an Electronic
Data Processing environment. Ruben Rosen of Canada led
• More and more national regulatory bodies are accept-
the task force, which also addressed computer-assisted
ing financial statements audited using ISAs.
audit techniques.
• The Financial Stability Forum includes ISAs as one of
The IAPC also debated attendance and voting procedures.
its 12 Key Standards for Sound Financial Systems.
In formulating a requirement for continuity of individuals
An Evolution of Leaders and Guidelines and regular attendance, the IAPC set a standard echoed
At its first meeting held in New York City, the IAPC, chaired by IAASB in its recent restructuring. While recognizing
by Robert May, agreed to issue its publications as guidelines, the importance of allowing designates to represent a
rather than standards, statements or recommendations. The member who could not attend a particular meeting, Gijs
Bak, second IAPC chairman, stressed the importance of
THE IAASB - The IAASB is an independent standard-setting continuity in membership.
board within the International Federation of Accountants
David Tweedie, the current chairman of the International
that works to enhance the quality and uniformity of practice
Accounting Standards Board (formerly the IASC) joined the
throughout the world and to strengthen public confidence in
IAPC in July 1983 and served as the United Kingdom repre-
the global auditing and assurance profession.
sentative until 1988. He was assisted by Martyn Jones, and
INTERNATIONAL AUDITING AND ASSURANCE STANDARDS BOARD

IAASB MILESTONES later, by Robert Charlesworth. This same


year, the IAPC approved release of The PUBLIC INTEREST OVERSIGHT BOARD (PIOB)
1978 First meeting held as
Auditor’s Report on Financial Statements - The PIOB oversees the work of the IAASB,
the International Audit-
ing Practices Committee guideline after deliberating 19 comment as well as IFAC’s other Public Interest Activity
(IAPC) in New York letters from member bodies and other Committees. It seeks to increase the con-
parties. In the late 1980s, the IAASB also fidence of investors and others that IAASB
1979 The IAPC issued its first
standard setting is properly responsive to the
International Auditing approved exposure drafts on the assurance
Guideline, Objective and public interest.
framework and going concern.
Scope of the Audit of
Financial Statements
Guided by Gijs Bak of the Netherlands, the to resolve differences in auditing stand-
IAPC developed final guidelines on three ards where differences exist in different
1985 IAPC members asked to
key subjects: related parties, going con- countries and to set a single international
act in the public interest
cern, and management representations. In standard. The IAPC recognized that a fun-
1987 Guideline issued on late 2006 and early 2007, the IAASB issued
review engagements; damental way to protect the public interest
exposure drafts on these topics, proposing was to require the application of a core set
International Organi-
zation of Securities updates and clarification. of internationally recognized auditing and
Commissions adopted Putting the Public Interest First assurance standards.
international auditing At his first meeting as chairman in
guidelines
In his comments at the 1987 World
October 1985, Justin Fryer of Canada Congress, Justin Fryer noted that in its
1991 IAPC’s guidelines re- called on IAPC members to act in the first ten years, the IAPC had issued 26
codified as International
interests of the public and said that duty auditing guidelines.
Standards on Auditing
should come before sectional interests. He
(ISAs) Around the same time, the IAPC began
also planted the seeds for today’s conver-
1993 ISA comment letters encouraging the International Organiza-
gence activities. He called on the IAPC
placed in public record
1994 IAPC Consultative Advi- IAASB Members
sory Group (CAG) held Representation on the IAASB has been both broad and diverse over the years. The board
first meeting has grown from 11 members to 18 members. Since the inception of the IAPC, more
1998 IFAC survey found more than 112 professionals from 28 countries have participated as IAPC/IAASB members.
than 70 countries world-
wide had adopted IAPC Country Participants Country Participants
standards or use them Australia 8 Jordan 2
as a basis for national
Brazil 4 Lebanon 1
standards
Canada 11 Malaysia 1
2001 Comprehensive review China 2 Mexico 7
of the IAPC undertaken
Denmark 3 Netherlands 6
First year in which the Egypt 1 Norway 1
IAPC met four times
Finland 1 Pakistan 1
2002 The IAPC was reconsti- France 6 Philippines 2
tuted as the International Germany 9 South Africa 2
Auditing and Assurance
Hong Kong 1 Spain 1
Standards Board (IAASB);
India 6 Sweden 4
IAASB membership
increased from 14 to 18 Israel 1 Taiwan 1
members and included, Italy 2 United Kingdom 11
Japan 7 United States 10

2
INTERNATIONAL AUDITING AND ASSURANCE STANDARDS BOARD

IAASB MILESTONES tion of Securities Commission (IOSCO) eliminating bold letters and grouping all
continued to adopt international auditing guidelines requirements together or interspersing
for the first time, public as appropriate standards for use in multi- them throughout a standard are not new!
members; and the IAASB national filings. A different Board in a different decade has
published its agenda come to different decisions.
papers on the web and IFAC was among the first organizations to
opened its meetings to refer to international auditing guidelines ‘90s See Establishment of CAG
public observers in its own financial statements. The audi- The 1990s was a period of change, marked
Audit Risk Standards tor’s report on IFAC’s 1987 financial state- by initiatives designed to increase the
resulted from first joint ment reads, “Our examination was made transparency of the IAPC’s work and to
project between the in accordance with generally accepted expand public interest input. In 1992,
IAASB and a national auditing standards in the United States of Matthew Patient, the IAPC’s fifth chair-
standard setter (Ameri- America, conforming in all respects with man, proposed that comment letters on
can Institute of Certified International Auditing Guidelines.” exposure drafts of ISAs be placed in a pub-
Public Accountants)
The Birth of ISAs lic record after approval of an ISA. He also
2003 IAASB began to meet proposed creating the Consultative
five times per year In 1991 the IAPC’s fourth chairman, Alan
Talbot of Australia, led the IAPC in pro- Advisory Group (CAG), to include busi-
2004 Chairman of the ness representatives, investors and those
IAASB became a full-
posing to IFAC member bodies that the
term “guidelines” be replaced with “stand- with an interest in the development of
time position
ards.” The United States member at the high quality international standards
First independent designed to serve the public interest. The
Chairman named for
time, Robert Roussey, who later became
IAPC chairman, supported this change CAG’s first meeting was held June 1994
the IAASB CAG
in designation, saying the IAPC output in Paris, France. The group continues to
2005 IAASB came under the meet twice yearly.
oversight of the Public would be comparable to IASC classifica-
Interest Oversight Board tion. With that, International Standards In 1994 at its 50th meeting in Stockholm,
on Auditing, or ISAs, were born. Sweden, Chairman Patient explained to
2007 100th meeting held in
Warsaw with 13 docu- The move from guidelines to standards the IAPC that IOSCO would not endorse
ments scheduled also brought a call for codification and the ISAs unless the black-letter type was
for approval editing of existing literature, to be accom- eliminated. IOSCO also called for ISA
IAASB issued third ver- plished by January 1993. During this same
sion of Objectives and period, the IAPC agreed to adopt a “black THE CLARITY PROJECT - To encourage greater
Scope of the Audit of letter” type whenever the basic proce- use of its standards and facilitate transla-
Financial Statements tion, in 2004 the IAASB launched a project
dures and essential procedures appeared
IFAC Member Body Com- designed to improve the clarity of its pro-
throughout the ISAs. After considerable
pliance Program survey nouncements, and after obtaining public
discussion, members agreed that black let-
identified more than input, it revised its drafting conventions to
ter wording would not appear at the begin-
100 countries that have make the ISAs more readily understood. In
adopted IAASB standards
ning of the ISA, since they did not want
December 2006, the IAASB issued the first
or use them as a basis for the standards to be read alone. Instead,
four final ISAs redrafted in the new style,
national standards they preferred to continue interspersing
and as of May 2007 it had issued 15 exposure
2008 Clarity Project slated
basic principals and essential procedures
drafts of proposed redrafted ISAs. The IAASB
for completion throughout the text. Current Board mem- plans to issue the remaining redrafted ISAs
bers will be heartened to recognize that as exposure drafts by the end of 2007 with
the vociferous debates at the IAASB over approval of all final redrafted standards by
the last two years around the implica- the end of 2008.
tions for the clarity of standards of using/
3
INTERNATIONAL AUDITING AND ASSURANCE STANDARDS BOARD

language edits, including changing many “woulds” to • Strengthening due process; and
“shoulds.” However, with a majority vote, the IAPC agreed
• Establishing liaisons with national auditing standard
to proceed with issuing ISAs in black-letter type.
setters.
The New Millennium: IAPC Takes John Kellas became IAASB chairman in January 2004 and
A New Name and Structure in October of that year became its first ever full-time chair-
At the beginning of 2001, IFAC led a comprehensive review man. Beginning in 1999, IFAC increased resources to pro-
of IAPC membership and processes and issued a report on vide for a full-time dedicated staff of experienced staff to
its findings, which included: support the work of the IAASB. From a staff of one, the sup-
• A name change from the then IAPC to the current port group has grown to a dedicated group of seven profession-
International Auditing and Assurance Standards als. The addition of the full-time chair and expansion of staff
Board; enabled the IAASB to expand its spokesmanship and visibility.
• Membership to include five representatives from Operating Transparently
international audit firms, proposed by the Transna-
The IAASB is dedicated to operating as transparently as pos-
tional Auditors Committee of the Forum of Firms;
sible. By 2007, it had become arguably the most transparent
ten from IFAC member bodies, with a majority of
standard setter in the world. IAASB meetings are open to
those from countries with strong national standard
the public and agenda papers, background documents and
setters; and three public interest members; and
meeting summaries are posted on the IFAC website. Visitors
• IAASB operations to receive adequate resources to can view project histories and may download audio record-
sustain its activities and follow due process and trans- ings of the IAASB meeting proceedings. Visitors can also
parency in carrying out such activities. download IAASB exposure drafts and view all comments
Dietz Mertin of Germany, IAASB’s seventh chairman, pre- made to those drafts by regulators, firms, standard setters
sided over the first meeting of the reformed IAASB. Under and others.
his leadership the IAASB embarked on its first joint project The Public Interest Oversight Board, CAG and regulators
with a national standard setter – the American Institute of have expressed increasing confidence in standards devel-
Certified Public Accountants – which resulted in the devel- oped by the IAASB.
opment of the suite of audit risk standards.
Looking Forward
In 2003, IFAC approved a series of reforms designed, among The IAASB has a full agenda through 2008 as it meets its
other things, to further strengthen its standard-setting pro- deadline for the Clarity Project, while continuing to revise
cesses, including those of the IAASB, so that they are prop- important standards. At the same time, it has begun a broad
erly responsive to the public interest. IFAC reforms relevant and transparent process to develop its strategy and work
to IAASB included: program for 2009 through 2011. A key part of the process
• Establishment of the Public Interest Oversight Board; is consultation on the strategy with various stakeholders,
• Appointment of a full-time chairman; followed by an exposure draft of the proposed plan, which
will be made available for public comment later in 2007. We
• Establishment of the Steering Committee;
remain committed to supporting quality performance by
• Implementation of a public interest declaration con- auditors worldwide and to acting in the public interest. As
firming that IAASB members will act with integrity we look at our future, we plan to build on past successes,
and in the public interest; continue to listen to our stakeholders, promote convergence,
• Meetings being opened to observers; and maintain confidence in the international auditing
standard-setting process.

INTERNATIONAL AUDITING AND ASSURANCE STANDARDS BOARD


International Federation of Accountants
545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017 USA
Tel +1 (212) 286-9344 Fax +1 (212) 286-9570 www.ifac.org email: pr@ifac.org 4

You might also like