This passage discusses and compares two allegorical works: John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress and Margaret Cavendish's religious allegories. It argues that while Bunyan's allegory presents mental integrity as a means to a higher religious end like salvation, Cavendish's allegories associate transcendent atonement with reflexive self-ordering and present mental order as an end in itself. The passage also notes that in Cavendish's political allegories, social order is used allegorically to resolve mental problems, rather than the other way around as one might expect. It provides the example of "Fancy's Monarchy" where writing poetry figures as bringing about good government and a good mental state.
This passage discusses and compares two allegorical works: John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress and Margaret Cavendish's religious allegories. It argues that while Bunyan's allegory presents mental integrity as a means to a higher religious end like salvation, Cavendish's allegories associate transcendent atonement with reflexive self-ordering and present mental order as an end in itself. The passage also notes that in Cavendish's political allegories, social order is used allegorically to resolve mental problems, rather than the other way around as one might expect. It provides the example of "Fancy's Monarchy" where writing poetry figures as bringing about good government and a good mental state.
This passage discusses and compares two allegorical works: John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress and Margaret Cavendish's religious allegories. It argues that while Bunyan's allegory presents mental integrity as a means to a higher religious end like salvation, Cavendish's allegories associate transcendent atonement with reflexive self-ordering and present mental order as an end in itself. The passage also notes that in Cavendish's political allegories, social order is used allegorically to resolve mental problems, rather than the other way around as one might expect. It provides the example of "Fancy's Monarchy" where writing poetry figures as bringing about good government and a good mental state.
rather than in an unknowable afterlife. In representing mental order as teleologically
paramount, the allegory secularises transcendent religious and personal virtue as psychological well-being, reversing the more common allegorical presentation of mental integrity as a means to a social or religious end. In obvious contrast, Pilgrim's Progress suggests mental integrity is not an end in itself, but a means to a higher religious end. Could Christian's acceptance into heaven function as a metaphor for a mental state? Could Bunyan's allegory be interpreted as a fable about psychological well-being? The narrative is certainly slippery and especially marked by the ambiguity characteristic of allegory in general. The events it represents are ambivalently psychological events, simulacra of actual events, and 'dark' shadowings of a transcendent truth that cannot be perfectly known. Christian's salvation, however, is not simply analogous to his psychological state, but contingent on it. He must master his inner fears in order to cross through the River of Death to the Celestial City. Failure to maintain faith would not result simply in mental anguish but damnation. Narrative closure is achieved not simply with the reaffirmation of faith, but with Christian's arrival and acceptance by God and the Saints. lO Thus, Bunyan's allegory is largely blind to the self-reflexive sense in which Christian's uncertainty, together with sectarian politics, requisition transcendence. B unyan does not emphasise the possibility that the effect of transcendence his allegory seeks to produce may stem from a self-fulfilling psychic and political desire. He presents transcendent atonement as a solution for the problem of mental struggle without suggesting that such atonement may be merely imaginary, taking place as an effect of mental resolution. Cavendish's religious allegories. on the other hand, repeatedly associate transcendent atonement with reflexive self-ordering. In Cavendish, moreover, mental order is fictive, depending upon the mind's acceptance of ideas toward which the narrative exhibits scepticism. There is a disjunction between the narrated and the narrating mind, which have opposed attitudes toward transcendent ideals. The narrated mind 'believes' these ideas and thus attains resolution. The narrating mind promotes these ideals merely as a means of bringing about resolution. The importance of mental order is evident in Cavendish's political allegories as well as her religious ones. Like her religious allegories, her political allegories make contradictory use of ordering ideals. In these, the purpose of achieving mental order is not necessarily to resolve the social problems they seem to be concerned with. Instead, social order is achieved allegorically as a way of resolving mental problems. In 'Fancy's Monarchy in the Land of Poetry', for example, mental faculties are allegorised as state officials and the five senses are military commanders patrolling the borders. 11 Good government makes for a good mental state, rather than vice versa. Here order is achieved through, and figured as, the discipline of writing poetry. While the ideals advanced in the mind's poetry are persuasive enough to regulate the mind, they are not asserted for their own sake by the writing mind of Cavendish, but are shown to serve the purpose of achieving mental order. Similarly, in 'Of the Indispositions of the Mind', a sick mind seeks help from divines and moral philosophers who disagree about the nature of the mind's disease and about the appropriate cure. 12 The wrangling of these doctors and theologians exacerbates the mind's indisposition to the point of refiguring it. The mind's disease