SCENARIOS FOR CHANNELING RUNOFF TO THE OUTLET POINT
DESC
1
1 CREATE A DIRECT ROUTE FOR THE RUNOFF EITHER
AS AN EARTHEN CHANNEL OR A ROAD.
2 DEVELOP OAK CLIFFS/SHANNON ROSE TO
TRANSPORT 190 CFS
3 SPLIT OUTLET BETWEEN OAK CLIFFS/SHANNON
ROSE AND KINGMAN CROSS BLVD.
POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS
GETTING RUNOFF ON THE SOUTH
A SIDE OF AIRWAY ACROSS TO THE
NORTH. THERE IS EXISTING WATER IN
AIRWAY.
RUNOFF IS GOING TO NEED TO BE
TURNED WEST HERE IN ANY
B SCENARIO. MAY REQUIRE LOSS OF A
LOT, BUT THEY ARE BIG LOTS AND
COULD POSSIBLY JUST BE
REDUCED.
2 TO BE CONFIRMING THE MAXIMUM
POTENTIAL CULVERT CROSSING IF
C CULVERT IS USED FOR RUNOFF
ALONG KINGMAN CROSSING.
IF 190 CFS IS RUN DOWN OAK CLIFFS
D THERE WILL BE AN AREA REQUIRED
TO GET IT TO TURN NORTH ACROSS
AIRWAY.
PROS CONS QUESTIONS
CHANNEL COULD BE CONSTRUCTED NO SO THAT AN INTERIM SOLUTION FOR
THE FLOOD ZONE WILL ALSO BE THE ULTIMATE SOLUTION SO
SOLUTION WOULD REQUIRE A REVISED CAN THE RIGHT OF WAY BE INCREASED TO IMPROVE THE CROSS SECTION? HOW
PRELIMINARY PLAN. WILL RUNOFF TURN WEST AND THEN TURN NORTH TO CROSS AIRWAY AVE?
RE-CONSTRUCTION IN THE FUTURE COULD BE MINIMIZED.
POTENTIALLY KEEPS IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. USES
PROPOSED ROADS AND LAYOUT - NO PRELIM PLAN REVISIONS REQUIRED.
DUE TO OAK CLIFFS SLOPE, TYPE A CURB
WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR THE LENGTH.
DUE TO OAK CLIFFS SLOPE, TYPE A CURB WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR THE
LENGTH.
NO LAYOUT REVISION REQUIRED. POTENTIAL EXISTS TO ROUTE THE RUNOFF
WHAT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR RUNOFF CROSSING WITHIN KINGMAN CROSSING
IN THIS MANNER WITH TEMPORARY MEASURES (DITCHES, BERMS) UNTIL
FINAL CONSTRUCTION. POTENTIAL TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF IN INTERIOR ROADS,
ADDITIONAL COST FOR CHANNEL IN
AIRWAY R-O-W.
BLVD (C)? HOW WILL RUNOFF TURN WEST AND THEN TURN NORTH TO CROSS
AIRWAY AVE? WILL C.O.K. ALLOW A CONCRETE CHANNEL ALONG AIRWAY?
AVOIDING VERTICAL CURVES OR WIDENED PAVING SECTIONS.
AIRWAY: COULD CARRY UP 300 CFS WITH A CHANNEL
(CONCRETE) 2’ DEEP AND APPROX. 12.5’ WIDE ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. COMMENTARY
ANY OF THE SOLUTIONS
A PROPOSED ARE GOING TO RELY
1 ON HOW WE'RE GETTING RUNOFF
D B NORTH ACROSS AIRWAY TO THE
EXISTING DRAINAGE PARCEL.
2 THERE WILL FOR SURE BE SOME
SORT OF CHANNEL ALONG THE
SOUTH SIDE OF AIRWAY IN THE
16+ FT BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK
AND THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY.
IT'S LOGICAL FOR THE NEXT STEP
3 RUNOFF WE WILL BE ABLE TO
CHANNEL ALONG AIRWAY AND GET
2 UNDER THE ROAD TO THE
DRAINAGE PARCEL. THEN
EVALUATE THE OPTIONS FOR THE
SURFACE RUNOFF.
1 C
PARCEL C: INPUT 1-24"(Q100=27.77),
PLAINS AVE: CANNOT 1-15"(Q100=12.61), 4-36"(Q100=354) PIPES TOTAL =
PARCEL G: OUTLET OF LINES OUTLET PARCEL C 394 CFS IN.
AA (2-36" ADS Q100=50.13) AND BECAUSE IT FLOWS EAST
B (1-30" ADS Q100=18.18 CFS). (ABOUT 4’ ELEV. DROP) TO BE METERED TO 190 CFS OUT WITH 7.5 Ac*FT
TOTAL Q100=68 CFS.
STORAGE. A TOP OF 3500 WILL BE ABOUT 4'
INV=3502.10 (NOT ASBUILT).
ABOVE THE STREET - THE OUTLET OF THE CMPS
FROM HMMC SHOULD BE ABOUT 3501.5. IT WILL
DIFFICULT WITH THESE ELEVATIONS TO GET
MORE RETENTION BY BACKING UP INTO THE
HMMC BASINS. THE BASIN AT 6 FT DEEP WILL
PROVIDE ADEQUATE RETENTION FOR THE
SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS PLUS REDUCING
THE OUTFLOW.