The document discusses controls on prices, including price ceilings and price floors. A price ceiling sets a legal maximum price at which a good can be sold, while a price floor sets a legal minimum. Price ceilings protect buyers by lowering prices, but can cause shortages if set below equilibrium. Price floors protect sellers by maintaining higher prices but can cause surpluses. While intended to help consumers or producers, price controls often have unintended negative consequences by distorting supply and demand. The document also discusses taxes, noting they burden both buyers and sellers by raising prices and lowering what producers receive. The side facing less elastic demand or supply bears more of the tax burden, as they cannot as easily adjust their quantities in response.
The document discusses controls on prices, including price ceilings and price floors. A price ceiling sets a legal maximum price at which a good can be sold, while a price floor sets a legal minimum. Price ceilings protect buyers by lowering prices, but can cause shortages if set below equilibrium. Price floors protect sellers by maintaining higher prices but can cause surpluses. While intended to help consumers or producers, price controls often have unintended negative consequences by distorting supply and demand. The document also discusses taxes, noting they burden both buyers and sellers by raising prices and lowering what producers receive. The side facing less elastic demand or supply bears more of the tax burden, as they cannot as easily adjust their quantities in response.
The document discusses controls on prices, including price ceilings and price floors. A price ceiling sets a legal maximum price at which a good can be sold, while a price floor sets a legal minimum. Price ceilings protect buyers by lowering prices, but can cause shortages if set below equilibrium. Price floors protect sellers by maintaining higher prices but can cause surpluses. While intended to help consumers or producers, price controls often have unintended negative consequences by distorting supply and demand. The document also discusses taxes, noting they burden both buyers and sellers by raising prices and lowering what producers receive. The side facing less elastic demand or supply bears more of the tax burden, as they cannot as easily adjust their quantities in response.
Denifition a legal maximum on the price at a legal minimum on the price at which a good can be sold which a good can be sold Purpose Protect buyers Protect sellers Non-biding Biding Non-biding Biding Position of price celing/floor compared to equilibrium price Change of Qd falls, Qs and Qs and P falls, Qs and P Qd falls, Qs and P Qd, Qs, P P rises Qd rises falls, Qd rises rises Impact on No impact Shortage No impact Surplus the market outcome Evaluation 1. Economists usually oppose price ceilings and price floors, because: - Markets are usually a good way to organize economic activity - Prices have the crucial job of balancing supply and demand 2. Governments can sometimes improve market outcomes by using price controls – Policymakers are motivated to control prices because they view the market’s outcome as unfair. Besides, price controls are often aimed at helping the poor. – Yet price controls often hurt those they are trying to help
TAXES (taxes per unit)
Tax imposed on sellers Tax imposed on buyers Graphs
Change of equilibrium Equilibrium quantity falls Equilibrium quantity falls
quantity Buyers pay (PB) More More
Sellers receive (PS) Less Less
Difference between PB PB – PS = tax PB – PS = tax
and PS Buyers’ share of tax Less More burden (Buyers pay more) Sellers’ share of tax More Less burden (Sellers get less)
Conclusion 1 When a good is taxed, buyers and sellers share the
burden of tax • Sellers get a lower price, are worse off • Buyers pay a higher price, are worse off Tax incidence Supply is more price-elastic Demand is more price- elastic
Conclusion 2 - How exactly the tax burden is divided depends on the
price - elasticity of demand and price - elasticity of supply - Tax burden falls more heavily on the side of the market that is less elastic Evaluation - When the government levies tax on a good, Eq of the good falls -> shrinks market’s size. - Tax burden falls more heavily on the side of the market that is less elastic because it cannot respond as easily to the tax by changing the quantity bought or sold.
Slide 143
New equilibrium: Q = 450
Sellers receive: PS = $9 Buyers pay: PB = $12 Difference between them = PB - PS = $12 - $9 = $3 = tax Slide 144 In our example, • Buyers pay price more, • Sellers receive price less.
C. Nos. 100 of 2013, 49 of 2014 & 89 of 2014 Shri Sharad Kumar Jhunjunwala vs. Ministry of Railways APPEAL No.01 of 2016 Sharad Kumar Jhunjhunwala, Vs UOI and Minstry of Railways