Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Research
Presented to the
Senior High School
University of Santo Tomas
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements of the Course
Practical Research 2
by
12STEM-16
John Justin C. Mesias, Msc
May 2018
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE I
ABSTRACT
Earthworms are a major component in maintaining the functioning of the soil ecosystem. It
improves the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil through their activities including
the breakdown of organic matter in soil, aeration, fragmentation, and releases nutrients needed by
plants. Earthworms can also change the soil environment by altering and maintaining soil
properties including soil pH. Soil pH is important to be considered because it influences how
plants can easily take up soil nutrients. This paper was reviewed to understand the role of
earthworms in soil dynamics and how they are referred to as ecosystem engineers. It was also to
find out the role of earthworms in the pH of soil. Five setups of soil with earthworms were tested
for five weeks, using a soil pH meter. ANOVA testing was performed and the results show that
earthworms have a significant effect to the soil pH. It shows how they increase and maintain the
soil pH, letting it stay in the optimal pH range. Soil that passes through the gut of the earthworms
contains more nutrients than the surrounding soil making their casts beneficial to the soil.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Background of the Study 1
1.2 Objectives of the Study 2
1.1 Significance of the Study 3
1.2 Scope and Limitation 3
References 21
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
and 3 but will not be measured in the actual experiment. The only variable the researchers will
measure in the experiment is the pH of soil.
The experiment was done in Bagong Silangang Quezon City. The duration of the study
will be performed for 5 weeks, from February 4 to March 10. The setup for the experiment has 5
identical containers or cans that contains 240 kg of raw soil for all. The subjects of the study are
earthworms which were acquired from the farm of one of the researchers. There will be a control
group which contains no earthworms. For the remaining 4 cans, the earthworms will have a
sample size of 10, 20, 30, and 40. For collecting data, an instrument will be used which is called a
soil pH meter. This meter indicates the pH, light, and moisture, but only the pH will be measured.
The recording of data will be done every after 5 days.
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 6
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Soil pH
Soil pH is a quantitative measure of the number of hydrogen ions in the solution of soil,
it is also a good chemical indicator in terms of soil quality. The potential of hydrogen, known as
pH, also measures the acidity and alkalinity of the soil from a scale of 0 up to 14. Hence, a pH of 7
is said to be neutral. While as the scale decreases from 7, the acidity of the soil gets higher.
Otherwise, as the range increases from 7 the alkalinity of soil gets higher. Soil pH is the key factor
for proper management in crop productivity (Xiao et.al, 2014).
According to McKie (2006), for pastoral soils a good “rule of thumb” has a soil pH
between 5.5-7.5. At this range, most of the nutrients required by the pasture plants will be
available and thus, all things being equal, optimum growth can be expected. At different pH level,
different nutrients are available too. Others are available at a higher pH (calcium, magnesium),
while others at lower pH levels (manganese, iron, copper, zinc). On the other hand, most nutrients
are available at a slightly acidic/neutral pH (phosphorus, potassium, sodium, boron, selenium,
molybdenum). The availability of some nutrients (nitrogen, Sulphur) is not greatly related to soil
pH level. However, between pH 5.5-7.5 all the plant essential nutrients will be available.
2.1.2. Liming
In the Philippines, most soils are acidic which is brought by the high intensity of rainfall(
(Noller, 1980). The rain washes down the basic salts which leaves most of the acidic substances in
the upper soil layers. The element calcium can neutralize acid substances in soil and limestone is
one which contains the element calcium. Liming applies a calcium- and magnesium-rich materials
in different forms, including chalk, limestone, or hydrated lime to a particular soil that will be used
in crop production. In acid soils, these materials react as a base and neutralize soil acidity. The
increase in acidity have negative effects on the growth and production of plants. The application
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 7
of liming lowers soil acidity, increasing soil pH, which reduces the toxicity of soluble aluminum
and manganese which causes a more suitable environment for plants (Higgins et.al, 2012).
2.2. Earthworms
Lumbricus terrestris or commonly known as Earthworm is a reddish-gray, tube-shaped,
segmented worm that is considered as the most important creatures living in soil. As of 2015,
over 3,500 lower classifications of earthworm are elucidated. In addition to that, further surveys
and studies claim that this count will considerably be larger in the future (Bohlen et al., 2002).
Earthworms perform a major role in soil processes such as microbial structure and properties,
health, and fertility of the soil, nutrients and carbon cycling, agricultural restoration and
sustainability, an indicator and bio concentration for contamination (Xiang et al., 2015).
There are about 400 different species of earthworms have been identified. These different
kinds of Earthworms promised to provide quicker and cheaper solutions to several
environmental problems. Earthworms have been divided into three primary ecological
categories that may contribute differently to ecosystem processes and thus ecosystem
services. .Endogeic earthworms feed directly on the soil and they live in horizontal burrows. Anecic
species produce and live in vertical burrows and feed on surface litter, they are also mostly large in
size. Lastly, the epigeic species exist in the litter and creates casts at the soil surface affecting
the macropores distribution and roughness(Bouch´e, 1977; Lee, 1985)Earthworm participation
enhances natural bio-degradation and decomposition of organic waste from 60 to 80 percent
(Published in The Environmentalist, vol. 22 (2), June 2002.).
To sustain physical soil fertility, there must be a joint presence of both compacting and
decompacting species. Compacting species tends to increase water retention capacity and decrease
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 8
infiltration rates while compacting is the opposite of that. Organic residues are also necessary in
agroecosystems. In the study “The Effects of Earthworms on Soil Structure and Physical Properties”,
it is seen that in the agroecosystems of Yurimaguas Peru, the activity of P. Corethrurus, a compacting
specie and the fusion of surface casts in the absence of organic residues develops a compact surface
crust which interferes water infiltration. But in the presence of organic residues, a favorable
macroaggregate structure is developed.
2.2.2 Effects in soil physical and structure or properties (water infiltration, soil aggregation,
and bulk density)
Soil structure is a very important component of soil fertility as it affects nutrient cycling
(immobilization, mineralization, ion exchange), physical processes (thermal and mechanical
properties of soil, runoff, erosion, infiltration, soil evaporation, drainage, aeration, water
retention), biological activity (microorganism activity, movement of soil fauna), carbon cycling
(physical protection of organic matter and humification, root and microorganism turnover, organic
inputs, respiration, decomposition, localization of organic matter) (Dindal, 1985; Elliott and
Coleman, 1988;Jastrow and Miller, 1991; Lee and Foster, 1991;Lavelle etaI., 1992;Oades, 1993).
In 1881, Charles Darwin was one of the first scientists who stated that the topsoil consists of
earthworm casts.
Earthworms impact on soil physical properties whenever they ingest, or excrete soil that
creates burrows (Shipitalo & Bayon, 2004). Their tissues and burrowing activities affect the
nutrients supply that produces aggregates and pores in the soil that cause changes in physical
properties, nutrient cycling, and plant growth. Their stability together with the concentration of
organic matter impacts the soil physical properties and SOM dynamics. Moreover, the effect of
earthworms on organic matter dynamics varies depending on the time and location. In humid
tropical areas, it enhances the organic matter, nutrients, water and microbial activity in the gut
(Bhadauria & Saxena, 2010). They have also been reported to improve soil physical properties by
increasing stability of aggregation and water infiltration and reducing the bulk density (Aina, 1984;
Barois et al. , 1993; Blanchart et al., 1990, 1996; Blanch- art, 1992; Lal, 1988; Mulongoy and Bedoret,
1989). Bundle of excrements which are wastes discharged from the body form compact soil which
causes water infiltration. Water management depends on the earthworms; the absence of
earthworms increases the porosity of the soil which provides water retention (Blanchart, 1999).
Increase in water infiltration due to earthworm activity lessen surface run-off, increases plant-
available water and avoids overland transport of sediments, nutrients and agrochemicals. The soil
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 9
ingested amount depends on the size, composition and activity of the earthworms (Shipitalo &
Bayon, 2004).
The effects of earthworm in the physical structure or property of the soil vary depending
on their sizes. Large earthworms like Pontoscolex corethrurus and Millsonia anomala defecate big,
compact casts. These kinds of earthworm, often specified as compacting species, increase the
relative amount of large aggregates in soil and bulk density. On the contrary, small earthworms
like eudrilid worms defecate smaller and delicate aggregates and feed partially on large compact
casts. These worms decrease the relative amount of large aggregates in soil and bulk density and
are specified as decompacting species (Blanchart et al., 1999). Changes in the physical properties
of soil is also evident with an introduction of earthworms to agroecosystem. When compacting
species are acquainted with agroecosystems, the infiltration rate decreases and the water retention
capacity increases. Howevever, when decompacting species are acquainted with agroecosystems,
the infiltration rate increases and the water retention capacity decreases (Blanchart et al., 1999).
The endogeic macrofaunal communities increases the stability of macroaggregates because the
casts have the ability to protect the organic matter from decomposition which obtains a structure
that is most favorable (Martin, 1991; Blanchart et al., 1993).
Earthworms enhance mineralization by mixing and fragmenting soil organic matter and
microorganisms which creates new contact surfaces between the two (Parmelee et al., 1998). They
also likely affect nutrient mineralization because of the different ecological groups of earthworms that
prefer distinct food resources. Endogeic earthworms ingest soil and humified organic matter in the
topmost layer of the mineral soil. Anecic earthworms on the other hand, absorbs litter materials into
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 10
mineral soils, making it accessible for the soil food web (Bossuyt et al., 2006). Earthworms are
also known to increase nitrogen mineralization, directly and inirectly. Directly through the release of
nitrogen in their metabolic products like urine and casts, and indirectly through organic matter
fragmentation and the changes in the physical properties of soils.
is dependent on organic matter for energy and nutrients including earthw orms which
tend to feed on plant debris (dead roots, leaves, grasses,
manure) and soil. They play a major role in decomposition and breakdown of
organic matter. The nutrients contained in organic matter are also recycled and released by
(of N2O out of the soil and O2 into the soil) and soil
moisture condition (E. Rizhiya, et. al.).
CHAPTER 3
THE RESEARCH METHODS
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Table 1
SOIL PH
Week Setup 1 Setup 2 Setup 3 Setup 4 Setup 5
Week 1 7 7 7 7 7
Week 2 7 7.5 7.5 7 7
Week 3 7 7.5 7.5 7 7
Week 4 7 7 7.5 7 7
Week 5 7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Table 1 shows the data wherein the pH was measured every after 5 days in a duration of 5
weeks from February to March 3, 2018. Five setups are done, Setup 1 is the control group
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE15
containing no earthworms and it starts at a neutral pH,7. The setup 2 contains 10 earthworms,
setup 3 has 20, setup 4 has 30 and lastly for setup 5 has 40.
Table 2
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 16
Table 2 above shows the calculation of a one way ANOVA testing to compare the effects of
soil pH in 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 earthworm conditions. The five setups has a grand mean of soil pH
which is 7.18 (SD = 0.2449); the control group had a mean of 7 (SD = 0); the setup with 10
earthworms had a mean of 7.3 (SD = 0.274); the setup with 20 earthworms had an mean of 7.4
(SD = 0.224); the setup with 40 and 30 earthworms both had an average soil pH of 7.1 (SD =
0.224). The effect of earthworms to soil pH is therefore significant, [F(4,20)= 3, p=.04], rejecting
our null hypothesis.
It reveals that earthworms affect the level of soil pH in comparison with the soil that contains
none. This supports Edwards et al., 1996; Lukkari et al., 2006 findings, that earthworms activities
such as ingesting soil or organic matter and excreting it as feces can increase the level of soil pH.
Earthworms benefit a lot to the soil pH as it increases nutrient availability and a more stable soil
structure for plants. The increase in the availability of nutrients is due to their role in mineralization
and organic matter decomposition (Brown et al., 2004). The optimal pH level that is best for soils
between 5.5-7.5 is maintained all throughout because of worm casts.
The gut of the earthworms helps in digesting the organic and mineral substances in the
food that they eat, so their casts are richer in available nutrients. They are known to select the
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE17
mineral and organic components they ingest which results a higher content of soil organic matter
and nutrients in their cast than the surrounding soil (Lee 1985). The earthworm gut contains a
bacteria which plays a role in destroying the harmful chemical that was ingested by these worms
(Ramsay and Hill, 1978). When the cast is excreted, the chemicals that was once present will not be
able to harm the crops anymore. It also helps some acidic soil to adjust their pH levels since
earthworms can alter and maintain its soil behavior.
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1. Conclusion
To show the relationship and significance of earthworms to the soil pH.
The relationship between earthworms and soil pH showed that the presence of
earthworms in the soil is a good indicator that the condition of soil is suitable for plant growth.
Furthermore, earthworms has a significant and positive effects on soil pH. It maintains the pH of
the soil and improved its structure for drainage through earthworm tunnels which serves as a
passageway for lime and other essential materials. It is a soil characteristic that is affected by
earthworms because of its ability to construct and to deconstruct soil particles. Soil pH does not
only identify whether a soil is acidic or basic, it is also related with the availability of nutrients.
Soil that passes through the gut of the worms undergoes chemical and microbial changes. This
leads to excreted casts containing more nutrients than the surrounding soil. Furthermore,
earthworms help clean toxic wastes and can loosen up the soil from being acidic to the plants and
other organisms.
earthworms makes organic matter and nutrients available in plants and in soil species or
organisms.
5.2. Recommendations
Further research must be done about the severe depletion of soil quality in terms of
pesticide residues, heavy metals, erosion and organic contents. The degradation of these soils
leads to many environmental and social problems including the depletion of soil organisms which
includes earthworms. Management of their communities would really make a progress in
agricultural practices. The difference in the soil pH, soil structure, and nutrient cycling are all
related to casts, which is a topic not discussed much in papers. An assessment in the nutrient
dynamics in earthworm burrows is one way to understand the ecological impact of casts in soil. More
research is needed in this area to really complete and broaden our knowledge of the role of
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PAGE19
earthworms in our soils. Doing this would also make us develop strategies or techniques for a better
management in our soils.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Blouin, M., Hodson, M. E., Delgado, E. A., Baker, G., Brussard, L., Butt, K. R.,
Brun, J-J. (2013). A review of earthworm impact on soil function and
ecosystem services. European journal of soil science, volume 64(2), pages
161-182. DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12025.
Bohlen, P.J. & Edwards, C. (1992). The effects of toxic chemicals on earthworms.
Review of environmental contamination and toxicology, pages 23-99.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2890-5_2.
Bohlen, P. J., Pelletier, D. M., Groffman, P. M., Fahey, T. J., & Fisk, M. C.
(2002). Influence of earthworm invasion on redistribution and retention of
soil carbon and nitrogen in northern temperate forests. Ecosystems,
Volume 7(1), pp.13-27. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?
id=2837797.
Chauhan, H.K. (2014). Effect of binary combinations of buffalo, cow and goat
dung with different agro wastes on reproduction and development of
earthworm Eisenia fetida (Hapolotoxida: Lumbricidae). World J Zool,
volume 7, page 23–29.
Edwards, G.R. (2004). The effect of four different pasture species compositions
on nitrate leaching losses under high N loading. Soil Use and
Management, volume 30. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12101.
Garrity, D.P., Kummer, D.M., & Guiang, E.S. (1993). The Philippines. National
Research Council, Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the
Humid Tropics, pp. 549-624.
Gupta, S., Kushwah, T. & Yadav, S. (2014). Exposure to ZnO-NPs enhanced gut-
associated microbial activity in Eisenia fetida. Journal of Toxicology and
Environmental Health Sciences, volume 7(2), pages 9-17.
Higgins, S., Morrison, S. & Watson, C.J. (2012). Effect of annual applications of
pelletized dolomitic lime on soil chemical properties and grass
productivity. Soil Use and Management, volume 28, pages 62–69.
Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262713196_Higgins_S_Morriso
n_S_Watson_C_J_2012_Effect_of_annual_applications_of_pelletised_dol
omitic_lime_on_soil_chemical_properties_and_grass_productivity_Soil_
Use_and_Management_2862-69.
Lavelle, P., Pashanasi, B., Charpentier, F., Gilot C., Rossi, J.P., Derourard, L.,
Andre, L., Ponge, J.F., Bernier, N. (1998). Large-scale effects of
earthworms on soil organic matter and nutrient dynamics. Earthworm
Ecology, pp.103-122.
Lemtiri, A., Colinet, G., Alabi, T., Cluzeau, D., Zirbes, L., Haubruge, É., Francis,
F. (2014). Impacts of earthworms on soil components and dynamics.
Biotechnology, Agronomy and Society and Environment. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278622912_Impacts_of_earthwo
rms_on_soil_components_and_dynamics_A_review.
Rizhiya, E., Bertora, C., Vliet, P., & Groenigen, J.W. (2007). Earthworm activity
as a determinant for N2O emission from crop residue. Soil Biology and
Biochemistry, volume 39, pp. 2058-2069. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.008.
Spain, A.V., Isbell, R.F., & Probert, M.E. (1983). Organic matter contents of
Australian soil. Soils: An Australian Viewpoint, pp. 551-563. Retrieved
from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284490479_Soil_organic_matter
.
Xiang H., Zhang J., Guo L., & Zhao B. (2015). In situ earthworm breeding in
orchards significantly improves the growth, quality and yield of papaya
(Carica papaya L.). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2752.
Xiao, K., Yu, L., & Xu, J. (2014). pH, nitrogen mineralization, and KCl-
extractable aluminum as affected by initial soil pH and rate of vetch
residue application: results 2from a laboratory study. Journal of Soils and
Sediments, volume 14, pages 1513-1525. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0909-1.