Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Territory: Jamaica
Unit Assessed: 1
Methodology……………………………………………………………...3
Bibliography…………………………………………………………….18
Statement of Purpose of Investigation
Horton developed a quantitative method of analyzing drainage basins of which Strahler
downstream of the confluence of two first order streams join a second order is formed (Strahler,
1952). Subsequently if two second order streams form a confluence then a third order stream
develops. The ensuing investigation uses this method in comparing the Rio Minho and Black
River drainage basins. Therefore, the main purpose of this investigation is to characterize and
analyze the hydrological behaviour of the Rio Minho and Black River drainage basins, using
Table 1 shows the three categories of drainage basin morphometric parameters that will be
These objectives were created to ensure that the main aim of the research is achieved:
To utilize topographic maps as analytical tools for investigating the Rio Minho and the
1
To calculate relief linear and areal morphometric parameters to characterize, compare and
To investigate the relationship between stream order and key aspects of the hydrological
basin being investigated (inclusive of the stream number, mean basin area and
2
METHODOLOGY
The primary purpose of this investigation is to compare the hydrological behaviour of the
Black River drainage basin in St. Elizabeth and the Rio Minho drainage basin in Clarendon,
Jamaica using Strahler’s stream ordering method. The morphometric parameters measured and
calculated are categorized into linear, relief and areal. The calculations and measurements
described in the proceeding segment was done for both drainage basins. The linear parameters
are the first to be explained. These include: stream length, basin perimeter, basin length, stream
Stream length (L ) was determined by using the string method of measurement. The string
u
was affixed to the length of a stream. Each stream in the drainage basin was measured and placed
against the scale of the map and converted into ground distance. Upon completion the total
stream length of each basin was found. Each stream in the drainage basin was measured and
placed against the scale of the map and converted. Figure 1 shows this process.
Source: Shaneil Facey (2021)
Following this, the length of each basin (L ) was determined by measuring the maximum length
b
of the basin parallel to the major stream with a string. A piece of string was stretched parallel 3
to the longest stream across the drainage basin. This length was marked on the string and then
placed against the scale of the map and converted into ground distance. Figure 2 illustrates this.
The basin perimeter (P) was also measured via the use of a string. The string was used to encircle
the boundary of the drainage basin. The length was marked off and then placed against the scale
of the map and converted into ground distance. Figure 2 below shows this parameter.
the use of Strahler’s stream order classification method. This classification method designated all
initial tributaries to be first order streams. Second order streams were formed at the intersection
of two first order streams. Third order streams were formed at the junction of two second order
streams. The stream order increased by one when two streams of the same order met. Where
streams of two different orders meet the stream takes on the classification of the higher stream
4
Figure 3: Strahler’s Stream Ordering
specific stream order by the total number of streams in the next higher order. Figure 4 is a
was measured by subtracting the minimum elevation (the mouth) from the maximum elevation
Calculation
distance along the longest dimension of the basin parallel to the principal drainage line as seen in
R = H/L
h b
Where:
H is the maximum basin relief,
L is the maximum basin length.
b
The ruggedness number (R ) was then determined by multiplying the basin relief or height by the
n
drainage density (discussed below under aerial parameters), as shown by the formula:
R = R× Dd
n
Where:
R is the basin relief,
Dd is the drainage density.
The areal parameters were then calculated and measured. To measure the area of the basin, a
map of the basin was overlain on a grid. The squares were counted, each of which represented
the given area. The total number of squares completely covered by the traced outline were
counted. Where the outline went partially through a square it was counted as either a half, a
quarter or three quarters of the square and tallied to arrive at the number of full squares. The
number of squares was then multiplied by the conversion factor of the scale. Figure 6 gives an
The drainage density (Dd) was calculated by dividing the sum of all the total stream lengths of
each drainage basin by the basin’s area, as seen in the formula below. It was then written as the
total length of streams of all orders (km) per drainage area (km). Figure 7 gives two examples.
Dd= ∑Lu/A
Where:
L is the total length of the major stream,
u
(Horton, 1945), as seen in the formula below. This was calculated by dividing the sum of all the
F = ∑N /A
s u
Where:
N is the total number of stream segments,
u
From calculating the drainage density and stream frequency, the drainage texture (T) was
calculated, by multiplying the drainage density by the stream frequency. This formula is shown
T = Dd × F s
Where:
Dd is the drainage density,
F is the stream frequency.
s
which was squared. From this the circulatory ratio and the elongation ratio was determined.
To calculate the circularity ratio (R ) the drainage basin area was multiplied by four pi. The
c
product of this multiplication was then divided by the square of the basin perimeter, as shown in
R = 4π A/ P
c
2
Where:
A is the basin area,
P is the basin perimeter squared.
2
8
basin. Basin shape (R ), was also calculated by dividing the area of the basin by the length of the
f
basin squared.
R = A/ L f b
2
Where:
A is the basin area,
L is the basin length squared.
b
2
depicted in the formula below, this parameter was calculated by finding a half of the drainage
L = 1/2 Dd
g
Where:
Dd is the drainage density.
Subsequent to the calculation of all morphometric parameters graphs illustrating the relationship
between stream order, cumulative average stream length, stream number and mean basin area
will be plotted for both drainage basins. These graphs will be analysed and compared. All the
10
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF DATA
The Rio Minho is a dendritic drainage basin of predominantly permeable rock. The Rio
Minho has 40 seasonal streams. This drainage basin is larger than the Black River basin as seen
in figure 10 below. This fourth order river flows in a southeasterly direction. It has three water
management units; Rio Minho, Milk River and Gut Alligator Hole. Their respective
measurements are 796.8 km , 852.8 km and 164.4 km . As a result, the total area of the drainage
2 2 2
basin is calculated to be 1814.0 km . The highest point of the Rio Minho basin measured 848 km.
2
The Rio Minho also has a perimeter of 1780 km with a basin length of 99 km, while the Black
Figure 10: Map of the Black River and Rio Minho Drainage Basins
However, the Black River is a trellis drainage basin which flows in a southwesterly
direction. This drainage basin has 22 seasonal streams. The total area of the drainage basin is
calculated to be 1311.4 km . The highest point of the Black River basin measured 811 km. The
2
Black River drainage basin, unlike the Rio Minho drainage basin, is a second order stream. This
basin has a swamp near its mouth indicating poor drainage. The values for each morphometric
Average Stream Length 0.7(with seasonal streams) 1.242 (with seasonal streams)
1.01(with seasonal streams) 2.543 (with seasonal streams)
through an area of limestone, shale conglomerates and tufts. The river then flows in a southeast
direction through a small area of yellow limestone formation into white limestone formation.
From there it travels southerly where its lower course flows through an area of alluvium in the
interior valley deposits. Moreover, as shown in figure 11, the Black River begins in an area of
yellow limestone formation and its middle course travels in a southwest direction across two
The lower course of the river then flows through an area of alluvium and mangrove in the
Figure 11: Geology of the Black River and Rio Minho Drainage Basins
The first morphometric parameter to be analyzed are the linear aspects. Bifurcation ratio,
is used with stream frequency and drainage texture to assess the possibility of flooding in the
drainage basin. The higher the second number in the ratio, the lower the risk of flooding in the
basin. There is a ratio of 1:4.34 in the Black River drainage basin and a ratio of 1:4.11 in the Rio
Minho drainage basin. This indicates that the Rio Minho basin is less susceptible to flooding than
By calculating the areal parameter, drainage density, it could be concluded that the Black
River drainage basin, 0.041km/km , has a higher chance of flooding than the Rio Minho drainage
2
basin, 0.51kkm/km . The drainage density is directly proportional to the stream frequency. The
2
stream frequency is dependent on the drainage texture and the basin rock type. The drainage
13
Based on the calculations the Rio Minho basin,0.068, has a higher infiltration capacity than the
Black River basin, 0.0623. It is also influenced by natural factors; climate, rainfall, vegetation
A basin shape of less than 0.5 highlights that the drainage basin is elongated. An
elongated basin has a high infiltration capacity and a low surface runoff. The Black River
drainage basin has a basin shape of 0.182 while the Rio Minho has a basin shape of 0.185. This
is a clear indication that both basins are elongated. It is highlighted by the difference in numbers
that the Rio Minho drainage basin has a higher infiltration capacity as well as a lower surface
runoff than the Black River drainage basin. This parameter is influenced by the land cover,
Lastly, the length of overland flow indicates the lag time of the water flowing into the
basin when it rains. The shorter the length of overland flow the quicker the surface runoff. The
Rio Minho basin has a length of overland flow of 39.92 km whereas the Black River basin has a
length of 48.78 km. The results obtained through calculation shows that the Rio Minho basin has
a quicker surface runoff than the Black River basin. This is likely the reason for the Black River
drainage basin having a swamp. It shows a sign of poor drainage, as the water takes a longer time
to reach the stream most of it is lost through infiltration. Therefore, creating an area of swamp.
The last morphometric parameters to be calculated are the relief aspects. The relief ratio
is significant because it indicates the overall steepness of the drainage basin, while the
ruggedness number analysis is used to indicate the steepness and the slope for the drainage
network. The Rio Minho has a relief ratio of 1:116.75 and a ruggedness number of 0.043
whereas the Black River has a relief ratio of 1:104.78 and a ruggedness number of 0.033. A high
value for the relief ratio is associated with steep slope and high relief whereas a low value 14
of relief ratio is associated with gentle slope and low relief. From the figures given above it can
be concluded that the Rio Minho drainage basin has a steep slope and a high relief. The Black
order streams and decreases as the gradient stream order increases. As shown in graph 1 and
graph 2 their overall patterns of both drainage basins support Horton’s Law of stream order.
From observation of a topographic map of Jamaica, the source of the rivers commences on a
high elevation with a steep gradient while the lower course is located on a low, gentle slope. A
high gradient results in high velocity and increased energy in the river. 15
there exists a geometric relationship between the average length of streams of a given order and
the corresponding order. The cumulative average length of the streams should increase as the
order increases; however, as shown in graph 3 and graph 4 the overall patterns of both drainage
16
CONCLUSION
In comparing the morphometric parameters between the Rio Minho drainage basin and
the Black River drainage basin it was found that the Rio Minho drainage basin is the larger of the
two. Both rivers flow through areas of permeable white and yellow limestone and alluvium.
However, the Rio Minho also flows through an area of shale conglomerates and tufts.
Moreover, the river with a higher rate of erosion is the Black River as it has a gentle
slope and a low relief. The Rio Minho, however, has a lower rate of erosion due to its higher
relief and a steeper slope. The drainage basin that is more susceptible to flooding is the Black
River drainage basin. This is indicated by the bifurcation ratio, 1:4.34. The lower the second
number in the ratio, the higher the risk of flooding in the basin. On the other hand, the Rio Minho
has a lower possibility of flooding because its bifurcation ratio is 1:4.11. It is also indicated by
the basin shape that the Rio Minho basin has a higher infiltration capacity and a lower surface
runoff than the Black River basin. A basin shape of less than 0.5 indicates that the drainage basin
is elongated, moreover, an elongated basin has a high infiltration capacity and a low surface
runoff. It was observed that both basins are elongated but the Rio Minho, 0.182, is more
elongated than the Black River basin,0.185. Lastly, it was also proven that the Black River has
Visiting the drainage basins would have given us the opportunity to properly assess the
factors that impact the basins’ characteristics. Due to the COVID-19 restrictions, the geography
group was not able to carry out the necessary field work; instead maps dated thirty years ago
were used. The continuous change of the land could not be reflected on these maps. It is believed
that a drainage basin 3D software could have been used to accurately compare the basins.
17
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Caribbean Examination Council (2012). Geography Unit 1: Study Guide. Cheltenham: Nelson
Thornes Limited.
Nagle, G. (2000). AS Geography, Concepts and Cases. London: Hodder & Straughton.
Nagle, P. G. (2012). AS & A Level Geography. New York: Nelson Thornes Limited.
Ross, S., Morgan, J., & Heelas, R. (2000). Essential AS Geography. Cheltenham: Nelson
Thornes Limited.