You are on page 1of 5

Prevalence, Treatment, and Control of Combined Hypertension and

Hypercholesterolemia in the United States


Nathan D. Wong, PhDa,*, Victor Lopeza, Simon Tang, MPHb, and G. Rhys Williams, ScDb

Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are important modifiable risk factors for cardio-
vascular disease (CVD). We examined the prevalence, treatment, and control of combined
hypertension and hypercholesterolemia in United States adults aged >20 years (n ⴝ 2,864,
projected to 118 million, 52% women) from the National Health and Nutrition Examina-
tion Survey 2001 to 2002 by gender, age group, ethnicity, and co-morbidities (metabolic
syndrome, diabetes mellitus [DM], and preexisting CVD). Hypertension was defined as
blood pressure of >140/90 mm Hg (>130/80 mm Hg if DM was present) or on treatment.
Hypercholesterolemia was defined as a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of >130
mg/dl (>100 mg/dl if DM or CVD was present) or on treatment. The overall prevalence of
hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension and hypercholesterolemia combined
was 30%, 47%, and 18%, respectively. The incidence of the 2 combined was 20% in women
versus 16% in men (p <0.05), ranging from 1.9% in those aged 20 to 29 years to 56% in
those aged >80 years (p <0.001). Combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia was
least prevalent in Hispanics (9.8% compared with 19% in whites and 22% in African-
Americans, p <0.01) and highest in those with CVD plus DM or metabolic syndrome
(69%), CVD only (44%), DM only (41%), and metabolic syndrome only (37%). Of those
with combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, 29% were being treated (8.3% in
those aged 20 to 29 years to 38% in those aged 70 to 79 years, p <0.01). Treatment was least
prevalent in Hispanics (12% vs 24% in African-Americans and 30.4% in whites, p <0.01).
Overall control of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia was only 9% and was low in all
disease groups (5.5% to 16%). In conclusion, treatment and control of combined hyper-
tension and hypercholesterolemia are suboptimal. Increased efforts to improve treatment of
these conditions are needed. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2006;
98:204 –208)

Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia represent highly hypercholesterolemia in the adult population in the United
prevalent conditions in the United States, the control of States from 2001 to 2002 and the variation by gender, age
which can substantially reduce the future risk of cardiovas- group, ethnicity, and co-morbidities, including metabolic syn-
cular disease (CVD) events and mortality.1,2 According to drome (MS), diabetes mellitus (DM), and CVD.
data from the Framingham Heart Study, 80% of patients
•••
with hypertension have additional CVD risk factors.3 Fur-
In the National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES)
thermore, the combination of hypertension and hypercho-
lesterolemia more than additively increases the risk of CVD Survey 2001 to 2002, we identified adults aged ⱖ20 years
events compared with the occurrence of 1 of these risk (n ⫽ 2,864 projected to 117.5 million, 52% women) with hy-
factors alone.4 Previous studies have indicated that hyper- pertension and hypercholesterolemia who had complete data
tension and hypercholesterolemia frequently co-exist, caus- on fasting lipids and blood pressure. MS was defined by the
ing what is known as “dyslipidemic hypertension.” Previous presence of ⱖ3 of the following: waist circumference ⬎102
prevalence estimates for concomitant hypertension and hy- cm for men and ⬎88 cm for women; triglyceride level of
percholesterolemia range from 15% to 31% in the United ⱖ1.69 mmol/L (150 mg/dl) if fasting; high-density lipoprotein
States.5,6 The present investigation aimed to examine the prev- (HDL) cholesterol level of ⬍1.04 mmol/L (40 mg/dl) for men
alence, treatment, and control of combined hypertension and or ⬍1.29 mmol/L (50 mg/dl) for women; blood pressure
ⱖ130/85 mm Hg or on antihypertensive medications; and/or
fasting glucose level ⱖ6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dl) and ⬍6.99
a mmol/dl (126 mg/dl) according to the National Cholesterol
Heart Disease Prevention Program, Division of Cardiology, Depart-
ment of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Education Program criteria.2
Irvine, California; and bPfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, New York. DM was defined by a fasting glucose level of ⱖ6.99
Manuscript received November 5, 2005; revised manuscript received and mmol/L (126 mg/dl), or ⱖ11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dl) if
accepted January 19, 2006. nonfasting, on oral hypoglycemic medications or insulin, or
This study was supported by a grant from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New
York, New York.
self-reported DM. CVD was defined as a self-report of
* Corresponding author: Tel: 949-824-5561; fax: 949-824-5567. previous myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure. Hy-
E-mail address: ndwong@uci.edu (N.D. Wong). pertension was defined as a blood pressure level of ⱖ140/90

0002-9149/06/$ – see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. www.AJConline.org
doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.079
Preventive Cardiology/Combined Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia 205

Table 1 Table 2
Prevalence of combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia in Percent treated for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia among United
United States adults (n ⫽ 2,864, projected to 117.5 million) States adults with combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia
(n ⫽ 638 projected to 21.5 million)
Variable Overall Men Women
(n ⫽ 2,864) (n ⫽ 1,380) (n ⫽ 1,484) Variable Overall Men Women
(n ⫽ 638) (n ⫽ 298) (n ⫽ 340)
Overall (n ⫽ 2,864) 18.3% 16.4%* 20.2%
Age (yrs) Overall (n ⫽ 638) 28.5% 27.2% 29.5%
20–29 (n ⫽ 587) 1.9% 3.5%*† 0.2%† Age (yrs)
30–39 (n ⫽ 511) 8.0% 9.4% 6.6% 20–29 (n ⫽ 11) 8.3%* 8.9%† 0.0%*
40–49 (n ⫽ 533) 13.4% 12.2% 14.7% 30–39 (n ⫽ 41) 5.0% 8.0% 0.9%
50–59 (n ⫽ 383) 24.0% 21.4% 26.5% 40–49 (n ⫽ 76) 22.2% 19.4% 24.7%
60–69 (n ⫽ 370) 48.3% 43.1% 52.7% 50–59 (n ⫽ 95) 35.5% 32.3% 37.9%
70–79 (n ⫽ 276) 51.3% 42.5%* 58.7% 60–69 (n ⫽ 171) 30.6% 35.8% 27.0%
ⱖ80 (n ⫽ 204) 55.9% 49.7% 59.2% 70–79 (n ⫽ 138) 38.3% 38.5% 38.1%
Race ⱖ80 (n ⫽ 106) 28.7% 25.9% 29.4%
African-American 21.7%† 21.2%† 22.2%† Race
(n ⫽ 518) African-American (n ⫽ 139) 23.7%* 25.9%† 21.8%
Hispanic (n ⫽ 769) 9.8% 11.0% 8.6% Hispanic (n ⫽ 110) 12.4% 9.6% 15.9%
Non-Hispanic white 19.4% 17.0%* 21.7% Non-Hispanic white (n ⫽ 368) 30.4% 29.3% 31.1%
(n ⫽ 1,482) Co-morbidity
Co-morbidity None (n ⫽ 217) 16.7%* 14.4%* 18.8%*
None (n ⫽ 1,932) 8.9%† 8.8%† 9.0%† MS (n ⫽ 221) 28.1% 21.7% 31.2%
MS (n ⫽ 551) 36.7% 28.7%‡ 42.5% DM (n ⫽ 45) 18.4% 19.9% 15.8%
DM (n ⫽ 98) 40.7% 39.1% 43.8% CVD (n ⫽ 63) 42.7% 68.9%‡ 17.7%
CVD (n ⫽ 147) 44.4% 39.3% 50.5% CVD plus DM or MS 57.0% 48.0% 64.9%
CVD plus DM or 69.0% 65.3% 72.7% (n ⫽ 92)
MS (n ⫽ 136) Risk factors§
Risk factor§ 0–2 (n ⫽ 577) 28.2% 26.3% 29.5%
0–2 (n ⫽ 2,731) 17.5%† 15.1%‡ 19.7% ⱖ3 (n ⫽ 61) 31.9% 32.6% 30.1%
ⱖ3 (n ⫽ 133) 39.2% 35.6% 54.4%
* p ⬍0.01 and † p ⬍0.05 across age group, ethnicity, or disease group;
* p ⬍0.05 between genders; † p ⬍0.01 across age group, ethnicity, or ‡
p ⬍0.01 between genders.
disease group; ‡ p ⬍0.01 between genders. §
Age (men ⱖ45 years, women ⱖ55 years), HDL cholesterol ⬍40
§
Age (men ⱖ45 years, women ⱖ55 years), HDL cholesterol ⬍40 mg/dl, DM, and smoking.
mg/dl, DM and smoking.
and hypercholesterolemia were defined individually. The
mm Hg (ⱖ130/80 mm Hg in patients with DM) or self- treatment and control rates were defined for those with
reported use of medication for hypertension. Hypercholes- hypertension aged ⱖ20 (n ⫽ 3,049, projected to 125 mil-
terolemia was defined as a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lion, 51% women) and for those with hypercholesterolemia
cholesterol level of ⱖ130 mg/dl (ⱖ100 mg/dl in patients aged ⱖ20 years (n ⫽ 2,982 projected to 122 million, 51%
with DM or CVD) or the self-reported use of medication to women). Analyses were also done by gender, age group
control cholesterol. LDL cholesterol was calculated using (⬍40, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 to 79 years),
the Friedwald equation (LDL cholesterol ⫽ total ethnicity (African-American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic
cholesterol ⫺ HDL cholesterol ⫺ [1/5] triglycerides), if tri- white), and disease group according to the presence of MS,
glycerides were ⬍400 mg/dl. Blood pressure was measured DM, CVD, or CVD plus either MS or DM and compared
using a mercury sphygmomanometer, and the average of 4 with those with none of these conditions. Cross-tabulation
readings was used. Treatment was defined by self-report. procedures with SUDAAN statistical software, version
Detailed specimen and data collection have been reported in 8.0.2 (Research Triangle Park, North Carolina) were used
the NHANES Laboratory/Medical Technologists Proce- for population-weighted percentages. Statistical Analysis
dures Manual.7 Systems statistical software, version 8.1 (SAS Institute,
When examining control within the hypertension and Cary, North Carolina) and SUDAAN software were used
hypercholesterolemia subgroup, we defined control as blood for analysis and computation of weighted estimates for
pressure of ⱕ140/90 mm Hg (ⱕ130/80 mm Hg in patients projection to the population of the United States.
with DM) and LDL cholesterol of ⱕ130 mg/dl (ⱕ100 mg/dl The overall prevalence of hypertension alone and hyper-
in patients with DM or CVD). Control was also defined cholesterolemia alone was 30% and 47%, respectively, with
using the National Cholesterol Education Program guide- hypercholesterolemia more common in men (52%) than in
lines,2 incorporating the Framingham global risk estimates women (42%, p ⬍0.01). Their prevalence increased dra-
when defining LDL cholesterol control as ⱕ130 mg/dl matically with increasing age. Overall, 64% of patients with
(ⱕ100 mg/dl in patients with DM or coronary heart disease hypertension were on treatment, but only 23% of patients
or a calculated Framingham 10-year risk of ⬎20%). with hypercholesterolemia were on treatment. Treatment for
The prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension hypertension was lower in men (56%) than in women (71%,
206 The American Journal of Cardiology (www.AJConline.org)

Table 3
Percent controlled for combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia among United States adults with combined hypertension and
hypercholesterolemia (n ⫽ 638, projected to 21.5 million)
Variable Overall Men Women Overall, GR Men, GR Women, GR
(n ⫽ 638) (n ⫽ 298) (n ⫽ 340) (n ⫽ 638) (n ⫽ 298) (n ⫽ 340)

Overall (n ⫽ 638) 9.0% 11.7% 6.9% 5.6% 7.8% 3.9%


Age (yrs)
20–29 (n ⫽ 11) 8.3% 8.9% 0.0% 13.1% 8.9% 77.0%
30–39 (n ⫽ 41) 3.4% 5.9% 0.0% 7.3% 9.6% 4.3%
40–49 (n ⫽ 76) 6.4% 8.1% 4.9% 3.9% 7.2% 0.9%
50–59 (n ⫽ 95) 9.6% 9.4% 9.7% 6.4% 4.0% 8.3%
60–69 (n ⫽ 171) 11.0% 15.8% 7.8% 4.6% 7.0% 2.9%
70–79 (n ⫽ 138) 13.0% 19.5% 9.1% 8.2% 15.0% 4.1%
ⱖ80 (n ⫽ 106) 5.3% 10.0% 3.1% 1.4% 4.3% 0.0%
Race
African-American (n ⫽ 139) 6.5%* 8.3%* 5.0%* 5.8% 6.0% 5.7%
Hispanic (n ⫽ 110) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 3.5% 4.7%
Non-Hispanic white (n ⫽ 368) 10.8% 14.1%† 8.3% 4.9% 7.7%† 2.8%
Co-morbidity
None (n ⫽ 217) 5.5%‡ 3.0%* 7.9%‡ 1.6%* 1.7%* 1.6%‡
MS (n ⫽ 221) 9.4% 12.7% 7.8% 6.7% 12.2% 4.0%
DM (n ⫽ 45) 2.0% 3.2% 0.0% 9.6% 15.2% 0.0%
CVD (n ⫽ 63) 14.8% 30.4%§ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CVD plus DM or MS (n ⫽ 92) 16.3% 25.7% 8.2% 15.8% 17.5% 14.2%
Risk factors储
0–3 (n ⫽ 577) 8.5% 10.9% 6.9% 4.5%‡ 6.5% 3.1%
ⱖ3 (n ⫽ 61) 14.0% 16.8% 6.2% 18.5% 16.3% 24.6%

* p ⬍0.01 across age group, ethnicity, or disease group; † p ⬍0.05 between genders; ‡ p ⬍0.05 across age group, ethnicity, or disease group; § p ⬍0.01
between genders.

Age (men ⱖ45 years, women ⱖ55 years), HDL cholesterol ⬍40 mg/dl, DM, and smoking.
GR ⫽ Framingham global risk assessment (hypertension and hypercholesterolemia defined as previously mentioned but control definition included
Framingham GR assessment) in defining National Cholesterol Education Program goals for LDL cholesterol.

p ⬍0.01). Among those with hypertension and hypercho- (30% and 27%, respectively). When examining across
lesterolemia individually, treatment increased dramatically age groups, a significantly higher percentage of treatment
by age group (p ⬍0.01). Overall, 41% of those with hyper- was seen (8.3% in those aged 20 to 29 years vs 38% in
tension were controlled, but only 11% of patients with those aged 70 to 79 years, p ⬍0.01). Hispanics had the
hypercholesterolemia were controlled, without any appre- lowest treatment rate at 12% compared with African-
ciable differences by gender. The control rates for hyper- Americans (24%) and non-Hispanic whites (30%, p
tension and hypercholesterolemia individually were higher ⬍0.01 across race) (Figure 3). By disease group, for
in older age groups than in younger age groups. those without MS, DM, or CVD, 17% were on treatment
The overall prevalence of combined hypertension and compared with those with MS (28%), DM (18%), or
hypercholesterolemia was 18% (Table 1). Women had a CVD (43%), or CVD plus DM or MS (57%, p ⬍0.01).
slightly higher percentage of combined hypertension and The overall control rate of hypertension and hyper-
hypercholesterolemia than men (20% vs 16%, p ⬍0.05)
cholesterolemia among those with combined hyperten-
(Figure 1). A marked increase was seen in the prevalence of
sion and hypercholesterolemia was 9.0% (Table 3). Men
combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia with age,
tended to have higher control rates than women (12% vs
from 1.9% in those aged 20 to 29 years to 56% in those aged
6.9%, p ⫽ NS) (Figure 1). The control rates appeared to
ⱖ80 years (Figure 2). Among the ethnic groups, the preva-
lence of combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia was peak in those aged 60 to 69 years (11%) and were lowest
19% in non-Hispanic whites, 9.8% in Hispanics, and 22% in among those aged ⱖ80 years (5.3%) (Figure 2). Hispan-
African-Americans (p ⬍0.01) (Figure 3). Of those without ics had the lowest control rate (0.0%) compared with
MS, DM, or CVD, the prevalence of combined hypertension African-Americans (6.5%) and non-Hispanic whites
and hypercholesterolemia was 8.9%, much lower than the (11%, p ⬍0.01) (Figure 3). Among disease groups, for
prevalence in those with MS (37%), DM (41%), or CVD those without MS, DM, or CVD, only 5.5% had con-
(44%), or CVD plus DM or MS (69%, p ⬍0.01 across trolled hypertension and hypercholesterolemia compared
disease groups). with those with MS (9.4%), DM (2.0%), or CVD (15%),
Overall, of those with combined hypertension and or CVD plus DM or MS (16%). When examining control
hypercholesterolemia, 29% were receiving treatment of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia using the in-
(Table 2). Women had a similar treatment rate as men corporation of the Framingham global risk assessment
Preventive Cardiology/Combined Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia 207

Figure 1. Combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: prevalence


(dotted bars), treatment (slashed bars), and control (black bars) by gender.
Prevalence indicates percentage with hypertension (blood pressure Figure 3. Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: prevalence (dotted
ⱖ140/90 or 130/80 mm Hg if DM was present or on antihypertensive bars), treatment (slashed bars), and control (black bars) by ethnicity.
medication) and with hypercholesterolemia (LDL cholesterol ⱖ130 or Prevalence indicates percentage with hypertension (blood pressure
ⱖ100 mg/dl if DM or coronary heart disease was present or on lipid- ⱖ140/90 or 130/80 mm Hg if DM was present or on antihypertensive
lowering medications). Treatment indicates percentage on treatment among medication) and with hypercholesterolemia (LDL cholesterol ⱖ130 or
those with combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Control in- ⱖ100 mg/dl if DM or coronary heart disease was present or on lipid-
dicates percentage controlled to below previously mentioned cutpoints of lowering medications). Treatment indicates percentage on treatment among
those with combined hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. p ⬍0.05 those with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Control indicates per-
comparing percentage controlled among men versus women. centage controlled to below previously mentioned cutpoints of those with
hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. p ⬍0.01 for prevalence, treatment,
and control across ethnic groups.

in the United States adult population, with approximately


1/5 of all adults having combined hypertension and hyper-
cholesterolemia. Less than 1/3 of these were on treatment
for the 2 conditions, and the treatment rates were apprecia-
bly lower in African-Americans and Hispanics. Less than
1/10 of those with combined hypertension and hypercho-
lesterolemia had the 2 conditions under adequate control.
The major strength of our study was the ability to project
the prevalence of combined hypertension and hypercholes-
terolemia, as well as the treatment and control rates, to the
adult population of the United States, given the population-
representative National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey data we used. One limitation of our study was the
Figure 2. Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: prevalence (dotted
reliance on measures of blood pressure and lipids taken at a
bars), treatment (slashed bars), and control (black bars) by age group.
Prevalence indicates percentage with hypertension (blood pressure single visit, and thereby not accounting for the inherent
ⱖ140/90 or 130/80 mm Hg if DM was present or on antihypertensive variability in these measures that may have affected the
medication) and with hypercholesterolemia (LDL cholesterol ⱖ130 or prevalence. Moreover, the use of medications was based on
ⱖ100 mg/dl if DM or coronary heart disease was present or on lipid- self-report of taking medications for hypertension or ele-
lowering medications). Treatment indicates percentage on treatment among
vated cholesterol to ensure comparability with previous
those with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Control indicates per-
centage controlled to below previously mentioned cutpoints of those with publications of national statistics on prevalence and treat-
hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. p ⬍0.01 across age groups for ment.1,8,9 Our measure of hypercholesterolemia was based
prevalence and treatment only. only on having increased LDL cholesterol or being on
medication for lipids; a much greater number of patients
would have been identified had the criteria for hypercholes-
(Table 3), the control rates were much lower overall and
terolemia also included decreased HDL cholesterol or ele-
by the subgroups examined.
vated triglycerides. Likewise, a much lower proportion
••• would have been noted to be in control had the criteria for
The results of this study have shown that a high prevalence control included cutpoints for HDL cholesterol and triglyc-
of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia continues to exist erides.
208 The American Journal of Cardiology (www.AJConline.org)

The results of our study have demonstrated that impor- 3. Kannel WB. Fifty years of Framingham study contributions to under-
tant gaps remain in the treatment and control of hyperten- standing hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2000;14:83–90.
4. Neaton JD, Wentworth D, for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention
sion and hypercholesterolemia, and in particular, when the 2
Trial Research Group. Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette
conditions are present together—the case for ⬎1/2 of older smoking, and death from coronary heart disease: overall findings and
adults in the United States. Greater efforts are needed to differences by age for 316,099 white men. Arch Intern Med 1992;
identify and adequately treat each condition individually, 152:56 – 64.
and especially if present together, for which the importance 5. Eaton CB, Feldman HA, Assaf AR, McPhillips JB, Hume AL,
of adequate control is even greater because of the higher Lasater TM, Levinson P, Carleton PA. Prevalence of hypertension,
risk of future coronary heart disease. dyslipidemia, and dyslipidemic hypertension. J Fam Pract 1994;38:
17–23.
6. Johnson ML, Pietz K, Battleman DS, Beyth RJ. Prevalence of comorbid
1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo
hypertension and dyslipidemia and associated cardiovascular disease.
JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr., Roccella EJ, for
Am J Manag Care 2004;10:926 –932.
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee
on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood 7. NHANES 1999 –2000 Laboratory/Medical Technologists Procedures
Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinat- Manual. Rockville, MD: NCHS.
ing Committee. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on 8. Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and
Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pres- control of hypertension in the United States, 1988 –2000. JAMA 2003;
sure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289:2560 –2572. 290:199 –206.
2. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood 9. Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Giles WH, Mensah GA. Serum total cholesterol
Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the Third Report of the concentrations and awareness, treatment, and control of hypercho-
National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on lesterolemia among US adults: findings from the National Health and
Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 –2000. Circulation 2003;107:
Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486 –2497. 2185–2189.

You might also like