You are on page 1of 5

Charge Accumulation at a Threading Edge Dislocation in GaN

K. Leung, A. F. Wright, and E. B. Stechel'


Sandia National Laborat.ories, M S 1421, Albuquerque, N.M. 87185
Ford Mot.or Company, MD 3028/SRL, Dearborn, MI 48121-2053
(December 19, 1998)

We have performed Monte Carlo calculations t.o determine the charge accumulation on &reading
edge dislocations in GaN as a function of the dislocation density and background dopant density.
Four possible core structures have been examined, each of which produces defect levels in the gap
and may therefore act as electron or hole traps. Our results indicate that charge accumulation,
and the resulting electrostatic interactions, can change the relative stabilities of the different. core
structures. Structures having Ga and N vacancies at the dislocation core are predicted to be st.able
under nitrogen-rich and gallium-rich growth conditions, respectively. Due to dopant depletion at.
high dislocat.ion density and the rnult.itude of charge states, the line charge exhibits complex crossover
behaxior as the dopant. and dislocat.ion densities vary.

Gallium nit,ride films grown on sapphire substrates t y p ciples studies: full core, open core, Ga-vacancy, and N-
ically contain bet.ween lo8 and 1O'O threading disloca- vacancy.' The possible charge states in each core struc-
tions per cm2 as a result*of the subst,ant,ial film-substrate ture are bracketed by t.he minimum and maximumvalues
chemical and 1att.icemismatch.l Nevertheless, it. has been deduced from first principles calculations. The energy
possible t.0 fabricate bright and efficient light,-emitt.ing levels of these charge states, neglecting coulomb inter-
diodes from films composed of GaN alloyed wit.h InN and actions, are 1ist.ed in Table I. The coulomb interactions
A1N.2 This success led several researchers t.o specu1at.e among charged defect.s and ionized dopants are screened
early on t.hat t.hreading dislocat.ions in GaN might not using an empirical, bulk, orientationally averaged stat.ic
act. as efficient. minority-carrier recombination sit.es.' Re- dielectric const.ant. of co = 10. Each dopant is randomly
cent. experiment.al studies, however, have confirmed that placed within a preassigned volume equal t o the inverse
there is significant opt.ica13 and elect.rica14activity asso- of the dopant. densit.y P d . The ionization energy (electron
ciat,ed with these defects. In particular, results from a affinity) of electron donors (accept.ors) are t.aken from ex-
recent. scanning-capacit.ance microscopy study5 suggest perimental values; see Table I. We apply periodic bound-
that dislocations are negatively charged in n-type GaN, ary conditions in all three spatial dimensions and t.reat
and studies of transverse mobility in n-type GaN the image charges using the Ewald sum technique. We
indicate that elect,rons are scattered from these nega- find that. the effect. of dopant positions on simulation re-
tively charged dislocations. sults is negligible. By considering more than one dislo-
Recent, charge-st,ate calculations for AlN and GaN' in- cation per simulation cell, we also find that correlation
dicate that threading edge disloqations produce defect between dislocations is negligible. We expect. the effect of
levels in the forbidden energy gap. These calculations finite temperature will not be important because defect
provide estimat.es for these defect. levels. In agreement levels are widely separated in the band gap.
wit.h experiment.al studies, edge dislocations are pre- The existence of multiple charge states suggests that
dicted to be negatively charged in n-type GaN. However, charge modulation along the dislocation line might be
the amount of charge accumulation could not be quan- energetically favorable. For example, in the isolated Ga
tified because electrostatic interactions between charged vacancy structure, if the charges were discrete, alternat-
defect sites and between defect. sites and ionized dopants
were not included in the calculations. In this study, we
treat coulomb interactions explicitly and therefore are
uration by -
ing -3/+3 charges are favored over the 0/0 charge config-
0.24 eV per sit,e. However, first principles
studies of core structure cells doubled along the disloca-
able t.o predict. the amount. of charge accumulation on an tion direction indicate that. the excess charges are always
edge dislocation under a variety of doping condit.ions. delocalized, due t o (1) large dispersions in the lowlying
We examine t.he zero-temperature behavior of thread- impurity bands; and (2) unfavorable strain field inter-
ing dis1ocat.ions using simulat,ed annealing.' The simu- actions associated wit.h unlike charge states on adjacent
lat.ion cell conbains one dislocation and is of lateral di- core structures. Based on t.he above, we treat the charges
mension u::' 2 , where u& is t.he dislocation densit.y. residing in defect levels as delocalized and uniformly dis-
Elect.rons, modelled as point charges, can t.ransfer be- tributed over the length of the dislocation, and we model
t,ween dopants (donors or accept,orsf and defect. leveis these charges as a continuous variable A.
at. t.he dislocat.ion cores, and among the dopants them- In the limit of small line charge A, our work is similar to
selves. The dislocat,ion consists of 50-1000 defect sit.es t.he model derived by Read" and widely used for making
situated 5.185A apart. We have examined the four dislo- line charge estimates.6 Our model improves upon that
cat.ion core st,ruct.ures previously considered in first. prin- analyt.ica1 work in that it can treat (1) multiple charge

1
DISCLAIMER

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored


by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the
United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any
of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied,
or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the
accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information,
apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that
its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference
herein to any specific commercial product, process, or
service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or
otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its
endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United
States Government or any agency thereof. The views and
opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily
state or reflect those of the United States Government or
any agency thereof.
DISCLAIMER

Portions of this document may be illegible


in electronic image products. Images are
produced from the best available original
document.
n 5

st,at.es; (2) explicit. interactions between dislocations; and, dering of E' for different core structures closely resembles
in principle, (3) the entropy of elect.ron hopping among that found in Ref. 8, where defect-defect interactions are
dopants at. high temperature. omitted.
At, large P d , there is an abundance of free charges. As
t,hese charges accumulate on the didocat.ion, they build

i
15.0

-..__ up an electrostatic repulsion that pushes the Fermi en-


13.0
ergy upwards, away from the isolated defect levels until
N rich it. coincides with the donor level. The defect levels can be
s I1-O
v
1 ------____ thought. of as strongly renormalized by the coulomb re-
ui 9.0 full core pulsion. In this regime, the coulomb interaction between
dislocation lines is eRectively screened out by the ionized
G a vacan
7.0 dopants. X becomes independent. of U&, and the dislo-
cations behave as though they are at infinite dilut.ion at.
5.0
the appropriate p d (Fig. 2). E f is strongly modified by
14.0
-----------_ the coulomb interactions in this regime.

20, I
1 Gavacancy
----_-____
m

W-

8.0

6.0
0.0 Le5
lo= 1016 1017 101% 10'" 10" iola 10' 1 I
donor density (Cm? acceptor density (an")

FIG. 1. Formation energies for core structures vs. dopant 0

density. Left-hand side panels: n-type; right-hand side pan-


els: ptype. Solid line - f
d core; dotted - N-vacancy; dashed
m

- Ga-vacancy; dot-dashed - open core. (r& = 10" in 0.0


10'~ 1o'6 10" 1ole 0lr
I
these plots. donor density (un?

0.8
The predicted formation energies (Ef) per c lattice con- Ga vacancy
stant in n-type materials are shown in the left panels of
Fig. 1 for N-rich and Ga-rich growth conditions. E' in-
corporates the defect and donor energy levels (Table I),
electrostatic contributions, and chemical potentials for
the reference Ga metal, N2 gas, and bulk GaN.' Note
that, due to the long ranged nature of the &rain fields,
the relative formation energies are relevant while the ab-
solute values are not. We find that the Ga-vacancy struc-
ture is favorable under N-rich growth conditions and the
N-vacancy structure is favored under Ga-rich growth con-
ditions over almost t.he entire range of attainable donor
densities. E' decreases with increasing Pd because of a acceptor density (cm")
combination of (1) the energy gain in transferring more FIG. 2 . Line charges per site for t.he energetically favorable
electrons from donors to defects; and (2) a better screen- Ga- and N-vacancy structures as functions of dopant density.
ing of the coulomb repulsion between defect sites at large Upper two panels: n-type; lower two panels: ptype. Solid
y d . The full core structure formation energy is almost line - CTdis = 10' (cm-'); dotted - lo9; dashed - 10".
independent of P d because the available defect levels are
high in energy, and only small net. charges accumulate on
the defect sites.
The Pd dependence of E' falls into two regimes. For
at p d -
The change in slope of E f and the A-upturn in Fig. 2
cm-3 and r d i s = 10'0cm-2 reflect. the
crossover between the two regimes. In this crossover re-
small p d , such t.hat the number of defect sites far exceeds
the number of donors, all dopants are ionized and de-
pleted by charge transfer to the dislocation defect sites
gion, the Fermi energy is intermediate between the de-
fect. and donor levels. Significantly, Pd cm-3 is
also the unintentional doping densit.y obtained using cur-
-
(Fig. 2). In this limit, X + 0, the Fermi energy is pinned rent growth techniques. N0t.e t.hat the donor-depletion
close to the partially occupied defect level, and the or- crossover in general does not coincide with the complete

2
' filling of a level. It. moves to larger pd as Udis increases. enna molecular simulat.ion package." This work was sup-
The Ga- and E-vacancy st.ructures (favorable under port.ed by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contxact
N- and Ga-rich growth condhions respectively) exhibit DE-AC04-94AL85000. Sandia is a multiprogram labora-
platseaus at X = 1 when tshe -1 charge states are fully oc- tory operated by Sandia Corporat,ion, a Lockheed Martin
cupied. The Fermi energies reside above the donor level Company, for the U.S. Department, of Energy.
and gaps develop in the defect. densities of states, un-
til the next higher defect level becomes occupied. The
predict,ed line charge for the Ga-vacancy structure is in
qualitative accord with X inferred from scattering experi-
m e n t ~Unlike
.~ Ref. 6, which applies the model of Read''
and predicts a discontinuous slope near X = 1 for n-t-ype
materials, a smo0t.h approach t,o charge saturat,ion is ob- S. D. Lester, F. A. Ponce, M. G . Craford, and I3. A. Steiger-
served in our resu1t.s. wald, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66,1249 (1995).
Note that E f in Fig. 1 are computed for u&s = 10" S. Nakamura, T. Mukai, and M. Senoh, Appl. Phys. Lett.
cm-2. At lower ads, t,here are more free charges avail- 64, 1687 (1993); S. Nakamura, M. Senoh, N. Iwasa, and
able, the threshold for depletion is pushed to lower pd, S. Nagahama, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67,1868 (1995); S. Naka-
and t,he charging induced separation bet.ween Ef for var- mura, M. Senoh, N. fwasa, S. Nagahama, T. Yamada, and
ious core structures widens. In other words, .the Ga- and T. Mukai, Jpn. 3. Appl. Phys. 34,L1332 (1995).
N-vacancy structures become even more energetically fa- S. J. Rosner, E. C. Cam, M. J. Ludowise, G. Girolami, and
vorable at low u & ~ .
H. I. Erikson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70,420 (1997); T. Sug-
ahara, H. Sao, M. Hao, Y. Naoi, S. Kurai, S. Totton,
The right. panels in Fig. 1 depict. the formation ener-
K. Yamashita, K. Nishino, L. T. Romano, and S. Sakai,
gies in p t y p e material. All core structwes, except the
Jpn. J . Appl. Phys. 37, L398 (1998).
full core, can act. as electron donors. The E' trends are
C. Youtsey, L. T. Romano, and I. Adesida, Appl.
similar t o those in n-t.ype mat,erials. At low acceptor Phys. Lett. 73,797 (1998).
density, all d0pant.s (acceptors) gain an electron from t,he P.J . Hansen, Y. E. Strausser, A. N. Erickson, E. J. Tarsa,
dislocation defect, shes, and the Fermi energy is pinned P. Kozodoy, E. G. Brazel, J. P. Ibbetson, U. Mishra,
close to t.he part,ially filled defect. level. T h e E' order- V. Narayanamurti, S. P. DenBaars, and J. S. Speck,
ing follows t,hat. in uncharged t.hreading dislocations' at. AppL Phys. Lett. 72, 2247 (1998).
that Fermi energy. At high accept,or density, the positive 6 N . G. Weinmann, L. F. Eastman, D. Doppalapudi,
charge built. up on t.he dislocation lowers t.he elect.rostat.ic H. M. Ng, and T. D. Moustakas, J. Appl. Phys. 83,
pot.ent.ia1of electrons there, and t.he Fermi energy falls t,o 3656 (1998); H. M. Ng, D. Doppalapui, T. D. Moustakas,
the accept,or chemical pot.ent.ia1. The Ga vacancy struc- N. G . Weinmann, and L. F. Eastman, Appl. Phys. Lett.
ture is predicted t.0 be more favorable than the full core 73,821 (1998).
by a small fraction of an elect,ron volt. in pt.ype material. D.C. Look and 3 . R. Sizelove (submitted for publication).
That. magnit.ude is probably wit.hin the error margin of 8 A . F. Wright and J. Furthmiiller, Appl. Phys. Lett.
the present model. Experimentally, the full core and G a 72, 3467 (1998); A. F. Wright and U. Grossner,
vacancy structures can be dist,inguished by their different. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2751 (1998). Note that. t.he N2 chem-
line charges. (The full core st.ructure is uncharged.) The ical potential used herein is shifted from the value in these
crossover in Ef is more gradual for yt.ype than n-type publications by the difference between LDA and experi-
mat.eria1, because t.he isolated defect. levels are generally mental chemical potentials.
'Applied Simulated Annealing, edited by R. V. V. Vidal
closer t.o t,he accept.or level t.han the shallow donor levels
(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993).
(Table I), yielding a smaller gain in charge transfer. As
l o W. T. Read, Philo. Mag. 45, 775 (1954).
adis decreases, t.he G a vacancy struct,ure becomes pro-
G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47,558 (1993); 49,
gressively more favorable than the fuIl core.
14251 (1994); G. Kress and J. Furthmiiller, Phys. Rev. B
In conclusion, t.he predict,ions of our model can be 54, 11169 (1996).
guides t.o t,he characterization of edge dislocation core
st,ruct.ures. In part.icular, we predict. t.hat. N-rich growth
condit.ions favor t.he Ga-vacancy st.ruct.ure, while Ga-rich
growt,h conditions favor the N-vacancy st.ruct,ure. The charge state +3 $2 +1 0 -1 . -2 -3 -4 ]
predict.ed line charge can be used 60 analyze the the Hall Full core 0.00 2.78 2.57
mobi1it.y in t.he charged dislocat.ion-dominat,edscat.t,ering open core 0.00 0.32 0.83 1.39 1.55 2.89 3.45
regime.6 Coulomb effect.s on t.he Fermi energy described Ga vacancy 0.00 0.32 0.35 0.44 0.72 1.16 1.74
in dhis work can also have significant, implications for op- N vacancy 0.00 1.87 1.56 3.15 3.45
tical t.ransitions involving dislocat,ion defect. levels. TABLE I. Defect levels in eV, referenced to the valence
We would like to t,hank Prof. D.C. Look for sharing band maximum. The donor (Si) and acceptor (Mg) dopant
his data prior t.0 publicat.ion. The first principles den- levels are at 3.45 and 0.16 eV, respectively. For details, see
sity funct.iona1calculat.ions are performed using the Vi- Ref. 8.

You might also like