You are on page 1of 4

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/221749052

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function

Article  in  Science · January 2012


DOI: 10.1126/science.1217245 · Source: PubMed

CITATIONS READS
84 2,935

1 author:

Guy F Midgley
Stellenbosch University
237 PUBLICATIONS   27,039 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Biodiversity Futures Program - South African National Biodiversity Institute View project

Global change ecology View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Guy F Midgley on 21 May 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function
Guy F. Midgley
Science 335, 174 (2012);
DOI: 10.1126/science.1217245

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.

If you wish to distribute this article to others, you can order high-quality copies for your
colleagues, clients, or customers by clicking here.
Permission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles can be obtained by
following the guidelines here.

The following resources related to this article are available online at


www.sciencemag.org (this infomation is current as of January 12, 2012 ):

Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on January 12, 2012


Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found in the online
version of this article at:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6065/174.full.html
This article cites 6 articles, 3 of which can be accessed free:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6065/174.full.html#ref-list-1

Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by the
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright
2012 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title Science is a
registered trademark of AAAS.
PERSPECTIVES

their function. Hence, these SWEET genes are sues; what other roles beyond phloem load- 2. T. L. Slewinski, D. M. Braun, Plant Sci. 178, 341 (2010).
genetically redundant, which likely explains ing might they play? One possibility is that 3. B. G. Ayre, Mol. Plant 4, 377 (2011).
4. E. A. Ainsworth, D. R. Bush, Plant Physiol. 155, 64
why earlier genetic screens failed to identify they may function in sucrose efflux to seeds (2011).
the efflux step. Collectively, the data dem- (13). Another is that during long-distance 5. C. Kühn, C. P. L. Grof, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 287
onstrate that the AtSWEET11 and 12 genes transport, SWEETs may facilitate the “leak- (2010).
6. S. Lalonde, D. Wipf, W. B. Frommer, Annu. Rev. Plant
encode the missing link in sucrose phloem age” of sucrose from the phloem to nourish Biol. 55, 341 (2004).
loading, the sucrose effluxer. adjacent stem tissues (14). If so, manipu- 7. N. Sauer, FEBS Lett. 581, 2309 (2007).
The identification of SWEET proteins lating SWEET expression could enhance 8. D. M. Braun, T. L. Slewinski, Plant Physiol. 149, 71
(2009).
as sucrose facilitators raises a number of carbohydrate delivery to developing seeds
9. I. Lager, L. L. Looger, M. Hilpert, S. Lalonde,
questions. Are the regulation and localiza- to increase yield, or it could increase the W. B. Frommer, J. Biol. Chem. 281, 30875 (2006).
tion of SWEETs and sucrose transporters sucrose concentration in the storage cells 10. B.-H. Hou et al., Nat. Protoc. 6, 1818 (2011).
coordinated to maximize phloem loading of sugarcane or sweet sorghum stems to 11. B. Chaudhuri et al., Plant J. 56, 948 (2008).
12. L.-Q. Chen et al., Nature 468, 527 (2010).
efficiency and minimize any potential loss improve biofuel production. 13. W. -H. Zhang et al., Funct. Plant Biol. 34, 314 (2007).
of sucrose to the apoplast (and thereby to 14. P. E. H. Minchin, M. R. Thorpe, J. Exp. Bot. 38, 211
References
pathogens)? Additionally, AtSWEET11 and 1. L.-Q. Chen et al., Science 335, 207 (2012);
(1987).
12 are expressed in most Arabidopsis tis- 10.1126/science.1213351. 10.1126/science.1216828

Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on January 12, 2012


ECOLOGY

Biodiversity and Ecosystem A study of drylands across the world highlights


the importance of species richness for
Function ecosystem function.

Guy F. Midgley1,2

H
ow is the biodiversity conclusions about the criti-
within an ecosystem cal importance of biodiversity
related to the ecosys- thus rest on a small and unrep-
tem’s function? Quantifying resentative knowledge base.
and understanding this rela- ? Maestre et al. ask whether
tionship—the biodiversity- the plant species richness in
ecosystem function (BEF) Abiotic drivers ? Biodiversity ? Ecosystem function semi-arid ecosystems (dry-
( 1)—is important because lands) enhances their multi-
Disturbance Consumer species Primary production
socio-economic develop- functionality (the ability of
Secondary production
ment is almost always accom- ecosystems to maintain mul-
Climate Decomposer species Carbon sequestration
panied by the loss of natu- tiple functions, such as car-
Carbon cycling
ral habitat and species (2). bon gain, carbon storage, and
Physicochemical Producer species Nutrient cycling
Short-term economic gains nutrient cycling). The authors
may thus trump longer-term employ a natural experiment
benefits for human society, approach, which uses quantifi-
creating vulnerabilities that able variables measured under
could be avoided or corrected field conditions as explana-
with enough knowledge about A framework for testing the BEF. Biodiversity and abiotic drivers determine ecosystem tory and response variables,
the role of biodiversity. Ero- function individually and in concert (blue boxes). How they do so cannot be fully answered to assess 14 functions in the
sion of biodiversity at local without assessing the roles of multiple elements within these categories (indicative elements carbon, nitrogen, and phos-
and regional scales may also elaborated below blue boxes). The elements included in Maestre et al.’s test of the BEF are phorus cycles in the soil. In PHOTO CREDIT: MLENNY PHOTOGRAPHY/ISTOCKPHOTO.COM

reduce resilience at larger spa- shown in red; dashed blue lines and arrows denote the relationships tested by the authors. a massive global effort, they
tial scales as a result of degra- collected data on these func-
dation of ecosystem function (3). On page Concern about the loss of biodiversity and tions by analyzing the soils of 224 dryland
214 of this issue, Maestre et al. (4) report an its consequences is motivating the develop- ecosystems sampled from all continents
important step toward extending our under- ment of an Intergovernmental Platform on except Antarctica. From this they evaluated
standing of BEF to globally important eco- Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (5), how biodiversity (quantified as the species
systems. which aims to address the gaps in the science– richness of perennial vascular plants grow-
policy interface on biodiversity and ecosys- ing in those soils) relates to ecosystem mul-
1
Climate Change and Bioadaptation, South African National tem services. Yet despite this level of attention, tifunctionality across dryland ecosystems
Biodiversity Institute, Rhodes Drive, Cape Town 7735, South understanding of the BEF is far from com- globally. This is a useful new angle and a par-
Africa. 2School of Agricultural, Earth, and Environmental plete (5), and is biased toward a small num- ticularly stringent test of the BEF hypothesis,
Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg
Campus, Pvt Bag X101, Scottsville 3209, South Africa. ber of ecosystems amenable to experimental according to which increasing biodiversity
E-mail: g.midgley@sanbi.org.za manipulation (6). Far-reaching preliminary enhances ecosystem function. Most previous

174 13 JANUARY 2012 VOL 335 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org


Published by AAAS
PERSPECTIVES

work assessed functions individually and did explanatory variable for ecosystem multi- much variation is explained by plant species
not address dryland systems, which, as Mae- functionality both on its own and when con- richness when potentially powerful factors
stre et al. point out, cover 41% of Earth’s land sidered together with several abiotic explana- such as land-use history and intensity of her-
surface and support over 38% of the global tory variables. Indeed, only two abiotic vari- bivory are controlled for. This will be impor-
human population. ables, mean annual temperature and soil sand tant in assessing the value of biodiversity in
Human society needs ecosystems to pro- content, were more important than plant spe- real-world settings and may suggest how rap-
vide multiple services effectively, especially cies richness in explaining ecosystem mul- idly ecosystem multifunctionality could be
as we increase pressure on ecosystems from tifunctionality (hotter, more sandy sites had enhanced under different land management
local impacts such as extractive harvesting to lower multifunctionality), in a set of variables practices aimed at ecosystem restoration.
global impacts such as climate change (4). In that included mean annual rainfall. All considered, Maestre et al.’s conclusion
drylands, critical ecosystem services include Maestre et al. find that the relationship that perennial plant species richness matters
the conversion of solar energy, atmospheric between species richness and ecosystem mul- for ecosystem function in dryland systems
CO2, and water to plant biomass (net primary tifunctionality rises steeply with fewer than is robust. This answer has global relevance,
productivity), carbon storage, and provision five species and then increases incremen- and is especially valuable for many devel-
of nutrient pools. This suite of services is tally with the addition of more species. This oping and least-developed countries facing
vital for arresting desertification trends and implies that ecosystem multifunctionality as desertification trends. Neither Maestre et al.’s
sequestering carbon. defined by Maestre et al. is well established by approach nor the experimental approaches

Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on January 12, 2012


Maestre et al.’s test of the BEF hypothesis relatively few species in these dryland ecosys- undertaken in temperate grasslands or ear-
is stringent because they test for a relationship tems, in contrast with results from temperate lier experimental work (7) have yet fully
between species richness of primary producer grasslands (5). However, the large spread in addressed the multilayered question of how
species (perennial plants) and ecosystem Maestre et al.’s data suggests that, apart from biodiversity across trophic levels, in conjunc-
functions expressed in soils. Soil functions uncontrolled effects such as land-use history tion with abiotic drivers, determines ecosys-
are subject both to abiotic drivers and many mentioned above, there may be important tem function (see the figure).
biotic effects other than those due to perennial individual species effects (including keystone
References
plants. Confirmation of the BEF hypothesis species effects) that are not quantified in this 1. J. E. Duffy, Front. Ecol. Environ 7, 437 (2009).
under these constraints would therefore imply natural experimental approach. That is, the 2. A. Duraiappah et al., Eds., Ecosystems and Human Well-
robust general support for it. They also did not stringency and generality of their test have the Being: Biodiversity Synthesis (Island Press, Washington,
DC, 2005).
shy away from the confounding influence of unfortunate consequence of obscuring impor- 3. S. Díaz, J. Fargione, F. S. Chapin III, D. Tilman, PLoS Biol.
human management impacts, given that their tant details that seem better revealed by the 4, e277 (2006).
4. F. T. Maestre et al., Science 335, 214 (2012).
field sites around the world represent a wide experimental approaches followed in the tem- 5. C. Perrings, A. Duraiappah, A. Larigauderie, H. Mooney,
range of intensity of human use, barring major perate grassland studies (6). Science 331, 1139 (2011).
soil disturbances such as farming or mining. Given the acknowledged limitations of the 6. F. Isbell et al., Nature 477, 199 (2011).
7. F. S. Chapin III et al., Science 277, 500 (1997).
Maestre et al. report that perennial plant experimental design used by Maestre et al.,
species richness is a statistically significant future work should focus on teasing out how 10.1126/science.1217245

ASTRONOMY
The Fermi Large Area Telescope is unveiling
Gamma-Ray Binaries Revealed a large population of otherwise hidden sources
of gamma rays.
I. F. Mirabel1,2

R
ecent ground- and space-based tele- ing around massive stars (1). On page 189 of have been unambiguously identified (Cyg-
scopes that detect high-energy pho- this issue, the Fermi Large Area Telescope nus X-3; PSR B1259–63; LSI +61° 303; LS
tons from a few up to hundreds of Collaboration (2) use the correlated orbital 5039; HESS J0632+057). However, models
gigaelectron volts (GeV) have opened a new modulation at gamma-ray, x-ray, and radio- of the evolution of massive stellar binaries
window on the universe. However, because wave wavelengths to show that the source suggest a much larger population of gamma-
of the relatively poor angular resolution of 1FGL J1018.6–5856 is a new gamma- ray binaries.
these telescopes, a large fraction of the thou- ray binary, demonstrating the potential of The Large Area Telescope (LAT) on
sands of sources of gamma rays observed searches for periodic modulation at gamma board the Fermi satellite has cataloged more
remains unknown. Compact astrophysi- rays and other wavelengths to unveil new than 1400 high-energy sources. Many of
cal objects are among those high-energy populations of gamma-ray binaries. them are in the Milky Way, but because of
sources, and in the Milky Way there is a This area of high-energy astronomy the uncertain positions in the sky provided
particular class called gamma-ray binaries. presents several challenges: identifying the by the gamma-ray telescope (typically a few
These are neutron stars or black holes orbit- gamma-ray source with a source observed at arc-min), and the complexity of the star-
other wavelengths; determining the proper- formation regions where gamma-ray bina-
1
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, IAFE-Coni- ties of the binary system; and understanding ries are usually located, the association
cet, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2Institut de Recherche sur les the physical mechanisms by which gamma- of these high-energy sources with objects
lois Fondamentales de l’Univers, Commissariat à l’Énergie
Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (IRFU-CEA), Saclay, rays are produced. In the Milky Way, only a observed at other wavelengths is usually
France. E-mail: felix.mirabel@cea.fr handful of binaries radiating at gamma rays uncertain. The observation of correlated

www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 335 13 JANUARY 2012 175


View publication stats Published by AAAS

You might also like