Professional Documents
Culture Documents
En Wave Soldering Performance Optimization Whitepaper 450-10-011 GLB
En Wave Soldering Performance Optimization Whitepaper 450-10-011 GLB
John C. Ivankovits
Christine Dong
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
U.S.A.
Eric Fremd
Solectron
Corporation
U.S.A.
Introduction Solectron, based in Milpitas, California, faced
Wave Soldering The Clean Air Act regulates the emission of
this situation when consolidating several manu-
facturing sites scattered across San Jose and
Performance and chemicals that contribute to ozone generation.
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are carbon-
Milpitas into its current campus facility in April
of 1992. This led to the investigation of VOC-
Optimization of containing substances that vaporize at low tem-
perature and result in harmful ozone generation
free wave soldering fluxes by the Solectron
Advanced Technology Group. At the time only
VOC-Free, when discharged into the environment. Ozone
precursors, such as VOCs, when discharged
one known VOC-free flux existed: HF-1189
developed by Ray Turner at Hughes in Fullerton,
No-Clean Fluxes near the ground, lead to smog and unhealthy air
conditions in the lower atmosphere. Therefore, it
CA. This was a water-based aqueous clean-
able flux with activators uniquely derived from
is a matter of public health and well-being that lemon juice. Shortly thereafter, Alpha Metals
VOC emissions be held to a minimum.1 Until submitted a new no-clean, VOC-free flux 4942
Abstract recently, wave soldering fluxes commonly con- (known as NR-300A2) for beta site testing. All
tained organic solvents, such as alcohols, which other competing flux manufacturers then began
Environmental regulations restricting the emis- act as a carrier of flux activators and vehicles to development of VOC-free, aqueous cleanable
sions of volatile organic carbons the surfaces being soldered. and VOC-free, no-clean fluxes. This report
(VOCs) have prompted many printed circuit will attempt to measure and document the
assemblers to evaluate alternatives to History performance of seven of these new no-clean,
isopropanol-based flux chemistries. The solder- Local Air Quality Management Districts (AQMDs) VOC-free fluxes versus three well-established
ing performance of several VOC-free, no-clean are directed with the responsibility for regulat- VOC-containing, no-clean fluxes.
wave solder fluxes has been evaluated, through ing and controlling emissions of VOCs. Each
production testing and by standard wetting AQMD has its own set of rules and regulations Description of Fluxes
balance measurements, and compared to the governing VOC emissions based upon the sever- Flux components include activators, vehicles,
performance of VOC-containing, no-clean wave ity of the air quality conditions in the respec- solvents, and special additives. Activators for no-
solder fluxes. Both the wetting balance testing tive district. Both the South Coast Air Quality clean fluxes are typically organic acids classified
and the production trials were conducted in Management District (SCAQMD) based in the as carboxylic and dicarboxylic acids. The vehi-
three separate soldering atmospheres (less than Los Angeles basin, and the Bay Area Air Quality cles for no-clean fluxes have been selected from
10 ppm O2, 1% O2, and air). The results char- Management District (BAAQMD) based in the rosins, chemically modified natural resins and
acterize VOC-free, no-clean fluxes as suitable San Francisco Bay Area have different rules synthetic resins. Traditionally, no-clean wave
alternatives to isopropanol-based, no-clean flux governing the emissions of VOCs from wave soldering fluxes have been formulated using
systems. soldering machines. volatile organic compounds such as methanol
and isopropanol as their primary solvent carrier.
Until the spring of 1991, “flux applicators”
The use of alcohols as the solvent aids in evapo-
associated with wave soldering were exempt
ration during preheating. When the assembly
from regulations governing VOC emissions in the
touches the wave, only activators and vehicles
BAAQMD. Since then, wave soldering machines
remain. Incomplete evaporation of the solvent
in the BAAQMD are governed by the following:
can lead to spattering and tiny solder balls being
Regulation 8: Organic Compounds transported through the holes of a board and
Rule 4, General Solvent and Surface Coating deposited on its top side. For this reason, the
Operations, specifies emission limitations for water content has been kept to a minimum in
operations involving heat, noncomplying traditional flux formulations. Alcohols have also
solvents, and complying solvents in Sections acted as wetting agents in the traditional no-
301 through 303. clean formulations. Special additives can include
surfactants, stabilizers, inhibitors and dyes.
In general, if any new or modified source results
in VOC emissions of either more than 365 New VOC-free fluxes are water-based formula-
pounds per year or 5 pounds per day, then best tions utilizing low solids, halide-free activators.
available control technology (BACT) must be As with alcohol-based no-clean formulations,
implemented. “New or modified” sources would a similar class of organic carboxylic acids is
be any wave soldering equipment brought into used as activators. Surfactants are added to the
the facility or any equipment that is physically formulation to reduce the surface tension of the
relocated from its current geographical position. water which enhances the wetting properties
Thus, if one wanted to reorganize a manufac- of the flux to the PCB. The BAAQMD classifies a
turing line that has been in its present location flux as VOC-free only if it has less than 1% by
since before the spring of 1991, and moves the weight VOCs as tested by EPA test methods. The
wave soldering equipment to a new location seven VOC-free fluxes and three VOC-containing
within the facility, then permits and regulations fluxes tested in this report are labeled A, B, C,
for VOC control would be required. D, E, F, H with a “-c” for VOC-containing and a
“-f” for VOC-free. A-f, B-f, C-f corresponds to the
same manufacturer for A-c, B-c and C-c respec- force (Fγ) and the upward buoyancy force (Fb), Sample Preparation
3
tively. The fluxes tested contain between 1% to which can be represented as: The test samples were 15 mm x 15 mm x 0.25
3% solids. mm, 99.999% pure copper foil coupons. The
Fwet = Fγ – Fb samples were degreased with 1,1,1-
= γl-gP cosθ – ρgV (1) trichloroethane in an ultrasonic cleaner for
Wetting Balance Solderability ten minutes at 80oC, and then triple rinsed with
where F is dependent on the surface tension
Evaluations deionized water.
of the molten solder γl-g, the perimeter of the
specimen P, and the contact angle θ. The buoy- The as-received and post-cleaned copper foil
Wetting Balance Apparatus
ancy force is expressed by the density of the coupons were analyzed in a UHV surface sci-
The performance of seven VOC-free, no-clean
solder ρ, the acceleration due to gravity g, and ence analytical tool equipped X-ray photoelec-
wave soldering fluxes was evaluated using wet-
the immersion volume V. The contact angle, θ, is tron and Auger electron spectroscopy (XPS and
ting balance techniques to characterize wetting
force, wetting time, and wetting rate. Three
determined by Young’s equation:4 AES respectively). This analysis was performed
to determine the soldering quality of the raw
VOC-containing, no-clean wave soldering fluxes γs-g – γl-s
cosθ = (2) material and to ensure that the cleaning process
were also tested so that the performance of the
γ did not contaminate the coupons. The XPS uti-
VOC-free fluxes could be compared to traditional
l-g lized a double pass cylindrical mirror analyzer
solvent-based, no-clean flux systems.
where for this study, γs-g is the surface tension and a nonmonochromatized Mg Kα source. Data
Wetting balance measurements were obtained of a copper test coupon and γl-s is the interfa- was collected before and after sputtering with a
using a Multicore Universal Solderability Tester cial tension between copper and molten Sn-Pb 4 KeV Ar beam for 10 seconds to remove adven-
(M.U.S.T.). The system was modified to collect solder. In equation (1) the buoyancy force Fb and titious carbon. The sample surface was ana-
voltage output from the M.U.S.T. armature using the perimeter P can be regarded as constants lyzed as a thin layer of copper (I) oxide with an
a Rustrak Ranger II data acquisition system, if the size is uniform for all of the test coupons. underlying base of copper metal. Other surface
which allowed wetting force data to be col- Therefore, the total wetting force Fwet varies as contaminants, such as halide residues from the
lected at a higher sampling frequency (62.5 a function of Fγ. By combining equations (1) cleaning procedure, were not detected.
millisecond intervals). This feature was useful to and (2), the surface tension force can also be
expressed as: The sample preparation provided a mild clean-
accurately characterize flux performance when
ing of the copper, which removed gross carbon
wetting force changed rapidly as a function of
Fγ = P( γs-g – γl-s) (3) contamination and did not compromise the
time.
From equation (3) the surface tension force is surface chemistry of the sample. The native
Wetting balance data was collected in solder- predicted to vary as a function of the oxygen oxide was not removed prior to wetting balance
ing atmospheres that are representative of concentration within the soldering environment testing. Removal of copper oxides with aggres-
cryogenic, noncryogenic, and compressed air due to the variation of the copper surface ten- sive sample preparation methods that utilize
delivery systems. The wetting balance apparatus sion γs-g and the copper/solder interfacial ten- strong acids or etchants can affect the surface
was placed inside a glove box to evaluate flux sion γl-s. microroughness, which in turn can affect the
performance in controlled soldering atmosphere. solderability of the substrate.7 Therefore the test
As the oxygen concentration increases within
The experimental setup has been described coupon finish evaluated in this study is assumed
the soldering environment, the solid copper
2
elsewhere. A 1% oxygen in nitrogen soldering to be representative of copper substrate materi-
surface and the molten solder alloy are subject
atmosphere, typical of gas streams produced als used in printed circuit board assembly. The
to oxidation so that both γs-g and γl-g decrease.5
by noncryogenic gas generators, was obtained effect of coatings that are designed to preserve
The presence of an oxide layer on both the
by blending zero grade compressed air with copper and solder surface prevents the direct the solderability of copper substrates on solder
nitrogen to achieve the desired oxygen con- contact and interaction between copper and wetting performance was not investigated in
tent. Experiments were also conducted using a solder upon immersion of the coupon into the this study.
soldering atmosphere containing less than 10 solder, and therefore wetting is delayed and the
ppm O2, which is typical of a wave soldering interfacial surface tension, γl-s, is increased.6
atmosphere produced using cryogenic nitrogen From equation (3) it can be concluded that the
storage and delivery systems. The oxygen con- surface tension force, Fγ, generally decreases
tent of the controlled soldering atmospheres with increasing oxygen concentration of a
was measured using a Thermox TM-1A analyzer. soldering environment. From equation (1), a
Wetting balance results were also obtained in decrease in the surface tension force will result
ambient air. in a decrease in the total wetting force, Fwet.
It is important to note that discussions related
Wetting Balance Principles
to the surface tensions described by Young are
In the wetting balance test method, the cleaned
often based upon assumptions that wetting
and fluxed specimen is suspended from a sen-
parameters are in equilibrium such that the
sitive balance and immersed edgewise, at a
surface tension values are constant. However,
controlled rate and to a consistent depth, into a
wave soldering is a non-equilibrium process and
bath of molten solder at a controlled tempera-
therefore γs-g, γl-s, and γl-g are changing as the
ture. The specimen is subjected to time-variant
substrate, solder, flux, and atmosphere interact
vertical forces of the downward surface tension
with respect to time and temperature.7
Test Procedure Figure 1a
The copper coupons were fluxed by uniformly
dipping the coupon into the liquid flux. Several Wetting Balance Curve for Flux A-f Processed in a Nitrogen Soldering Atmosphere
other fluxing methods were evaluated, including
dipping followed by decanting excess flux, dip-
ping followed by blotting excess flux using an
adsorbent material, and application of the flux
by spraying the coupons. Each of these methods
proved to yield inconsistent results as deter-
mined by wetting balance analysis. Although flux
application by dipping may have resulted in a
liberal flux coating on the coupon, it proved to be
the most reproducible method. After fluxing, the
coupon was positioned vertically in the sample
armature thirty seconds prior to immersion into
the solder pot. The solder used for the experi-
ments was a 60/40 tin-lead near eutectic alloy
at a temperature of 235oC. The solder pot was
skimmed fifteen seconds prior to each trial to
remove solder dross and expose a pristine alloy
surface. The foil samples were immersed in the
Figure 1b
solder pot to a depth of 5.0 mm at an immersion
rate of 20 mm/sec. Data was collected over an
Wetting Balance Curve for Flux A-f Processed in a 1% Oxygen in Nitrogen
immersion time of 10 seconds. Twenty coupons
Soldering Atmosphere
per condition were tested to acquire statistically
relevant data.
The average wetting curves of the ten fluxes Wetting Balance Curves for All Fluxes Tested in an Air Soldering Atmosphere
in each atmosphere were combined to obtain
a comparison of general flux performance as
a function of soldering atmosphere purity. The
results, illustrated in Figure 9, show that as the
oxygen concentration decreases from 21% O2
to less than 10 ppm O2 , the wetting force at
two seconds as a percentage of the theoretical
force increases by 49%, the wetting time at 2/3
Fmax decreases by 25% and the wetting rate at
2
/3 Fmax increases by 100%.
These results indicate that soldering perfor-
Figure 9
mance achieved with no-clean fluxes is depen-
dent on the oxygen content within the process Wetting Balance Results
atmosphere, and that the soldering parameters Wetting Force at 2 Seconds as a Percentage of the Theoretical Wetting Force
of force, time, and rate maximize when no-clean
wave soldering is performed in an inert environ-
ment.
Production Evaluations
Test Procedure for Wave Soldering
Production trials evaluated the performance
of the ten fluxes in cryogenic nitrogen, 1% O2,
and air soldering atmospheres. The production
testing consisted of two separate evaluations. In
each evaluation, flux is uniformly sprayed onto
the bottom side of the printed circuit boards,
wave soldered, and visually inspected for the
Wetting Rate at 2/3 Fmax
following defects: bridging, icicles, solder balls,
topside wetting, solder joint appearance, and
amount of residue. In each trial the run order
and choice of flux was randomized. The two
evaluations differed in the wave soldering
machines selected for use and in the printed
circuit board used as a test vehicle.
Figure 20
tell me more
www.airproducts.com/electronics_assembly