Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Definition of Stable Ineastic Material
A Definition of Stable Ineastic Material
AD NUMBER
AD143756
FROM
Distribution authorized to U.S. Gov't.
agencies and their contractors;
Administrative/Operational Use; SEP 1957.
Other requests shall be referred to Office
of Naval Research, Washington, DC.
AUTHORITY
DiSTRIBUTION STATEMENT A
0~ m~ed e ca alu
M4M I
as :IIL JAVITi.'lli
mff
FOOr,
"{-,
STI -
-J
------
- .- W
sumS
cammATWn
NorX-362(2o)/2
bV
E6 C. kueker
Technical Report N. 2
Division of WEngiring
Brown University
Providenoe, Rhode Islad
September 1957
Sponsored by
Departmsnt of the Navy
OffTic of Naval Research
Under catrect Nonr-562(20)
Task Order NR 4
IAbstract
i The definitions given previously for work-hardening and perfect
considered includes both the body and the time-dependent set of forces
acting upon it. An external agency is supposed to apply an additional
I
I
I
=1
1
I* The romults presented in thi-s p pr vere obtained in the course of
research ponsored by the Office of Naval Research under Contract
fonr.*56f(20) with Rrow tlnisAiVty.
VIn Introdutton
the description of material, terms such as elastic, viscous,
limit the class of materials which are described and so are arbitrary
strain curve in simple tension may have a wide variety of shapes including
specified the drop in stress with increase in strain must be ruled out
explicitly.
Plasticity denotes irreversibility and permanent or residual
I actval time history of the loadings Figure 2 gives possible sizple tension
curves for a material combi linear elasticity and workihardening
loading or more generally by the time history of the loading, where tim
models. Instability now has a more obscure meaning and certainly must
if involve time. For example, a falling curve on a plot of stress versus
strain-rate for a Maxwell type raterial would denote viscous instability, I
* Figure 3.
over a cycle of application and removal# positive or zero, zero only when
extracted from the system of the body and the set of forces acting
Bodies under constant load will creep, bodies under constant deformation
j from the system. A body under constant load usually does not maintain
placement history, partly due to the existing force system and partly
are functions of time. The displacements ui, the stresses cij, and
the strains cij are likewise functions of time. Figure 4b shows the
existine system plus the xternal agency and the ccbined effeet. The
added surface tractions ATi and the added be forces AFi also vary
I with time as do the chage~s in dipUcent, stress, anA strain auj,
superposed on the existing set of forces*' Except for the very special
fully linear case, it will not be true that, ATi and AF1 acting alone
Ptc Ifr
If {AT AiuidA + JAF AuidV~ dt >0[I
ilwhere the dot indicates derivative with respect to time$ and t -0 is
the instant of time at wbich the external agency begins to apply force.
term, for example AT:1,A = AT. Au, + ATV A + AT, and, for later
uses Clj tij OX -X + ay 87 + az St + Ix "fY + , Yz + or Yz
I
Nonr-562(2O)/2
fj ] ui -U dA
+ 4 F 1(I f 1] dV dt > 0
the straightlizwj will exist which is capable of giving the same final state
B. In fact for the most general materials there Is no available path what-
soever from (1) to (2); path (2) is the only waty of prxducing the state
of the material at B.
Stress-strain Relations
ij and strain rates tij througb the theorem of virtual work. For any
continuous u
ii Ti1. dA + J(,1 Vd 31
(S I
f where Ti, F', crJ are any set of equilibrium values and u j, ja
any compatible set (7). There need be no relation between the equilibrium
(2 )
i ~ ~~2) 1)frT
Ti
and the comptible sets. Substitution of T - Ti :'or '
for Ui, etc., in the virtual work expressiom [3] thus is permissible
(2- (2) (- alone will not prouce
J f=0
taj (2) " ")]j
(2)" ( j iJ)]% t am [4
can be expanded in a power series for each of the paths (i) anM (2), the
] t +a t 2/ oo
a0
ij]
=BJ 0 +
SiJ ajjajj 0 ij /2 +,e
ij t 2j]+
/2 00
0 00
ei j)0+ jt+0 &jt 4 /+
The two paths are identical up to so that stress and strain are
t=0
the same at t=0 (2) and 6 ]o o Time deriva-
ij 0
h a tO i, i 0
tives of these quantities need not be the same so that strain rates and
gives
*(2)(2) (l)
+(a. () .(2) () (210(2
+ i
aj-c0+ij 10 ai a ij -o iij 0iJ %o
*(2) "(l)
If, however, "iJj
-iJ then it is necessary that
strain and of stress as weii if ;(2) ;(1), etc. The general requi:re-
ij iJ
ment in the sense of [7] and [8] is
(m(2) m() n (2) n (1)
8tm - - 0 tn 8atn o -9]
at at
goes or, for the more restricted definition of stability in the small [7]
10
. (2)(10
i. j 0o[]
For time independent materials the (1) terms disappear conipletely leaving
. .
the earlier result ijeij > 0.
then the system remains at A, and a similar time history holds for
B A B .A
(i ")
ij )(ij ii -
j Nonr-.,2(20)/2 -11-
upon this specially selected time history. Here the distinction between
j the broad and narrow delinition of stability does not arise because the
path OAB traversed with extreme rapidity gives the same state point B
Gji au Oum
mn [13]
e~,,G [1+a r )2
9en
I
No r-562(2o)/2 -12-
The magnritude of the stress rate is arbitrary and can be chosen to give
containing G(l) and G(2) then must likewise be zero. If not, a very
small increase or decrease in the magnitude of ij or the opposite
"ot op t
for cij will violate Inequality [14]. Therefore, (2) G( ) or
Iof the postulate, but stability in the large is needed for convexity.
large with the new postulate may be more restrictive than is reasonable
in which time derivatives of arq order may appear but stress and strain
• =0 ci j e i j dt > 015
the viscous. Suppose that, for convenience and for reasonable agree-
I
ment with actual behavior, the viscous strain rate
of stress alone.
*iJ
ii
is a function
two paths of loading diverge. Inequalty (8] for stability in the snf,
Stability in the large gives far more spectacular and useful results.
Referring to Inequality [12], the restriction on the path or time
B 3B
S J =>i) - 0 (16]
ij ij
as (12] is not.
The restrictions on stress-strain relations in creep imposed
by [12] and (16] are strong and may be extored for each special
in strain rate for any stress path is in the direction of the change in
stress (OBj atj )(sij _> 0.
eta=aij
7" where (p is a function of the existing state of stress only. The surfaoe
in accord with the actual physical behavior) is that the strain rate is
ftnction of the stress invariants, for example; the sum of the principal
stresses J and the invariants J2j = 1 sjk si of
21 sij sivJ :5 JsksiO
the stress deviation tensor sij, (10). Considerable discussion of convex
I
Nonr-562(20)/2 -j6-
portion Au, and body forces Fj throubhout the volume V, each given
of tio (or more) solutions 1 and n for the interior stresses, strains,
work [3] Just as in the description following Equation [3]. The general
result is that tae left hand side is always zero and for any order of tim
0-J [a S m j M
a~Oj
i 2) " C3' M GiJ
1)
] [ jan &t
"MM
ii(2) (1) ]
an. 6j dV [19]1
[9
ij o
(2)= =in napai
Uniqueness the sense of ~ .or= or
(2.()~ 8 tm ii at m
With this understanding the term uniqueness will be used without qualification
in the following.
of Inequality ( 9.. The initial state and the complete history of loading,
there.fore, determine the stress and the strain uiquely throughout any
in the small.
for any material undergoing the rapid loading type of path described for
any creep law in which the strain rate depends upon the stress only because
they too most obey Inequality ( 12 1. It is not true for most materials.
path exists from A to B, Figure 6, the work done by the external agency
and kinetic energy have been ignored, although velocity and acceleration
terms are finite. Aa wil be seen, the inclusion of dynamic terms does not
affeet the conclusions to be draun and, in fact, makes les demands on the
appropriate and tha steps uhich lead to Inequaty (4] Cive instead the
ffonr-562(20)/2 -18-
more inclusive
where the second term is the value of the v~olume integral at t o minus
agency applies load slowly, the acceleration ui is the same for the
two paths (1) and (2), Figure 6. Necessarily, in all cases the velocity
! , Conclusions
coupled with elastic and plastic action is an almcst unknown field. .ich
Bibliogrsh,
(1) "Soe Implications of Work Hardening and Ideal Plasticity" by
D. C. Drucker, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 4.,
January 1950, pp. 411-418.
(2) "AMore Fundamental Approach to Plastic Stress-Strain Relations"
by D, C, Drucker, Proceedings of the First National Congress of
Applied Mechanics, ASME, 1951, pp 487-491.
(3) 'echanik der plastischen Formanderung von Kristallen" by R. v. Mises,
ZAMZ, vol. 8, 1928, pp. 161-185.
(4) "Recent Developments in the Mathematical TheorI of Plasticity" by
W. Prager, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 20, 1949, pp. 235-241.
(5) "Coulomb Friction, Plasticity, and Limit Loads" by D. C. Drtuker, Jounal
of Applied Mechanics, v0o 21, Trem. ASME, vol. 76, 1954, PP. 71-74.
(6) "Rheology Theory and Applications, Volume I", Edited by F. R. Eirich,
Academic Press, New York, 1956.
440
UNSTABLE
iii- rT
KELVIN MAXWELL
OR
VOIGT
Ti Ti + AT i
Fi + AF;
ta) (b)
YIELD OR
SURFACE II
2)
(AVpF
OF PATH
(I PAT H
Ii ei
Ai
PERMMISSIBLE
(~) (b)
Commander Ccvuander
Uo S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory Naval Ordnance Test Station
k ihte Oak, layland Underwater Ordnance Division
Attn: Technical Library (2) 3202 E. Foothill BouLevard
Technical Evaluation Pasadena 8, California
14 Department (1) Attn: Structures Division (1)
Director Superintendent
Materials Laboratory Naval Post Graduate School
~~New Yor.. w_!-2 Siyalrd --- - -- ,-"
()
Brooklyn 1; New York
Comandit
Commanding Officer and Director Marine Corps Schools
U. S. Naval Electronics Laboratory Quantico, Virginia
San Diego 52, California (1) Attn: Director, .Marine Corps
t Officer-in-Charge
Naval Civil Engineering Research Coz 4dng General
and Evaluation Laboratory U. S. Air Force
U. S. Naval Construction Washington 25, D. C.
Battalion Center Attn: Research and Developiment
17 Port 1ueneme, California (2) Division (1)
Director Comannder
Naval Air Experental Station Air Material Comnd
Naval Air Mterial Cepter WrIght-Patterson Air Force Base
Naval Base Dayton, Ohio
Philadelphia 12, Pennsylvamia Attn: MREX-B (1)
Attn: Materials Laboratory (1) Structures Division (1)
Structures Laboratory (1)
Cczander
r Officer-in-Charge U. S. Air Force Institute of
Underzater Eplosion Research Division Technology
Norfolk Naval Shipyard Wright-,Patterson Air Force Base
Portsmouth, Virginia Dayton, Ohio
Attn: Dr. A. H. Keil (2) Attn: Chief, Applied Yechanics
Group (I)
Commander
. U. S. Naval Proving Grounds Director of Intelligence
Dahigren, Virginia (1) Headquarters, U. S. Air Force
Washington 25, 1. C.
Superintendent Attn: P. V. Branh
Naval Gun Factory (Air Targets Division) (1)
Washington 25, D. C.
4WCommier
Commander Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Naval Ordnance Test Station Washington 25, Do C.
Inyokern, China Lake, California Attn: 3echanics Division (1)
Attn: Physics Division (i)
Mechanics
i Branch () U. S. Atomic Energy Coaission
tbshington 25, Do C.
Commanding Officer and Director Attn: Director of Research (2)
Naval Engineering Experiment Station
Annapolis, 1aryland (1)
Nonr-562(20) Distribution List -4-
1University
Engineering Experiment Station
of "Kinnesota.
11inneapolis 14,* Minesota ()
Professor Aris Phillips
Departmezit of Civil &gineering
15 Promwect Street
=al University
Ii~b Nov rn, Corzacti0ttl
Nonr-562 (20) Distribution List -6-
I
!
I
I