Decision of Appellate Committee 28 & 29 June 2021

Decision of Appellate Committee regarding Unfair means Cases framed at Examination Centre(s) /Table Marking Centre(s) for Jan.
-March 2021
Exam
The Appellate Committee has heard the appeals of the UMC candidates in person on 28.06.2021 & 29.06.2021 After giving due opportunity,
following decisions have been taken:
Sr. Name Rollno Inst Instname Brief History of the Case Decision of Appellate Committee
No. code
14 MANISH KUMAR S/o 190010700067 1 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
MANOJ KUMAR POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. The Mobile phone writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, AMBALA from him Google browser was Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
CITY him opened recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (28). After hearing the candidate and
the hand of the candidate. giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
(Mobile phone attached) Committee has decided as below :
Taking cognizance of the fact that in COVID times students
rely on mobiles for online studies, the committee recommends that
forfeited mobile may be returned to the student as one-time measure
but the remaining punishment as per the decision of Unfair Means
Committee may be upheld i.e. cancellation of full performance in
current examination. Accordingly, the candidate is advised to collect
his mobile from office of HSBTE on any working day.
17 SOURABH KUMAR S/o 161270700107 127 E-MAX The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
RAM PAL POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
COLLEGE, printed slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
VILL. GOLA, 3.5*12.5cm was recovered under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
PO BHADAULI, near his seat of the candidate. cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
DISTT. decided as below :
AMBALA. The printed slip does not relate to the concerned subject. Hence
the answersheet may be got evaluated.
-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-
Dr. Sultan Singh, COAF, Anil Budhiraja, Principal, Pardeep Hooda, Principal, Vindu Anand, Principal, T.K. Tayal,
(Officiating Additional SJPP Damla SRM Bhurewala Ambala KCGPW Ambala Controller of Exam,
Secretary), HSBTE, Panchkula
HSBTE, Panchkula
20 ARYAN S/o 190011000012 1 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
NARINDER KUMAR POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, AMBALA hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
CITY 9*10.5cm was recovered from under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
the answer book of the cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
candidate. decided to upheld the decision of Unfair Means Committee.
21 ANSH S/o KAMAL 190010900009 1 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
KUMAR POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. Two both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, AMBALA hand written slips of size Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
CITY 7.5*10.5cm were recovered under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
from the shoes of the cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
22 MOHIT CHAUHAN S/o 190011000031 1 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
KRISHAN KUMAR POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, AMBALA hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
CITY 7*9.5cm was recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
the answer book of the giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
candidate. Committee has decided to upheld the punishment i.e. cancellation of
full performance in current examination.
101 SULINDER KUMAR S/o 180330900033 33 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
AVTAR SINGH POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. Two both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, CHIKA printed photocopied slips of Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
(KAITHAL) size 9*7, 9*15cm were under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
recovered from the table of cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
the candidate. decided to upheld the decision of Unfair Means Committee.
102 TEVINDER SHARMA 190330900019 33 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
S/o MEGRAJ POLYTECHNIC Supdt. Two both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, CHIKA photocopied slips of size Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
(KAITHAL) 13*16.5, 10*15cm were under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due

HSBTE, Panchkula
recovered from the shocks of cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
106 AJAY KUMAR S/o 170530718001 53 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
SUBE SINGH POLYTECHNIC Principal, Dr. Ram Rakesh. writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
NARWANA, Three both sided printed slips Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
JIND of size 5.5*12.5 & 7*14.5cm under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
were recovered from the cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
pockets of the candidate. decided to upheld the decision of Unfair Means Committee.
107 LAKSHAY S/o SATISH 180531700022 53 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
KUMAR POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
NARWANA, printed photocopied slip of Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
JIND size 10*6.5cm was recovered under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
from the hand of the cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
108 SHABIR S/o LAL 180531700040 53 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
SINGH POLYTECHNIC Supdt. One both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
NARWANA, photocopied slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
JIND 15*13cm was recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
Committee has decided to upheld the punishment i.e. cancellation of
full performance in current examination
116 NARESH KUMAR S/o 193012100012 301 RS Memorial The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
OM PARKASH College of Supdt. One both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Pharmacy, photocopied slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
11*12.5cm was recovered under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
from the desk of the cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
121 JAIRAJ S/o RAJ 191642700006 164 Govt. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
SINGH Polytechnic Flying Squrad. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
HSBTE, Panchkula
Jattal,Panipat sided hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
5*9cm was recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
near his seat of the candidate. giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
Committee has decided that only concerned paper of the candidate
may be cancelled and result of other subjects may be declared.
122 RAJESH S/o 191642700018 164 Govt. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
NARENDER Polytechnic Flying Squrad. One single writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Jattal,Panipat sided printed photocopied slip Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
of size 11*8cm was recovered examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
from the pockets of the giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
127 YASHASWI RAWAT 172301700521 230 Delhi Institute The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
S/o GOKUL CHAND of Technology Flying Squrad. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
& sided printed slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
Management, 150*100mm was recovered examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
from near his seat of the giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
candidate. Committee has decided that only concerned paper of the candidate
128 SATISH KUMAR RAY 172301718504 230 Delhi Institute The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
S/o DINANATH RAY of Technology Flying Squrad. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
& sided printed photocopied slip Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
Management, of size 9*13cm was recovered examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
from the answer book of the giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate

HSBTE, Panchkula
129 NAVEEN KUMAR S/o 11040090006 40 JANTA The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
DARSHAN NEHRA POLYTECHNIC Supdt. One both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, BUTANA book page of size 21*13.5cm Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
was recovered from the desk under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
of the candidate. cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
decided to upheld the decision of Unfair Means Committee.
140 VISHWJEET KUMAR 181930919505 193 International The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
SINGH S/o Institute of Flying Squrad. Three both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
SRINARAYAN SINGH Tech., & sided printed slips of size Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
Management 9*16, 15.5*15.5cm were under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
recovered from the pockets of cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
141 AMAN KUMAR S/o 181930900503 193 International The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
SHREE SANTOSH Institute of Flying Squrad. Three both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
PRASAD Tech., & sided hand written Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
Management photocopied slips of size under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
7*11cm were recovered from cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
the pockets of the candidate. decided to upheld the decision of Unfair Means Committee.
142 SACHIN S/o 180134119013 13 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
SATNARAYAN POLYTECHNIC Flying Squrad XV. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, SONEPAT sided hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
9.5*7.5cm was recovered examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
from the pockets of the giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate

HSBTE, Panchkula
149 KAPIL S/o RAJESH 190130900021 13 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
KUMAR POLYTECHNIC Flying Squrad XV. Two both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, SONEPAT sided printed photocopied Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
slips of size 18*13cm were examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
recovered from the shoes of giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
the candidate. Committee has decided to upheld the punishment i.e. cancellation of
162 SACHIN S/o SUNDER 182021719021 202 South Point The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
LAL School of Supdt. One both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Polytechnic, photocopied slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
Sector-20, 10*12cm was recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
168 NAVEEN S/o 190190900017 19 HINDU The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
RANDHIR INSTITUTE OF Supdt. One both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
TECHNOLOGY slip of size 6.5*13.5cm was Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
INDUSTRIAL recovered from the hand of examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
AREA, the candidate. giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
SONEPAT Committee has decided that only concerned paper of the candidate
178 SACHIN KUMAR 180180900026 18 VAISH The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
MEENA S/o VISHRAM TECHNICAL Flying Squrad VI. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
MEENA INSTITUTE, sided printed slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
ROHTAK 9*11.5cm was recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
the answer book of the giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate

HSBTE, Panchkula
183 HANS RAJ S/o RAM 170780500008 78 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
CHANDER POLYTECHNIC Supdt. One both sided hand writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
SAMPLA written photocopied slip of Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
(ROHTAK) size 14.5*11cm was examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
recovered from the pockets of giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
185 VIPIN S/o HARINDER 180781700057 78 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
POLYTECHNIC Supdt. One both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
SAMPLA slip of size 10*16cm was Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
(ROHTAK) recovered from the answer examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
book of the candidate. giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
188 MD. NASRSUDIN 160630700017 63 SHRI BALAJI The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
ANSARI S/o MD. INSTT OF Supdt. Two both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
JAKIR HUSEN ANSARI ENGG. & photocopied slips of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
TECH. 8*11cm were recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
the table of the candidate. giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
191 RAHUL S/o SHYAM 180170919013 17 CHHOTTU The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
LAL RAM Supdt. Candidate was found writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
POLYTECHNIC with one electronic device in Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
, ROHTAK candidate’s ear and also found examination under rule 9.7 (28). After hearing the candidate and
that he is receiving giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
information for outside was Committee has decided to upheld the decision of Unfair Means
recovered from the clothes of Committee.
the candidate.

HSBTE, Panchkula
198 DEEPAK S/o JASBIR 180260900039 26 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
POLYTECHNIC Flying Squrad. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, SANGHI sided hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
(ROHTAK) 3*2.5cm was recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
the desk of the candidate. giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
208 GAGAN SHARMA S/o 180041700028 4 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
NARESH KUMAR POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, HISAR hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
11.5*11cm was recovered examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
from the clothes of the giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
217 AAYUSH S/o BANSI 190042600002 4 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
LAL POLYTECHNIC Dy. Supdt. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, HISAR hand written photocopied slip Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
of size 8*6cm was recovered under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
from the hand of the cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
234 RITESH S/o MANOJ 190111720009 11 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
KUMAR POLYTECHNIC Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, SIRSA hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
8*17cm was recovered from under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
the answer book of the cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has

HSBTE, Panchkula
259 DEEPANSHU S/o 180051700035 5 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
SUBEDAR SINGH POLYTECHNIC Flying Squrad 17. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, JHAJJAR sided printed photocopied slip Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
of size 7*9cm was recovered under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
from the answer book of the cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
260 DEEPAK S/o 180051700031 5 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
CHARANJEET POLYTECHNIC Flying Squrad 17. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, JHAJJAR sided hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
8.5*15cm was recovered from under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
the pockets of the candidate. cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
279 VISHWAJEET KUMAR 180670919016 67 RCM The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
S/o SHYAM BABU RAY POLYTECHNIC Supdt. One both sided printed writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
M.P. MAJRA, photocopied slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
BERI, JHAJJAR 28*20cm was recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
291 VIKASH BHARDWAJ 192031700536 203 BM Group of The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
S/o RAJESH ARYA Institution, Vill Supdt. The Mobile was in writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Hari Nagar candidate recovered from the Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
(Dumha), hand of the candidate. examination under rule 9.7 (28). After hearing the candidate and
Farukhnagar, (Mobile phone attached) giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
Gurgaon Committee has decided as below :
As per examination rule 9.7(28) device used for cheating is
forfeited. However taking cognizance of the fact that in COVID
times students rely on mobiles for online studies, the committee
recommends that forfeited mobile may be returned to the student as
one-time measure but the remaining punishment as per the decision
HSBTE, Panchkula
of Unfair Means Committee may be upheld. Accordingly, the
candidate is advised to collect his mobile from office of HSBTE on
any working day.
318 SHAILESHA PATWARI 180030800105 3 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
S/o SUNILKUMAR POLYTECHNIC Flying Squrad. The candidate writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
PATWARI FOR WOMEN, caught copying from mobile Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
FARIDABAD phone hidden under answer examination under rule 9.7 (28). After hearing the candidate and
sheet. (Photocopy attached & giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
mobile phone not attached) Committee has decided as below :
Since the mobile has not been forfeited at the time of UMC as
required under the Rule 9.7 (28) of Examination Regulation, no case
of unfair means can be established by the Committee and hence her
result may be declared in all subjects.
338 SACHIN S/o 191821720014 182 Pt. L.R. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
RAMKISHAN College of Supdt. One both sided hand writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Technology written/printed photocopied Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
Technical slip of size 15*10cm was examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
recovered from the answer giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
book of the candidate. Committee has decided that only concerned paper of the candidate
394 ARBAJ KHAN S/o 190140700005 14 GOVT. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
MOHAMMAD AJIJ POLYTECHNIC Flying Squrad XIII. One both writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, UTTAWAR sided hand written slip of size Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
(MEWAT) 6*11cm was recovered from examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
the table of the candidate. giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate

HSBTE, Panchkula
397 SEHBAZ S/o ISLAM 182490800052 249 Govt. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
Polytechnic Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Malab, Nuh, printed photocopied slip of Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
Mewat size 20.5*10cm was examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
recovered from the desk of giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
the candidate. Committee has decided that only concerned paper of the candidate
398 MOHD KAIF S/o 182490800031 249 Govt. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
AFJAL KHAN Polytechnic Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Malab, Nuh, printed photocopied slip of Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
Mewat size 20.5*9.5cm was examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
the candidate. Committee has decided that only concerned paper of the candidate
399 RASHID HUSSAIN 182490800047 249 Govt. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
S/o JAMEEL AHMED Polytechnic Invigilator. One both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Malab, Nuh, printed book page "AG Sure Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
Mewat Success Series" of size under rule 9.7 (8). After hearing the candidate and giving due
20*13cm was recovered from cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
the desk of the candidate. decided to upheld the decision of Unfair Means Committee.
400 JAVED ALI S/o 192490800008 249 Govt. The case was detected by the The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
RASHEED Polytechnic Invigilator. Two both sided writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
Malab, Nuh, printed photocopied slips of Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
Mewat size 21*10.5cm were examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and

HSBTE, Panchkula
TMC- RAVI PAL S/o 12117170054 117 PRABHU Writing Mobile No. on Page The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
02 MOHINDER SINGH DAYAL No. 06 writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
POLYTECHNIC Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
under rule 9.7 (1). After hearing the candidate and giving due
cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate Committee has
TMC- CHANDAN 180770719008 77 GOVT. Writing Mobile No. on Page The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
04 KUSHWAHA S/o POLYTECHNIC No. 10 writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
SATYADEVPRASAD MEHAM Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
(ROHTAK) under rule 9.7 (1). After hearing the candidate and giving due
TMC- AMAN S/o BIRENDER 180770700004 77 GOVT. Writing Change Handwritting The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
05 POLYTECHNIC on Page No. 07 onwards writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
MEHAM Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance and he is debarred
(ROHTAK) from appearing in State Board Exams for the next one Board Exam
under rule 9.7 (18). The Committee has decided to impose
punishment of cancellation of full performance only.
TMC- GOLU KUMAR S/o 180170819005 17 CHHOTTU Found stapled currency on The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
19 SHIVNATH SAH RAM Page No. 08, amounting Rs. writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
POLYTECHNIC 200/- with Sr. No. 129763 Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance and he is debarred
, ROHTAK from appearing in the next one Board Exam under rule 9.7 (21). The
Committee has decided to impose punishment of cancellation of full
performance only.
TMC- HITESH KUMAR S/o 150300900018 30 GOVT. Writing Mobile No. on Page The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
21 SATPAL SINGH POLYTECHNIC No. 10 writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, LISANA Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
(REWARI) under rule 9.7 (1). After hearing the candidate and giving due

HSBTE, Panchkula
TMC- NITISH KUMAR S/o 181541719026 154 Krishna Handwritting change on The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
20, 24 SURENDER Polytechnic, different pages writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
to 28 VPO Jhal, Committee i.e. cancellation of full performance in current
Tehsil Kosli, examination under rule 9.7 (7). After hearing the candidate and
Distt. Rewari giving due cognizance to the evidence on record, the Appellate
Committee has decided as below :
Six UMC Cases in 6 Subject IDs have been reported by
different subject experts at TMC. Although change of hand writing
could not be established, it is certain that in all six answersheets
initially for 3-5 pages, questions were left blank or with wrong
answers in small handwriting but afterwards suddenly in all
answersheets there are correct answers in big handwriting with lot of
spaces left between the words as if written hurriedly from some
material with the help of some outside assistance or dictated by
someone, may be through Bluetooth device. Similar pattern in all six
answersheets observed by different subject experts at TMC, cannot
be a coincidence. Hence, it can be concluded that unfair means have
been used by candidate.
Moreover, student has in his own writing stated on 03.04.2021
before the UMC Committee that he would not repeat the same
mistake again and requested for forgiveness.
In view of above, his current performance in all papers be
cancelled under Clause 31 of Rule 9.7 of Examination Regulation of
HSBTE.

HSBTE, Panchkula
TMC- KARAMVIR S/o 170071700074 7 GOVT. Due to request on Page No. The candidate was given due opportunity to defend his case in
31 DHARAMBIR POLYTECHNIC 04 & 21 writing as well as verbal against the decision of Unfair Means
, MANESAR Committee i.e. cancellation of concerned paper of the candidate
under rule 9.7 (1). After hearing the candidate and giving due

HSBTE, Panchkula

Decision of Appellate Committee 28 & 29 June 2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Decision of Appellate Committee 28 & 29 June 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Decision of Appellate Committee regarding Unfair means Cases framed at Examination Centre(s) /Table Marking Centre(s) for Jan.

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

-Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd- -Sd-

You might also like