.

GROUP 7
Guidelines
1 Score for each criterion is within 1 to 10. The highest score is 10.
2 No member can have exactly the same score correspondingly for all items with any other member of the team.
3 Every gray cell should be filled out.
4 ALL members should be able to fill out TIGS.
5 Make sure the black and white part in the right side remains blank, else, you have to repeat rating because there are students with the same score.
6 if only 5 members, leave the last 2 rows and last 2 columns for the 6th & 7th, empty.
7 Instead of rating per column on one part (horizontally), you are going to rate your classmate VERTICALLY based on your assigned column/color.
8 This is a new IGS format. If you have questions, please don't be afraid to ask.

TEAM MEMBERS Code PSA % Cont AA IG

(Write your complete names in alphabetical order)
HINTO, ADDAM ZYRIL P. 9.70 97.19% 0.00
LIBATON, JAZEL 9.12 91.38% 0.00
SULLANO, ANGELICA U. 9.42 94.39% 0.00
SUMAGPAO, GERALD PAUL L. 9.66 96.79% 0.00
TAN, HAZEL GRACE A. 9.98 100.00% 0.00
TAPIC,NIMAR C. 9.58 95.99% 0.00
TIODANCO, JERARD R. 9.40 94.19% 0.00

WEEK # PUGH, KANO AND TRIZ ANALYSIS

. .
Item Criteria HINTO, ADDAM ZYRIL P.
1 Attendance of meetings 10 10 10 10 10
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 9 9 10 10 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 10 10 9 10
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 10 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 9 10 9 9 9
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 10 10 10 10 10
7 Contribution to report writing 9 10 10 10 9
8 Leadership / initiative 10 10 10 9 9
9 Creative approach 10 10 9 10 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 9 10 10 10 10

Item Criteria LIBATON, JAZEL

1 Attendance of meetings 8 8 10 9 8
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 9 9 9 9 9
3 Active participation during discussions 8 8 10 9 9
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 10 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 9 9 10 10 9
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 10 8 10 10 9
7 Contribution to report writing 10 8 10 9 8
8 Leadership / initiative 9 8 9 9 8
9 Creative approach 9 8 9 10 8
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 8 10 10 9

Item Criteria SULLANO, ANGELICA U.

1 Attendance of meetings 9 9 9 9 10
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 9 9 9 9 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 10 10 9 10
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 10 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 9 10 10 9 10
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 9 10 10 10 9
7 Contribution to report writing 9 10 9 9 9
8 Leadership / initiative 9 10 9 9 9
9 Creative approach 10 9 10 10 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 9 10 10 10 9

Item Criteria SUMAGPAO, GERALD PAUL L.

1 Attendance of meetings 10 10 10 10 10
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 9 10 10 10 10
3 Active participation during discussions 9 10 9 10 9
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 10 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 10 10 9 10
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 9 10 9 9 10
7 Contribution to report writing 9 10 10 10 9
8 Leadership / initiative 10 10 10 10 8
 9 Creative approach 9 10 9 9 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 9 10 9 10 9

Item Criteria TAN, HAZEL GRACE A.

1 Attendance of meetings 10 10 10 10 10
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 9 10 10 10 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 10 10 10 10
4 Respect for team members' opinions 9 10 10 10 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 10 10 10 10
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 9 10 10 10 10
7 Contribution to report writing 10 10 10 10 10
8 Leadership / initiative 9 10 10 10 10
9 Creative approach 10 10 10 10 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 10 10 10 10

Item Criteria TAPIC,NIMAR C.

1 Attendance of meetings 10 10 10 9 9
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 9 10 10 10 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 10 9 9 9
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 10 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 10 9 9 10
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 9 10 10 10 9
7 Contribution to report writing 10 10 10 9 9
8 Leadership / initiative 9 10 9 9 10
9 Creative approach 10 10 10 10 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 10 10 10 9

Item Criteria TIODANCO, JERARD R.

1 Attendance of meetings 9 10 10 10 9
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 10 10 9 9 9
3 Active participation during discussions 9 10 9 9 9
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 10 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 8 10 9 9 9
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 9 10 10 10 9
7 Contribution to report writing 9 10 9 9 9
8 Leadership / initiative 9 10 9 9 9
9 Creative approach 10 10 10 9 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 10 10 10 10
h the same score.

column/color.

OVERALL AVERAGE 9.70

YRIL P. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 9 10 9 66 9.40
9 10 10 9 68 9.80
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 9 10 9 65 9.20
9 10 10 9 69 10.00
10 9 10 9 67 9.60
9 9 10 9 66 9.40
10 10 10 9 68 9.80
 10 9 10 9 68 9.80
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.12
EL MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
9 8 10 8 60 8.40
9 9 9 9 63 9.00
9 8 10 8 61 8.60
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 9 10 9 66 9.40
9 9 10 8 65 9.40
9 10 10 8 64 9.20
9 8 9 8 60 8.60
10 9 10 8 63 9.00
10 9 10 8 66 9.60
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.42
ICA U. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
9 10 10 9 65 9.20
9 10 10 9 64 9.00
9 9 10 9 67 9.60
10 9 10 9 69 10.00
10 10 10 9 68 9.80
10 10 10 9 68 9.80
9 9 10 9 64 9.00
8 9 10 8 63 9.00
9 9 10 9 66 9.40
9 9 10 9 66 9.40
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.66
D PAUL L. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 10 10 9 69 10.00
10 9 10 9 66 9.40
9 10 10 9 69 10.00
9 9 10 9 67 9.60
10 10 10 9 67 9.60
10 10 10 9 68 9.80
9 9 10 8 66 9.60
 10 9 10 9 65 9.20
10 9 10 9 66 9.40
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.98
CE A. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 10 10 9 68 9.80
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 10 10 9 69 10.00
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 10 10 9 69 10.00
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 10 10 9 69 10.00
10 10 10 9 69 10.00
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.58
C. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
9 9 10 9 66 9.40
9 9 10 9 66 9.40
9 10 10 9 66 9.40
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
10 9 10 9 67 9.60
9 10 10 9 67 9.60
9 9 10 9 66 9.40
7 9 10 7 63 9.20
10 9 10 9 68 9.80
10 10 10 9 69 10.00
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.40
RD R. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
10 9 10 9 67 9.60
9 8 10 8 64 9.20
10 9 10 9 65 9.20
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
9 8 10 8 62 8.80
9 9 10 9 66 9.40
10 10 10 9 66 9.40
8 9 10 8 63 9.00
9 9 10 9 66 9.40
10 10 10 10 70 10.00
THESIS INDIVIDUAL GRADING SHEET (TIGS)
Basic Principle: IE Department believes in the value of meritocracy. Fairness is upheld to motivate students to do their best in contributing to excellent o
Description:
TIGS is the mechanism of IE Department to provide equity to each member's effort to produce the research and/or project.
This peer- and self-assessment tool is integrated in the computation of the per-chapter grade of each student as a multiplying factor to the corresponding

GENERAL GUIDELINES
1 Score for each criterion is within 1 to 10. The highest score is 10.
2 No member can have exactly the same score correspondingly for all items with any other member of the team.
3 Every gray cell should be filled out.
4 ALL members should be able to fill out TIGS.

DEFINITION OF TERMS
PSA Peer & Self Assessment
% Cont % Contribution = PSA / Max PSA
AA Adviser Assessment of Team Output
IG Individual Grade
in contributing to excellent output.

g factor to the corresponding team grade given by the Research Adviser.