Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GG Toys
GG Toys
Toys
–
1. Do you recommend that G.G. Toys change its existing cost system in the
Chicago Plant? In the Springfield plant? Why or why not?
In the Chicago plant, G.G. Toys should change its existing cost accounting system
from the legacy or traditional costing methodology to activity-based costing (ABC).
In allocating overhead as a percentage of direct labor cost, the margins of 9% and
34% in the Geoffrey doll and the specialty branded doll #106 respectively, do not
reflect the actual cost of overhead.
Currently G.G. Toys is calculating its manufacturing overhead costs on only on one
cost driver, the direct labor. From case facts, we know that the manufacturing
overhead at the Chicago plant is very high (approximately 95% of the overall GG
Toys manufacturing overhead)
The 3 different categories of dolls require different amounts of machine hours and
other variable costs. By using Activity-based costing, each specific category of doll
would have a different manufacturing overhead (and hence different contribution
margin) allocated to it and the profit margin analysis for the doll category would yield
an accurate result that can be used successfully for measuring controllability and
relevance over long run.
For the Springfield plant, GG Toys has approximately 5% of the overall overhead and
from case fact, we know that GG purchases finished components from local
manufacturers and then assemble the components (to form the cradles) using manual
labor and there is no machine hours involved in this (Exhibit # 1). So, I recommend
GG to keep the existing cost accounting system as the primary cost driver here is
labor hours which is being rightly applied as the cost allocation basis. Moreover,
ABC methodology is unnecessary because Springfield plant is related to producing
only one product.
2. Calculate the cost of Geoffrey Doll, the specialty-branded doll # 106, and a
cradle using the cost study conclusions
Specialty
Category Geoffrey Doll Branded # 106 Cradles
Units 7500 4000 3000
Unit Level costs Machine Runs $37,500 $12,000 $0
Facilities $11,111.11 $5,925.93 $4,444
Batch Level Setups $833.31 $8,333.13 $0
Prod. Run $3,913.04 $39,130.43 $391
# of
shipments $1,514.29 $33,314.29 $7,571
Total Mfg. Overhead $54,871.75 $98,703.77 $12,407.18
Unit Overhead cost $7.32 $24.68 $4.14
3. Compare and contrast the profitability of each doll under the new and the
old systems. Based on your recomputed product costs, what actions would
you recommend the company consider to enhance its profitability? What
additional information would you like to have to make these
recommendations?
Geoffrey Doll Speciality Branded Cradle
Doll # 106
Traditional 9.00% 34.00% 21.00%
Activity Based 27.52% 4.37% 21.21%
Based on the above analysis, the following are the actions that I would recommend
the company consider enhancing its profitability
Change the sales mix of the toy category. Sell more of Geoffrey Doll and
Cradle but do not sell Specialty Branded Doll # 106
Implement Activity based costing in the Chicago Plant but keep the existing
costing procedure in the Springfield plant.
Increasing the batch size would reduce the number of batches which can
increase the contribution margin and thereby the profit margin.
Carefully examine the total material requirement to build the dolls and the
pajamas and then order for the raw materials.