Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 - A)
In pursuit of classifying and organizing the multitude of organisms, Karl Von Linne
Although it is still widely recognized today, there are certain limitations that open such
concepts to be debatable. One of the strengths of the hierarchal system is its ability to
shared morphological characteristics, they are bound by their most recent ancestors.
genetics (Miller & Harley, 2016). Furthermore, the hierarchical system opens the binomial
nomenclature, which is the current basis for the scientific names of organisms. Therefore,
through the hierarchal system, organisms are given specific names that are standardized in
scientific literature. Contrastingly, several limitations can be observed. The primary limitation
of the hierarchal system lies in its inability to provide concrete definitions of what
constitutes a taxon above the species level. A set of criteria to qualify whether families
represent the same level of divergence from a common ancestor, or how meaningful such
divergence in terms of time, does not exist (Miller & Harley, 2016). Most scientists refer to
the ranks above the species level as “artificial constructs” (Withgott, 2000). As the Linnean
system precedes modern taxonomy, molecular advances challenge such primitive method,
similarities. The debate between the Class Aves and Class Reptilia among birds attests to this
limitation. Finally, Linnaeus initially presented 44,000 species at the onset of his imposed
system. As diversity grows and advances are limitless in the animal kingdom, such ranks may
not be sufficient enough to cater to all of the newly discovered species (Withgott, 2000).
Reference List
Miller, S.A, & Harley, J. P. (2016). Zoology (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0646:IISLL]2.0.CO;2