INDUSTRIAL UNIVERSITY OF HO CHI MINH CITY

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES

SUPERVISOR’S EVALUATION FORM

Student’s name: …………………………………… Student ID No.:……………………..

Supervisor’s name: ……………………………………………………………………….
CRITERIA SCORE
Format (3)
Coherence and Organization (4)
Format And
Grammar mistakes (3)
Language Use
Introduction Research topic and objectives of
research (5)
Research questions (5)
Literature Definitions of key terms/concepts (5)
Written Review of previous studies (5)
Review
Referencing (5)
Graduation
Methodology Research Methodology (10)
Thesis Research Collecting and analyzing data (5)
(70) Relevance between research findings
Findings
and objectives (5)
Evaluating and discussing the findings
(5)
Conclusions Conclusions & recommendation (10)
Oral Content (3)
Performance (3)
Presentation Time management (10 minutes) (2)
Questions response (2)
(10)
Supervisor’s Communication skill (2)
Punctuality (2)
Appraisal Continuous improvement (6)
(10)
Supervisor’s Group Decision &Planning
Roles & Distribution
Appraisal on Establish Goals
teamwork
Meeting Minutes
(05)
Peer Contribution to the team project

1
evaluation Taking responsibility

on teamwork Working with others

(05)
Other
comments

TOTAL SCORES ………./100

Date: …………………………….
Signature

………………………………..

2
 INDUSTRIAL UNIVERSITY OF HO CHI MINH CITY
FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES

EXAMINER’S EVALUATION FORM

Student’s name: …………………………………… Student ID No.: ……………………

Examiner’s name: …………………………………………………………………………….

CRITERIA SCORE
Format And Format (3)
Coherence and Organization (4)
Language Use
Grammar mistakes(3)
Introduction Rationale and objectives of research (5)
Research questions (5)
Literature Definitions of key terms/concepts (5)
Review of previous studies (10)
Review
Written Referencing (5)
Graduation Methodology Research Methodology & Methods (10)
Thesis Research Collecting and analyzing data (5)
Relevance between research findings and
Findings
(80) objectives (5)
Evaluating and discussing the findings (10)
Conclusions Conclusions & Recommendation (10)
Oral Content (6)
Performance (6)
Presentation Time management (10 minutes) (4)
Questions responses (4)
(20)
Other
comments

TOTAL SCORES ………../100

Date: ………………………….
Signature

………………………………..

3
Updated in July 2017
Prepared by:
Le Thi Thuy, M.A.

Head of the Division:

Tran Kieu My An, Ph.D.

August 29, 2020

Second revision
Vice Dean:
Phan Thi Tuyet Nga, Ph.D.

4
 Rubrics for Written Graduation Thesis (70%)
Item/ Weight Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Exemplary
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Format There are There are several There are minor There are
(3) consistent mistakes in the mistakes in the hardly any
mistakes in required format. required format. mistakes in the
the required required
format. format.
10 Coherence and The The paper is The paper is The paper is
Organization (4) development of presented with presented in clearly stated,
paper is vague; connected concept logical sequence well-developed
no apparent and ideas, clear and well and well
logical order of transitions. organized. organized.
presentation.
Grammar There are There are several There are minor There are
mistakes consistent spelling and spelling and hardly any
(3) spelling and grammar mistakes grammar spelling and
grammar in the paper. mistakes in the grammar
mistakes in paper. mistakes in the
the paper. paper.
Rationale and The rationale of The rationale of The rationale of The rationale of
objectives of the research the research topic the research topic the research topic
research (5) topic area is is presented and is adequately is introduced in a
unclearly the significance defined. The coherent and
described. Little and objectives of significance and interesting
Introdu evidence shows the paper is objectives of the manner. The
ction the significance justified. paper is well significance and
10 and objectives justified. objectives of the
of the research paper is well
topic. justified.

Research Research Research questions Research Research

questions (5) questions are are defined. questions are questions are
not successfully coherently and scientifically
clearly defined.
defined. meaningful and
challenging.
15 Definitions of Definition of Key concepts are The key The key
key key concepts recognized. concepts related concepts
terms/concepts is insufficient. to the research related to the
(5) topic are research topic
defined. are also clearly
defined.

5
 Review of The previous The previous The previous The previous
previous studies studies are studies are studies are quite studies are
(5) inadequately relevant with the relevant with the adequately
relevant with research topic and research topic relevant with
the research summarized. and the research
topic and appropriately topic and
inappropriatel summarized. appropriately
y summarized. summarized.
Referencing References are The referencing is The referencing The referencing
(5) of poor quality. in a proper manner is in a proper is in a proper
The format and but the layout of manner and the and extensive
layout are the bibliography is layout of the manner. The
inconsistent consistent with bibliography is format and
and not in line APA style. There largely in line layout of the
with APA style. are, however, a with APA style. bibliography are
number of correct and in
inconsistencies. line with APA
style.
10 Research The author The author The author The author
Methodology displays such a correctly presents justifies his/her justifies his/ her
and Methods low level of the research choice of analysis choice of
(10) research methods and methods and research
methodology shows good demonstrates methods
and methods organization and effective systematically
that it can be application of application of and
regarded as research relevant research demonstrates a
unacceptable. methodology. methodology. deep
understanding in
the application
of relevant
research
methodology.
Collecting and The author The author The author The author
analyzing data describes the correctly presents presents the data presents the data
(5) data collecting the data collecting collecting and collecting and
and analyzing and analyzing analyzing stages analyzing stages
stages but the stages and also clearly. The correctly and
description outlines the author makes clearly. The
does not form a analysis. The good use of the author makes
coherent and analysis data in the great use of the
Researc logical whole. demonstrates a analysis. The data in the
h The analysis good command author chooses analysis. The
findings methods are and reliable use of the methods author chooses
15 mainly chosen the method. sensibly to the relevant

6
 to answer the summarize the methods to best
research information summarize the
questions, but provided by the information
the author has data. provided by the
an insufficient data.
command of
the methods.

Relevance The author The author The author The author

between demonstrates a demonstrates demonstrates demonstrates
research poor level of a satisfactory adequate levels of advanced levels
findings and understanding understanding in understanding in of understanding
objectives in the analysis the the analysis of the in the analysis of
(5) of the research analysis of the research findings. the research
findings. The research findings. The research findings. The
research The research findings are research findings
findings are findings may be adequate relevant are relevant to the
inadequate in adequate but not as to the objectives objectives of the
meeting described. of the study. study.
objectives of
study.
Evaluating and The thesis does The research The research The research
discussing the not succeed in findings make a findings make a findings make a
findings making minor contribution good contribution significant
(5) contribution to to the knowledge to the knowledge contribution to
the knowledge base of the base of the the knowledge
base of the discipline and field discipline and base of the
discipline and of study. field of study. discipline and
field of study. field of study.
10 Conclusion & No logical The conclusions are The conclusions The conclusions
Reconmmendati conclusions are partially logical. are presented are presented
on (10) reached. The link between logically and logically and
Answers to the conclusions and answers to answers to
research research questions research research
questions is left somewhat questions are questions are
studied and unclear. The final explained in a explained
discussion about summary only good manner. in a coherent
them is almost partially The final manner. The
entirely missing communicates the summary final summary is
or it is purpose and communicates relevant and
unconnected findings of the the purpose and communicates
from the study. The author findings of the the objectives
perspective of demonstrates quite study. The author and findings of
the research adequate demonstrates the study. The

7
 The final understanding of adequate author
summary in no the strengths and understanding of demonstrates
way weaknesses of the strengths and good
communicates his/her own weaknesses of understanding of
the purpose and research. his/her own the strengths and
findings of the research. weaknesses of
study. The his/her own
author research.
demonstrates
inadequate
understanding of
the strengths
and weaknesses
of his/her own
research.

August 29, 2020

Second Revision
Vice Dean:
Phan Thi Tuyet Nga, Ph.D.

8
 Rubrics for Oral Presentation (10%)
Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Exemplary
Item/ Weight
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Content Organizational Organizational Appropriate Organizational
(3) structure present structure present organizational pattern is
but unclear with clearly with pattern used and compelling and
underdeveloped introduction, easy to follow moves audience
introduction, body and with developed through speech
body and conclusion. A introduction, with ease.
conclusion. few transitions. understandable Introduction
Transitions are body part and draws in the
awkward. satisfying audience and
conclusion. Main conclusion is
points are satisfying. Main
smoothly points are clearly
connected with made and
transitions. smoothly
connected with
transitions.
Performance Very little Little gestures Adequate use of Effective use of
(3) gestures or eye or eye contact. gestures, eye gestures, eye
contact. Monotone voice contact, contact, vivid
Monotone voice or insufficient language, and language, and
or insufficient volume. Little voice. Limited voice to add
volume. poise. Heavy oral fillers and interest to speech.
Reading of reliance on nonverbal Poised with use of
notes only. notes. Abundant distractions. notes for reference
Speech is often oral fillers and Uses a wide only. No oral
unintelligible nonverbal range of fillers and
distractions. pronunciation nonverbal
Mispronunciatio features distractions. Clear
ns are frequent pronunciation
and cause some
difficulty for the
listener
Time No regard for Presentation Presentation Presentation given
management time constraints. given within given within two within time
(10minutes) six or seven four or five or three minutes constraints (from
(2) minutes above minutes above above or below 9-11 minutes)
or below the or below the the allotted time
allotted time allotted time.

9
Questions Unable to Most questions Nearly all All questions are
response respond many are responded questions are responded
(2) questions. competently. responded knowledgably and
knowledgably respectively.
and respectively

10
 Rubrics for Supervisor’s Appraisal (10%)

Item/ Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Exemplary

Weight
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Communic Students show a weak Students show an Students show Students show a
ation skill communication skill in adequate a good very good
(2) meetings with the communication skill communication communication
supervisor and group in meetings with the skill in skill in meetings
members. supervisor and group meetings with with the
members. the supervisor supervisor and
and group group members.
members.
Punctuality Students are always late Students are Students are Students are
(2) in meetings with the sometimes late in usually always punctual
supervisor. meetings with the punctual in in meetings with
supervisor. meetings with the supervisor.
the supervisor.
Continuous Students show an Students show a Students show Students show a
improveme unwilling attitude positive attitude a positive willing attitude
nt towards assigned work, towards assigned attitude towards assigned
(6) complete work late often work, complete towards work, complete
and make no reference work late sometimes assigned work, work on time or
from the supervisor. and can make a complete work make alternative
relevant reference on time or arrangement and
from the supervisor. make make a good
alternative reference from
arrangement the supervisor.
and make a
good reference
from the
supervisor.

11
 Rubrics for Teamwork (10%)
1. Rubrics for Supervisor’s Appraisal (5%)
2. Rubrics for Peer Evaluation (5%)

1. Rubrics for Supervisor’s Appraisal (5%)

Student’s name: ____________________________ Student code: ___________________

Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Exemplary

Item/ Weight
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A clear
A clear procedure
A procedure for procedure for
for planning &
There is no planning& planning &
making decisions
planning& making decisions making decisions
Group in research work
decision making is established by in research work
Planning & is informally
process, decisions the group, but it is formally
Decision established by all
are made by is not clear established by all
members of the
individuals. and/or it focuses members of the
group.
on individuals. group.

The group The group

The group does The group
establishes establishes and
not establish roles establishes
informal roles documents clear
for each member clear and formal
Roles & for each and formal roles
and/or the roles for each
Distribution member. The for each member
workload is member and
workload could and distributes
unequally distributes the
be distributed the workload
distributed. workload equally.
more equally. equally.
Scheduled
meetings minutes Scheduled
Scheduled meetings Scheduled
are often recorded meetings minutes
minutes are rarely meetings minutes
and the are always
recorded and the are usually
Meeting contribution of recorded and the
efforts are recorded and the
Minutes each team contribution of
scattered. contribution of
each team
members are NOT each team members
members are
identified. are identified.
identified.

12
 Rubrics for Teamwork (10%)
2. Rubrics for Peer Evaluation (5%)

Name of member: __________________________________________

Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Exemplary

Item/ Weight
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Collects and
Collects
presents to the
information when Collects basic,
Does not collect team a great deal
prodded; tries to useful information
any relevant of relevant
Contribution offer some ideas, related to the
information; no information; offers
to the team but not well research,
useful suggestions well-developed
project developed, and not occasionally offers
to address team's and clearly
clearly expressed, useful ideas to meet
needs; expressed ideas
to meet team's the team's needs;
directly related to
needs;
the group's topic.
Performs assigned
Does not perform
tasks but needs
assigned tasks;
many reminders;
often misses
attends meetings Performs all Performs all tasks
meetings and,
regularly but assigned tasks; very effectively;
when present,
Taking generally does not attends meetings attends all
does not have
responsibility say anything regularly and meetings and
anything
constructive; usually participates participates
constructive to
sometimes expects effectively; enthusiastically;
say; relies on
others to do
others to do the
his/her work;
work;
Rarely listens to, Usually listens to Generally listens to
shares with, and others but others' points of Almost always
Working with supports the sometimes does view; always uses listens to others
others efforts of others; not pay much appropriate and and their ideas;
often uses attention when respectful helps them
inappropriate others talk, and language; tries to develop their ideas
language; often is assumes their make a definite while giving them
not a good team ideas will not effort to understand full credit.
member. work; others' ideas;

Evaluator's name:  __________________________________________
Date of evaluation:  __________________________________________

Updated in July 2019 Head of the Division:

Prepared by: Tran Kieu My An, Ph.D.
Le Thi Thuy, M.A.

13
 INDUSTRIAL UNIVERSITY OF HO CHI MINH CITY
FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES

PROGRESS FORM
GRADUATION THESIS
Research title:
THE COMMON READING CHALLENGES IN READING THE INTERMEDIATE MARKET
LEADER OF ENGLISH - MAJORED SENIORS AT INDUSTRIAL UNIVERSITY OF HO CHI
MINH CITY.
Student name: NGUYỄN VÕ QUANG THỊNH Student ID No.: 17015471
Supervisor name: PHAN THỊ TUYẾT NGA
Week Date Content Supervisor’s
comments &
Signature
1
(22/01/2021-
27/01/2021)
2
(28/01/2021-
04/02/2021)
3
(05/02/2021-
11/02/2021)

4
(12/02/2021-
18/02/2021)

5
(19/02/2021-
25/02/2021)

6
(26/02/2021-
04/03/2021)

7
(05/02/2021-
11/03/2021)

7 13/03 Chapter II: Literature review submit

14
(12/03/2021- 17/03 Chapter III: Conduct questionnaires
18/03/2021)

8 20/03 Chapter II: Literature review

(19/03/2021- 22/03 feedback
25/03/2021) Chapter III: Conduct interviews

Check - Work completion: ……..%.

Progress - Continue or not?
………………………………...........
9 03/04 Chapter III: Methodology submit
(26/03/2021- first time
04/04/2021)

10 08/04 Chapter III: Methodology feedback

(05/04/2021- first time
11/04/2021)

11 15/4
(12/04/2021-
18/04/2021)

11 20/04 Chapter III: Methodology submit

(19/04/2021- 23/04 second time
25/04/2021) Chapter III: Methodology feedback
second time
12 01/5 Chapter IV: findings and discussion
(26/04/2021- 02/5 submit
04/05/2021) Chapter IV: findings and discussion
feedback
13
(05/05/2021-
11/05/2021)

14 19/05 Chapter V: abstract, conclusion

(12/05/2021- 20/05 submit
18/05/2021) Chapter V: abstract, conclusion
feedback
15
(19/05/2021-
25/05/2021)

16
(26/05/2021-
02/06/2021)

17
(03/06/2021-
15
 10/06/2021)

The supervisor’s approval of the students’ submission (Yes/ No): ………………………………

Date: …………………………….
Supervisor
(Signature & Full name)

………………………………..
Updated in July 2018
Prepared by: Le Thi Thuy, M.A.
Head of the Division: Tran Kieu My An, Ph.D.

August 29, 2020

Second Revision
Vice Dean:
Phan Thi Tuyet Nga, Ph.D.

16