Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research methods
BSC IV A
Q1. Differentiate between quantitative and qualitative research, discuss any three
differences using examples (15 marks)
Ans) Qualitative research is more subjective it describes a problem or a condition whereas
quantitative is more objective and provides observed effects. Qualitative includes in-depth
interviews whereas in quantitative research surveys and structured observations and interviews
are taken. One of the most prominent difference is qualitative is text based whereas quantitative
is number based. Qualitative has unstructured response options whereas in quantitative has fixed
response options.
Quantitative Example: 1) The health department studied the number of cases of Covid in
Qualitative Example: 1) What are the experiences of people working night shifts in health care?
Q2. How is cross sectional study different from cohort study? 10 marks
Cross sectional studies are used primarily to determine the prevalence of a problem whereas
cohort studies involve the study of the population that is both exposed and non-exposed to the
cause of disease development agents. In cross sectional studies, prevalence determines the
number of incidences in a given population. Questionnaires are mainly used in most of the cross-
sectional studies. Cross sectional studies are relatively cheap and quick, and allow the
researchers to obtain lot of information very quickly. Whereas in cohort study both exposed and
the non-exposed population are compared to try and find out the link or association between the
suspected cause and the disease. Cause and effect can be established by this type of study. There
Q3. Define RCT’s and their major drawback (15 marks). Use examples
A study design that randomly assigns participants into an experimental group or a control group.
As the study is conducted, the only expected difference between the control and experimental
groups in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the outcome variable being studied. It is
Expensive in terms of time and money, volunteer biases: the population that participates may not
be representative of the whole and Loss to follow-up attributed to treatment. Power calculation
might demand vast samples size, which require more resources from the investigators. Validity
requires multiple sites, which will be difficult to manage. Long trial run time may result in the
loss of relevance as practice may have moved on by the time the trial is published